ie8 fix
madison

A first look at Windows 7's pre-beta PDC release

By | October 28, 2008, 9:01am PDT

Is it a major release or just a revamped Windows Vista? That’s the big question surrounding Windows 7, which made its public debut in a keynote address by Steven Sinofsky today at the Microsoft Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles.

Microsoft executives showed off the new Windows upgrade in a day-long series of demos on Sunday, doing their level best to impress a room full of journalists with a long list of new and improved features. At the end of the day, they loaned me a sleek new Lenovo X300 notebook running a recent build of the OS so that I could test Windows 7 for myself.

I’m using that loaner PC to compose this post, but I can’t use several of the key Windows 7 features that I saw over the weekend. The problem? My test machine is running the M3 release of Windows 7, build 6801, which was locked down more than six weeks ago in preparation for distribution at PDC. The demos I saw on Sunday were using more recent builds (6926 and 6933, according to ID tags on the desktop), which contain some significant revisions to core Windows features.


  Image Gallery: See features from the pre-beta release as well as later internal builds not yet publicly released.   Gallery: Windows 7 PDC release   Gallery: Windows 7 PDC release  

As a result of that dichotomy, the gallery that accompanies this post contains a mix of screen shots I created and screens provided by Microsoft from those later builds. (My Windows Vista Inside Out co-author Carl Siechert assisted in the preparation of this post and the accompanying screen shots.)

This loaner machine certainly doesn’t feel like it’s running pre-beta code. It’s wicked fast and eerily quiet thanks to a solid state drive. In a very long day’s worth of use it has yet to crash or display any of the flaky behavior you might expect from a beta.

So what’s in Windows 7?

The most visible new features are enhancements that streamline core Windows tasks like connecting to a wireless network or organizing a digital music collection. But the new OS features are more than just skin-deep; there are also improvements to core components, such as an innovative way to stream music and other media directly to network-connected media players.

Connecting to a wireless network in Windows 7

Some of the tweaks to the Windows interface are blindingly obvious, at least in retrospect. Explorer windows now include a button that toggles the preview pane on and off; in Vista, you have to drill three levels deep into a menu to enable or disable the preview pane. Much cooler is the new technique for maximizing, restoring, and resizing a window. Drag the window’s title bar to the top of the screen and it maximizes. Drag the title bar of a maximized window away from the top of the screen and it restores to its former position. Drag a window to either side of the screen and it resizes to fill half the screen. Drag another window to the opposite side and, voila, you now have two windows arranged side by. side

On the next page, we’ll show you some of other key improvements to the Windows 7 desktop.

Rethinking the Windows taskbar –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

249
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: A first look at Windows 7's pre-beta PDC release
RICHMONFT 30th Sep
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
When the big day comes ...
softwareFlunky 28th Oct 2008
and Windows 7 is released, I would consider it as an alternative and possible replacement for XP; if it is cost effective.
0 Votes
+ -
Just tired of change for the sake of change.

Maybe this is an improvement in the user enterface but I now think of this stuff like fins on a car or extra chrome where no chrome is needed.

Put the controls somewhere and leave them alone.
0 Votes
+ -
Most people who purchased Vista are going to hold out because they are still feeling the pain of being burned by Microsoft on their not ready for prime time release of Vista.

I was fortunate enough to get mine via MSDN through my employer, so I didn't have to pay for it, and I hope I will be able to do the same with Windows 7...as for people who paid for Windows Vista, I hope Microsoft has enough fortitude to offer a discount for now coming out with Windows 7 "Vista only better" as Ballmer puts it.
0 Votes
+ -
I Disagree
mikefarinha 28th Oct 2008
I disagree with your assessment. Most people that use Vista on a daily basis love it.

Some people used it once and had some hardware issues. They let that one experience define Vista for them... they are the ones that will choose to be skeptical.
0 Votes
+ -
You Forgot The Huge Majority
itanalyst2@... 28th Oct 2008
Those home users who bought a desktop or laptop that were really meant for XP and Microsoft and the seller graciously slapped a "Vista Capable" sticker with them, conning the user into thinking they had a fast, reliable system when they really had something so slow it forced them to purchase hardware to upgrade.
0 Votes
+ -
The hardware wasn't the issue
mikefarinha 28th Oct 2008
The hardware wasn't the issue for these PCs. It was the immature drivers the hardware vendors released.

My wife's eMachine (purchased in Oct 2005) runs Vista Business silky-smooth. Her specs... Single Core Athlon 3600+(2.2GHz), 1.8GB ram(I upgraded a while back) ATI IGP with 16MB shared RAM.

Her PC runs Vista just as well as my dual core AMD 3800+ w/4GB of RAM, and ATI Radeon 3650.

So you can stop with the FUD anytime now.
0 Votes
+ -
thats not exactly a bad spec'd emachine
deaf_e_kate 28th Oct 2008
so i hope it would work.
0 Votes
+ -
This was a budget PC 3 years ago.
mikefarinha Updated - 28th Oct 2008
I never said that this was a bad spec'd machine. However my point being was that it was a budget PC 3 years ago($600 IIRC, and came with lexmark printer and 15" LCD monitor), over a year before Vista was released.

To say that a budget PC released two years ago is some how less capable of running Vista than a budget PC from three years ago is asinine.
It gives me a frame of reference.
0 Votes
+ -
They're given up Vista themselves.
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps Because Technology Doesn't Stand Still?
mikefarinha Updated - 28th Oct 2008
Why has Apple announced Snow Leopard? Why has any company announced any future version of their existing software?

You're insinuations are quite annoying.
0 Votes
+ -
Call me crazy...
Sleeper Service 29th Oct 2008
...but I think it's something to do with refreshing product range.

You know, like they do with cars and stuff.

No, really.
0 Votes
+ -
OK. You're crazy.
Userama 31st Oct 2008
Just couldn't resist! Sorry. happy
0 Votes
+ -
"They're given up Vista themselves."

Try this one on for size. Why is Apple working on Snow leopard and Ubuntu on the next version?

Does it mean they think what they have made already is crap?

I do agree on one thing the Mac users of the world are going to jaw Vista forever and would if it were the best OS anyone could, can, or ever will make.

How good the OS is has nothing to do with it.

Some of the XP forever crowd are just as bad.

Every modern OS I have used is about equally usable. The rest is pretty much a personal bias _or_ making a selection based on the programs they run.

You will pay about a 20% Mac tax above the maybe 10% mark up most vendors hope to make on the other machines. Not sure how this compares to the cost of Windows.

Linux is clearly the cheapest but it may not run your favorite programs.
0 Votes
+ -
Vista Not Ready for Business Sector
ceh4702 30th Oct 2008
The place where I worked refused to downgrade to Vista, because some of our database programs would not run on it. It takes the business model longer to react and adjust. Before we could even change the OS all of our server software would have to be certified for new OS. Business requires the applications to work 100% of the time. We cant just switch over to a new OS and hope for the best like Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
Huh?
thelivo 29th Oct 2008
I am on a very new HP laptop - 4GB RAM, Vista Business. It runs better than my girlfriends new "Vista Capable" (ha ha) machine with only 2GB RAM, but its still a dog. SO much so that i put ubuntu on dual boot last night. WHat a difference. I can do things quickly now!
Some of the stuff about Windows 7 makes me think it might be the first Microsoft OS i have had any interest in for years, but only if
Footprint is reduced
Start up time is down to less than a minute
It works on lesser hardware.
UAC isn't such a dogs breakfast.

If they don't get it right this time, they will be in trouble. Vista is NOT good.
0 Votes
+ -
I have same build as you.
bananatwinkie 5th Nov 2008
My have the ASUS A8N-SLI, AMD 3800+ 939 socket w/ 4gb RAM, and ATI HD3650. It ran very smooth. On XP, I had to set it to NOTEBOOK to use the Cool n Quiet feature. Vista sets it automatically with BALANCE. Vista is a lot easier to install than XP.
0 Votes
+ -
Huge bologna is more like it.
Cayble 28th Oct 2008
I know plenty of Vista based laptop users who got their machine a little over a year ago and I can assure you they all work perfectly fine.

I can also assure you that the majority of Vista based laptops in use today were not purchased so long ago that they had inadequate hardware. I do realize there were laptops sold the first couple of months that got some complaints due to being a LITTLE light in the hardware department, which never should have happened, but I have not heard of one single example of these nightmare fairy tales told by the Vista nay sayers crowd who claim there are thousands of practically unusable laptops because they don't have the hardware to do the job. Its nonsense and rumor is what it is.
0 Votes
+ -
We hear of all these systems having problems but rarely, if ever, are we provided with even the most basic details.
0 Votes
+ -
With due respect...
rodonn 29th Oct 2008
'All' is a mighty big claim. So big, in fact for me to accuse you of talking arrant and errant nonsense purely for effect.

My laptop came with Vista HEP as OEM. 1Gb RAM, Nvidia etc... and it reminded me of my OEM Win ME install. Turning off the pointless Aero skin and other nasties (like having to kludge SP1 on to the machine with the CLI... ) I can say that, while not 'useless' it's certainly not been something I'd have handed to my mother to use...
0 Votes
+ -
"...Huge Majority"... can't forget something that
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 29th Oct 2008
doesn't exist. Prove "Majority"
0 Votes
+ -
The crux of the issue
mlindl 7th Nov 2008
" conning the user into thinking they had a fast, reliable
system"

Isn't that the whole Windows legacy?

C'mon.

Never heard a compliment about Vista from any user.

Each now version of OS X opens up new horizons,
primarily because there is always new stuff under the
hood.

Vista seems to not be able to do anything without
reminding you there is a War on Terror and that life isn't
secure and that you are always a target.

And while the GUI is really nice it feels really heavy to me.
0 Votes
+ -
"Never heard a compliment about Vista from any user"?
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 7th Nov 2008
I am guessing that you've read many of the responses to these (and most likely other) threads. There are actually quite a few people who state clearly that they not only like Vista but that (especially since SP1 and since ATI/nVidia have fixed most of their driver issues) that they in fact love their Vista machines.

The fact is that you choose to disbelieve them and discount (and flame) them for stating their personal preference based on actual experience.

I work in a company with 100,000 employees, each and every one of which runs Vista. Whilst there were some app compat and HW compat issues around RTM, these days, there are very few issues being raised ... and far fewer than we ever had with XP.

And the many thousands of companies, customers and partners that we work with also use Vista and by and large love it reinforces what I know to be true: Although it has a few niggles, Vista is nothing like as bad as the detractors would have you believe.
0 Votes
+ -
Vista
jmorgus@... 28th Oct 2008
I use Vista on a daily basis (32 bit Ultimate) and I loathe it. There is a fine line between love and hate, there is no line for loathing.

My wife also dislike Vista, preferring XP. If I didn't need to support it for some (a small minority) users, I would have replaced the drive and loaded XP. Instead, I added a drive and loaded XP and dual boot.
0 Votes
+ -
Too bad for you.
mikefarinha 28th Oct 2008
To bad that you hate it... I'm assuming that since you don't cite any reasons for hating it... er, sorry, 'loathing' it you simply loath it to loath it... a popular past time on ZDNet.

Your prerogative.
0 Votes
+ -
Complete nonsense.
Cayble 28th Oct 2008
If you loath Vista then you simply don't know how to use a computer. Out of every single Vista user I know, and thats many, the only complaints I have heard are having to learn the idiosyncrasies of a new OS. I don't hear even that after a month or so. It becomes a non issue.

You clearly thrive on spreading FUD or you just cant learn the few new things involved in Vista and that makes you all but computer illiterate.
0 Votes
+ -
Idiosyncrasies
rodonn 29th Oct 2008
Lets see... slowing Eyecandy standard skin, blue screen of death, having to turn of MS enabled services in CLI to install SP1...
0 Votes
+ -
Facts or it didn't happen.
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 7th Nov 2008
BSOD is a driver/kernel issue. What caused your BSOD? Most likely a 3rd party driver. Get the latest updates. If the problem persists, complain to the driver vendor.

"slowing Eyecandy standard skin"???
Huh? Ah ... I am guessing you don't like Aero. Turn it off and go back to classic then. You have a choice. If you don't like the "eye candy", don't use it.

"having to turn of MS enabled services in CLI to install SP1"
Which service?
0 Votes
+ -
what do you loathe about it?
xuniL_z 28th Oct 2008
I love my Vista Ultimate x64 machine. Can't find a single thing to not like about it and I'll never be going back to XP.


I would always recommend 64 bit whenever possible for the user(s).



I work for a handful of hospitals and at one site they have rolled out 500 Vista clients now, out of 2000 total machines.


I have found Vista to be actually very strong and since SP1 and driver issues being a thing of the past (and too many people not realizing any XPSP2 driver will work on vista if installed in compatibility mode....actually if anything they have been led astray by a smear campaign that continues today and goes far above any problems there ever really were, in fact many posters here are still claiming driver incompatibility issues, but then very ironically turn around and say the moved to Linux. It's easy to tell when someone is outright posting propaganda.


That site, anyway, has seen a reduction in support calls. Also went with 64 bit. It even runs 32 bit apps faster since it can make dual 32 bit reads from memory.


We did extensive work on this project but it is paying off bigtime. They rolled out their first 5 windows 2k8 servers, which is by far the best server I have ever seen from Microsoft and 2k3 had reached the point where even most pundits were saying it was on par with any *x server out there and better in many areas. worse in some. there are many metrics by which we measure the value of an OS, and Windows still comes out on top.


There were no devices in use by any of the 500 clients that didn't have a driver available. In a few cases xp drivers were loaded in compatibility mode and have worked flawlessly.


I'm not at all sure where you are running into anything that would bring about loathing?
0 Votes
+ -
Whilst I'm sorry...
Sleeper Service 29th Oct 2008
...that it's not worked for you perhaps you can give us details of the specific issues that are causing you bother and why you loath it so we can help?

Hmm?
0 Votes
+ -
Well look at that...
Sleeper Service 29th Oct 2008
...question asked four times, no response.

Quell suprise.
0 Votes
+ -
I Disagree
Axsimulate Updated - 28th Oct 2008
"I disagree with your assessment. Most people that use Vista on a daily basis love it."

I can't say they love and and I can't say they hate it. Most people use it because they had no choice and it is what it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Any numbers to back that up?
mikefarinha 28th Oct 2008
just curious.
0 Votes
+ -
Know what?
prikkebeen 28th Oct 2008
People use a Mac because they like it.
People use Linux because they like it.
People use Windows because it's getting rammed through their throat.

I left Windows because of Vista. It's not bad maybe, I just didn't feel oke working with it.
I now use Ubuntu and it fits my needs, so no reason to try Windows again, never.

Just my rant.
...manage to switch to something else? Both of those
statements can't be true.

Oh, and mikefarinha, the answer to your question is: No, they
don't have any numbers to back up the claim.
0 Votes
+ -
Claims w/o numbers
mrnaturl1@... 29th Oct 2008
In the meantime mikefarinha doesn't have any numbers to back up his inital claim either. To expect a rebuttal to include numbers, the initial poster should first provide his/hers. Otherwise the content posted by the first claimant is just as useless and baseless as you all are trying to portray the follow up as.

I use Vista on a laptop purchased nearly one year ago. It crashed numerous times per day until I finally got fed up, wiped the drive and reloaded it. It wasn't hardware issue. It was a buggy pc of junk OS. I still despise it. Moving documents, sharing them and such between XP & Vista machines is a serious PITA. Vista was shoved down my throat as no other OS was offered at the time I purchased my laptop. Same reason I got stuck buying 3 Vista Business machines at work. And I'm sorry but expecting a consumer to pay an extra $200 or so for a proper OS like XP to replace the garbage installed on a brand new PC is ASININE!!
0 Votes
+ -
I don't care what you use.
mikefarinha 28th Oct 2008
All I ask is that people simply not slander something just because they don't think other people should use it.

And if there are problems with something the by all means address the problem... however don't blow something completely out of proportion.
0 Votes
+ -
@mrnaturl1: "You all"?
ye 29th Oct 2008
I don't recall supporting mikefarinha so how did "you all" come to include me. For the record I believe it's mikefarinha's obligation to support his claim first. And he did admit he doesn't have specific numbers to support his claim. However he did make a good faith effort to provide something to support it.

As for being forced to buy Vista no one is forcing you. Buy a Mac. Buy a Linux system. Buy a netbook with Linux pre-installed. You do have choices. Stop pretending you don't. And while you're at it please let me know where I can buy the current MacBook with a copy of Tiger. Thanks!
Then Vista wasn't rammed down your throat. You had a choice. Be happy.

As for as the user experience is concerned I don't see any real major value user differences between Ubuntu, Vista, Leopard, or XP as an OS from the point of just turning the machine on and using it.
0 Votes
+ -
Win7 will feel more like Win2k
sysin 30th Oct 2008
The Vista fiasco was just too soon a rollout, that's
all. MS will not let this happen twice in a row with
Win7. Just like how Win2k was pretty stable right out
of the box, following the abysmal Win95.

I waited for SP1 before trying Vista, and I like it
better in every way over XP. Windows mail/contacts/cal
is better and leaner than Outlook, and is easier to
back up (I'll never go back to a giant, rickety .pst
file).

I also recently got a Mac as a family computer,
primarily because it integrates better with the
iPhone, the god of phones. It's very nice as well. It
comes installed with all the (Apple-supported)
software you need (what? i can just stick in a dvd and
it plays?). No trial versions, no bloatware, no
viruses, no endless update cycles. Yahoo IM was the
only thing I needed to install.

As far as Xandros/Unbuntu/Linux and the like? I'll
pass. I grew up on DOS and I'm too old to start
speaking Unix. Every time I go down the Linux road, it
always ends up inme troubleshooting inside a shell.
I'm too old for that. "But you haven't tried the
latest and greatest *nix DuJour!". They been beating
that drum for 7 years.
0 Votes
+ -
Do you have any numbers to back up your claim?
0 Votes
+ -
That's what I suspected
alaniane@... 28th Oct 2008
you don't have any numbers either. The link to the blog rant provided nice propaganda, but it didn't contain real numbers. It didn't even attempt to give any stats to backup the author's own conclusions. It merely stated that when he asked his customers about Vista the reactions he got. Even his experience used vague terms like some, etc.



"The ones who are actually using it are now having positive experiences! I presented to customers last week and asked them who was using Vista - all their hands went up. "Great", I thought. Then, the big question - "who's had a good experience with Vista so far" - some hands went down, but some remained up. To those who put their hands down I asked, "Are these recent bad experiences?" and people were shaking their heads."


If that's all the numbers you've got then your opinion is no better than the other guy's. Neither of you can prove your statements.
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps he can't...
Sleeper Service 29th Oct 2008
...but the market share figures which show Vista's share increasing in multiples of OSX's and Linux's seem to do they not?

And don't give me the 'no choice' argument either because every one of those sales could have been a Mac or an Ubuntu switch. Whilst you're at it can you advise where I can still by a new Mac with Tiger installed?

And yet they're not. Wonder why?
0 Votes
+ -
You're reply is as bad as his
alaniane@... 29th Oct 2008
Let's take it apart:

"...but the market share figures which show Vista's share increasing in multiples of OSX's and Linux's seem to do they not?"

Actually, his giving the market share figures would have been better than what he gave. Although market share figures don't necessarily indicate that new users love Vista.

"don't give me the 'no choice' argument either because every one of those sales could have been a Mac or an Ubuntu switch. Whilst you're at it can you advise where I can still by a new Mac with Tiger installed?"

You assumed that I use either a Mac or Ubuntu. I don't use either OSes. I've experimented with Ubuntu, but I prefer Fedora. I don't use a Mac since I build my own computers. You also assume that I don't like Vista. I actually use and like Vista.


My original argument was that if your going to challenge someone else's opinion/experience by calling for them to provide data to back it up, you better provide data to back up your assertions. Frankly, most users that I've supported have no idea what OS is on the system they bought or even have inkling of what OS choices there are. They really don't care. What they care about is getting their work done on that computer (whether it's playing their favorite game or doing actual work). Only geeks love their OS.
0 Votes
+ -
@alaniane@
Axsimulate 29th Oct 2008
Couldn't of said it better myself.
0 Votes
+ -
@alaniane@... I admit, you got me!
mikefarinha 29th Oct 2008
You're right, I cannot find numbers on this topic from either side.

However I submit that I provided more 'evidence' to my argument than was provided for the claim that most Vista users hate the OS.
0 Votes
+ -
I understadn what you're saying...
Sleeper Service 29th Oct 2008
...and I agree that most people are ambivalent as to their OS.

Fair comment.
0 Votes
+ -
@mikefarinha
Axsimulate 29th Oct 2008
"Any numbers to back that up?"

How about you, any numbers to back up your claim?
0 Votes
+ -
Most people love it?
GoPower 28th Oct 2008
What? Did you do a worldwide survey?
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix