ie8 fix
madison

Mac malware authors release a new, more dangerous version

By | May 25, 2011, 12:05pm PDT

Summary: Apple finally responded to the Mac Defender outbreak, with a technical note containing removal instructions and the promise of a removal tool. Within hours, the bad guys had released a new version of their malware. This one doesn’t require that you enter an administrator’s password.

Yesterday, 25 days after the Mac Defender malware began to appear in the wild, Apple finally responded. In a technical support note, “How to avoid or remove Mac Defender malware,” the company posted instructions for users to follow if they’ve encountered this malware specimen in the wild. It also promised a security update to remove infections automatically.

File that memo under, “Too little, too late.”

Within 12 hours of Apple’s announcement, the author of the original Mac Defender program had a new variant available that renders key portions of the current Mac Defender prevention plan obsolete.

A security researcher for Intego, the Mac-centric security company that identified the original Mac Defender, found the first example of this new code via a poisoned Google search very early this morning.

Several factors make this specimen different. For starters, it has a new name: MacGuard. That’s not surprising, given that the original program already had at least three names. But this one is divided into two separate parts.

The first part, a downloader program, installs in the user’s Applications folder. If you’re an administrator on your Mac (and most people are, given that the overwhelming majority of Macs have only one user and the default account in that scenario is an administrator), the installer will open automatically. All you have to do is click Continue to begin the installation.

Unlike the previous variants of this fake antivirus, no administrator’s password is required to install this program. Since any user with an administrator’s account – the default if there is just one user on a Mac – can install software in the Applications folder, a password is not needed. This package installs an application – the downloader – named avRunner, which then launches automatically. At the same time, the installation package deletes itself from the user’s Mac, so no traces of the original installer are left behind.

Update: The preceding scenario assumes that the user has visited the SEO-poisoned site using Safari (the default browser in OS X) and that the browser’s default settings are in use. You can block the automatic installation in Safari by clicking File, Preferences, and then clearing the Open “Safe” Files After Downloading check box.

In this release, visiting a malware distribution site using Firefox or Safari causes a Zip file to be downloaded. Running the installer in that Zip file does not require an administrator password.

The downloader portion then installs the second part, which is similar to the original Mac Defender.

The new architecture seems to be a specific response to Apple’s instructions in the Mac Defender security note: “In some cases, your browser may automatically download and launch the installer for this malicious software. If this happens, cancel the installation process; do not enter your administrator password.”

In this new variation, no password is required as long as you’re logged in using an administrator account. That might lull a potential victim into thinking they’re safe.

I know a lot of Apple users who breathed a sigh of relief yesterday, thinking that Apple’s belated response finally means that the problem is over. As any computer security researcher will tell you, this arms war is just getting started.

Apple appears to be treating this outbreak as if it were a single incident that won’t be repeated. They seriously underestimate the bad guys, who are not idiots. Peter James, an Intego spokeperson, told me his company’s analysts were “impressed by the quality of the original version.” The quick response to Apple’s move suggests they are capable of churning out new releases at Internet speeds, adapting their software and their tactics as their target—Apple—tries to put up new roadblocks.

If Apple plans to play Whack-a-Mole with these guys, they’re in for months of misery. Just ask any Windows security expert who was around in 2003 and 2004 when Microsoft was learning a similar painful lesson. If each reaction from Apple takes two or three weeks, the bad guys will make a small fortune and Mac users can count on significant pain and anguish.

If you’ve run across this new variation in the wild, let me know. I’ll have my eyes open and plan to report back if I find anything.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

361
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Mac malware authors release a new, more dangerous version
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
Lets see how long it takes for Apple to acknowledge this new variant and that's assuming they do. I need to go back and watch some of those Mac vs. PC ads and laugh about how Mac's couldn't get this stuff.
@LoverockDavidson

I wish they had built their operating system with security in mind.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL!
Joe_Raby 25th May
@Bookmark71

Apple design their OS with security in mind? Oh, but Uncle Skeletor, er, Steve said they did, so it must be so.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@Bookmark71

It is secure. You can't program against the user entering their password when requested by an installation routine without preventing all installations.

Maybe John Dvorak is right - people should be required to show knowledge and skill and be issued a license before they can operate a computer, just like driving an automobile.

(as soon as you make something idiot proof, somebody develops a better idiot)
0 Votes
+ -
They did.
Lester Young 25th May
@Bookmark71

For the security environment of about 15 years ago. It was ahead of Windows' security architecture when it was released, but Apple rested on those laurels while the last couple of Windows releases have increased intrinsic security by leaps and bounds.
@mseyf

Uh, mseyf.... read the article. The new version of this thing doesn't need you to enter your admin password to install this thing!

So..... Apple apparently did NOT design OSX with security in mind, as the people 'in the know' have been saying for years now.
Remember that Apple didn't build OS-X...would be interesting to have seen how resistant Copeland would have been since it completely closed-source and would likely have stayed that way.
0 Votes
+ -
Talk about lame... Mac malware can't spead all by itself... They have to trick a user to installing it and that user has to enter an admin password to do the install... Unlike Winblows... Where you can pick up malware just by visiting a site or checking out a friends facebook page (and you don't even have to be an admin, you can simply be a power user or a regular user).

But Special Eddie keeps crying that the Mac sky is falling and it isn't and everyone knows it... Mac Malware is still a great big yawn and there still isn't a virus for any version of Mac OS X... OS X is UNIX and no one is going to write a UNIX virus... Nothing to do with market share... So the only thing Mac users will ever have to deal with is socially engineered malware that requires 6 to 8 screens of user interaction to install... But all you trolls be sure to hop on that Special Ed bus and pat yourselves on the back real good...

So riddle me this special Eddie... Just how is the Mac sky falling???


???


???


???


Yeah... That's what I thought...

BTW... You can keep deleting my accounts and I can keep making more... This retarded little game you started really is lame and pointless... But I guess that is kinda fitting considering that you are really lame and pointless.

Awwwww... Did I hurt yer wittle feelwings Special Eddie??? You better go tell your mommy and get my account deweeted... That'll show dat mean ol' i8thcat... LOL... You are such a Doofus...
  • Flagged
@i8thecat3
Please, i8thecat3, please direct us to the line in Ed's article where he said anything about any sky falling?

???

???

???

Yeah... That's what I thought...

And Doofus? How old are you, 10?

You are just about the worst kind of Apple apologist that lives. You come across like a spoiled little child that has their allowance tied up in Apple stocks and is more then willing to spin any lie you can dream up to avoid any negative impact on Apple stock.

You clearly have no idea (and that in itself is very telling) but the way you just ranted only tarnishes the reputation of Mac users generally. If anyone reading your post thinks you represent in any way the thinking process of a Mac user in general they would think Mac users are a bunch of childish morons who are prepared to excuse away any flaw in a Mac to preserve their own enormously fragile self esteem thats apparently been based solely on their choice of computer hardware.

So sad indeed.
0 Votes
+ -
Grow a brain cell Cayble
i8thecat3 27th May
@Cayble

The sky is falling is a metaphor brainiac... Special eddie posting daily about how bad this so called mac malware epidemic is like chicken little running around screaming that the sky is falling...

And your ignorant claim that I am spinning a lie is just that... ignorant... have you see this malware on a Mac... Gee, No... Of course you haven't... You are still afraid to touch a mac let alone have any clue as to how they work.

So put your self rightous rant to bed, it is painfully obvious that you are a clueless MS Troll and that you ride the Special Eddie Bus.

Here is a little advice... Go touch a Mac... it's not going to bite you, and even you can quickly learn how to use them... And then, while using that mac, go hit a page with mac defender on it and see just how stupid all this troll hysteria really is... Then go stand in front of a mirror and laugh at yourself hysterically... Cus that's what you Special Eddies do.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Sigh.
rahbm 28th May
@Bookmark71
"I wish they had built their operating system with security in mind." Yeah, just like MS did, right?

The ensuing posts read like a sad roll-call of all the little Microsoft bigots, trolls and shills having their field day.
Scalable recognition is a slow evolving technology that will reap huge benefits when it fully matures. I have seen these techniques used for help systems in the area of medical diagnostics. These work best with specialty areas with distinct vocabulary requirements.
Mobile broadband uk
that information posted here seems to be very reliable, I believe you really have shown a excepicional work, I think it's very good, you posted this kind of article, keep on posting interesting stuff, hugs!
Mobile broadband uk
that information posted here seems to be very reliable, I believe you really have shown a excepicional work, I think it's very good, you posted this kind of article, keep on posting interesting stuff, hugs!
Mobile broadband uk
Great and fantastic blog. I am interested very much in the subject matter of your blog, it???s my first visit. Mobile broadband uk
Yesterday, 25 days after the Mac Defender malware began to appear in the wild, Apple finally responded. In a technical support note, ???How to avoid or remove Mac Defender malware,??? the company posted instructions for users to follow if they???ve encountered this malware specimen in the wild. Thesis Writing Service It also promised a security update to remove infections automatically.
0 Votes
+ -
LMFAO!!!
SonofaSailor 25th May
@LoverockDavidson

I'm having flashbacks of the XP days, when all the Mactards would scream at the top of their lungs: "any o/s that doesn't require a password to install something is worse than swiss cheese" and "what kind of idiot would run under an admin account"
0 Votes
+ -
So let's not be like them, OK?
Lester Young 25th May
@SonofaSailor

Well, maybe once or twice to get it out of your system.
  • Flagged
@SonofaSailor and they are exactly right. This new variant, if I read the article correctly, only requires you to be running with administrator privileges. I suppose all your Windows accounts have administrator rights? Of course not. It's a bad idea on *nix OSes and on Windows. If the user is that naive, they deserve what they get. You should create at least two accounts on every OSX instance. One for an ordinary user with no admin rights and one with admin rights. For day-to-day work, use the user account. For tasks that require admin rights, login with the admin account. How hard is that? Who would install software they don't know about anyway?

Now let's get back to work and quit calling each other's babies ugly. It's an argument that can not be won.
@LoverockDavidson
except no Mac vs PC ad ever said what you are implying they said. The commercial said that macs didn't get PC viruses, not that they were immune to anything that could ever be made.
@doh123 The commercial said that macs didn't get PC viruses, not that they were immune to anything that could ever be made.

Let's pretend we're a non-techie first time Computer buyer for just a moment here. You see a commercial that says Macs don't get all those viruses PCs do.

Do you really believe that they're not going to get the impression that Macs are immune to Viruses, Trojans, and other Malware? Really? Because to the Mac users I know, they're ALL viruses.
@doh123 The ad implied that only Windows get viruses, since the Mac guy had never had one before. Then, it implied that OSX doesn't crash, since the Windows guy crashed but the Mac guy didn't.
@doh123 To most naive users that means the same thing. That was who it was addressed to. Stop being so pedantic...
@doh123
Funny, the first anti-malware software I ever used was "Worm Food" for Mac, back in the mid 80's. The PC's (running DOS 5) just weren't targeted then.
0 Votes
+ -
Very good! You pointed out the typical...
Cayble Updated - 25th May
@doh123
...Apple double talk. And I guess if Microsoft had any brains they would run a few years worth of ad's explaining how PC's don't get Mac malware.

Its always the same with the Apple apologist crowd. Its like a four step process.

1. If your an Apple lover, concede that Apple products are not perfect or flawless. It makes you seem sane, gives your upcoming arguments an air of authenticity, and if god forbid, sometime in the future something really goes sideways you can at least save some face by saying "I never said Macs were perfect!" Plus, keep in mind, saying something isn't perfect isn't an admission that something isn't right!

2. If your an Apple lover and you come across someone pointing out that something isn't right about a Mac then immediately jump down the throat of the person saying such a thing. Fight them with everything you have and everything you can think of. Never concede that anything is not right with a Mac. Ever. Its one thing to say a Mac isn't perfect, its a completely different thing to actually admit to any specific flaw.

3. If your an Apple lover, and something does happen that for all intents and purposes does appear to be empirical evidence of something specific not being right with a Mac, do not despair or give in. Instead minimize the issue to the point of it appearing that it's actually a non-issue. Rationalize it away. Use arguments like, "when you can show me a PC that doesn't have these kind of issues worse then a Mac then talk to me about whats wrong with a Mac." Above all, never ever relent. And never, ever ever agree that PC's have been getting called out by Apple lovers for the same kinds of issues. That admission can never happen because it minimizes the very things we have been claiming are wrong with PC's.

4. If your an Apple lover, try not to let an opportunity to bash PC's pass you by. When times seem hard for anything about the reputation of Mac's, thats actually when you should be looking at the situation as an opportunity! Its hard to take any kind of issue with a Mac seriously if you can divert attention from the issue at hand by pointing out that PC's have had all sorts of problems and issues for years, and best of all, most PC users concede that so it should be easy!!

Happy hunting.
@doh123

This new programmed response is interesting. "No, the ads said they wouldn't get PC VIRUSES." Since I've seen this several times from supposedly different authors, I'd say this ridiculous (laughable) interpretation must be spread by some central propaganda source, just like the ridiculous political nostrums are sent out for the gullible to spread, word for word, with no analysis required.

So, fess up, doh123, who told you to spread this nonsense?
0 Votes
+ -
Verbatim
Lester Young 25th May
@doh123

one of the Mac TV commercial bimbos said "....without viruses, crashes, or a ton of headaches." Apple doesn't use that language in print, but the attempts to make users believe Macs are immune to viruses are still pretty transparent.
@doh123 - yes, malware and social engineering can cause minor issues for any OS, but this wasn't a virus, a worm or a trojan.

Mac OSX remains the most secure OS by a long mile, so this is more about "educating switchers" to the Mac not to be so uneducated. The Mac community didn't fall for it, it was Windows users that went through all the extra hoops to install this benign software.

Glad Apple acted so quickly, now this minor "scareware" problem is over. Former Windows users need to learn not to be tricked, so let this be a lesson to them.

Apple will go ahead and convict the people behind it, there is no room for security issues within the Mac community. They will end up in jail, just watch.
@Pederson

The same can be said in the reverse, that the only windows users who have ever been infected are clueless former Mac users who blindly clicked on anything and everything.

It'd be completely false, but that didn't stop you either.

As for your faith in Job's lawyers, are you really thinking Apple's going to get an extradition order from China or Russia for a malware author? Can't wait to see it.
0 Votes
+ -
Couple of things wrong with your post.
UrNotPayingAttention 25th May
@Pederson

First - Apple themselves called this a trojan, in a internal document. First paragraph, under "symptoms". Now, either they don't understand malware classifications, or you don't... which is it?

http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/apple-macdefender-investigation-may-16-2011.png?tag=mantle_skin;content

Second - as to "The Mac community didn't fall for it, it was Windows users that went through all the extra hoops to install this benign software."

When a Windows user stops using Windows, and gets a Mac, they stop being a Windows user. They are a Mac user at that point, and are apart of the Mac community. What... is it like a country club, and even after someone pays to join, they have to be deemed worthy of the group before they can become apart of the group? Yeah, that really breaks through the "Mac users are snobs" persona.

Thirdly - "Mac OSX remains the most secure OS by a long mile,"

Please. Charlie Miller, who hacks for a living, has even said Windows 7 is more inherently secure than OS X. Not to mention, there are several Linux distros that make OS X look like XP pre-sp2.
@doh123 Is a Mac not a Personal Computer, thats what PC means and Apple at the time was lying through its teeth in that there was a virus making the rounds, it was a test virus that informed its maker that it had successfully installed then erased itself. It was in preparation for something bigger to happen later, well now is later and I have a feeling Lord Steve Jobs is the cause, in the last two Blackhat competitions he has refused to honor the $10,000 prize for hacking the Mac OS, so now he has made Apple a prime target especially that they are now bragging that they are gaining on Windows.
@everyone
you all must just be stupid. If some idiot cannot understand a commercial, that is their problem. The fact is the commercial didn't even say that Macs don't get viruses, they didn't even say that Macs don't get PC viruses... It was said that X number of new viruses came out the previous year for PCs, then "Mac" simple said "yeah PCs, not Macs" ... truth be told, that only means there there were no X number of viruses the previous year discovered for Macs.

I'm not the one twisting anything here, its the Apple haters who try to twist every word Apple says into something evil.
@doh123 If some idiot cannot understand a commercial, that is their problem.

Do you work for Apple's legal team? Because you sound like a lawyer. ewww
@doh123 The problem with even bring up the ads are they are just that, ads. Who in their right mind believes everything said or implied it every ad they see?
Ed argued for a response, go it, now points out it won't work.

Apple can't respond to every piece of malware. The original tech note applies; don't troubleshoot the impossible, put them onto anti-malware software.

Funny Ed should be bring up lessons from 2003 when he was demanding the opposite a day ago.
@Richard Flude ... I would be willing to bet my career that someday Apple really will have a product-- let's say "iDefender" for now-- that will be a full-fledged, integrated security experience for the Mac, just like Windows Defender and Security Essentials. OR they will completely redesign OSX in a way that forces users to continually acknowledge prompts much like Windows with User Account Control prompts.
@Richard Flude: "Apple can't respond to every piece of malware" ... and yet you expect Microsoft to do so.

As has been pointed out here MANY times, once OSX exceeded the 10% of market share threshold, Apple had better be ready to deal with the inevitible malware issue. Alas, Apple have done nothing to prepare to address malware on OSX as these first couple of attacks have clearly illustrated. Now Apple has a BIG problem on its hands that will only get worse.

Alas, they've sold a product based on claims which everyone else in the industry repeatedly pointed out as being naive and inaccurate, and yet the continued unabated.

I don't expect it'll be long before we see the first class-action lawsuit suing Apple for losses caused due to their products actually being susceptible to malware, despite their advertising and claims to the contrary.
0 Votes
+ -
@Richard Flude Apple can't respond to every piece of malware. Oh THAT is rich! It simply amazes me that you say this when you mac fanbois are always saying that Microsoft should be responding to every single malware threat... Cue the Double Standards!
0 Votes
+ -
Why not? it is only two so far
Mister Spock Updated - 25th May
@Richard Flude
yet other companies respond to all of them.

It appears that Apple is as innept as many people had concluded as they can not even deal with two pieces of malware.

Yet, what should one expect from a company that felt "security by obscurity" was a logical approach?

plain
0 Votes
+ -
Links please
Richard Flude 25th May
bitcrazed, athynz and spock : where have I ever call for MS to respond to each piece of malware?

I've actually stated, for more than a decade, the anti-malware model used will never be effective and repeatedly called for a different response.

I've never claimed Macs are immune from malware, and pointed to their low market penetration as positive. I've repeatedly called for Apple to improve it's security.

This does not alter the fact that windows is awash with malware!

The MCSEs have a real problem with basic english comprehension. After the third post on this topic you'd think they'd get it.
@LoverockDavidson
I dare you. Just find a single Apple add that says that Macs are safer than PC computers.
You won't find any. It's all in your head.
@Rafale555 http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-os/#viruses "Safeguard your data. By doing nothing"

"Macs don't get PC viruses". Mac Vs. PC ad, and on the website.

Apparently it's in Steve Jobs' head as well.
@Rafale555 almost all the ads I have seen for pcs/macs talk about virus i.e security. What are you talking about ? Go to youtube and you will find plenty. Examples:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TABhGdeGyM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQb_Q8WRL_g
@Rafale555

"I dare you.... "
ROFL
0 Votes
+ -
@Rafale555
The ads say do nothing. Since there IS STILL NO VULNERABILITY UNLESS THE USER TYPES THEIR PASSWORD, I suppose the ad is correct.
@Rafale555 - from http://www.apple.com/why-mac/better-os/:

" It doesn?t get PC viruses.

A Mac isn?t susceptible to the thousands of viruses plaguing Windows-based computers. That?s thanks to built-in defenses in Mac OS X that keep you safe, without any work on your part."

... and ...

" Safeguard your data. By doing nothing.

With virtually no effort on your part, Mac OS X defends against viruses and other malicious applications, or malware. For example, it thwarts hackers through a technique called ?sandboxing? ? restricting what actions programs can perform on your Mac, what files they can access, and what other programs they can launch. Other automatic security features include Library Randomization, which prevents malicious commands from finding their targets, and Execute Disable, which protects the memory in your Mac from attacks.
"
@Rafale555

DOH
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix