madison

The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?

By | July 27, 2010, 11:54pm PDT

Following a ruling this week by the Copyright Office and Librarian of Congress, it’s not illegal to jailbreak an iPhone. Hurrah! It’s the latest clash subcultures: Apple fans vs. the iPhone anarchists, aka the iOS Flash fanatics.

The Electronic Freedom Foundation announced the victory on Monday:

In its reasoning in favor of EFF’s jailbreaking exemption, the Copyright Office rejected Apple’s claim that copyright law prevents people from installing unapproved programs on iPhones: “When one jailbreaks a smartphone in order to make the operating system on that phone interoperable with an independently created application that has not been approved by the maker of the smartphone or the maker of its operating system, the modifications that are made purely for the purpose of such interoperability are fair uses.”

Note: I am a contributor to the EFF and agree with the ruling. It should be considered “fair use” to hack your computer or computing device. But that doesn’t mean that you should do it.

And on Tuesday in response, Apple repeated its usual party line at The Cult of Mac:

“Apple’s goal has always been to insure that our customers have a great experience with their iPhone and we know that jailbreaking can severely degrade the experience. As we’ve said before, the vast majority of customers do not jailbreak their iPhones as this can violate the warranty and can cause the iPhone to become unstable and not work reliably.”

Apple has always maintained that jailbreak software can disrupt other software and system services. For example, sync services as well as “apps that use the Apple Push Notification Service have had difficulty receiving notifications or received notifications that were intended for a different hacked device.”

How can anyone deny that these bad things can happen? Come on, these are hacks, right? Maybe, maybe not. But more on the maybe side.

But the big problems for jailbroken iPhones is the chance that the hacked iOS device might become bricked, “permanently inoperable” in Apple-speak, when a future update is installed. It could happen.

Apple strongly cautions against installing any software that hacks the iOS. It is also important to note that unauthorized modification of the iOS is a violation of the iPhone end-user license agreement and because of this, Apple may deny service for an iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch that has installed any unauthorized software.

A computing device is an investment, in the hardware and software, but mostly in the time we put into learning how to use it effectively and to integrate it into our workflow and lifestyle. It’s that productivity thing. However, it’s hard to reconcile jailbreaking with productivity.

Right now, the noble cause of the iPhone anarchists is Adobe Flash. A recent example is Frash, a port from the Android OS, according to the Redmond Pi blog.

Dubbed as “Frash”, this is basically a port of Adobe Flash runtime for Android running on iPad using a compatibility layer. You can check out the video after the break to see it for yourself. It looks really promising, specially because its coming from non other than well known iPhone hacker named comex.

For the first generation iPhone, one could understand the attraction of jailbreaking an iPhone. There was no approved SDK, nor 225+ thousand applications to get things done. But even then, it was a chancy bet. Now, it’s counterproductive foolishness.

So, iPhone users have choices: whether they will hang with Apple or the jailbreaking iPhone hackers. Or whether they will have the goal of getting their work done or following the dream of running Flash on the iPhone. Or having an iPhone that works or may be bricked? What choices!

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

Talkback Most Recent of 25 Talkback(s)

  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    unlocking your phone shouldn't be an issue. you can't use 3G on the iPhone 4 in the US on any other network. If you want to buy the iPhone 4 and use it on EDGE with TMO you should be able to. 99% of the world sells unlocked phones and this allows for this more in the US. Jailbreaking is another thing
    ZDNet Gravatar
    octechnophile
    28th Jul 2010
  • Third option, use Android
    When you chose this option you get all the benefits of a legal iphone as well as a jail broken one plus all the wish list most Apple fans want.

    To top it if you get a better experience, cause you have the freedom of choice and devices something apple doesn't comprehend.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Uralbas
    28th Jul 2010
  • If I were dissatisfied with my iPhone ...
    @Uralbas

    ... I would, as you say, choose another platform. I understand the desire to jailbreak an iPhone. The platform is powerful, and Apple definitely errs on the side of being conservative about opening features up to APIs. However, for me, the copyright ruling wouldn't really change my mind about jailbreaking. For me, the benefits of jailbreaking are minor compared to the potential headaches of supporting a hacked platform.

    Android is currently the strongest competitor. I know many of you think it surpasses iOS. For me, it does so only on the supported features checklist, not on the experience of using the phone.

    Windows Phone 7 actually looks pretty interesting. The UI is decidedly different from iOS, which sets it apart. I will seek it out and try it when it is released.

    I'm also very interested to see what HP will do with webOS (and how that will affect the MS/HP relationship going forward).
    ZDNet Gravatar
    RationalGuy
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    Fair use - if they want to control it, don't sell it
    ZDNet Gravatar
    BrentRBrian
    28th Jul 2010
  • Correction
    @BrentRBrian

    Fair use - if they want to control it, don't buy it
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Economister
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    For me it boils down to who owns the phone - me or apple? If it belongs to me then I should be able to do with it what i please - I am a big boy and understand that if I choose to install something of which 'nanny' doesn't approve it might turn round and bite me. I am, unfortunately, tied into a two year contract - so I have to wait another year (i'm not made of money) to get hold of a smartphone that truly does give me access to the whole of the internet - at the moment that looks like android - but who knows WM7 might have got round to allowing it by then so I might actually have the choice.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    psychobdelic
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    @psychobdelic and the world
    I'm fairly techie. I write code, have no hesitation to use a command line, have "cvsup and compile" the just-released FreeBSD 8.1 for my code repository server on my to-do list. People ask me for help with their computers all the time. Yet I have no doubt that psychobdelic can runs circles around me with regards to the arcana about all operating systems, stationary and mobile, and affiliated runtimes.

    I agree jailbreaking should be okay and I really don't think Apple was all that aggressive about it. Their os loaders shouldn't say "whatever" when installing updates, otherwise the security of the system is compromised. Psychobdelic clearly understands that when he or she customizes his or her possessions, he or she takes responsibility for the good and bad.

    Me, I guess I've gotten to an age where there are so many obsolesced technologies I've learned, like that carburetor on the '72 Dodge van, the inner workings of a teletype, the analog 1/8" tape recorder and razor blade editing bay, etc., that nowadays I need a real compelling reason to go deep on any thing.

    I also look at the iPhone as phone that can do other things, rather than a computer that also telephones.

    Apple tells me what their product does, others are generous with their words and time and tell me what it doesn't, if I want apps, there's a one-stop place to go which also has the free ones, and somebody took a look to see that they pretty much work, and should something malicious sneak through, the store proprietor will take responsibility and uninstall it. That works for me. I bought one (though I got it pre-App store.)

    I join psychobdelic in wishing for the tomorrow in which we both are happy. A person of erudition and intelligence, I presume as there had been two years of Apple not being supportive of jail-breakers and there had been one year of us customers in the pram of the Apple-nanny app store, psychobdelic made a conscious choice to accept the restrictions that rankled as a cost of getting the better smartphone. So, he or she has to wait another year (Fie on two year contracts! Who's with me?) to get the next great and user-open phone. Or he or she could jailbreak his or her iPhone and breathe in the heady airs of freedom and responsibility.

    It's about time I answered today's question. Are those the only two choices? The jailbreakers do what they do for their reasons. Apple does what they do for their reasons. I'm just a customer doing what I do for my reasons: I want a phone, I like apps, and I don't care about physical keyboards or that my finger is less precise than a pencil, and that is not a knock on people who think differently. I'm over here with the customers, with one hand in my pocket and the other one attenuating signal. Now that there's self-actualizing power.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DannyO_0x98
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    "For the first generation iPhone, one could understand the attraction of jailbreaking an iPhone. There was no approved SDK, nor 225+ thousand applications to get things done. But even then, it was a chancy bet. Now, its counterproductive foolishness."

    I think not.

    Jailbreaking my iPhone 4--which I'm currently debating--will allow me to use it in a tethering capability without having to step down from my current unlimiited data plan. Oh sure, AT&T will allow me tethering as well, but only up to 2GB per month.

    Jailbreaking will also allow my iPhone to run as though it were always on wi-fi. This would free up FaceTime to run anytime, anywhere--not to mention let me download apps/movies/etcetera over (I believe) 20 MB.

    Another useful jailbroken-only feature are apps which display useful info on the lockscreen. So instead of having to press the home button and swipe to unlock the phone and view certain items, I can just press the home button (without unlocking) to view new emails, weather, texts, etc.

    If you can't agree that the the 3 reasons above--not to mention the numerous other reasons I'm skipping entirely--don't at least make you consider jailbreaking (if not actually follow through, as I can understand why some would have reservations), then the foolishness is all on your end. Jailbroken iPhones have considerably more capabilities, and the only reason not to jailbreak is on the chance that Apple--well-known for being draconian at best or outright spiteful at worst--updates its software in such a way as to purposefully brick jailbroken iPhones. I for one wouldn't put it past them.

    Regardless, it's entirely off-base to call jailbreaking "counterproductive foolishness". I and many others consider it incredibly useful.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    schumachiavelli
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    I'm also going to dispute this For the first generation iPhone, one could understand the attraction of jailbreaking an iPhone. There was no approved SDK, nor 225+ thousand applications to get things done. But even then, it was a chancy bet. Now, it?s counterproductive foolishness. For the reasons schumachiavelli posted above and add my own 2 cents regarding the 3G

    Apple claimed that things like video recording would negatively impact the performance of the iPhone 3G hence that was not an enabled feature of the iOS3x update... however there is an app called cycorder which recorded video on the 2G and 3G iPhones with no performance issues.

    The main allure of jailbreaking IMHO is to open up the iPhone platform to apps that are not Apple approved such as Google Voice... as well as allow a level of customization that Apple has yet to allow on the iPhone.

    Sure enabling multitasking on the 3G running iOS4 can be counterproductive due to the increased lag but for the ability to run apps from another source other than Apple's App Store and web-based apps is hardly "foolishness"

    Besides jailbreaking is hardly permanent - one can always do a full restore via iTunes and run a clean, stock, as Apple intended iOS.

    So to answer your question I'm hanging with the jailbreakers as I have for the last 2 years.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Pete "athynz" Athens
    28th Jul 2010
  • RE: Apple or Jailbreakers: Who are you gonna hang with?
    @athynz

    I agree to a point.
    There are a number of features that jailbreaking can add to your phone to significantly enhance the experience (ex: no limit on 3G download size, saving email attachments other than pics, file explorer, themes, security, firewall, etc...).

    I jb my 3G and my 3GS.
    It allowed me a lot of functionality and apps that Apple would not. It allowed me to use as my primary work phone.

    Once I updated my 3GS to iOS4 I quickly wished I could roll back to 3.1.3. Apple does not allow this. This update quickly turned my 3GS from a usable device to a semi-functioning device.

    On to the 4. Crap. Ditto crap.

    Moved on to Android. 2.2
    Great OS! Better phone than my 3GS. (Nexus One).

    For those still on iOS, jb will become like another app that allows you more options.

    and to the Apple comment about stability?
    more CrApple commentary. They lie.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    rhonin
    28th Jul 2010
  • Jailbreakers!!!
    Jail breaking is helping consumers expand the use of the iPhone as well as release Apples grip on over censorship (now also in the bookstore), they could adapt this new to be good PR as it looks like thy will have to embrace it or if they react badly will create another setback that I?m sure the company could have done with not coming to light at the moment in time ,it will be interesting to see what's next in the news regarding iPhone/Apple issues (antenna, manufacturing, roaming service charges) and their steps to refund cases won?t make up for the iPhone 4's lack of function over form.

    It's a shame to see so many issues with the iPhone 4 after so many people waited for it's release. What's more of a shame is that it seems Apple knew about some of these issues already, such as the problem with reception.

    But Apple have created such a loyal following that people may just put up with what issues there are for the sake of owning the latest Apple product.
    Personally, I'd be happier with an older iPhone - at least then the issues are all ironed out.

    However, it's also interesting to see how much excitement new technologies can bring. New technology and innovation is important for new business, illustrated by entrepreneurship grants and new business competitions like www.ukesnc.com.

    Guess it's not all bad!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    galile0
    28th Jul 2010
  • The Truth Of The Matter Is...
    apple is essentially saying, that if their hardware is treated in the same fashion as MS Windows hardware, with and endless selection of customized components, an endless selection of software, etc. etc. then their operating system will have all the same problems that Windows experiences. Their OS is no better, or more stable than Windows. Everyone who is intimately involved with hardware and software already knows this. Apple, who is solely motivated by money (which isn't illegal), knows that the price MS has to pay for supporting Windows, with all of it's infinite variations, and wants to pocket that money instead (which isn't illegal). So anytime an apple customer modifies apple hardware, either through software or hardware changes, apple cuts the cord. This is all that apple is saying. Net profit is king, and support is limited...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Steve@...
    28th Jul 2010
  • The real truth of the matter is....
    @Steve@...

    The real truth of the matter is.... That Apple realizes what anyone with a few brain cells can understand. The shmucks who wrote that lovely Jail Breaking SW don't do it for free nor out of the kindness of their hearts... When you Jail Break an iPhone, you just installed Malware, keyloggers, etc. And if you install additional junk apps on your Jail Broken iPhone, there is no telling what kinds of havoc they can cause with the device and your identity. And Apple is not going to be responsible for either, so they take a public stance against Jail Breaking your iPhone.

    Apple is essentially saying that if you install cr@p on your iPhone, then it's all on you, and don't expect us to pay employees (tech support) to sort out your self imposed stupidity.

    And you know what... I get that. Personally, I love the garden... There are more choices inside the walls then outside the walls. And I have confidence in the safety and reliability of all the hundreds of thousands of apps within the walls.

    So you guys can Jail Break your iphones till your blue in the face. Or... Go with those roid phones which you might get to update once a year and have 50K of Apps, (Half of which work on any gven phone model) to choose from... I'll stick with my iPhone and the value I see in that walled garden you bozos are afraid of.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    i8thecat
    28th Jul 2010
  • Not Afraid Of Anything...
    @i8thecat
    least of all some apple walled garden. I just don't have any respect for disingenuousness.
    I have never had a virus, malware, a worm etc... etc..., because I know enough about good and bad. apple is making the decision for everyone, because they know that most users don't know, and will end up with a screwed up device.
    I fully understand the "lowest common denominator" approach to life, that we in the US are having to accept, more and more every day. But, I resent the hell out of anyone dumbing down my options, because of the "LCD" people who are probably in the majority.
    So, I'll choose another company, who is more focused on selling lots of units to make the same kind of net profits that apple shoots for with just 1 sale.
    Because, in the end, I know more about my hardware, good & bad, and what I want to do, than apple does. When I buy hardware, I buy hardware and software that is better than anything apple sells, and I have infinite choices. I actually pay more for my electronics than what apple charges, but the recipients of my technology budget aren't greedy cowards.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Steve@...
    28th Jul 2010
  • So Steve@... in essence, what you are saying...
    So Steve@... in essence, what you are saying... Is that you buy pain in the butt devices because you have a huge chip on your shoulder and you enjoy living in denial.

    Apple isn't marketing to the LCD type.. They are marketing to the masses. And the masses want devices that are not a pain in the butt, and work, while still being the best and coolest devices on the market...

    You have this strange notion that with Apple you don't have choices, when in fact, you have more apps than all the competitors combined. You have better hardware and more reliable hardware, as well as the company with the absolute best customer satisfation rating (by a landslide margin for the last decade) backing that device... And you say you end up paying more from a competitor because you don't want to pay less to Apple because you feel Apple is greedy??? Do you even listen to yourself??? It's like you are a walking contradiction...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    i8thecat
    29th Jul 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources