A first look at Windows 7's pre-beta PDC release

A first look at Windows 7's pre-beta PDC release

Summary: Is it a major release or just a revamped Windows Vista? That’s the big question surrounding Windows 7, which made its public debut in a keynote address by Steven Sinofsky today at the Microsoft Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles.

SHARE:

Is it a major release or just a revamped Windows Vista? That’s the big question surrounding Windows 7, which made its public debut in a keynote address by Steven Sinofsky today at the Microsoft Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles.

Microsoft executives showed off the new Windows upgrade in a day-long series of demos on Sunday, doing their level best to impress a room full of journalists with a long list of new and improved features. At the end of the day, they loaned me a sleek new Lenovo X300 notebook running a recent build of the OS so that I could test Windows 7 for myself.

I’m using that loaner PC to compose this post, but I can’t use several of the key Windows 7 features that I saw over the weekend. The problem? My test machine is running the M3 release of Windows 7, build 6801, which was locked down more than six weeks ago in preparation for distribution at PDC. The demos I saw on Sunday were using more recent builds (6926 and 6933, according to ID tags on the desktop), which contain some significant revisions to core Windows features.


 Image Gallery: See features from the pre-beta release as well as later internal builds not yet publicly released.  Gallery: Windows 7 PDC release Gallery: Windows 7 PDC release 

As a result of that dichotomy, the gallery that accompanies this post contains a mix of screen shots I created and screens provided by Microsoft from those later builds. (My Windows Vista Inside Out co-author Carl Siechert assisted in the preparation of this post and the accompanying screen shots.)

This loaner machine certainly doesn’t feel like it’s running pre-beta code. It’s wicked fast and eerily quiet thanks to a solid state drive. In a very long day’s worth of use it has yet to crash or display any of the flaky behavior you might expect from a beta.

So what’s in Windows 7?

The most visible new features are enhancements that streamline core Windows tasks like connecting to a wireless network or organizing a digital music collection. But the new OS features are more than just skin-deep; there are also improvements to core components, such as an innovative way to stream music and other media directly to network-connected media players.

Connecting to a wireless network in Windows 7

Some of the tweaks to the Windows interface are blindingly obvious, at least in retrospect. Explorer windows now include a button that toggles the preview pane on and off; in Vista, you have to drill three levels deep into a menu to enable or disable the preview pane. Much cooler is the new technique for maximizing, restoring, and resizing a window. Drag the window’s title bar to the top of the screen and it maximizes. Drag the title bar of a maximized window away from the top of the screen and it restores to its former position. Drag a window to either side of the screen and it resizes to fill half the screen. Drag another window to the opposite side and, voila, you now have two windows arranged side by. side

On the next page, we’ll show you some of other key improvements to the Windows 7 desktop.

Rethinking the Windows taskbar -->

<-- Continued from Page 1

At first glance, the Windows 7 Desktop doesn’t look all that different from its predecessors. Indeed, the taskbar and Start menu in the M3 build look so much like Windows Vista that you might not notice the difference at first. But look a little more closely at this screen shot, taken from a recent build, and you’ll see some noteworthy changes.

the Windows 7 desktop

For starters, the Quick Launch bar is gone; its capabilities are now integrated directly into the taskbar. If you recognize some similarities to the Dock in OS X, you’re half right. The new taskbar borrows some navigation concepts from the Dock and adds some enhancements of its own, all the way retaining the Windows DNA.

You can permanently place program icons on the taskbar, where they allow one-click access to programs. Running programs appear on the taskbar as well.

But the new taskbar isn’t just a program launcher and window switcher. Hovering the mouse pointer over a button that represents multiple running windows displays a strip of thumbnails; hover over a thumbnail and its full-size window appears on the screen. Right-click a taskbar icon (or swipe it with your finger on a touch-enabled screen) and you’ll see a Jump List containing common tasks, recently opened documents, and favorites.

You’ll find that other common tasks have been greatly simplified. For example, it;s now much easier to connect to a wireless network: when a wireless network is available, a tray icon glows. Click to pop up a list of available networks, and click again to choose a network and enter a passphrase or connect to a browser-based logon screen a a hotspot or airport.

Oh, and speaking of making things less annoying, User Account Control, the least-loved feature in Windows Vista, is noticeably less intrusive, thanks to a slider control that lets you dial back its tendencies to nag and pester. As an administrator, you can set it to suppress warnings when you change Windows settings but still alert you if a third-party program is trying to make a potentially dangerous change.

Simpler home networking -->

<-- Continued from Page 2

Networking is tricky, especially for home users. With Vista, Microsoft tried to consolidate networking features in a single location, the Network and Sharing Center, with decidedly mixed results. In Windows 7, the Network and Sharing Center gets a radical overhaul designed to make it simpler to set up and manage small networks. In Windows 7, the Network and Sharing Center includes four links to common tasks instead of a long list of detailed options.

Windows 7Â’s new Network and Sharing Center

If you look closely at the screen shot above, you’ll see an option to create a homegroup. This feature, new in Windows 7, works only if you choose the Home option when you configure your network’s firewall settings. It provides a simplified interface for sharing pictures, music, videos, documents, and printers. The network itself is protected with a strong password, and you have the capability to change or remove sharing at any time.

In theory, at least, the homegroup concept pays off profoundly for workers who carry a notebook between home and work settings. The homegroup helps you connect to the right printer and protect work files from unauthorized access.

Homegroups also offer an interesting capability that digital media fanatics should love: From within Windows, you can stream media to any DLNA server or to a Media Center extender, without jumping through a bunch of configuration hoops. We weren’t able to test this feature using the M3 build.

And while we’re on the subject of Media Center… it gets some interface tweaks, including a new visual style for the main menu and the ability to customize that menu.

Enterprise customers will have plenty of new stuff to chew on, as well. The PowerShell scripting language is part of Windows 7, as are a host of new troubleshooting and administration tools. We especially liked the new Program Compatibility Troubleshooter, which lets you fix programs that fail to run correctly because of permission problems or hard-coded version checks.

BitLocker also gets a new features: the capability to encrypt the contents of a USB flash drive or other removable storage device. This is a logical extension of the BitLocker feature, which first appeared in Vista and was enhanced in Vista Service Pack 1 to allow encryption of hard disks other than the system volume.

One particularly impressive demo we can’t wait to try is the ability to upgrade Windows Vista to Windows 7 from a USB flash drive. From start to finish, the installation took roughly 30 minutes, a dramatic improvement over the slow upgrade process in Vista.

We couldn’t test most of these new enterprise features but will come back to them after a few months of use.

That lineup of features only begins to scratch the surface. I haven’t mentioned IE8, or the many Windows Live Essentials applications that will be bundled with most OEM machines, or themes, or … Well, you get the idea.

So, is this a major release or not? After seeing the lengthy list of new features and the small improvements in so many aspects of everyday Windows use, I’m inclined to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt and say, yes, it probably is.

The real test, of course, will come when release candidates are available and we finally get a chance to measure performance. Can Windows 7 really boot in 20 seconds or less and perform impressively on a low-powered netbook? If it can, it deserves to be called a major upgrade.

See also:

Seven questions Microsoft won't answer about Windows 7

Microsoft readies pre-beta release of 'Windows 7 Server'

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes: Windows 7 must support netbooks

Jason Hiner: Windows 7: Five things Microsoft must do

Topics: Software, Microsoft, Networking, Operating Systems, Windows

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

242 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • When the big day comes ...

    and Windows 7 is released, I would consider it as an alternative and possible replacement for XP; if it is cost effective.
    softwareFlunky
    • Just tired of change for the sake of change.

      Just tired of change for the sake of change.

      Maybe this is an improvement in the user enterface but I now think of this stuff like fins on a car or extra chrome where no chrome is needed.

      Put the controls somewhere and leave them alone.
      deowll
  • Verdict Is Going To Be Out For Awhile On This Ed

    Most people who purchased Vista are going to hold out because they are still feeling the pain of being burned by Microsoft on their not ready for prime time release of Vista.

    I was fortunate enough to get mine via MSDN through my employer, so I didn't have to pay for it, and I hope I will be able to do the same with Windows 7...as for people who paid for Windows Vista, I hope Microsoft has enough fortitude to offer a discount for now coming out with Windows 7 "Vista only better" as Ballmer puts it.
    itanalyst2@...
    • I Disagree

      I disagree with your assessment. Most people that use Vista on a daily basis love it.

      Some people used it once and had some hardware issues. They let that one experience define Vista for them... they are the ones that will choose to be skeptical.
      mikefarinha
      • You Forgot The Huge Majority

        Those home users who bought a desktop or laptop that were really meant for XP and Microsoft and the seller graciously slapped a "Vista Capable" sticker with them, conning the user into thinking they had a fast, reliable system when they really had something so slow it forced them to purchase hardware to upgrade.
        itanalyst2@...
        • The hardware wasn't the issue

          The hardware wasn't the issue for these PCs. It was the immature drivers the hardware vendors released.

          My wife's eMachine (purchased in Oct 2005) runs Vista Business silky-smooth. Her specs... Single Core Athlon 3600+(2.2GHz), 1.8GB ram(I upgraded a while back) ATI IGP with 16MB shared RAM.

          Her PC runs Vista just as well as my dual core AMD 3800+ w/4GB of RAM, and ATI Radeon 3650.

          So you can stop with the FUD anytime now.
          mikefarinha
          • thats not exactly a bad spec'd emachine

            so i hope it would work.
            deaf_e_kate
          • This was a budget PC 3 years ago.

            I never said that this was a bad spec'd machine. However my point being was that it was a budget PC 3 years ago($600 IIRC, and came with lexmark printer and 15" LCD monitor), over a year before Vista was released.

            To say that a budget PC released two years ago is some how less capable of running Vista than a budget PC from three years ago is asinine.
            mikefarinha
          • It's interesting to see what you consider a "not bad" spec'd system.

            It gives me a frame of reference.
            ye
          • So why is Microsoft annoucing Windows 7?

            They're given up Vista themselves.
            GoPower
          • Perhaps Because Technology Doesn't Stand Still?

            Why has Apple announced Snow Leopard? Why has any company announced any future version of their existing software?

            You're insinuations are quite annoying.
            mikefarinha
          • Call me crazy...

            ...but I think it's something to do with refreshing product range.

            You know, like they do with cars and stuff.

            No, really.
            Sleeper Service
          • OK. You're crazy.

            Just couldn't resist! Sorry. :)
            Userama
          • "So why is Microsoft annoucing Windows 7?"

            "They're given up Vista themselves."

            Try this one on for size. Why is Apple working on Snow leopard and Ubuntu on the next version?

            Does it mean they think what they have made already is crap?

            I do agree on one thing the Mac users of the world are going to jaw Vista forever and would if it were the best OS anyone could, can, or ever will make.

            How good the OS is has nothing to do with it.

            Some of the XP forever crowd are just as bad.

            Every modern OS I have used is about equally usable. The rest is pretty much a personal bias _or_ making a selection based on the programs they run.

            You will pay about a 20% Mac tax above the maybe 10% mark up most vendors hope to make on the other machines. Not sure how this compares to the cost of Windows.

            Linux is clearly the cheapest but it may not run your favorite programs.
            deowll
          • Vista Not Ready for Business Sector

            The place where I worked refused to downgrade to Vista, because some of our database programs would not run on it. It takes the business model longer to react and adjust. Before we could even change the OS all of our server software would have to be certified for new OS. Business requires the applications to work 100% of the time. We cant just switch over to a new OS and hope for the best like Microsoft.
            ceh4702
          • Huh?

            I am on a very new HP laptop - 4GB RAM, Vista Business. It runs better than my girlfriends new "Vista Capable" (ha ha) machine with only 2GB RAM, but its still a dog. SO much so that i put ubuntu on dual boot last night. WHat a difference. I can do things quickly now!
            Some of the stuff about Windows 7 makes me think it might be the first Microsoft OS i have had any interest in for years, but only if
            Footprint is reduced
            Start up time is down to less than a minute
            It works on lesser hardware.
            UAC isn't such a dogs breakfast.

            If they don't get it right this time, they will be in trouble. Vista is NOT good.
            thelivo
          • I have same build as you.

            My have the ASUS A8N-SLI, AMD 3800+ 939 socket w/ 4gb RAM, and ATI HD3650. It ran very smooth. On XP, I had to set it to NOTEBOOK to use the Cool n Quiet feature. Vista sets it automatically with BALANCE. Vista is a lot easier to install than XP.
            bananatwinkie
        • Huge bologna is more like it.

          I know plenty of Vista based laptop users who got their machine a little over a year ago and I can assure you they all work perfectly fine.

          I can also assure you that the majority of Vista based laptops in use today were not purchased so long ago that they had inadequate hardware. I do realize there were laptops sold the first couple of months that got some complaints due to being a LITTLE light in the hardware department, which never should have happened, but I have not heard of one single example of these nightmare fairy tales told by the Vista nay sayers crowd who claim there are thousands of practically unusable laptops because they don't have the hardware to do the job. Its nonsense and rumor is what it is.
          Cayble
          • Even a model number would be nice.

            We hear of all these systems having problems but rarely, if ever, are we provided with even the most basic details.
            ye
          • With due respect...

            'All' is a mighty big claim. So big, in fact for me to accuse you of talking arrant and errant nonsense purely for effect.

            My laptop came with Vista HEP as OEM. 1Gb RAM, Nvidia etc... and it reminded me of my OEM Win ME install. Turning off the pointless Aero skin and other nasties (like having to kludge SP1 on to the machine with the CLI... ) I can say that, while not 'useless' it's certainly not been something I'd have handed to my mother to use...
            rodonn