Robots agree: iPhone touchscreen is most precise
Summary: Moto.com did some robotic testing of the sensitivity and precision of the latest crop of smartphone touchscreens and the iPhone appears to win the day.
Moto.com did some robotic testing of the sensitivity and precision of the latest crop of smartphone touchscreens and the iPhone wins the day.
It concludes that the iPhone competitors use "last-generation silicon and touch panel components" but that Apple won't have as big of a lead for long.
In the long run, however, we don’t expect this high degree of touchscreen variation between handset manufacturers to continue in such dramatic form. Right now, capacitive touchscreens are a relatively new feature to appear in consumer electronics products. And as we’ve pointed out several times before, creating a seamless touchscreen experience is hard work that requires a high level of commitment to technology integration and interdisciplinary teamwork. Over time more brand-name manufacturers will acquire the expertise required to deliver excellent touchscreen products.
In my own testing I found the iPhone touchscreen to be vastly superior to the touchscreen on my Nexus One. My N1 frequently refused to accept touches in the lower area of the screen (causing me not to be able to answer calls, or retrieve voicemail). My Nexus One would often lose its calibration and select completely different areas of the screen than I was touching. When I inquired about the issue, Google offered that "there are some people who just may not have as good an experience with capacitive sensors." Sensing that this could be problem with my specific Nexus One I asked to have my unit swapped out, but HTC simply didn't reply to my emails.
Click over the labs.moto.com for a video of the robot in action and for the full results.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Robots agree: iPhone touchscreen is most precise
Let the whining begin.
The android, err robot arm validates the testing done by
hand a few weeks ago.
contradiction of previous post?
So, on balance, which phone do you prefer?
Not a contradiction...
I'm prepping a piece on the ways that the iPhone beats the Nexus One -- and there aren't many (think apps) -- but insofar as the touchscreen is concerned, the iPhone definitely wins.
- Jason
I'm surprised you didn't mention Flash
Flash is not on Android yet
will definitely improve browsing experience.
Yup - I want more ads to improve my browsing experience
But ALL touchscreens ARE the same!!!!
And
Mom says I have to clean my room!!!
And
I'm a moron who hates everything Apple!!!
And
Anyone who buys anything Apple must be a Jobs
worshiper and thinks Jobs is Jesus!!!
Sorry Jason... I just wanted to see what it
felt like to be a Troll... That really
sucked... It actually hurts to be that
ignorant... LOL
Hmm could it be
<i>"Sensing that this could be problem with my specific Nexus One I asked to have my unit swapped out, but HTC simply didn?t reply to my emails."</i>
Not to mention, non-reply would indicate very poor customer service. I won't buy products that have companies that won't stand behind their product.
When I build a custom built computer, I always buy parts that come from reputable companies that stand behind every product they make. Asus, AMD, Thermaltake, and so on.
If you cannot get this company to stand behind a product within the same year the product was released, well then I would buy from someone else.
RE: Robots agree: iPhone touchscreen is most precise
decisions seem to always favor the Nexus phone. It seems that
the fanboys are desperately grasping at ANYTHING to be able to
claim that the iPhone is better at something. I had the iPhone 3G
and recently switched to an Android. I can tell you first hand that
the iPhone is extremely outdated.
This is Apple marketing FUD
surprise.
please provide evidence...
Okay NZ
Double Standards Queued.
These results don't count, according to Apple zealot rules
CEO "used" to work for Apple.
http://www.moto.com/about_02.html
[i]J. Daniell Hebert
CEO and Co-Founder
...
and later joined Apple Computer as a researcher of
advanced manufacturing systems[/i]
It also states that moto is privately funded,
obviously by Apple.
Sorry Apple zealots but whenever any report comes out favoring anything MS and it turns out that anyone that
had anything to do with that report has even the tiniest connection to Microsoft, that report is
immediately invalidated in your eyes. Well, same goes
here.
Cue the double standards...
obviously by Apple
Sure NZ, you're often SO accurate.
You're as spot on as a 2007 investment realtor saying, 'You can't
loozzze!"
So the guy used to work for Apple
And while it does indeed say that Moto is a privately funded company there is no proof that Apple is funding it or has anything to do with Moto... Again, provide some proof or stop spreading the FUD.
And yes I'd say the same exact thing if Herbert worked for Microsoft or Google and the results favored the WM based phones or the Android based phones... unless and until there is proof that one company is funding Moto to make a biased report.
However, the results jive with my own personal experiences with the iPhone and the Driod... admittedly my experience with the Droid was limited to playing with the demo model in a VZW store but I felt the device to be less responsive than my iPhone.
The WM/ Android Zealots may not count this due to Herbert previously working for Apple and the Apple Zealots probably would not count it if Herbert worked for MS or Google but for the rest of us until there is definite irrefutable proof that Apple is paying Moto I'm not buying your kool aid.
You like this sort of logic don't you!!!
anything MS and it turns out that anyone that
had anything to do with that report has even the tiniest connection to
Microsoft, that report is
immediately invalidated in your eyes.[/i]
Maybe it does invalidate it - maybe it doesn't.
Check the methodology and argue the facts.
This quoting supposed zealots from other posts, often with what they
didn't say then arguing against that rather than the facts is just
pointless.
Yo sir are a zealot, and you know it -so cut this crap.
How many times do you think you can say 'cult' and 'zealot' without it
becoming obvious what you are doing?
And do you really think calling yourself NonZealot is believable past
the first posting?
Please, Do not feed the troll
negative B.S. on every article containing the word Apple in it. Things like
facts and logic do not fit in the Zealot?s world. This is the type of fool
that complains that Apple?s hardware is overpriced junk; then claims to
have purchased a MacBook Pro, just to install windows on it. No one
really believes the garbage spewed by the Windows Zealot. At least Mike
Cox is funny, this fool is the village idiot.
So what. My finger is large enough
Jason reported "real world" problems with the N1
"In my own testing I found the iPhone touchscreen to be vastly superior to the touchscreen on my Nexus One. My N1 frequently refused to accept touches in the lower area of the screen (causing me not to be able to answer calls, or retrieve voicemail). My Nexus One would often lose its calibration and select completely different areas of the screen than I was touching."
That sounds more like a mechanical problem
My assumption would be that the phone is somewhat defective, and needing to be replaced.