New PowerBooks underwhelm
Summary: Only Apple could announce PowerBooks at the same clock speed, and PowerMacs and a lower clock speed and call it an upgrade.
Only Apple could announce PowerBooks at the same clock speed, and PowerMacs and a lower clock speed and call it an upgrade.
There are some really cool things about the new PowerBooks announced yesterday: larger displays, support for the 30-inch Apple Cinema display, faster DDR2 memory and the 8x double-layer SuperDrive. My issue is that the new PowerBook's clock speed is the same as it was before—1.67GHz. Sure the faster RAM and better video card, an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 with 128MB of DDR SDRAM and dual-link DVI for those playing at home, should yield a little better performance, but a 1.67GHz processor?
The new dual-core PowerMac G5 is a stunner, however. And before you jump all over me, I know that two 2.5GHz cores are faster than a single 2.5GHz core. But whatever happened to the 3GHz PowerMacs? No matter how you slice it, the new PowerMacs are going to scream and I have to admit that these are the first PowerMacs that I have ever lusted after. I want one. Bad.
The PowerBooks, however are a yawn upgrade. Sure it would be great to have some additional screen real estate, but this is not an upgrade that I'll be buying. I think that once Apple announced that they were switching to Intel chips Freescale Semiconductor, Motorola's chip division, cut Apple off. Why would Freescale go out of their way to deliver faster chips to Apple when they know that their contract is soon coming to a screeching halt?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I don't think you will see faster PowerBooks until...
There IS a reason they made this switch ya know :)
You don't understand computer architecture
Upgrades of this sort DO make a difference. And for the record, I don't have a Macintosh. I'm speaking purely as someone who understands what's going on under the hood.
-M
One more thing
of the older 5400 RPM models.
I'm buying one
new PowerBook. Understand that I'm limping by on a 1st Gen
TiBook 500 Mhz with 500 Mb of RAM, so this should be a decent
boost for me. I can't really wait at least another year for the
Mactels, and since all of the software I own is PPC, I don't want
to run it under emulation and take a performance hit.
I figure by the time I'm ready to ugrade again, the bugs will have
been worked out with the Mactels, and most software companies
will have native x86 versions of their programs available.
I bought one too
a card slot for the Verizon Broadband Card. So, i got the new PB
and the speed and screen, scroll pad and updated SDrive are
enough for me.
Possible upgrades in the future
And why not? How about making upgrade kits for older macs? How about making upgrade kits for current macs (for when they make faster processors)? There is life in the aftermarket!
bass ackward
Agreed...
deliver faster CPUs. That's why they are switching to Intel. Normally
I don't get upset when I see incorrect articles, but this one was so
easy to get right. Do SOME research please!
Powerbooks vs. PC Notebook
It's all they had
dual core G4 about now (as was "planned") but that's not
happening. The 1% chance was due to the fact that Freescale
might actually have wanted to make some good sales off of it
before the Mactel PB showed up.
The new PB does add some nice features, especially with the
display, and the memory change and 7200 HD are going to help
performance - with the faster HD probably being the most
noticeable. The hidden factor is the enhancements PLUS the
price cuts. The new 15" PB is significant lower in price than the
1.5 I bought when you consider that I had to pay for more
VRAM, the 80 gig HD, SuperDrive, Airport and BT.
For those that really need a notebook the PB is a very good
value. For people like me there is no need to change, especially
since 90% of the time the PB is attached to a 23" display at work.
Stuck on processor speed
Stuck on processor speed -- Indeed.
Big Problem with the Memory DDR2 400 not really.
http://www.apple.com/powerbook/specs.html
I was hoping someone would have pointed this out long ago but after a recent trip to my local apple store I have found that even the sales people don't read the tech specs.
akfulqc 60 nme