The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

American Express mulling iPhone return policy

By | September 7, 2007, 8:04am PDT

Summary: I received this from a colleague: American Express has a Return Protection line (1-800-297-8019) in which customers (I think limited to gold and platinum, tho not sure) can return products they’re unhappy with for any reason within 90 days of purchase. I took advantage of this to exchange an iPod I just bought. In any case, I [...]

American Express mulling iPhone return policyI received this from a colleague:

American Express has a Return Protection line (1-800-297-8019) in which customers (I think limited to gold and platinum, tho not sure) can return products they’re unhappy with for any reason within 90 days of purchase. I took advantage of this to exchange an iPod I just bought.

In any case, I just called to make sure my request was going through and was on hold for 15 mins. When the guy came on I asked if the long time was b/c of iPhone customers calling — he said yes, and that it was the single busiest day they’ve had since he’s worked in the office (I neglected to ask how long he had worked there). They’ve been getting flooded with calls, but iPhone customers are basically SOL, because the offer is limited to $300 per item. (Though it works great for folks like me who are just trading in iPods).

The American Express Blue credit card also features the 90-day product return protection. When a merchant will not take back a specific item, within 90 days, American Express will refund the purchase price up to $300 per item and a maximum of $1000 annually per credit card account.

TUAW reports that AMEX is “mulling” their Return Protection policy and that iPhone claims are being “handled on a case-by-case basis and that the refunds are not an official program or policy.”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason O'Grady is a journalist and author specializing in mobile technology. He has published six books on Apple and mobile gadgets and his PowerPage blog has been publishing for over 15 years.

Disclosure

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady is the creator and editor of O'Grady's PowerPage, which has been publishing mobile technology news since 1995. He maintains an advertising relationship with the following legacy advertisers on the PowerPage:

  • Amazon Associates
  • Google Adsense
  • Tekserve
  • Advertising on the PowerPage is brokered by a third-party agency (BackBeat Media) and he recuses himself from these negotiations.

Biography

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady developed an affinity for Apple computers after using the original Lisa, and this affinity turned into a bona-fide obsession when he got the original 128 KB Macintosh in 1984.

He started writing one of the first Web sites about Apple (O'Grady's PowerPage) in 1995 and is considered to be one of the fathers of blogging. He has been a frequent speaker at the Macworld Expo conference and a member of the conference faculty. He also co-founded the first dedicated PowerBook User Group (PPUG) in the United States.

After winning a major legal battle with Apple in 2006, he set the precedent that independent journalists are entitled to the same protections under the First Amendment as members of the mainstream media.

O'Grady is the author of The Nexus One Pocket Guide, The Droid Pocket Guide, The Google Phone Pocket Guide, and The Garmin nuvi Pocket Guide (Peachpit Press), the author of Corporations That Changed the World: Apple Inc. (Greenwood Press), and a contributor to The Mac Bible (Peachpit Press). In addition, he has contributed to numerous Mac publications over the years, including MacWEEK, Macworld, and MacPower (Japan).

When he's not writing about Apple for ZDNet at The Apple Core, he enjoys spending time with his family in New Jersey.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Morals vs ethics
Erik Engbrecht 10th Sep 2007
That's a question of morals, not ethics.
0 Votes
+ -
An ethical question
frgough 7th Sep 2007
If you are returning a product simply to buy a cheaper one of the same thing, at the expense of your credit card company (they bite the cost difference), are you being ethical and honest?

I once knew a woman who would go to a store on Friday and buy a $200 dress. On Monday morning she would take it back, claim dissatisfaction with the product and use the store's return policy to get her money back.

She thought she was being a smart shopper, too.
0 Votes
+ -
Answer: Absolutely Not
Badgered 7th Sep 2007
If you are returning a product simply to buy a cheaper one of the same thing, at the expense of your credit card company (they bite the cost difference), are you being ethical and honest?

Answer: Absolutely Not, but how many people would that stop from doing it anyway?
0 Votes
+ -
It's not uncommon
John Zern 8th Sep 2007
Many, many years ago while working part time for a large, established retail electronics chain, people would come in and "rent" the VHS video cameras. You know, take it ob vacation or to their kid's graduation, then return it within the 30 days citing "some" reason they did not like it.

One guy had the nerve to oome back 2 months later to "buy" the same camera.
0 Votes
+ -
return policy "renting"
devlin_X 9th Sep 2007
Many, many years ago while working part time for a large, established retail electronics chain, people would come in and "rent" the VHS video cameras. You know, take it ob vacation or to their kid's graduation, then return it within the 30 days citing "some" reason they did not like it.

Yeah, this is why many retailers especially electronic retailers charge a "restocking" fee. Think of it as a rental fee.... You can thank the sphincters that practice that kind of "renting" and think their getting over on the stores. Now returns working or not will have a nice 10% - 20% restocking fee, even if defective since we've had some people damage an item intentionally so they could skirt the restocking fee....
0 Votes
+ -
ummm... missing a break in there
devlin_X 9th Sep 2007
Yo! ZDnet ya need to put a preview that allows WYSIWYG so we can mistakes before final submission..... just a thought..... wink
0 Votes
+ -
If an insurance company denies a legitimate claim base on the
flimsiest of excuses to "keep their bottom line" is this ethical
or honest? (Re: Katrina victims and the "Good Hands" with
outstretched middle fingers)

American Express uses this as a legitimate marketing tool and
and know the risks involved. Since they charge sellers a much
higher rate than Visa/MasterCard to process the sales then they
have already covered their fictitious losses.
0 Votes
+ -
True, but
BroGnorik 7th Sep 2007
"Since they charge sellers a much
higher rate than Visa/MasterCard "

What you forgot to add is that American Express also gives the seller thier money upfront, whereas Visa/Master Does it over time.

If a business made say $500 a day. Visa/Master will hold on to the money and pay the seller once a month and pay $15,000

American Express pays the seller immediatly per transaction. Whatever the amount is.

I used to work for a company that installs Hotel Computers and Software, and was responsible to get all the information to get the software to work as the point of sale, without using the little black box.

During this time I learned how they all work.
0 Votes
+ -
Not true
mmelton 7th Sep 2007
Visa/MasterCard does not hold money and pay once a month. I accept all credit cards with my business, and get paid by Visa/MC faster than AMEX. Plus, AMEX's fees are much higher.
0 Votes
+ -
If an insurance company denies a legitimate claim based on theflimsiest of excuses to "keep their bottom line" is this ethical or honest?

Just a question: Did you go to the "2 wrongs do make a right" school of ethics?
0 Votes
+ -
One would think
Michael Kelly 7th Sep 2007
that companies which sign with Amex would be obliged to go along with whatever terms Amex decides, meaning Amex would hit their bank accounts whether they like it or not. Though I'm sure there would be some sort of proof required from the customer.
0 Votes
+ -
One would think ...
pmong55 8th Sep 2007
... that considering we've been here since the crack of dawn this morning, the management would have more consideration than to leave us sitting on our jaxies for the post mortem!
0 Votes
+ -
It is unethical
Erik Engbrecht 7th Sep 2007
After-the-fact dissatisfaction with the price of a product is not dissatisfaction with the product itself, but rather with your decision to buy the product.

If someone bragged to me about doing this, I would think substantially less of that person.
0 Votes
+ -
Many large retailers..
msalzberg 7th Sep 2007
are now keeping track of people who return things constantly, and are starting to
refuse to allow them any more.
0 Votes
+ -
Our sales manager use to take things back that were waaaaaay beyond the stated return policy (I'm talking MONTHS). At the same time we the employee's were being asked to sell "Product Replacement Plans" that would promise to replace the item or it's purchase price for it's warranty plus a year. We had people refusing the plan because they knew if it died they'd just go to the manager and complain & make a scene and he'd do the return.

Needless to say he no longer does this once he realized what the side effect was. As for the jerk(s) who would yell and make a scene to get him to take back the item....They can suck eggs since especially in the first year they still have the manufacturer's warranty they just don't want to have to deal with them.

As to the iPhone price drop. It is well known that there is a price for being on the bleeding edge, to say "I got one as soon as they came out!". Why should the retailers have to suffer because you bought it as soon as it was released? Early adopters always pay a premium in all areas of technology. Sometimes they even get burned when the technology flops and its discontinued shortly after its released...Is that too the retailers fault?

Suck it up people! You were willing to part with the cost when you bought it!
0 Votes
+ -
Distorted view of Ethics.
Bozzer 8th Sep 2007
Since most of the 3rd world survive on less than a dollar a day and are practically starving is it ethical for the 1st world to consumer so much of the worlds output. Surely some food in the belly of a starving child is worth far more than being able to get the latest gadget. Or doesn't it work like that?!
0 Votes
+ -
Morals vs ethics
Erik Engbrecht 10th Sep 2007
That's a question of morals, not ethics.
0 Votes
+ -
It would be interesting to know...
adam.prall@... 7th Sep 2007
...for what reasons people are wanting to return their iPhones?is there any
information about that? I mean, I've been buying Apple stuff for 23 years, and the
only two reasons I've ever returned anything are: 1) it was defective (this has
happened only two times I can think of); 2) it turned out I didn't need it after all
(I'm a little ditzy at times). There are always people who will shop unethically, and
the example someone gave above of the lady who purchased dresses to use just for
the weekend is a very, very, very common one. I don't do this as an adult, but as a
teenager, I used to buy games from Egghead Software and return them the next
day after copying them sad
0 Votes
+ -
Anyone who wants to return an iPhone that they were excited about two weeks ago just because someone else was able to purchase one at a lower price needs to have their head examined.

Try that with the car you bought last month, and your neighbor got the same model with the same equipment (in another color just to be a little different than you) for $500 less from a different dealer (or the SAME dealer!). They will laugh you off of the lot!

So now the whole world has "low price protection"? Whatever happened to folks being responsible for the decisions that they make for themselves? Why does it have to be some one elses fault all the time?
0 Votes
+ -
Ummm
BroGnorik 10th Sep 2007
Check it again. Visa/Master may show that they paid you, but they actually don't for a full 30 days, just in case the customer has a problem with the transaction.

It works like a hold on your credit card but reversed. The money is really added to your account, but you cannot use spend it. Many sellers believe they can and do, because they have little problems with thier customers.

Larger companies like Hoetels, get tons of fradulent charges complaints, where they spend alot of time proving to the credit card companies that the customer did indeed spend what they were charged, even though Visa/Master card has technically paid you they will take it back immediatly, American Express does not, until it figures out what happens.

I never said American Express did not charge a higher rate, but when they pay you, the money is there waiting for you to spend it.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix