The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Steve Jobs WiFi troubles, could they have been avoided?

By | June 9, 2010, 9:17am PDT

Summary: The WiFi glitches that prevented Steve Jobs from accessing the Web at WWDC could have been prevented. Here’s how.

During Monday’s WWDC keynote Steve Jobs suffered through a number of WiFi glitches that prevented him from accessing a number of Web sites.

The problems begin at about 39:50 into the keynote (video), when Jobs tries to connect to the New York Times Web site from the iPhone. Jobs gives an audible sniff of disgust (40:03) when the page doesn’t load, saying “our networks in here are always unpredictable, so… no idea what we’re going to find,” then “they are slow today.”

40:20 “you know you can help me out if you’re on WiFi, if you’d just get off… I’d appreciate it” (laughs). Then he finally gave up, saying “I have a problem and I’m not going to be able to show you much today.” He then punted to show photos from the camera roll – which doesn’t require a network connection.

Glenn Fleishman posits that it was the overwhelming number of portable WiFi access points (like the MiFi) competing for airspace that caused the problems. According to InfoWorld’s consultation with an Apple engineer at the event, over 500 networks were in operation at the same time.

An Apple engineer later told me there were 527 Wi-Fi hotspots set up in the room, most of which were MiFi devices, which connect to the Internet via 3G and set up a local Wi-Fi network so that laptops and mobile devices can access the Internet through them. More than 1,100 devices were connected to those and other local Wi-Fi networks set up by attendees, he said.

I spoke with executives at AirTight Networks (disclosure: I consult for AirTight), a wireless intrusion protection system provider, this morning about Jobs’ troubles and they confirmed that the WiFi congestion issue is well known and that 500+ competing WiFi networks could easily have caused the type of problems that Jobs experienced on stage. Even worse, just one malicious user could have easily launched a DDOS attack targeting Apple’s WiFi network, bringing it down. They went on to say that their WiFi sensors could have warned Apple engineers in advance about the proliferation of rogue AP’s allowing them to make adjustments as necessary.

But at what price? Should Apple be able to own the airspace during its keynote addresses and shut down rogue access points? I think that with the right notification they could because WWDC is, after all, a private, invitation-only event.

However, the journalist in me (not to mention my editors) would be furious if I wasn’t able to get a reliable connection to upload blow-by-blow accounts and photos from the event. Apple could easily quell the need to liveblog the event (and the proliferation of rogues) by simply providing live audio and video streams via the Internet.

What’s your take? Will/should Apple patrol the airwaves during its next live event?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason O'Grady is a journalist and author specializing in mobile technology. He has published six books on Apple and mobile gadgets and his PowerPage blog has been publishing for over 15 years.

Disclosure

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady is the creator and editor of O'Grady's PowerPage, which has been publishing mobile technology news since 1995. He maintains an advertising relationship with the following legacy advertisers on the PowerPage:

  • Amazon Associates
  • Google Adsense
  • Tekserve
  • Advertising on the PowerPage is brokered by a third-party agency (BackBeat Media) and he recuses himself from these negotiations.

Biography

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady developed an affinity for Apple computers after using the original Lisa, and this affinity turned into a bona-fide obsession when he got the original 128 KB Macintosh in 1984.

He started writing one of the first Web sites about Apple (O'Grady's PowerPage) in 1995 and is considered to be one of the fathers of blogging. He has been a frequent speaker at the Macworld Expo conference and a member of the conference faculty. He also co-founded the first dedicated PowerBook User Group (PPUG) in the United States.

After winning a major legal battle with Apple in 2006, he set the precedent that independent journalists are entitled to the same protections under the First Amendment as members of the mainstream media.

O'Grady is the author of The Nexus One Pocket Guide, The Droid Pocket Guide, The Google Phone Pocket Guide, and The Garmin nuvi Pocket Guide (Peachpit Press), the author of Corporations That Changed the World: Apple Inc. (Greenwood Press), and a contributor to The Mac Bible (Peachpit Press). In addition, he has contributed to numerous Mac publications over the years, including MacWEEK, Macworld, and MacPower (Japan).

When he's not writing about Apple for ZDNet at The Apple Core, he enjoys spending time with his family in New Jersey.

42
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Steve Jobs WiFi troubles, could they have been avoided?
arabaoyunlari@... 11th Aug
@brble That is really a big question. Google's servers are the heart of Google's business. And it has long been a FEATURE, a FEATURE, not a LOOPHOLE, that one could privately modify the GPL code they use to run their business. Of course web applications are obviously SaaS. But where does one draw the line between those applications and the servers that host them? For example, take an insurance company running open source on their back end servers. At some point they decide to put a customer facing front end on those servers so that customers can access their accounts over the Net. Does that suddenly make that whole kaboodle Saas? If so, I am not sure I am comfortable with AGPL. In fact, I am not sure I am comfortable with this concept anyway since it undercuts one of the few provisions that make GPL software highly attractive to businesses that are not engaged in reselling the software itself. It really compromises the spirit of the GPL in some ways.
I'd be curious to hear if anyone in the audience experienced similar issues. Seems like enough journalists were there to be able to report any issues.
0 Votes
+ -
@brble I don't know why Apple being such a forward thinking company doesn't just broadcast the thing live on the net anyway. That would avoid all of this crazyness. Developers would still come to the event for the rest of the panels etc.
@frank dib 527 base stations operating at a power rate of about 100 milliwatts, isn't that a bit dangerous? The cumulative power would be 52 Watts worth of microwave power (for reference: a typical microwave operates at 700 Watts). On a typical place over there, the power would be around 20 Watts. I think that's a lot.
0 Votes
+ -
At the time the white iPhone arrived, most in the tech industry were expecting the next iPhone to accessmedicalbooks from this we cartecampus to get the internetparalaevangelizacion will have any pcloshwdb that can be estudielenco from be
released just a couple months later in June/July, since that?s been Apple?s pattern for the past four
years. In retrospect, the launch of the white iPhone in April along with the launch of the Verizon
iPhone in January should have been clear signs that pattern wasn?t going to continue this year.
current expectation is thatthe next iPhone will arrive this fall, potentially sporting Verizon LTE 4G connectivity.
The change in release schedule has certainly given the white iPhone 4 a longer shelf life.
significance of this product has nothing to do with the fact that it will likely be on the market for just
5-6 months. It?s about the power of ?No.?
This email promotion for the white iPhone 4 even has Apple poking fun at the delay. Photo credit: Apple
0 Votes
+ -
The significance of the white iPhone 4 is that Apple didn?t release it until it got it accessmedicalbooks from this we cartecampus to get the internetparalaevangelizacion will have any pcloshwdb that can be estudielenco from right.
0 Votes
+ -
The company apparently said ?No? to the product over and over again. Over the last couple of years, our Client and Mobile team has done a fantastic job of building a number of XAML related technologies that have been a huge value add to the Microsoft client platforms and an instrumental part of delighting our developer customers. The agility and customer focus that the team has demonstrated over the years has been a pleasure to ipad bag blog of best sutudeg community the modern education news and watch.
because it wasn?t quite right and Apple felt that customers wouldn?t have been happy with it.
0 Votes
+ -
@brble

If Apple already has their sohbet iOS devices connected in order to chat broadcast the screens during the demos, why not just use the portal 30 pin connector for internet access and forum forgo the issues of the spectrum being taken over by rogue APs - I'm sure Apple engineers could figure something out easily.
0 Votes
+ -
@cstrathmore I don't know why Apple being such a forward thinking company doesn't just broadcast the thing live on the net anyway. That would avoid all of this crazyness. Developers would still come to the event for the rest of the panels etc. pembe maske energy balance oyna oyunu moliva orjin krem
@brble

YES! because GOD FORBID apple come up with its' own freakin' print utility for it's toys macera oyunlari mario oyunlari
@brble My guess is that as more and more people start using open source based development software stacks, the percentage contributing back will fall. Early adopters are enthusiastic and are more devoted to the cause. Many times the custom code that a programmer develops may designed specifically for their scenario. It takes time to document and deliver code that is consumable for the broader community. It's no surprise that the use of Windows as a desktop operating system is falling in popularity with this group. Linux has become a more viable option, and someone who believes in developing using a open source software stack is more likely to choose an open source desktop OS to work on
@brble No surprises here. Network storage is such a key component of most cloud architectures that it can and does serve as a bellwether of cloud adoption. What has yet to be determined is the correlation between network storage growth and cloud growth on a revenue basis. Given the variability of usage on cloud platforms and the ratio of storage to computational usage, are cloud revenues growing at 50% Y/Y? It's hard to say, which begs the question whether or not we're seeing the beginnings of a storage bubble developing in advance of expected cloud computing demand. In any respect, thank you for sharing these great data points with us. I look forward to future insights from you.
@brble That is really a big question. Google's servers are the heart of Google's business. And it has long been a FEATURE, a FEATURE, not a LOOPHOLE, that one could privately modify the GPL code they use to run their business. Of course web applications are obviously SaaS. But where does one draw the line between those applications and the servers that host them? For example, take an insurance company running open source on their back end servers. At some point they decide to put a customer facing front end on those servers so that customers can access their accounts over the Net. Does that suddenly make that whole kaboodle Saas? If so, I am not sure I am comfortable with AGPL. In fact, I am not sure I am comfortable with this concept anyway since it undercuts one of the few provisions that make GPL software highly attractive to businesses that are not engaged in reselling the software itself. It really compromises the spirit of the GPL in some ways.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't tell Google
dunraven 9th Jun 2010
about that DDoS option...
All those MiFis probably don't use the 5mhz 802.11n band so why didn't Apple usurp that spectrum for demo use and leave the 2.4Mhz to the attendees.
0 Votes
+ -
@kennmsr While the iPhone 4 does support 802.11n, it only does so in the 2.4 GHz band, not the 5 GHz band. It would be nice if the iPhone 4 did in fact support 5 GHz, but I guess the radio chipset isn't there yet.
@kennmsr iPhone 4 supports only 2.4 GHz, not 5.8 GHz. The high-frequency chipset is more expensive than the low-frequency one.
@ctxppc
Hows abouty a nice Steve Job's gold-plated executive version of the iPhone 4 with 5Ghz 11.n WiFi happy

BTW just to clarify cordless phones operate on 5.8Ghz. WiFi is centred on 2.4Ghz and 5.0Ghz (not Mhz)!!
...why mention the company you do work for at all?
Next time Steve should have a Faraday cage on stage, with it's own wifi hub inside - and ignore the outside world...
0 Votes
+ -
If Apple already has their iOS devices connected in order to broadcast the screens during the demos, why not just use the 30 pin connector for internet access and forgo the issues of the spectrum being taken over by rogue APs - I'm sure Apple engineers could figure something out easily.
Maybe they should just do pre-recorded video of the operations if they can not squelch out their own section of bandwidth, or perhaps seek out a wired solution. They could always just ban the use of MiFi and set up racks where pre-registered guest can plug into a wired network.
all he had to do was use a phone from HTC...

happy
@John Zern Every device would have a problem there, except of course if it was using the cellular network. It's Wi-Fi, and you can't avoid problems in the airspace.

By the way, how should Steve use the HTC to demonstrate the iPhone's screen? Not so logical? And you know, the iPhone is from Apple, and WWDC is managed exclusively by Apple. Apple hates HTC. Your answer seems a (heck of a) bit weird. wink
0 Votes
+ -
@ctxppc John Zern Every device would have a problem there, except of course if it was using the cellular network. It's Wi-Fi, and you can't avoid problems in the airspace.

By the way, how should Steve use the HTC to demonstrate the iPhone's screen? Not so logical? And you know, the iPhon orjin krem
altin cileke is from Apple, and WWDC is managed exclusively by Apple. Apple hates HTC. Your answer seems a (heck of a) bit weird.
@John Zern
You feel cute now? You feel like you added levity? Feel like you stuck it to the "man"? Really you just made yourself look foolish.
0 Votes
+ -
Banning MiFi and similar ad-hoc access points would be a good first step, and then provide adequate public access points for live blogging. It could then be coordinated so that Steve has his own AP on a channel unused by anything else.
0 Votes
+ -
So next year
Ken_z 9th Jun 2010
Apple engineers will have a solution in place.

As the "One More Thing" Jobs will announce the solution as a new Apple Product, available immediately, for $299.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know why Apple being such a forward thinking company doesn't just broadcast the thing live on the net anyway. That would avoid all of this crazyness. Developers would still come to the event for the rest of the panels etc.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple WiFi problems not new
CJConine 10th Jun 2010
There have been over 1000 post on Apple discussion forum about the SL release causing WiFi problems on Mac (new and old) when none existed before with their previous OS's or with other existing devices and Windows machines. See http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2142725&start=975&tstart=150
0 Votes
+ -
Except this wasn't related...
nix_hed 10th Jun 2010
Why don't you set up 527 different WAPs and then try to connect to the one you set up. with an average of 47 access points per channel, there's bound to be interference that slows everyone down.

If Apple learns something from this, is that they should configure the auditorium with 3 or 4 public access points and 2 private access points, along with the cell phone killers used in places where they want to force you not to use a cell phone.
0 Votes
+ -
Two questions
ctxppc Updated - 10th Jun 2010
527 base stations operating at a power rate of about 100 milliwatts, isn't that a bit dangerous? The cumulative power would be 52 Watts worth of microwave power (for reference: a typical microwave operates at 700 Watts). On a typical place over there, the power would be around 20 Watts. I think that's a lot.
@ctxppc
Why do you think Steve Jobs has cancer. Go figure...
0 Votes
+ -
They should have set up a network only for him!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix