ie8 fix
madison

Confessions of a Windows 7 pirate

By | March 3, 2010, 4:00am PST

Summary: I’ve been hanging out with a bad crowd lately, trying out popular hacking tools and utilities to see if I could install Windows 7 without paying for it. Unfortunately, I succeeded. In this post, I’ll share my experiences, including close encounters with some very nasty malware and some analysis on how the latest showdown between Microsoft and the pirates is likely to play out.

I’ve been hanging out with a bad crowd lately.

In the interest of research, I’ve been digging into message boards and forums run by unabashed Windows enthusiasts who are intent on breaking Microsoft’s activation technology. I’ve had these forums bookmarked for years and stop in every once in a while just to see what’s new. This time I decided to drop by and actually try some of tools and utilities to see if I could become a pirate, too.

Unfortunately, I succeeded.

In this post, I’ll share my experiences, including close encounters with some very nasty malware and some analysis on how the latest showdown between Microsoft and the pirates is likely to play out.

You won’t find names or direct links here—although these guys seem like genuine enthusiasts, I have no intention of giving them any free publicity. But if you’re interested in tracking down the tools I tested you should have no trouble finding them using the clues available in screenshots and descriptions here.

If you do intend to try this stuff out for yourself, I recommend extreme caution. My hunt for utilities that bypass Windows 7 activation technologies led me to some very seedy corners of the Internet. First, I did what any red-blooded wannabe pirate would do and tried some Google searches. Of the first 10 hits, six were inactive or had been taken down. After downloading files from the remaining four sites, I submitted them to Virustotal.com, where three of the four samples came back positive for nasty, difficult-to-remove Windows 7 rootkits. Here’s one example:

And that experience is borne out by at least one real-world experience, which was reported, ironically, in the Talkback section of this blog. After I wrote about Microsoft’s most recent anti-piracy initiative last week, one commenter (a loud, proud Linux advocate) insisted that the update opened a secret back-channel, probably as part of a plot by Microsoft to covertly gain access to its customers’ PCs. A day or so later, after checking with his Windows-using friend, he returned with this sheepish admission:

It turns out his iso was not a bona fide purchased copy [of Windows 7], but rather a cracked version off of the net. In all likelihood the iso was trojaned…

Indeed. Which is why I exercised extraordinary caution. For my hands-on tests, I used a fresh copy of Windows 7 Ultimate, installed without a product key. I then looked at two widely distributed tools that work in completely different ways.

Page 2: Disabling Windows activation completely A clever little tool called RemoveWAT not only disables Microsoft’s activation subsystem, it also installs the latest anti-piracy update from Microsoft and then disables it, too!

Page 3: Fooling Windows by tinkering with the BIOS Big PC makers get to install copies of Windows that don’t require activation. Naturally, pirates soon figured out how to make any PC look like it came from one of those big factories.

Page 4: Microsoft versus the pirates Pirates are clever and fast. Microsoft is highly motivated to keep its lucrative Windows revenue stream intact. Are customers going to get caught in the crossfire?

Details and screenshots begin on the next page.

Page 2: Disable activation completely? –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

536
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Confessions of a Windows 7 pirate
LarsDennert 4th Jan
@D.T.Schmitz ms deserves what they get. I have several machines with legal serial numbers pasted on the side but no way to restore the os. An oem xp home serial number often doesn't work with an xp home system disk. Highway robbery.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting
MoeFugger 3rd Mar 2010
One of the more interesting blogs in a while.
0 Votes
+ -
1
voyager529 3rd Mar 2010
Agreed. Very nice work, Ed. I was worried for a
little bit that investigative journalism was a
relic of the past.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Thanks
Ed Bott 3rd Mar 2010
I suspect you initially typed "+1" as the subject and ran into the funny little bug that strips away leading plus signs. wink
0 Votes
+ -
highly interesting
Opcom_ 3rd Mar 2010
This was one of the more interesting ones. I pay for windows but I dislike having M$ inspect my computer whenever it wants. Like checking to see if anyone has pooped their pants, heh.
0 Votes
+ -
No Kidding!!!! (NT)
Darth Malus 12th Mar 2010
NT
0 Votes
+ -
Great Article
Mark@... 3rd Mar 2010
I'm amazed how quickly the RemoveWAP developer returned with a fix for Microsoft's "Fix".
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed.
AzuMao 3rd Mar 2010
It's good to know that Windows has gone the way of Assassin's Creed 2 (you don't just need an Internet connection during the initial install, you also need connected after that, or it stops working).


Of course, the pirated versions (which disable this check) won't have such a problem.

Pirates: 1
Paying customers: 0


[sarcasm]What a great business model these companies have come up with. I can see their sales instantly rocketing through the roof in response.[/sarcasm]
0 Votes
+ -
1
jedikitty@... 3rd Mar 2010
Great article, Ed. I'm very much looking forward to your "analysis" report!

I'm almost tempted to go and have some fun with these "tools" myself now but I've already purchased my very legal OEM System Builder Pack. Oh well, perhaps the next release wink
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Confessions of a Windows 7 pirate
RevolutionEagle 9th Sep 2010
@Ed Bott

Great article! Sounds like pirating is actually easier than getting a Win7 64 upgrade to upgrade a Vista 32 OEM. Oi.

Of course, I usually don't have to do things like that. I'm a Mac wink
0 Votes
+ -
I heard that a legit copy of Windows keeps asking you whether it is a legit copy whereas a pirated copy often has the advantage of not bothering to ask.

Not that i would use Windows now, given the choice. This article just reminds us how flaky and vulnerable Windows is. Even a non-pirate copy has risk of infection.
Regards from
Tom happy
0 Votes
+ -
Downloading, thank you. chanel replicas
0 Votes
+ -
Ed,
Your portrayal of me is inaccurate.

Folks, go back to the article in question and trace my comments thru the TalkBack.

You can draw your own conclusions based on what's there.

I maintain that through that TalkBack, I was being intellectually honest and unlike Ed, I conducted myself in a professional manner.

In the meantime, I submit that as long as MS invokes these anti-piracy measures, they guarantee that a percentage of systems on the Internet will always remain unpatched.

Thus, these systems will be targets of exploits and become compromised and widen the botnets at large which go much further to perpetrate very devious acts of crime.

I submit that if MS removed copy protection that they would do equally well and if every user felt they would not be a target of punitive action they would have their systems fully patched and up to date, thereby lessening the chance of infection.

The Ubuntu GNU/Linux Repository system is by default, either 32- or 64-bit GPG keyring protected.

The software licensing makes Ubuntu Free and any of some 20,000+ applications in the Firewalled Repository are GPG keyring protected.

Any installation made through that repository guarantees that no rogue software of any kind can gain entry to the GPG keyring toolchain of Apps on your local computer, including installation of Ubuntu itself.

If MS adopted the Linux GPG keyring approach with a central repository method of distribution, it would resolve many issues including the pointless need to battle against counterfeit software pirates.

A consortium of Windows application developers could maintain a Windows affiliated keyringed (PGP) repository, much the same way Linux does.

In your face Ed.


Dietrich T. Schmitz
GNU/Linux Advocate, Loud and Proud
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Direct quote
Ed Bott Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
It's a direct quote, DT. And up until you struck it out (kudos to you for not just deleting it), you had been insisting that the update was opening port 1234.

What was inaccurate, specifically?
0 Votes
+ -
Show me a quote that backs up your assertion
D.T.Schmitz Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
"you had been insisting that the update was opening port 1234."

Readers will interpret that I was asking a series of carefully crafted guided questions, which you opted to either not answer or make fun of (Custom Tin Foil Hat).
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
I tested it, DT
Ed Bott 3rd Mar 2010
DT, I actually got out a copy of Wireshark and Process Monitor and spent several hours testing, in response to your alarming insinuations. I found nothing to back up your repeated claims that the patch opened port 1234. In fact, I found exactly the opposite, as you'll read in tomorrow's detailed follow-up.

Your comments made no sense until you came back (thanks) and added that the copy you were reporting on, secondhand, was pirated and probably infected with a Trojan.

So, if anyone wants to go back and read the comment thread, that's what they'll see.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't see a quote to back up your assertion Ed.
D.T.Schmitz Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
I know what I wrote. Don't put words in my mouth.

The point that stands out is that if users of W7 had a trusted repository from which to download their non-copy protected software, including the O/S, these issues would cease to exist.

This blog is yet another redirection away from the real substantive issues concerning Microsoft Windows.

The most recent BSoD/rootkit issue (still not fixed) is a road side billboard that punctuates Microsoft Windows' chronic ongoing security design issues that carry forward today into their newest product, Windows 7, and of the worst possible kind: an as yet unfixed rootkit infection.
0 Votes
+ -
Realy?
jdbukis@... 3rd Mar 2010
How difficult would it be to make a system image then?
Thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
Great Point...
Darth Malus 3rd Mar 2010
I mean after one obtains a virus free copy of the Windows 7 ISO and installs, yes, using Ghost 15 to image for instance, this is a lay-up. No difference between implementing a legit copy than an illegal one.

I use on my various machines of Ghost Images to clone and implement. Never a problem. I mean other than installing the necessary drivers akin to a particular machine that may have different hardware.
0 Votes
+ -
D.T."I don't see..."
justanitguy 3rd Mar 2010
In other words, D.T, you just want Microsoft to do things your way. You look at every thing through DT tinted glasses, and childishly, want everyone else to do things your way. I may be misinterpreting your comments, but aren't you advocating that Microsoft put Windows 7 out there for everyone to download? "Non-copy protected software"
0 Votes
+ -
What BSoD/Rootkit issue?
Cylon Centurion 3rd Mar 2010
There is none that affects any other OS but Windows XP. You can't judge newer products by old ones, especially when they don't even share the same codebase.
0 Votes
+ -
Even if you didn't keep up with the various malware forums, a quick Internet search would convince you that rootkits for Windows 7 do exist. Heck, there have been presetnation on such exploits at various conventions. You can even find some information on rootkit kits for the x64 flavours of Vista and Windows 7 that claim to be able to bypass PatchGuard, ASLR, DEP and whatever other alphabet soup is popular today.

We are not paranoid -- they are out to get us.
0 Votes
+ -
NM
Cylon Centurion 3rd Mar 2010
I thought he was referring to the Alueron(SP?) Rootkit issue with XP and one of it's updates.


While they do exist, it is pretty darn hard to be infected with one running on an x64 of Windows, unless you frequent some not so bright areas of the Internet. That's asking for trouble.
0 Votes
+ -
NM again
Wintel_BSOD 3rd Mar 2010
While they do exist, it is pretty darn hard to be infected with one running on an x64 of Windows, unless you frequent some not so bright areas of the Internet. That's asking for trouble.

You can practice those same principles using XP. I've been doing it for years.

With Linux, you won't have to worry about those sorts of things.
0 Votes
+ -
The issue with "Trusted Repository" is...
mnemennth Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
... it works FINE as long as the contents are FREE. As soon as you put a price on the contents, someone is going to try and find a way around it.

If Windows 7 Ultimate was on that repository, and authorized access cost ONE DOLLAR per copy, there would STILL be someone out there willing to spend a week trying to crack it.

Once that happens, there's your hacked copies out in the wild and I guarantee you're going to have every kind of infection imaginable on a large percentage of those hacked copies.

You may feel safe living in your *NIX rose-colored world where everything should be free; the rest of us have to make a living in a world where Organized Crime has been replaced by Corporate Mandate and the devil himself is a weak anachronism.

Hackers hack for the sake of the hack and pirates see people like you as just another brand of sucker.
0 Votes
+ -
By your reasoning...
Wintel_BSOD 3rd Mar 2010
...then give it away for free. Embed it with ads and pop ups and let advertisers pay for it.

Problem solved. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Here's exactly what you wrote
Ed Bott Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
Direct quotes from your comments:

"@Ed Bott: Hey what is port 1234 used for (tcp/udp)? is it one of those you know 'back doors'?"

Followed by:

"Folks to really assess what Windows is or isn't doing... you need to install Wireshark.

"Ed Bott can make all of the apologies he wants but the situation with WAT speaks volumes about the current state of affairs with Microsoft proprietary closed-source Windows.

"If you do install and run Wireshark, please pay special attention to port 1234 (both TCP and UDP), although MS does tunnel over http and https.

"Google on back door and port 1234."

Links:

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=75736&messageID=1473643

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=75736&messageID=1475067
0 Votes
+ -
You're mixing parts fro different posts.

This is the one relevant to your claims and it completely disproves you: http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=75990&messageID=1478614

it says:
"It turns out his iso was not a bona fide purchased copy, but rather a cracked version off of the net.

In all likelihood the iso was trojaned and so 1234 was open."
0 Votes
+ -
Eh?
wolf_z 3rd Mar 2010
I'm confused. It looks like *ED* is right and DT did indeed admit his friend's ISO was cracked, and the 1234 port opening (in all likelyhood) was the culprit *NOT WINDOWS*.

How exactly can you claim the opposite? Ed's right, and why DT is trying to squirm out of his own admission is bizarre.
0 Votes
+ -
You're getting it wrong.
The Mentalist 3rd Mar 2010
According to Ed Bott, Dietrich claimed the Microsoft patch opened the port when in fact Dietrich said it was probably the crack that did it, not Microsoft.
0 Votes
+ -
Not true, Mentalist. Here is the link
GuidingLight Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
he then corrected that when he learned that it was indeed a patched copy.

http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12354-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=75736&messageID=1473643&tag=content;col1

But we know exactlly what he was implying. Phrasing it up in the form of a question does not get you a pass, unless of course you are competing on Jeopardy.
0 Votes
+ -
Most will agree, and it's DT that answers most question - nt
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 3rd Mar 2010
nt
though most of the time they're either an off topic misdirect, or FUD, so I'll say, as others here will agree, that he is trying to back out of an inuendo that blew up in his face.
0 Votes
+ -
Be for real...
Darth Malus 3rd Mar 2010
Please, you're so off base. I immediately question your sanity let alone your dismal reading comprehension. Let me guess, you're a product of the public education system in America, right?

Ed did a wonderful and accurate job reporting here, and exposing an idiot to the many of us that came to our own conclusion about the simpleton.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@ The Mentalist
Pete "athynz" Athens 3rd Mar 2010
And YOU doing the same thing is okay?

Face it, DTS screwed up - yet again - by not looking past his Linux bias and is being called out for it.
0 Votes
+ -
DT? Why does this Guys Opinion Matter?
Ez_Customs 6th Mar 2010
Linux in it's own rights is a Great OS, but to compare the OS to Windows, which DT, is designed for ease of use and get you going with minimal setup and configurations, is just rediculous. MS does do a Great job, and just think and remember when Apple Computer was the one with no virus threats not more then 5 years ago? Now that Apple is making a comeback with an OS that truely does appeal to all who have the money, now MAC OS is getting attacked in much more agressive way.


DT, it goes as is, The hackers do one thing, and that is attack the more popular system. Just remember that the majority of websites out there do use some for of Linux Kernel for security purposes, and even those get hacked if what is behind them is important enough. It's about numbers, and that is the sum of it.


Your Previous posts that made this one valid, are just a Linux Fan Boy, trying to push a More advanced user interface on the people who just want a PC to work right out of the box. They don't give a hoot about linux, yet are somewhat interested. Bottom line on that is, a novice user will not spend the time required to locate a Driver database that works, or write there own hardware driver config files. More so, a novice user and many advanced users are not going to take the time to mount hardwares, just to use and navigate them either! FACTS MR. T DT, SIMPLE FACTS!

MS is all about Ease of use, while remaining customizable and powerful, and when you look at the numbers, all code is crackable, even Linux builds!!!


I like Linux when I take the time to configure it for one or two things, but I will not go 100%, and it is because I just am not interested enough to learn the code and the core geek levels. Many other PC users are going to tell you the same thing too. DT GET OVER YOURSELF, AND AT LEAST COME UP WITH A NEW CONTECT THEN THE TYPICAL LINUX INSULTS, they are really old and really do nothing to move people to Linux. Do Linux a favor, and stop crying, and if you like it that much, make it more user friendly, instead of a geek OS!!
0 Votes
+ -
First, STOP YELLING.
AzuMao 6th Mar 2010
Second, take a step back and think.

Linux isn't an OS in itself; it is the core of one.
Which the user will almost certainly not be interacting with in any way.

Some operating systems which use Linux, such as Gentoo, are like you say; very technical/do-it-server/get-your-hands-dirty/etc.
But on the other hand, there are very easy to use ones like Ubuntu, where all the drivers are automatically installed, disks automatically mounted, everything point-and-clickable, etc.

Where as with Windows, there is just.. well.. Windows.

Also, although how big a target is obviously plays some part in how much people will want to hack it, it's just that; a part.

I think it's safe to say that a lot of people would very much like to break into PayPal, for instance, yet unimportant little Windows desktops are getting hacked, not PayPal. Why? Because, no matter what size the fruit is, low hanging fruit is low hanging fruit. You can't always have what you want.
0 Votes
+ -
No, we interpreted exactlly what you where implying
GuidingLight Updated - 3rd Mar 2010
Which is that the Microsoft patch was opening port 1234.

Just because you write in implications does not indicate that the end reader will give you a pass of some type when proven incorrect, by quickly proclaiming "I said nothing of the sort, I was asking a question"

You are nowhere as smart as you believe and give yourself credit for, and you give the others here too little credit for their skill at observation.

Something of a personal nature you must learn to accept.
0 Votes
+ -
You Are Right!...
windozefreak 3rd Mar 2010
Even with just a public school education I understood that. Go figure!
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
That's a weasly response, D.T.
rapson 3rd Mar 2010
You know pefectly well what you were implying in your "carefully crafted guided questions", as does everyone else who read that exchange between you and Ed. To try and backtrack now into the lame "I was just asking questions" defense is beneath even you.

Carl Rapson
0 Votes
+ -
It's not beneath him..
daftkey 3rd Mar 2010
"To try and backtrack now into the lame "I was just asking questions" defense is beneath even you."

Giving credit where credit is due only works when you give credit ONLY when credit is due.

You have to dig pretty low to get beneath D.T... I think Loverock and Linux Geek are the only thing separating him and Godwin's law, when it comes to compelling, logical arguments.
0 Votes
+ -
My apologies...
daftkey 3rd Mar 2010
..Sorry to Linux Geek and Loverock.. I read the conversation between Ed and D.T. completely.. I think I've found someone with even less capacity for logic than you two!
0 Votes
+ -
OMG Daftkey, NAILED DT
Ez_Customs 6th Mar 2010
Couldn't haveen put any clearer. It is pointless to compare two things with two totally different directions. Which is what truely sets the two appart with Linux and PC. You can only argue so long before it become retorical, then when you realize it, it's all about backing up and making you look right. Typical Linux Fan Boys, who use it only to slap MS or any other OS developer for that matter!!
..sounds like something Hitler would do!
0 Votes
+ -
You see it over and over again around here with many posters, particularly the ones that really hate one product or another. What I am referring to is the seemingly overwhelming need to make broad bold negative statements about a hated product or producer of that product, often outrageously so, and then when it backfires in their face you never see them come back to eat a little crow. Apologies are rare.

I recall back when Intel was about to release the Conroe and it was getting rave reviews. The pro AMD Intel haters were completely loosing their minds. They often called the reported tests on the Conroe unreliable and even to some degree fakery. There were wild claims that Intel would go broke trying to get the Conroe to compete with AMD. There were claims that the Conroe itself was mostly smoke and mirrors so to speak.

Any voice of reason that tried to explain how these things that were being claimed just didn't make sense were met with ridicule, yet when Intel began to properly kick AMD's collective butt, not a single poster returned to even admit some surprise that they had been just guessing, and their bias had lead them to guess wrong.

Its just a common place thing with these product haters that making wild unfounded claims against those they hate is done with an absolute fearlessness that they could be wrong, as not a one lets themselves be taken to task for their too often ridiculous remarks.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Cayble, U are exactly right!
j-mccurdy@... 3rd Mar 2010
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Oh Yah
BoneLazy 3rd Mar 2010
Well your Mother board wears army
boots

Or was that Your Motherboards so Fat...

Or I was with your Motherboard last night and...

I hope that clears up any misconception you might have had about my particular amazing piece of hardware or software as compare to your bad ripoff hardware/software.

Showed you didn't I
0 Votes
+ -
People weren't born with this bias
Wintel_BSOD 3rd Mar 2010
It was burned, learned and earned the hard way.

Besides, I could never bring myself to apologize to corporate shills, who's only purpose on zdnet is to promote their product through FUD and deceit.

The exceptions to that are few and far between.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@D.T.Schmitz ms deserves what they get. I have several machines with legal serial numbers pasted on the side but no way to restore the os. An oem xp home serial number often doesn't work with an xp home system disk. Highway robbery.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix