ie8 fix
madison

94 more secret Windows shortcuts

By | January 12, 2010, 6:25pm PST

Last week the blogosphere went temporarily insane over a simple GUID that displays a list of Control Panel shortcuts. It’s not even close to deserving the “God mode” label, but I’m still hearing about it. As I noted in response, that’s only one of 39 GUID shortcuts available in Windows 7. But even those are esoteric and mostly of interest to programmers and geeks.

But there’s another, much larger class of well-hidden Windows shortcuts that are useful to everyone, not just techies. I dug through my notes for Windows 7 Inside Out and found a treasure trove of information about these shortcuts. They wound up on the cutting-room floor for that first edition, but are scheduled to be in the expanded second edition in a year or so.

The shortcuts I’m referring to involve the shell command, which is curiously undocumented in the Windows 7 Help files or on Microsoft’s web site. The idea is to give Windows programs and users access to common locations using the Windows shell, Windows Explorer. The syntax is simple—you type shell, followed by a colon and the name of the shell folder location. That list of folder locations is hard to memorize, with lots of inconsistencies especially in regard to spacing. For example, the shell shortcut for the shared Downloads folder is shell:CommonDownloads, whereas the equivalent shortcut to the shared Documents folder is shell:Common Documents. And the command will not tolerate typos. If you add a space in the former or leave out the space in the latter, the shortcuts won’t work. The good news is that these commands are not case-sensitive, so you can ignore the sometimes odd capitalization.

Despite the syntactic challenges, these shortcuts are very useful for some tasks. They’re especially good for fast typists who don’t want to move their hands from the keyboard to do a bunch of mouse movements. If that’s you, tap the Windows key to open the Start menu with the insertion point already positioned in the Search box. Then type shell: followed by the location.

I’ve broken the full list of 94 shortcuts into four groups, each with its own page. If you want to dive right in, here are the links to click. But I suggest you keep reading for some examples of shortcuts that I find worth memorizing.

Note that many, but not all, of these shortcuts work with Windows Vista, and a smaller subset work with Windows XP. For this post I assume you’re using Windows 7.

The following list includes my favorite Windows shell shortcuts, those that I use regularly:

shell:Profile
This opens your user profile folder (on a default installation, you’ll find this at c:\users\username). You can get the same results by clicking your account name at the top of the Start menu’s right column. This location is also accessible via the environment variable %userprofile%.

shell:Personal
Typing this command takes you straight to the Documents folder in your user profile. You can reach the same destination by clicking the Documents shortcut on the Start menu’s right column.

shell:SendTo
This one solves a real usability problem for Windows users who are used to running with hidden files visible. If you look in your user profile folder, you’ll see a normally hidden SendTo shortcut. But clicking that shortcut displays this error message:

That’s because this shortcut is actually a junction, created for backwards compatibility. The real SendTo folder is several subfolders deep in your profile’s hidden AppData folder. After you use the shell command to open this file, you can add shortcuts that appear on the Send To menu when you right-click a file or folder. Add a shortcut to your favorite text or hex editor and you can view any file by sending it to that shortcut with a right-click.

shell:Public
Use this command to open the default collection of shared folders on your machine. If you use Homegroups, these folders act as dropboxes for shared libraries on your system, and this is an easy way to see (and search) their contents in one window.

shell:Common Startup and shell:Startup
Which shortcuts are loaded automatically when you start Windows? Program installers often create a shortcut that run automatically at startup. Some even offer the choice of running for just your account or for all users. You’ll find these shortcuts in two separate Startup folders, one buried deep in the hidden AppData folder of your user profile, the other in the hidden ProgramData folder, which is in the root of your system drive.

shell:ConnectionsFolder
This might not be the most elegant way to get to the Network Connections folder, but it’s definitely faster than the official path. Without this trick, you have to stumble to the Network and Sharing Center, then click Change Adapter Settings in the navigation pane.

shell:Programs and shell:Common Programs
These two folders (from your personal profile and the ProgramData folder, respectively) combine to create the All Programs list on your Start Menu. The mouse-driven alternative is to click the Start menu, right-click All Programs, and choose Open (for your profile) or Open All Users (for the much more densely populated list available to any user account).

shell:AppData and shell:Local AppData
These shortcuts open the Roaming Application Data and Local Application Data folders, respectively. In everyday use, you don’t need (or event want) access to these folders, but knowing their whereabouts is handy when you want to work directly with saved settings for a program. You’ll find Firefox and Thunderbird user profiles here, and most e-mail programs (including Outlook and Windows Live Mail) store the files containing saved messages and contacts here as well.

shell:Cookies and shell:cache
These shortcuts are, without question, the fastest way to see information saved by Internet Explorer. The first shortcut lets you inspect and manage saved cookies; the second opens the Temporary Internet Files folder. The alternative involves much spelunking through the Internet Options dialog box and is not recommended for long-term sanity.

Want to see the entire list? Click that link below.

Page 2: Folders from current user profiles –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

50
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks Ed
lehnerus2000 13th Jan 2010
These might be handy.

lehnerus2000
0 Votes
+ -
That is a good article, thank you. Chanel Shoulder Bag
0 Votes
+ -
Re: shell:AppData and shell:Local AppData
bmeacham98@... 13th Jan 2010
I certainly do want access to these folders in order to back up my email and contacts! Thanks for the tip.
0 Votes
+ -
Backing up your email and contacts
klystron91311 13th Jan 2010
shell:AppData takes you to the location like ..\Application Data\Microsoft\Address Book
It would be risky to backup your email or contacts by simply copying the contents of these folders to a backup location. Email and Contacts are most often backed up into a form that is restorable from within your mail client application ( I can only guess your using some version of Outlook). The best and safest way to backup your email and contacts is to export or archive it into a file format that can be restored (for outlook a .pst file, or a tab-delimited .csv file). It can be an awful process depending on which mail client app you use.
0 Votes
+ -
Bug or By Design?
nestorsanchez@... 13th Jan 2010
Try changing the location the Documents, for example, and the shell:Personal command will display the default location, not the new one.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Works fine here
Ed Bott 13th Jan 2010
I just tested on a clean installation of Windows 7 Enterprise and the relocated folder shows up as the target of shell:Personal.
0 Votes
+ -
Wouldn't it be more efficient if....
elCharles 13th Jan 2010
Most of these are truly just shortcuts to folders, wouldn't it
be more efficient if users were just to create folder full of
their favorite of these shrotcuts on their desktop? That way
users would not have to 1) memorize this syntax 2) type it in
every single time. they need just navigat to an time they use
frequenty once, make a shortcut, and then they will never
have to search for that item, or memorize this syntax, ever
again.
0 Votes
+ -
Shortcuts in a file manager
nfordzdn 13th Jan 2010
I use a freebie dual-pane file manager by the name of "xplorer2". One of its features is the ability to save shortcuts for folders to display. I entered the shell commands I wanted to use and saved the resulting paths as shortcuts, so now I can bring them up with a click without having to type anything in or navigate to a folder with shortcuts in it.
0 Votes
+ -
Have to agree
klystron91311 13th Jan 2010
Yup do the work once making all your shortcuts and then forget about all the shell commands. You could even hack the registry to overwrite all these locations with custom ones you pick. Most of these shell: commands seem to work in XP too, definitely not a win7 exclusive.
0 Votes
+ -
Good plan here
john3347 19th Jan 2010
In addition to creating a desktop folder of shortcuts, it would be VERY handy to be able to group and arrange these shortcuts within the suggested folder according to user preference. This ability, however has been taken away from us with the introduction of Windows 7. We must now accept alphabetical arrangement with no ability to change the order.
0 Votes
+ -
These are very helpful!

However, they did not seem to work consistently. When executed from the Run box, they open the Explorer window, as expected. But when typed in a command prompt, they do not seem to work.

Any idea about all the various ways these shell: commands can work? i.e., can they be used in ways like %WINDIR%?
0 Votes
+ -
CMD window commands need to be prefaced...
PollyProteus 13th Jan 2010
... with "Start" if you want to get an explorer window.

so in a CMD window you would type the following:

"start shell:CommonDownloads"

to get the Shared Downloads folder.

Also, if you're in a CMD window and you want an explorer window to the folder that the command prompt points to, just type in "Start ." and press enter.

The period basically says "here" and launches an Explorer window to that location.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Different rules
Ed Bott Updated - 13th Jan 2010
These can't be used as direct parameters to a command or shortcut, as environment variables can. In those cases you can use %localappdata% and so on.

As for shortcuts, use the shell command to open a window, then drag the contents of the address bar to the desktop or another folder.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks PollyProteus and Ed! (nt)
Speednet 13th Jan 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
NOW all I need is the shortcut for.....
carlsf@... 13th Jan 2010
The "CLASSIC" option that was in XP, Vista and NOW THANKS MS is no longer there.
If MS wants us )115) to move to WIN7 then we need/require this option.
This and the "RIBBON" are the reasons why we will remain with XP, VISTA and Office 2003.
0 Votes
+ -
agree, except
bmeacham98@... 13th Jan 2010
I would remain with XP and Office 2003, but not Vista. But I just got a new machine and got Win7 Pro on it. There are definitely some things about it that are cool, and not just eye candy either. It is much easier to connect to public WiFi in a coffee shop, for instance.
0 Votes
+ -
"Classic" Windows
ag0044 13th Jan 2010
Try looking on SourceForge for "Classic Shell". It may do some/much of what you want.
0 Votes
+ -
"Classic" Windows isn't that great
Rick_R 13th Jan 2010
I tried it. At least the free version has LOTS of problems. For instance, you can't copy and paste, drag and drop, etc. There are several commercial programs more like the Classic menu but they go for about $30 per seat. That can get pretty expensive for a home user with several computers.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
seancecil@... 13th Jan 2010
why does windows thrive on caos! were is the system that was supposed to make our lives simpler?all the geekodites LOOOOVE complication it makes up for there lack of social skills ."lets teach those bullies that WE are the power players now!"they say.
Come on guys and gals, dont use your gift as retribution for those lunkheads!Get some counseling, balance your life and use your gifts to better the world not complicate it.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Um, OK?
Ed Bott 13th Jan 2010
That makes absolutely no sense.
0 Votes
+ -
I think you may need to take your own advice - Sheesh. nt
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 13th Jan 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Dude, they're just shortcuts
Michael Kelly 13th Jan 2010
I don't think a shortcut is going to make a major difference in how a system is administered. Certainly not enough to separate the highly skilled from the marginally skilled.
0 Votes
+ -
Dang Dude, I am embarrassed for you ...
babyboomer57 13th Jan 2010
Please take off the tinfoil hat before posting in the future, we here speak English.
0 Votes
+ -
Awesome Ed, as always. Thank you - nt
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 13th Jan 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks Ed. A good article
Tom6 13th Jan 2010
Articles like this is why i signed up to ZdNet. It's good to get some neat tricks to try happy

Thanks Ed
Regards from
Tom happy
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
DarienHawk67 13th Jan 2010
Some I knew; others I did not. This is a very good list to have available.
0 Votes
+ -
Network Connections window
Darr247 Updated - 13th Jan 2010
"Without this trick, you have to stumble to the Network and Sharing Center, then click Change Adapter Settings in the navigation pane."

Ah, no. Orb->Run, NCPA.CPL [Enter]
0 Votes
+ -
No, I am not using Windows 7.
(I will be sticking with XP, until there is a very good reason to change.)
So your title should have mentioned that it is really meant to be read by those users.
That would have saved me the time taken to discover this.
Talking about saving people time, surely everyone does not wish to read EVERY post, just to see if it interests them.
This web site SHOULD BLANK the Subject box, so that we are forced to enter a meaningful Title/Subject.
I apologize that my above post does not have a meaningful Subject (as it fooled me again).
0 Votes
+ -
If you haven't disabled Javascript...
D T Schmitz 14th Jan 2010
...clicking at end of subject line blanks out the line for you.

Try it. Or disable NoScript if you are running it.
0 Votes
+ -
Even the option to place my reply under yours is not idiot proof. So my reply appears lower down as a separate post (look for RANT).
In other forums if you click a post then your reply appears under it.
If you wish a fresh post, there is usually a large button at the bottom.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
cazeault@... 14th Jan 2010
Those a nice to know.

I would like to have just a file (pdf of else) with just the full listing instead of ramming through 5 ou 6 pages.. no?

but the work done is well apreciated...

Henri
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
It's four pages, not "5 or 6"
Ed Bott 14th Jan 2010
...and you can copy and paste them to a document in any format you want in about 20 seconds.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey, Ed
bmgoodman 14th Jan 2010
Let me know where I can download a version of your list in VisiCalc format! wink
0 Votes
+ -
Windows Mobile 7 delayed to 2011?
tim.hobbes 14th Jan 2010
Microsoft will not deny report of Windows Mobile 7 delay to 2011?

http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft-will-not-deny-report-of-Windows-Mobile-7-delay-to-2011/1263332374

I sure hope it is not true! I sure hope Microsoft will be able to deliver a thriving mobile OS, something brilliant like they never did before, and manufacturers will be able to put it in devices before Christmas 2010!

Please, please Microsoft, if you are listening to me, hurry! Drop unfinished features if needed, but launch the new Windows Mobile ASAP, pleeease!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
No
Ed Bott 14th Jan 2010
That's classic "Are you still beating your wife?" reporting.

Microsoft has not announced ship dates and will not comment on this bogus report. For another perspective, see Neowin:

http://www.neowin.net/news/main/10/01/12/windows-mobile-7-delayed-till-2011-umm-no
0 Votes
+ -
nt
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
xp-client 15th Jan 2010
Don't you just love making us click Next..next..next for 5 pages?
0 Votes
+ -
Why do I RANT about this
Rob C Updated - 15th Jan 2010
If you peruse the other posts on this page you will see that quite a few of them do not have a Subject (instead they are showing the Subject of the story that started this page).
That happens because the other posters do not think/remember to type a meaningful Subject.
If the box started out as blank, then they would be forced to type a meaningful subject.
Why do I think that is important ?
I don't know about you, but I have not clicked on every post to read them. Instead I peruse the Subjects and only click on those that interest me.
All those that have the default subject have not been clicked by me.
Have you clicked them all, to see what they are about ?
If you haven't, then please join me in RANTING about this.

EDIT It just happened to me again.
I am now typing a proper Subject
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 94 more secret Windows shortcuts
algzdnet 16th Jan 2010
What link on the right...!
0 Votes
+ -
What link on the right?
pctyson@... Updated - 24th Jan 2010
I was going to to ask the same question. The first page mentions a link that will show all of the shortcuts.

"Want to see the entire list? Click that link on the right."

However, when I view the page there is no link on the right that I can click. Am I missing something?
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
0 Votes
+ -
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix