ie8 fix
madison

Google Music proves why it deserves the beta label

By | June 9, 2011, 11:26am PDT

Summary: After a day with the Google Music Beta, I’m convinced it was rushed out the door too early. Even for a beta, this combination of software and service is too buggy for me to take seriously for now.

On Monday, while Steve Jobs was onstage introducing iTunes in the cloud, I got an e-mail from Google that included an invitation to the Google Music Beta.

Coincidence? Maybe, but my money says this timing was deliberate.

I thought at the time that it looked like a panic response from Google to Apple’s iTunes announcements. After a day with the beta, I’m even more convinced that this software-and-service package was rushed to market.

Google Music Beta made a positive initial impression when I installed it yesterday. It consists of two lightweight programs, a browser-based music player and a music uploader that runs as a background task. I installed both Windows and Mac versions.

Music Player looks more “designed” than most Google projects (which typically strike me as being assembled, like something from Ikea). But the Music Player is useless until you upload your tracks, so I concentrated on Music Manager. And that’s where Google Music went off the rails.

I was impressed with the list of formats that Google Music supports. In addition to MP3 and AAC, it also supports Windows Media Audio (WMA) and the lossless FLAC format. I have a lot of tracks in the latter formats, so that’s very good news. It also supports uploads from Windows Media Player, from iTunes, and from the My Music folder on a Windows PC.

I told Music Manager to upload my Windows Media Audio library around 2:30PM yesterday; when I checked on its progress this morning, here’s what I saw:

Yikes.

After 19 hours of chugging away, only 1,654 tracks had been uploaded. At that pace, it would take nearly two weeks of round-the-clock uploading to get my entire collection into Google’s cloud servers.

But that’s not going to happen, based on the staggering number of errors I saw for this collection. Why were 21,300 tracks skipped? Clicking that number fired up a troubleshooting tool.

The more I look at the list, the less sense it makes, and the more I see failures on top of failures.

For example, Google says it failed to upload 206 tracks because of “DRM in file.” But I have never purchased a single DRM-protected track, and inspection of the troublesome files shows they’re DRM-free.

Two tracks failed because Music Manager thinks there’s “No music in file.” They play just fine here.

The two “unsupported format” files are bonus-track downloads from Radiohead, both in WAV format. OK, I need to convert those.

But what on earth were those 13,862 “Error uploading file” messages? There’s a mix of MP3 and WMA files in that group, most of them either purchased from Amazon or eMusic or ripped from CD. That’s roughly half the collection not available.

And to add insult to injury, my collection is just too big, so some 5000 tracks are just going to be skipped. And yet the Tijuana Brass Christmas album (a holiday classic that is played, at most, once a year) was among the first to arrive at Google’s servers. Awesome.

I’m completely baffled by the message at the bottom of the troubleshooting window, which says “Only version 11 of Windows Media Player is supported.” That’s the version from Windows Vista, which was also available as an update in Windows XP.

Windows 7 includes Windows Media Player 12. But that troubleshooting message doesn’t say anything about versions higher than 11. So is it supported or not?

Then there’s the message that says “Norton may be blocking the application.” It even includes a link that promises “further instructions,” which would be extremely helpful if the link actually went somewhere instead of to a 404 error page.

And I won’t even mention the fact that, on Windows 7, I couldn’t get Google Music to play at all in Internet Explorer 9, although it worked perfectly in Chrome. Hmmm. [Update: I tried Google Music a few hours later, with a different album, and this time it played successfully.]

When I mentioned these Google Music experiences on Twitter earlier today, I heard from a few people who had had no problems, but several others said they had experienced similar woes trying to upload tracks to Google’s cloud. 

All in all, Google Music is, to put it charitably, a work in progress. Apple’s announcement of a “scan and match” feature for iTunes in the cloud makes uploading even a medium-sized music collection seem as tedious and error-prone as the process inevitably will be.

I’m sure Google will improve this service over time; they don’t have any choice if they want to compete.

But I’ve seen enough to convince me that it needs more work, so I’ll set it aside for a closer look at the end of summer. By that time, Apple’s new iTunes should be online and Microsoft will be ready to show off what it’s doing with music in Windows 8. I expect Amazon will have some things to say in the fall as well.

So long for now, Google Music. See you again in September.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

74
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google Music proves why it deserves the beta label
Mordus 23rd Nov
I downloaded it this morning, seemed to be doing the same thing, 90% of my library showed that error. what was worse, after listening for @ 15 minutes on my HTC EVO an error message popped up saying my SD card was unloaded?? Yep, lost all my pictures and who knows what else? Going to take the phone to a Sprint Store this afternoon.
first of all, way to be a MSFT loser and have your stuff in .WMA, second, i'm sorry ZD isn't paying you a living salary that you can afford more than 8,000 songs.
@mikehill33 I guess you missed the error where it said he had more than the 20,000 songs allowed. Also, considering Ed is primarily a MICROSOFT blogger (hell, check the title of the blog), why shouldn't he use WMA?
@mikehill33

What is wrong with .WMA? Would you say the same about those who use .AAC?
@Cylon Centurion
Frankly, yes.
@Cylon Centurion AAC is a standardized format (ISO and IEC), while WMA is a proprietary format that can be licensed by 3rd parties.
@Cylon Centurion

WMA = dead format
@mikehill33
Wow. I can see you put your full intellect into this insightful response to the article. Perhaps you should restrict your comments until your IQ reaches double digits?
@mikehill33 You're an a$$h0Le
@sackbut - So say we all
@mikehill33 Are you okay? He is a Microsoft blogger commenting on a Google Music service which IS still in beta.
@mikehill33 By immediately calling him a loser you lost all credibility what so ever.
thanks so much for sharing! rolex yacht master replica
I would love to know in what world does anyone think putting a music library online make sense?
@Cylon Centurion
I'm with you Cylon. I can't fathom it at all. Especially when you will possibly have to pay to stream it down to your mobile devices.
@MacDuffie

Well, I was thinking more along the lines of bandwidth issues. In most places, it's not nearly big enough to support this type of service.
@Cylon Centurion
I like the idea. Then you can access your tunes from any device as long as it has access to "the cloud".

Which is all well and good until the RIAA comes along and demands to inspect Google's servers.
@TBone2k

It's a good idea *in theory*, but as Ed has shown us, bandwidth is a major problem facing cloud music.

Remember the days of the REAL player? Remember "Buffering... 75%.... Buffering....". Yeah, that comes to mind here.
0 Votes
+ -
I Put my music online
facebook@... 9th Jun
@Cylon Centurion

I like to be able to get to my music wherever I may be in the world. So, I put my NAS online.
@facebook@...

That is something I would love to do someday.
@facebook@... just pray your link doesn't go down
0 Votes
+ -
Streaming my own music...
Malcolm.Cosby 9th Jun
@facebook@...

I'm using Ampache (a cross-platform open source software that runs in any web server) to make my music available across the WWW. I'm using Lullabye on my Android phone to play it everywhere, and the built in web interface to play it when I'm sitting at a computer. There are a couple of other Android client, as well as a couple for iDevices.

I keep control of my music, it plays wherever I want it to, and it makes my friends jealous that I have 102GB of tunes at my fingertips...

Except for when my machine dies at the house. SO upgrading that hardware this summer!
@Malcolm.Cosby@... Doesn't Ampache default to something like 32kbps for streaming? Seams like there is a realistic bandwidth limitation for these streaming services.
@Cylon Centurion
Works out very well for me. I have 20 gigs of music in the cloud which is 20 gigs I don't need to waste on my phone (which only has 4 gigs left), and 20 gigs on my netbook (which has 10 gigs left), and 20 gigs on my Cr-48 (which only has 8 gigs left), and 20 gigs on my work issued laptop (which is regularly scanned for non-work files). Plus that same 20 gigs is available on my girlfriend's media center (MacBook) and my local bar's music player (old iBook). all of this with never having to sync or transfer a single file (after initial upload).
@30otnix yes and your carriers are loving you long time.
@Cylon Centurion If your name begins with A and ends in E you probably think it makes lots of sense.

Me personally - why do I need to put my library in the cloud when I have access to almost any song I could possibly want and it can be streamed directly to my phone.

Seems Ass backwards.
@jessiethe3rd
Yep, that didn't take too long. Way to make an article about Google, into an Ihater (Apple) article. Sheesh! Grow up will you.......
@Cylon Centurion I work between 5 devices and I have a music collection of about 5500 songs. I don't have that amount of storage on some of the mobile devices so I can get all of my music on them even though they can't store it locally.

I also have found that making playlists on Music allows me to sync those lists between the devices and hear the music I really want to hear. I don't have to try and copy and paste playlists manually. I think that once they get the uploading errors worked out that this will be a good solution for some of us. I am tired of buying songs or ripping albums and then not having a convenient way to sync it between all of my PC's and mobile devices. Music does give me that ability.

To be fair, I did have about 200 songs that didn't upload for various reasons. I have gone through many of them and corrected the problems. I found some of the issues were MP3 properties weren't filled in on some of the music I ripped. Going through and updating the tagging has fixed this. The rest were old DRM files that I no longer wanted anyway.
@Cylon Centurion It's backup I guess, I don't need it I'm not connected 24-7 and don't want to be.
@Cylon Centurion .. Try this world. I have more music than what fits on my SD card. It was nice uploading an extra 20,000 songs that I can stream from my phone whenever I'd like. It's basically freeing up 20,000 songs worth of space that can be used for many other things.
@Cylon Centurion .. Well I'll admit that there's probably many situations in which this wouldn't work (bad signal for example). However, in my experience with Google Music, aside from the painfully long upload process, I had no problems whatsoever. Playing music from the cloud was the same as playing music from my phone. No delay, no buffering, and the quality was great.
Are you joking with this article? The timing was not deliberate. I got my Beta invite two weeks ago, and other people I know got it even before that.

It only skipped ONE file for me for whatever reason.

I think you're a solo case here Ed. Works fine for people I've spoken with.
@Droid101: ... at all; "beta" means that software usually works for most people in most conditions, but not yet for everyone and not for any possible conditions.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeRSSS his undergarments get in a wad when something negative is mentioned about Google.
@Droid101 I have come to the conclusion that you have a LOT of imaginary friends with you in grandma's basement. Doesn't matter the topic being discussed you always seem to say something like "all the people I talk to" or "all the people I know" to indicate those people are backing up your side of the debate no matter how stupid it is.
Google/Amazon cloud music is pointless. Get a $10 memory stick/card and you could carry all the music you own anywhere in the world. And an year from now most smart phone will have a minimum of 32G memory. So from a consumer perspective the whole cloud music thing is rubbish.
@owlnet

What happens when you forget your memory stick? How do you forget the internet??
@Bob_BLC

Well what if you're in a location with no/poor connectivity?
I know where you are coming from Ed, I am in the process of uploading about 8000 songs...so far it has skipped almost 500. It really doesn't bother me though as I'm sure I only listen to about 20% of my music anyways...but yes this definetly still beta.

Also, as for the user who posted about the RIAA, a couple articles I read earlier this week said that Google will remove pirated music from this service itself. I'll try and find a link for you.
0 Votes
+ -
Isn't supported in Canada
rbethell 9th Jun
and you get the Hulu style IP wall, which sucks. Apple will be smarter about this, showing you what iCloud does do in your area, not blasting you with a "you're banned" type of page.
@rbethell that's because us canadians have the most restrictive media circulating laws and the most relax stance on music pirating. We'll be forever shait on.
A Dvd costs me 20 cents. 50 DVD cost me 10.00.
That's more music than I ever imgined having
And I never have anything go "offline"

Why would I want to upload that stuff to someone else's computers? With just a little bit of foresight, I have access to any music I would ever want, and there is no 3rd party server to go down.

Your article says that you were notified some content had DRM in it? Are you the only person that was notified?
@inkwell So it doesn't work for you, great. You need to realize that the world isn't a one size hits all kind of place.

How would he know if he was the only one notified?
I had to dismiss Google Music today, maybe the 2nd time I've had to rid myself of a Google product (can you say Google Wave).

Too slow to upload music and ugly to boot.
I have been using Google music for a week now. I have not had any of the issues that Ed has described. It is slow to upload the music. The only errors I had was it would not upload my zune subscription music. That is expected and as it should.
Google music solves a major problem. I have 60 gigs of music and 24 gig storage on my phone. How can I listen to all of my music on my phone? Google music allows me to do this. The streaming is fast and sound quality is great. There is no pause from buffering. It goes from song to song quickly. In fact there is no difference between music local on my phone and streamed from google. It is seamless and solves the limitations of phone storage nicely.
I just uploaded my music library from a vintage (PowerPC) iMac. Perhaps the process works better with OS X than with Windows....

11 hours 45 minutes to upload 1192 files (about 8gb), with 57 errors reported (4 DRM in file, 6 No music in file, 47 Unspecified "Error uploading file"). Oddly, GMB reports 1343 "songs" added, and most of the tracks identified as errors are actually in my Google Music Beta library.

Really the only glitch was that about 25% of my cover art didn't make it. Cover art in my library is a mix of what came automatically when iTunes ingested a CD, art that I found manually for CDs, and art I assigned to vinyl to MP3 conversions that I have ripped myself.

For an early beta, Google Music looks pretty good to me, it's available NOW (unlike iCloud), it has no ongoing annual cost, I can upload music that did not come from iTunes (about 99% of what I have, including vinyl to mp3 conversions), and I don't have to use any iOS devices to access it.
@S_Deemer Do we know if it will remain a free service? I have read a few times that Google had not announced pricing but have not heard that it will remain free. If you don't have any iOS devices then iCloud doesn't have many benefits for you but your comment about being able to upload music that didn't come from iTunes is misleading. You are not limited to iTunes media with iCloud at all. Also not sure if you will have to continue paying the annual fee (even as cheap as it is) with iCloud once you have matched all your songs, will be curious to see.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow, what insight...
jasonp@... 9th Jun
A beta is "a work in progress". Your parents must be proud for such a brilliant deduction. There are days I believe Ed can't possibly become more of a Microsoft suck-up and then he comes out with a doozie like this. Go back to writing about Microsoft Ed. Tell us how brilliant their betas are, how they aren't a "work in progress". Make excuses for any problems they have because the software is still in beta. Man, what a loser.
0 Votes
+ -
Not just Music...
wright_is 9th Jun
I am using Carbonite for backups. I've removed music from the list of things to back up, because it just isn't important...

My actual data is important. But on the Mac, the picture library causes lots of problems. I've taken around 20GB of photos over the last 2 months, which means that Carbonite is trying to currently back up 58GB of data... But every time I add a photo to the library, it seems to reset the counter.

At the current rate, if I don't take any more photos, it'll take about 3 months to finish the backup. As I use my camera regularly, it will never get a complete backup finished...

I use Timemachine locally (and Acronis on my Windows machine). When I go away, I make sure that the backups are up to date and store them offsite.

That doesn't help me against natural disaster, fire or theft when the drives are at home, but it is still more reliable than a cloud based solution - mainly because it does get the backups completed!
0 Votes
+ -
Google often uses the Beta label as an excuse to get early PR and traction for poor products. It's lame, and it's a misuse of the Beta idea. Thus, Google products sometimes stay in Beta for a VERY long time.
@Tim Acheson

... Only to be "kinned" shortly afterwards.
I downloaded it this morning, seemed to be doing the same thing, 90% of my library showed that error. what was worse, after listening for @ 15 minutes on my HTC EVO an error message popped up saying my SD card was unloaded?? Yep, lost all my pictures and who knows what else? Going to take the phone to a Sprint Store this afternoon.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix