The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Forbidden fruit: Is the Bible Belt unfriendly to Apple?

By | April 30, 2010, 6:39pm PDT

Summary: As one might expect, a recent report on Apple’s U.S. market penetration shows its top 10 markets in Apple’s home town, in major metro areas and surprisingly in Las Vegas. However, a look at the bottom 10 reveals that Apple products are sparse in parts of the Bible Belt.

Image by Experian SimmonsAs one might expect, a recent report on Apple’s U.S. market penetration shows its top 10 markets in Apple’s home town, in major metro areas and surprisingly in Las Vegas. However, a look at the bottom 10 reveals that Apple products are sparse in parts of the Bible Belt.

Consumer Insights, the newsletter of analyst company Experian Simmons, looked at which markets are the biggest users of Apple products, including the Macintosh, and iPod/iPhone mobile clients. The company’s geographic data engine ranked 206 “Designated Market Areas.” No shock, at the top of the list is Apple’s home town, the San Francisco Bay Area, where 32.3 percent of adults own or use an Apple product.

According to the company, 21.6 percent adults in the U.S. use an iPod, iPhone or Mac computer. That is an amazing stat.

Here is what the Apple Market Ranker report said about the top 5 Apple-friendly territories.
percent

2. Boston, MA: Almost one-in-three adults in the Boston DMA (31.3 percent) own or use an iPod, iPhone or Mac computer making area residents 45 percent more likely than average to be Mac maniacs. And with 11 Apple stores located within the Boston DMA, residents never have to go far for their Apple fix.
3. San Diego, CA: San Diego-area residents are 42 percent more likely than the average American to be toting around an iPod, chatting on an iPhone or computing on a Mac. In fact, 31.8 percent of the San Diego DMA’s 2.2 million adults are admitted Mac users.

4. New York, NY: Anyone can tell you that iPhones are about as common in New York City as taxis, which supports the fact that there are roughly 4.9 million Mac-users in the New York DMA. Of the almost 16 million adults in the area, 30.4 percent use either an iPod, iPhone or Mac computer.
5. Washington, D.C.: Residents of our nation’s capitol can agree on at least one thing: their love for Apple. D.C.-area residents are 39 percent more likely than average to be found listening to an iPod, chatting on an iPhone or tapping away on a Mac computer.

Also in the Top 10 are several west coast cities, such as San Diego and Santa Barbara, Chicago (a region with a lot of printing history), Denver and Las Vegas.

I took a look at the bottom of the list and found that interesting reading as well. Here are the names of the bottom 10 areas with a population greater than 500K (Number 1 is the lowest):

1. Charleston-Huntington, WV: Only 11 percent of the 912,277 adult residents use an Apple product. Ranking 197/206.
2. Tri-Cities, TN-VA: Apple penetration is 11.5 percent. Ranking 196/206.
3. Shreveport, LA: PCs are popular here with only 12.3 percent Apple users. Ranking 190/206.
4. Tyler-Longview (Lufkin & Nacogdoches), TX: Only 12.9 percent of the 537,418 population use Apple. Ranking 185/206.
5. Johnstown-Altoona, PA: Lucky 13 percent. Ranking 184/206.
6. Springfield, MO: Of a population of 802,021 only 106,705 use Apple, 13.3 percent. Ranking 180/206.
7. Myrtle Beach-Florence, SC: Apple penetration is 13.7 percent. Ranking 177/206.
8. Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA: Apple penetration is 13.9 percent. Ranking 173/206.
9. Little Rock-Pine Bluff, AR: Apple penetration is 13.9 percent. Ranking 172/206.
10. 163 Jackson, MS: Apple penetration is 14.7 percent. Ranking 163/206.

I noticed that many of these Apple-unfriendly regions can be found in the Bible Belt. Perhaps there’s a fallout from the Western European depiction of the biblical “forbidden fruit” as being an apple. [“But as for the tree of knowledge of good and bad, you must not eat of it; for as soon as you eat of it, you shall die.” (Genesis 2:17 The Jewish Publication Society translation)]
On the ifo Apple Store blog, Gary Allen also pointed out that Apple has placed stores in some not-so-loyal regions, including Tulsa, which is at the bottom of the list.

Beyond the top 10 loyal regions, there are several other high-ranked regions without an Apple store, including Baltimore (Md., #13), Charlottesville (Virg., #16), Boise (Idaho, #25), Lafayette (Ind., #36) and El Paso (Tex., #46). Baltimore is served by two stores in the far suburbs, while Lafayette and Boise are home to universities. Tipsters say a store will open in Boise this fall. But the other cities listed above have never been spotted on any listing of possbile store locations.

How far down the loyal list of 206 metro areas did Apple dip to locate an Apple store? Tulsa (Okla.) has the lowest percentage of Apple users in the study, just 15.7 percent, and it’s ranked #145. Apple opened a store at the Woodland Hills mall in June 2007.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

115
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Oink much?
Lester Young 6th May 2010
@Dorkyman No insight, just stereotypes. Typical Fox News watching Repiglican teabagger.
0 Votes
+ -
I-Anything
Richard B 30th Apr 2010
Just an expensive young urbanite fad. I would be surprised if it did well outside major metropolitan areas.
0 Votes
+ -
Obvious to me
Dorkyman 1st May 2010
I have friends who have numerous Apple products. I also have friends who don't have a single Apple product.

It's obvious to me the the difference is a matter of personality: the Apple buyers crave acceptance and are eager to be a part of the group that considers itself to be the American Intelligentsia, the leaders of the masses into the bright white future. They, incidentally, voted for "change" without knowing what that "change" really meant. Right now they're feeling pretty deflated.

My other friends really couldn't give a sh*t about joining that clique, and see many of the Apple people as members of a weird semi-religious cult. Instead, they buy value and want something that gets the job done. They are traditionalists in other ways, too, which is why you find them NOT living in Silicon Valley or Manhattan.

Hey, to each his own. I buy Dell, HP, and Sony.
0 Votes
+ -
Idiot
midgarddragon@... 1st May 2010
Quit bringing your whiny-ass Faux News politics
into this. I voted for change while realizing
no one's perfect. So far we've got a PRes
who's trying to bring us health care reform (we
got a crippled bill but it's a start),
strengthening our relationships around the
world instead of acting like a college frat
boy, and overall working on real issues like
nuclear disarmament instead of "let's go blow
'em up!" So we voted for change and we got it,
but your whiny ass listening to Fox News tell
you to hate doesn't understand. What you need
to do, is go the f*** to hell and leave this
country to people who care about each other
insrtead of MONEY.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Wow...
becabill 4th May 2010
I can see you're really pissed at democracy...
0 Votes
+ -
So...your friends prefer NO change?
mykmlr@... 4th May 2010
shouldn't they be working on DOS P.C.'s then? Adequate for web surfing, as long as there is no video, with a keyboard for firing off hate rants like your post to Freerepublic and Stormfront?
Assuming we 'intelligensia' are so desperate for acceptance really loses steam when you consider what NOT voting for change would have gotten you...ever increasing insurance company profits while women with breast cancer continue to be defrauded of the insurance coverage they bought.
Myself, I'm stuck with a Windows 7 dual core 4 gig because of the BUSH DEPRESSION still sweeping America.
But when the Republicans are brought to heel, and things turn BACK UP for the citizens instead of the corporate dynastic class, I will go Mac. like any thinking person!
0 Votes
+ -
If the left had there way
becabill 4th May 2010
there would be no companies strong enough to build computers, PC or Mac. We would all be equal, like ants, or maybe amoebae.

Hey, OK, there would also be no left or right.

OK, enough politics.
0 Votes
+ -
I mean
becabill 4th May 2010
if the left had THEIR way. Sorry.
0 Votes
+ -
Obvious to me: really?
781lc 4th May 2010
With a name like dorkyman it would be unlikely your analysis that "the Apple buyers crave acceptance" would have much substantive evidence.

Along with a number of acquaintances who also use Apple after having retired from the need to use a Microsoft OS, we simply adopted the REAL windows. Most of us were employers, are you?

After years of DOS the graphic interface was accepted by virtually everyone .. but, it never was and is not now equal to the current Mac OS.
0 Votes
+ -
Oink much?
Lester Young 6th May 2010
@Dorkyman No insight, just stereotypes. Typical Fox News watching Repiglican teabagger.
0 Votes
+ -
well, i live in florence and i can tell you that ipods are pretty popular here...hell, i own a Touch myself. not a lot of people here actually buy Macs though since they fall into one of three things: 1) too expensive, 2) dont need it, or 3) we play PC games. personally, i suppose you could put me in the anti-apple bin since i really dislike their computers and the cult of personality surrounding apple products (though since a rather large portion of the population owns ipods [excluding iphones], they dont have as much of a "cult inducing" experience). i suppose that the reasoning behind the lack of sales in the bible belt may be found that a lot of us are very practically-minded (myself included) and dont see any value in buying what is basically a piece of furniture with a computer chip and internet connection. $1000 for a $430 laptop? no thanks. btw my toshiba satellite ($430) has better hardware specs than any white macbook (minus the C2D, i have a good pentium which serves my needs well).
0 Votes
+ -
I have to agree . . .
JLHenry 30th Apr 2010
about cost being the primary issue. Most people in the Hinterlands (I'm in Ohio), simply don't see the need to blow a grand (or more) on a device that is essentially allowing people to shop on-line, send and receive e-mail, and work with family photos.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm not sure I understand...
mixedupfiles 30th Apr 2010
If you are happy with your Windows computer, then what is the
problem? Am I missing something?
0 Votes
+ -
Here.....
OhTheHumanity 1st May 2010
He thinks that the Mac, though nice, is not worth the money when it comes down to it. Like he said most people don't do much outside of shopping, email, and basic web searching. Many do not surround anything about their life around their computer. I guess in some places people still get out and do things in life and not on their computers?
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly.
JLHenry 1st May 2010
But try getting geeks like him to understand. It's like trying to describe the concept of color to someone who's been blind their whole life, or the concept of Music to someone's who deaf from birth . . .
0 Votes
+ -
So...
becabill 4th May 2010
I think you might be somewhat like me, computers aren't my basic interest, *using them* for what they will do is, they are a tool, nothing more, and if they work well, that's enough. I don't buy a Corvette to go to the grocery store, nor would I use my Buick Century to race.

Not that i consider the Mac to be a 'Vette.
0 Votes
+ -
What car do you drive? what - if you could afford it?

Home? same question. Clothes? Food? vacations? how about golf clubs?

Envy? Jealousy? ignorance? inexperience?

What???
0 Votes
+ -
"Cult inducing experience"
781lc 4th May 2010
For those of us who were born and raised in the bible belt, served in a couple of wars, finished school, went to work, and became heads of companies the choice of a Mac was similar to buying a Cadillac or a Lexus.

Someday you too might select products that please you rather than just meet a necessity.

With the attitude exhibited in your post .. maybe not.
The idea that your $430 laptop has better specs than a macbook just show an ignorance of hardware. Care to post those specs for a one on one comparison?
Let's start with that pentium.

It is just this delusional and, to be honest, duplicitous, attitude that cherry picking specs is acceptable, that perpetuates this myth of cost.
0 Votes
+ -
ok
0 Votes
+ -
umm
privatejarhead 2nd May 2010
soo...what do i not understand? there are some people out there that do seem to value looks over the internal parts. i get that, though i not one of them. quite frankly, i couldnt care less about style (my satellite is fat and ugly lol), but it does the job well. again, my $430 pc has better hardware specs than any macbook. if i really want to show off some style, i can better spend the extra $570 i save, perhaps on a few nice pairs of clothing? maybe an extremely nice date with some girl? certainly much better than acting like a snob, going "look at my shiny new mac!" besides, like others have said, people in the South do not get paid as well, so i doubt i could afford a mac if i wanted to. and no, im not some dumb hillbilly (i try to stay as far from the southern stereotype as possible), completeled IB MYP and now in the AP, so im not some backwards person who doesnt understand the differences between windows v osx, pc v mac, etc. i just choose to spend my hard-earned money on something better. food is a nice option....
0 Votes
+ -
Po' Folk
becabill 4th May 2010
What a lot of people don't seem to understand is is that while job for job, incomes are much lower here (in the South) than elsewhere, so is the cost of living - until it comes to cars and computers. They cost as much as anywhere else, an represent a larger comparative investment to us. We has to economize on such things, and tend to be more aware of value and substance over some perceived social statement. Therefore, PC's rule here.
0 Votes
+ -
It's the economy stupid
toadlife 30th Apr 2010
The Bible Belt/Red States tend to have MUCH lower per-capita incomes than the more Urban Areas. People who have trouble affording rent and car payment are more like to opt for the cheaper $20 mp3 player, the free flip phone or the cheaper $399.00 Dell laptop over the Apple equivalent.
0 Votes
+ -
Cheap $399 Dell laptop???
wackoae 30th Apr 2010
Do you know the difference between a Netbook and a Laptop???
0 Votes
+ -
netbooks and laptops
CobraA1 Updated - 30th Apr 2010
netbooks are $300, and the only real difference
is the Atom CPU and the lack of a CD-ROM. For
all intents and purposes - they are really just
small laptops with a different name slapped on
by techies to make them sound cooler, and to
emphasize the idea that techies don't want
people actually using them for stuff besides
the internet.

Which is just bull. They can absolutely be used
for stuff besides the internet. They're not as
fast as a full laptop, but there's no technical
reason why they can't do most of the stuff that
laptops can do.

The only thing they really can't do is 3D games
- but if you're not a gamer, that's not much of
an issue.
0 Votes
+ -
Yep...
zak89 1st May 2010
Dell's Inspiron 15 starts at $399 - not a powerhouse (2.2Ghz Celeron + 2 GBs RAM), but no netbook.
0 Votes
+ -
It's the economy stupid
peter02l 30th Apr 2010
But they are richer spiritually, God bless them.
0 Votes
+ -
just me, but
privatejarhead 2nd May 2010
i suppose that i have said spirits, dont i dont need god for them...
0 Votes
+ -
No,
becabill 4th May 2010
We're no better off than anybody else in that respect, that's a matter of choice, not economics.
0 Votes
+ -
it evens out.
lostarchitect 3rd May 2010
people in cities tend to make more, but everything
costs more, too. From groceries to car insurance
to a cup of coffee. I pay more for rent on my
crappy 1 bedroom apartment than many people pay
for a mortgage on a 3 bedroom house.
0 Votes
+ -
Cost
becabill 4th May 2010
So a computer, PC or Mac, costs a considerably smaller portion of your budget.
I bet these Apple owners in these cities are all liberals who support health care and financial reform. Microsoft makes software and hardware for the silent majority that are enraged with universal health care and Apple products.
0 Votes
+ -
Not a very good one this time Mike.
0 Votes
+ -
However....
Bill4 1st May 2010
Several readers seem to have bitten hard!
0 Votes
+ -
It ain't universal health care.....
snberk341 30th Apr 2010
..... until they plunk a helipad on the roof able to handle a Galaxy Class
Starship.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't be silly !
Jkirk3279 30th Apr 2010
You know perfectly well that a Galaxy Class Starship can't
be landed on a planet.
0 Votes
+ -
Some Mac Users are Conservatives
tehart 1st May 2010
I hate to disillusion Mr. Cox, but some of us conservatives use Macs too. I
invite him to take a look at http://tinyurl.com/yjp7ulk,
http://tinyurl.com/259mf83, or http://tinyurl.com/22n83wq, and say
that I support healthcare and financial reform.

Of course, it may be that there are conservative elites too.
0 Votes
+ -
just to let you know Cox,
privatejarhead 1st May 2010
but i'm living in the middle of this bible belt (flroence, sc), and i am quite liberal. politics do not dictate the electronic products one buys. liberals, conservatives, democrats and republics alike around here generally do not buy apple products simply because of price compared to features. if i want to pay $1000 for a computer, i expect it to do much more than a macbook can really do on its own.
0 Votes
+ -
I was gonna give you 4 out of 10.
The Danger is Microsoft 2nd May 2010
But considering the fish you caught I'll up that to 6.0 - Welcome back Mikey!
n/t
0 Votes
+ -
Kinda lame there Mike
Pete "athynz" Athens 3rd May 2010
I own a few Apple products and I despise the heath care bill that was shoved down our throats by people who are not only unaffected by it but didn't even bother to read the damned thing.

Apple Owners do NOT equal Liberals.
0 Votes
+ -
Make some room for us independents.
becabill 4th May 2010
Microsoft certainly doesn't suit me, I don't know anything about OS X, so I run Ubuntu most of the time. I support universal health care 'cause I'm now disabled,and financial reform because I'm not yet a complete idiot. And I consider myself firmly entrenched in the Silent Majority, thank you, though I'm growing less silent all the time thanks to ZD Net!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Well, no doubt you have a vast background in research and have made a study to arrive at your ridiculous conclusion.

Personally, we contribute a substantial sum to the Republican Party and candidates but are just right of center and not at all pleased with the results when either one has full control.

For those who can remember .. the exact same accusations were made toward Microsoft for years until apple became a bit of a competitor. More of a thorn in MS who has always wanted it all .. not a major problem.
"Perhaps there?s a fallout from the Western
European depiction of the biblical 'forbidden
fruit' as being an apple."

Doubtful. I don't think that religion has much
to do with Apple's lack of popularity in the
Bible belt at all.

It's more likely to be some economic reason
IMO. Perhaps Apple isn't pushing as hard there,
or perhaps it's more lower income areas and
they're less likely to buy the more expensive
Apple products.

Or maybe, since they do tend to be more
conservative - they're just lagging behind the
new trends.

Or maybe a combination of those reasons.

But IMO it's doubtful it's due to the Apple
logo.

As a conservative Christian myself - I haven't
heard of anybody who has a negative view of
apples just because the forbidden fruit is
often portrayed as an apple. That's simply not
the case.

In fact, the Bible belt is often known for its
apple pies. Does that sound like people are
treating apples as evil?

It's rather insulting to think that you'd stoop
so low to portray the Bible belt as a bunch of
people who hate things just because of some
popular illustration.

"The Jewish Publication Society translation"

Heh, don't think I've ever seen that
translation. In a place like the Bible Belt,
you're a lot more likely to see the KJV, NKJV,
NIV, or ESV.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed, shortsighted at best
voyager529 1st May 2010
...and insulting at worst.

The most bleeding obvious thing is that the Bible never mentions what kind of fruit the Forbidden Tree produced. For all we know, it's an extinct variety of fruit, and it's only been in human portrayals of the story that an apple has been used (ya gotta pick something, right?)

There *is* a culture difference between the Bible Belt and metro areas, but it's not just due to religion. The south has always been a more agricultural economy. Compare the size and number of farms in the top 10 region list with the number in the bottom 10 list. If your livelihood depends on working your 150-acre farm, there's minimal financial incentive to get the latest iWidget. A business worker in the SFBA is much more likely to benefit from having an iPhone than a farmer will.

Here's another example of a cultural difference: compare gun ownership in the top 10 with the bottom 10. Different numbers? I'm guessing that they would be. Again, I'm sure there are plenty of 9mm's in the SFBA, but it's a matter of cultural priority that greatly assists in what sells better.

I don't mean to stereotype the south vs. the metro areas (I live in a metro area myself), but these are just simple examples of some traditional culture differences between the two areas. The culture as a whole will affect what sells.

Joey
0 Votes
+ -
"If your livelihood depends on working your
150-acre farm, there's minimal financial
incentive to get the latest iWidget. A business
worker in the SFBA is much more likely to
benefit from having an iPhone than a farmer
will."

I think this is really the best explanation
I've seen for the difference.

A farmer isn't running a large international
corporation with offices all over the place.

We're not talking about office workers here.

Yes, ZDNet, believe it or not there are jobs
that don't happen in office buildings.
0 Votes
+ -
my two cents
privatejarhead 2nd May 2010
you seem to hit most of the points spot-on joey. with little disposable income in the South (especially rural areas), there isnt as much concern to get the latest widgets out there. im not sure what you classify florence, sc as (a town of 30,000 in the middle of the hellhole that is the peedee is what i call it), but i do like to have nice new things every so often, though not as much as you might in the northern cities (im assuming you're in the north).

by the way, by looking at the region the bible takes place in (palestine, middle east), the most likely forbidden fruit would have been the fig. my educated guess, since apples never grew in the middle east... that and jesus isnt white, he's arab (or palestinian).
0 Votes
+ -
Jesus was not Palestinian
snberk341 2nd May 2010
Palestine was an arbitrary "territory" that the British (and some other
winning members of WW I ) drew on a map. The British were given
Palestine as a Mandate to administer, and did so until shortly after WW II.
Anyone who happened to be living in this territory when it was created
was then tagged with the name Palestinian.

Jesus was Jewish. If you read the bit in the New Testament that talks
about his lineage you will see he is descended from King David. All of
Jesus's relatives and most of disciples were Jewish. The first saints were
Jewish since the religion of Christianity was not formalized until after the
death of the early saints.
0 Votes
+ -
jewish, yes, but...
privatejarhead 2nd May 2010
..."jewish" describes a religion, not a race. sure, you can make the argument that palestinian isnt a race (actually, its a nationality that's been around for thousands of years, not just 1948 onwards). nevertheless, jesus was still arab, being born to a family line living in the region for a bit of time (forgot how long). i could even make the argument that because the middle east is actually western asia, then jesus is truly in fact asian. unless his family immigrated from egypt, in which case jesus is actually african. regardless, you cant claim his race to be jewish, since there isnt a thing called the jewish race. judaism is a belief, not a skin color....
0 Votes
+ -
one thing.
Rama.NET 3rd May 2010
You shouldn't refer Jesus as "he", you should refer Him as "He". Sorry to
point it out.
--Ram--
0 Votes
+ -
Not to be nit-picky but...
technology@... 4th May 2010
Jesus' lineage is given through Joseph, his adoptive father. (Something
that has always puzzled me.) He was actually half-Jewish and half divine,
I guess.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix