More on the MacBook Pro SuperDrive

More on the MacBook Pro SuperDrive

Summary: In one of their most controversial moves yet, Apple dropped the double-layer 8x DVD-R SuperDrive from their new professional notebook - the MacBook Pro. Here's why...

SHARE:
TOPICS: Apple
5

One of the most surprising things about the announcement of the the new MacBook Pro at Macworld Expo this week was Apple's dropping the 8x burning double-layer SuperDrive in favor of an inferior 4x single-layer mechanism.

I was puzzled during his keynote address when Steve Jobs listed the specs of the new MacBook Pro with only a 4x SuperDrive, it was surely an error I thought. Why would Apple ship a 4x SuperDrive in a machine touted as so much faster than current PowerBooks? (The current PowerBook G4 ships with 8x SuperDrives.)

One possibility was Apple was using an even slimmer optical mechanism than the one found in the current PowerBook G4 based on the slimmer profile of the MacBook Pro. A colleague went to the Apple booth and interrogated the MacBook Pro and found some interesting information: the part numbers coming up in Apple System Profiler for the 4x SuperDrives were ones we've never seen before - and no double-layer support.

After a little research we found out that the optical drives in the new MacBook Pro (PN: GWA4080M) are a slimmer version of current PowerBook slot-loading drives. Being slimmer there are some technical hurdles to cross before they can write at 8x and before they can support the double or dual-layer protocols. This was confirmed with a contact in Apple's storage division. 

So it would appear that Apple is not dropping double-layer support or purposefully shipping slower mechanisms in the new MBP. Given the space limitations in the MacBook Pro these drives are probably the fastest available. Once the technical issues are resolved, later MacBook Pros will certainly write at 8x and support double-layer writing.

I think that while the slower drives are certainly a downside to the new MacBook Pro, they should not be a reason not to buy one. In time new drives will appear which will write at 8x and support double-layer and which can be retro-fit into the first generation MacBook Pro with little trouble and fairly economically - just as you can now fit an 8x double-layer SuperDrive into first generation PowerBook G4s for US$149.

Topic: Apple

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Who really ever upgrades later?

    Those older Powerbook G4s probably don't even command the $149 price on eBay - so does upgrading them make any sense? Apple is hoping that these early adoptor schmucks will just come back later and buy another (newer) MacBook. You can't tell me in the world of commodity products, that APPLE is the only company that can make a "superdrive" of those dimensions! I'm sure that you can already buy something out there with those specs - but Apple didn't want to inflate the initial price tag
    Roger Ramjet
    • You'd be surprised

      I myself don't upgrade later unless I have to (ie. dead harddrive),
      short of maybe a bigger stick of memory. But when it comes to
      'peeling' the aluminum skin off a PowerBook to upgrade a media
      drive or put in a larger harddrive-- no thanks, and I'm not paying
      someone qualified to do so either -- it is just too expensive and
      time consuming to be done right. Getting into those things is like
      microsurgery. Putting them back together PROPERLY is even more
      of a pain. But that is not to say many out there don't. I just don't
      have the patience OR bankroll to do it.
      999ad@...
  • Old news.

    Not to brag but I did mention that there was no double layer support on the 10th of Jan. (http://www.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16611&messageID=329497&start=-1) Although i did incorrectly say dual layer. The drives do read double layer disks so support for burning shouldn't be too far off. (hopefully)
    IdleWanderlust
  • If you don't make DVD's, the speed of the drive

    doesn't realy matter.
    mlindl
  • qwwrbvn 87 lak

    gojgqs,mkvgolbp24, tjgok.
    bmakrejktt4301-24379008915123875014380701288289