ie8 fix
madison

Stay safe online: 5 secrets every PC (and Mac) owner should know

By | July 7, 2011, 5:11pm PDT

Summary: My #1 help question of 2011? It’s no contest: “How do I protect myself online?” In this post, I share the five steps I teach to friends, family members, and clients who want to avoid malware, scareware, phishing sites, and other online scams.

In any given week, I get dozens of requests for help. The #1 question of 2011? It’s no contest:

“How do I protect myself online?”

These days I’m getting that question in equal numbers from PC and Mac owners who are concerned about the best way to avoid being sucker-punched by social engineering attacks.

Many people think that security begins and ends with antivirus software. I disagree. Should you run antivirus software? As I’ve said before, if you don’t know the answer to that question, then the answer is yes.

So let’s stipulate that you’re running a well-supported, up-to-date security program—whether you use a PC or a Mac. What else do you need to do? In this post, I share the five steps I teach to friends, family members, and clients who want to avoid malware, scareware, phishing sites, and other online scams.

If you’ve been paying attention to the current threat landscape, much of the advice in this post will be familiar, even obvious. A lot of it is just common sense, but some is unconventional wisdom. Yes, of course you should expect to be attacked if you download porn or pirated software. But just staying out of bad online neighborhoods isn’t sufficient anymore.

These days, threats can come from unexpected places: Google (and Bing) search results, compromised websites, deceptive ads, seemingly innocent downloads. You don’t have to be doing anything out of the ordinary to inadvertently stumble across one of these potential threats.

If I had to summarize my guidance in a single sound bite, it would go something like this: Pay attention to your surroundings, and don’t be stupid.

Let’s break that down.

Step 1: Don’t panic.

To borrow from a classic Monty Python sketch,  the two … no, three chief weapons of online criminals are “fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency.” Their goal is to appear when you don’t expect them and convince you to act hastily. Online criminals often play on fear (your PC or Mac is infected with malware!) or simple social engineering (try these smileys! oh, and you need this codec—fake, of course—to play an enticing video clip).

The antidote to Monty Python, of course, is Douglas Adams, for whom “Don’t panic” was the secret of successful intergalactic hitchhiking.

When in doubt, stop. Think. Ask for help. If you’re truly worried, pull the plug on your Internet connection temporarily until you can call a knowledgeable friend or drag the machine in to a specialist for a thorough diagnosis.

You should, of course, have a regular backup routine. Mechanical failures (a crashed hard drive or a dropped notebook) can be even more devastating than a malware attack. With Windows 7, you can use the built-in backup program to save an image backup on an external hard drive; you can do the same thing on a Mac using Time Machine. Restoring a full backup is easy, especially if the alternative is spending hours trying to track down a well-hidden infection.

And don’t be paranoid. I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard from otherwise smart people who break out all sorts of terrible tools—registry cleaners and system optimizers being the worst offenders—at the first sign of trouble. Those snake-oil programs, in my experience, tend to make the problem worse.

Page 2: Stay up to date –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

145
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

No OS is Not Susceptible Given...
roystreet Updated - 7th May
All I can say is....Give it time, give it time...and enough users. When there is a good user base & people keep talking about how "indestructible an OS is", flaws will be revealed. It's very foolish to keep talking about how indestructible it is. People will take that as a personal challenge...and...a larger user base will give more of a reason for people to try. Linux has an incredibly small user base compared to Windows, but it's increasing.

Anything made by man has a way to be broken by another man. (or by the same man)
Remember the old saying, "Where there's a will, there's a way"...It holds true in any area of life. I have quite a bit of experience using Linux, but none really using the Mac OS. It's amazing some of the things Linux can do, how secure it is, & very customizable. Windows also is very customizable. Many times it's the 3rd party software vendors that cause trouble. If users were more Personally concerned about security (Instead of just buying 3rd party software to make it more 'secure') there would be a lot less of the issues with Windows or Android today.

Overall, I prefer Windows, there is a lot more software development involved, so many more software options.

Like I said though - Give it time & a larger user base...You will see problems arise.

EDIT: More likely it's the user that opens the door to exploitation, then, it's the 3rd party software that helps do the trick as well.
0 Votes
+ -
Good post
kcredden2 Updated - 7th Jul
Here's a couple of extra tips that I've used for years.

#1 spam. When you come by a site, or program that insists on your e-mail address. No matter what, don't give them your main addresses. Have a 'spam honeypot' web mail address, just for this. If it's needed, you can hop on, get what ever's needed then get off. I also use this on (then) the USENet, and it's listed publicly.

#2 Lastpass. I totally agree 100%. However, we do a lot of businesses with companies that have to have files uploaded. Do you know that every single one has fixed the web sites so you cannot save login/passwords though Firefox and IE? I've told my employer, that's the stupidest thing to do. For that makes people want to re-use passwords, and make them rediciously easy to remember.

"1-2-3-4-5? That's amazing. I've got the same combination on my luggage."

Thanks however, to Lastpass, that isn't a problem anymore.

I'm going to share this article around. It's great to use, even in linux.

- Kc
Only 1 way to not get infected. Use Linux or Unix and don't open any executables you're not familiar with.
@nicholas22
Speaking of SPAM. I Love Linux and I hate when people say this. NO OS IS SAFE! So be responsible.
@KBot Sorry to hurt your feelings. But using Linux/Unix you automatically get better security due to fewer malware threats (orders of magnitude fewer). I didn't say they're invulnerable.
  • Flagged
@nicholas22: I think you miss the point. 1) Mac with its Unix kernel is comparable to Linux in bulletproofness; 2) the major threat these days is "social engineering" trojanware, not viruses; and 3) if Linux is safer than the others it's only because the users are invariably uber-geeks who are not likely to fall for the deceitful tactics trojanware depends on to be effective.
@nicholas22

leave it to a freetard to go way off topic. Repeat after me there is NO 100% safe OS and keep saying it until. Oh and your a flat out lair type this into any search provider "linux infections" That proofs you are a lair.
Now you can say its safer that's closer to the truth
@Stan57
No platform is invulnerable but it's one and only one that totally stinks in the security department. I'll give you a hint: it's from Redmond.
  • Flagged
@Mikael_z: No platform is invulnerable but it's one and only one that totally stinks in the security department. I'll give you a hint: it's from Redmond.
@nicholas22 Your post is highly informative and interesting, thanks for sharing this valuable information.
Olwa University
  • Flagged
@nicholas22 Not opening an .exe you don't know isn't always possible..sometimes I like to test software and if you like to do that sometimes you have to install things you're not so sure about. IDK about Linux or Unex too much because I have only used it a few times but with an up to date Vista/7 with Microsoft Security Essentials installed it seems to catch anything that will cause issues I have threw at it the last few years..in fact I think it has been 5 years since I have had a major failure with Windows and my computer has been on 24/7 (excluding reboots and going away for more than a day) for the most part since 2004/2005..sure I have found things at times but I easily removed them usually in a few secs-mins.

Really what your saying is true about Windows because if you don't open/install anything you're not sure about and you keep it up to date you won't have any issues with Windows...
@nicholas22 hmmm ok!!!
Very well presented thing, moreover incredibly valuable thoughts. In order to read supplementary material on the subject, it is easy to visit http://france-pharma.com/
Lujayn
@kcredden2

So among those businessses, "every single one has fixed the web sites so you cannot save login/passwords though Firefox and IE? "

That is not as bad an idea as you make it sound like. For neither Microsoft nor Mozilla have done their homework with this feature. They offer it as a 'convenience' without first convincing the user according to sound reasoning that they store it in a secure manner. But this encourages people to sloppy with security in a different way.

Now I don't know how Mozilla stores the password information. But I do know that on Android, they were recently caught storing the information in the clear on the phone file system. This is incredibly bad. Does either Mozilla or Microsoft do substantially better?
@mejohnsn Yes, these browsers are well known and to create a sense of security amongst their users they make sure that the user information should stay secure and stay out of reach of malwares.
Coursework | Assignment
@mejohnsn: If you set a master password in Firefox then it will all be encrypted.
But you should be aware that it's practically useless in most cases to "scramble" the passwords whenever the user don't need to enter another password to decrypt/unscramble them. That's because if access don't have to be authorized, then any app that already can read the password database can decrypt the passwords too.
Oh, and my Samsung Galaxy S allows me to set a master password.
@kcredden2 I strongly agree with your idea, never give you email id as they are actually creating a pool of email ids and sell them to mass email submission companies.
Admission Essay | Essay | Research Paper
You can share some of your article, I'm like you write something, really very good! I will continue to focus on. Never done in the article comments, this is my first network comments, appreciate you sharing. Very good article fashion ********
***** hangbags
Tip-top article. I'm sending this to my in-laws happy
0 Votes
+ -
Good information
Richard Flude 9th Jul
I'd add tell them they will be offered all sorts of financial incentives but you don't win competitions you didn't go in, nor are you entitled to money from the IRS, a bank, or a royal family in Africa.

Never give out personal information to people. if people call you claiming to be from XYZ company requesting information to prove who you are tell them you'll call them back (not on a number they give you) but via a number you get from an invoice, web site or whitepages.
The techie and non-techie both alike will sure need this. Thanks Ed for sharing.
"If you?re queasy about the idea of having all your passwords stored on a web site, then consider RoboForm Pro."

Or KeePass, which is free.
@CobraA1 +1.

I use KeePassX on Linux. It is truly superb. Its encrypted datafile is portable, so if I have to use a Windows box, then I can still access my passwords. It has a really nice, customisable password generator. This means I can generate a different, full strength password for every site to which I belong.

It has a flexible (and very pretty) categorisation system - so I can group my various passwords together in a meaningful way. It allows me to store additional information against each password, e.g URL, user name, notes, expiry dates etc.

It's open source, so its unlikely to have any nasty back doors. And as you rightly say, it's free.

Best wishes, G.
@mrgoose
I too use Keypass on my Linux and Windows network. Main key database on one server with backup databases and on clients, in case of connection failure.
The Windows clients use the older Keypass for backward compatibility. I have to say I love generating unique keys for sites.
Another excellent read. I wish more people payed more attention to what they do online, but it seems most of the time words like these fall on deaf ears.

Most users nowadays simly don't care enough to follow through on all of this, just as long as they get to where they were going. Case in point: an ad could display in big bold letters "CLICK HERE TO INSTALL VIRUSES! (And win an Apple iPad2!)" and they WOULD STILL click the dang thing. And the surprising thing would be, they would be more upset over the fact that they won't be getting that iPad, over the fact that they just infected their machine.

Eitherway, this is yet another article I have bookmarked for future reference.
@Cylon Centurion -- Users are the front line, and the last line in security, with anti-virus, anti-malware, and firewall apps being the middle men in the internet game.

The real first and last barriers to infection and cracked machines is the loose nut behind the keyboard, aka "YOU, Mister or Miss User" There isn't a program in the world that can stop you from doing things that you shouldn't. Even when prompted "needs administrator permission" or having added something like Spybot's TeaTimer ... "allow allow allow .... hmmm ... I wonder why my searches are now from websearchhelpertoolbar.com ?"

And it takes the user having an ACTIVE roll in understanding its their fault and how they should have seen it coming, and how they should have selected the "custom install" option so that they wouldn't get the bing/ask/yahoo bars without direct informed consent..
@ Sir Edward 'Eddie Baby' Bott (borrowing from a classic Monty Python Sketch)

And for the really secure minded only surf or get email within a virtual machine.

PS we should have pass phrases rather than passwords.
@Alan Smithie
I think pass phrases is an excellent idea. They's be easier to remember also.
@sackbut: Use a passphrase for a pass database like KeePassX, then use it to generate and store (encrypted) passes. 20 characters are recommended (by me, at least), and let KeePass generate them.
Good sound well explained common sense Ed. Gonna send this to several of my relatives and friends!
Yes, good tips.
But they won?t make your PC an absolutely save place for all your sensible info.
What companies and government services do, is building separated networks for highly sensitive info. In the end, they know they can not, with all their resources and knowledge, protect the info on INTERNET connected systems.

Consider this, with a good backup, is it really that dramatic when 95% of your information would we stolen? Probably not, it is just that 5% or less.

We can do something similar as the big companies. Have a multiboot system or a virtual PC to keep sensible data separated from the INTERNET. These days this is simple and can be done without spending another $. If you need a system that you need to trust for 100% to be not infected but that needs to make an INTERNET connection to some trusted sites, like your bank site, think about a live CD. No malware can install itself on the CD and after rebooting it will be as clean as it was et the moment it was installed.
Excellent article Ed! Great advice for both tech/ internet savvy people and tech/internet newbies.
I'm not just queasy about any service like LastPass, they give me anaphalitic shock!

I feel they are just the holy grail for hackers.

Imagine if LastPass *was* compromised, on the same scale as Sony. Yes, it's unlikely, but it's not impossible. And if it did happen...

Brrr.

Nightmare city. It's just a variation of using the same password everywhere. Which brings up the whole federated password scheme that MS and Google and everyone else would love us to implement.

Not to mention the abuse potential for law enforcement...

I don't have any answers to the password issue. That's a thorny problem and the heart of security right now. Passwords *suck* for all the many reasons in Ed's article and others like it--but everything else sucks worse--sort of like democracy, I guess. happy

My first suggestion is to pass a law that *every damn site* has to store passwords that are encrypted--and that the site has no ability to decrypt the passwords into plain text.

There's no need for anyone but the user to know their password and if they forget it the site can reset it for them and then force them to change it when they log in once--which, of course, is another potential hole but better than what we have now.
@wolf_z Agree. Lastpass is more dangerous than reusing passwords. Better just to write your passwords down on a piece of paper and stick it to the side of your computer. Virus programs and dodgy websites cannot read this! Unless the bad guys actually break into your home they can't get you. (if your afraid of this, write the passwords in your diary in disguised form)

Personally, I have two passwords, one for max security, eg my bank, and another for less important websites. If the unimportant websites are compromised, no danger to my bank. If my bank password is compromised, well then I'm in big trouble anyway!
@wolf_z
Even if someone was able to hack the lastpass site they won't get much information from there. The passwords/usernames used by the users are encrypted so that even the LastPass employees allegedly can't access your information. It's encrypted locally before even being sent to the lastpass site.

I feel very confident in using lastpass over any other type of online service to store my passwords. I use it on every computer so that I can log into any site, from any of them, without having to remember anything more than the login credentials for my lastpass account, which I hope is secure enough that IT can't be easily guessed.
Great article, great tips. ZDNet needs more write ups like this.
I realize it's very impolitic to suggest this, but aren't there hundreds of thousands of known types of malware and variants for PC's in the wild? Millions even?

And aren't there a grand total of three known pieces of malware for Macs?

Does that not suggest that from a mere numbers perspective, you will dodge 99% or better of known threats just by using a Mac instead of a PC?
1 Vote
+ -
Contributr
Wrong
Ed Bott 8th Jul
@HollywoodDog

The biggest threats are from phishing attempts and identity theft, often facilitated by web-based social networks. Those are platform-agnostic.
@Ed Bott

Of course, if you are daft enough to fall for a phishing scam or if you use your dog's five-letter name as your password for every site to which you belong, then your screwed. It doesn't matter what platform you use.

Stupidity aside, I feel one is much safer if one avoids using Windows to surf the Web. An operating system that allows its users to be compromised simply by visiting a site must be regarded as deeply unsatisfactory.

I'm not a great Apple fan either. Whilst I accept the argument that one is safer with Mac than with Microsoft products, I resent paying vast sums for what is still predominantly Chinese made hardware, just to display Apple's logo.

Personally, I prefer one of the free, open source Unix-like OS's such as Debian or Ubuntu, running on cheap unbranded hardware. This is a solution I have successfully rolled out to my business, to my family and to my customers.

This has the advantage that the bogus antifungus products that Windows users (and even some Mac users) fall for, will not run on Linux. Even if these bogus apps would run, my Linux users generally would not be tempted anyway because they do not perceive the need for such products.

Furthermore, all my users are told that unless they have a damned good reason, they should only install software from their operating systems' software repositories. This closes off another major attack vector. And of course, the rigidly-applied file access permissions on Linux systems means that users always have to make a conscious decision to install something.

Since dumping Microsoft over four years ago, this strategy has delivered fantastic bangs-per-buck coupled with zero malware incidents.

Best wishes, G.
-2 Votes
+ -
Hangon, Ed said it was an exe
HollywoodDog 8th Jul
@Ed Bott "Of course, if you are daft enough to fall for a phishing scam or its ilk, then it doesn't matter what platform you use."

The phishing Ed describes in the article downloads an exe, which does nothing on the Mac. Doesnt' that mean this phishing is useless against Mac users?

(Ducking)
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Wrong
Ed Bott 8th Jul
@Hollywood

"The phishing Ed describes in the article downloads an exe..."

No, that is social engineering, not phishing. The Facebook phishing attempt brings up a logon dialog box that asks for my credentails. It will work on any platform.

There have been several fake-codec scams that have targeted Macs. None of them (yet) has achieved wide usage. That could change anytime.
@HollywoodDog I realize it's very impolitic to suggest this, but

But.... you did it anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
Hallowed, the system worked
HollywoodDog 8th Jul
@HollywoodDog ... I was publicly thrashed by my betters, and the Mac's perceived inherent security advantage demolished by Bott.

His point from a previous post: "the Mac community has a pretty consistent collective understanding of how computer security works" was reinforced by my obvious stupidity. Just because 99% of malware is for PC's that doesn't mean there is unequal threat between Mac and PC.

Bott then said "And [Mac users] believe, sincerely but also incorrectly, that OS X is inherently secure and that they are basically immune as long as they avoid doing stupid things."

I'm not sure whether responding to phishing attempts delivered by web-based social networks constitute a 'stupid' thing or not - I kind of assumed they did.

Apparently I'm a sincere but misinformed rube who needs to reread all his previous instructions from Mr. Bott.
@HollywoodDog
Bott then said "And [Mac users] believe, sincerely but also incorrectly, that OS X is inherently secure and that they are basically immune as long as they avoid doing stupid things."

That's kind of funny. I'd say that at this point that's not far from true even with the much targeted Windows. Of course avoiding doing stupid things is what this article is all about, really.
@HollywoodDog

If Mac, or Linux for that matter, had equal market share, they would have equal attacks. And it's likely more unknown vulnerabilities would be found.

But since Mac will never reach such lofty numbers, yea, you're probably safe.

Clown. Don't you get tired of spewing the same thing over and over? Go hang out with the other fanbois and let people who actually have use for this info get into a conversation that is helpful to them instead of just you and those like you on a different OS (linux/unix) using this as a forum to bash the dominant OS in the world for PC's.

Beat it. Bum.
1 Vote
+ -
@HollywoodDog

Here he has a list of safe practices, that if the Mac communitry would have followed, you would not have to have come here defending the Mac users who where infected with the Malware (to the point that Apple had to finally speak to in public).

But then again, you can never pass up an opportinty to belittle MS or their users, can you?

I think it's a great article that will benefit the Mac users more then the Windows users as they are the ones who believe the incorrect things people like you tell them about "being immune" and all.
-1 Votes
+ -
Please don't hurt me Mr. Zern!
HollywoodDog 8th Jul
@John Zern ... I was merely asking in the comments section in the article of what stupid things not to do online whether Mac users can feel comfortable if they don't do stupid things online.

Apparently we need to be frightened at all times, avoid dark corners of the internet, and go out of our way not to do stupid things online, however Mac users are at risk even if they *don't* do stupid things online, despite their sincere but incorrect belief that OSX is inherently more secure than Windows and that avoiding stupidity online will protect them, which it won't according to Bott's last article on the subject.

So fine, you win, I'm a terrified Mac user who sincerely understands that I need to avoid the dark corners of the internet and not do stupid things online, although even not doing stupid things online isn't enough to protect a Mac user becuase it's just so dangerous to use Macs because they're so not inherently secure even though there are only three known pieces of malware for them compared to hundreds of thousands or millions for PC's.

Am I scared enough yet?
  • Flagged
-1 Votes
+ -
Please don't hurt me Mr. Zern!
HollywoodDog 8th Jul
@John Zern ... I was merely asking in the comments section in the article of what stupid things not to do online whether Mac users can feel comfortable if they don't do stupid things online.

Apparently we need to be frightened at all times, avoid dark corners of the internet, and go out of our way not to do stupid things online, however Mac users are at risk even if they *don't* do stupid things online, despite their sincere but incorrect belief that OSX is inherently more secure than Windows and that avoiding stupidity online will protect them, which it won't according to Bott's last article on the subject.

So fine, you win, I'm a terrified Mac user who sincerely understands that I need to avoid the dark corners of the internet and not do stupid things online, although even not doing stupid things online isn't enough to protect a Mac user becuase it's just so dangerous to use Macs because they're so not inherently secure even though there are only three known pieces of malware for them compared to hundreds of thousands or millions for PC's.

Am I scared enough yet?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@John Zern
everyone who disagrees with you, or is tired of seeing troll posts (you can disguise them any way you wish, we can see them for what they are) is "frightened at all times", ect. then there is not much I can do for you.

I do notice the amount of people that seem to say the same thing in reference to your posts, is it because we are all "frightened", or observent enough to see the pattern to your responses, and respond accordingly?

After all, isn't that what you are after?
0 Votes
+ -
Not freightened, HD
John Zern 8th Jul
@HollywoodDog

more like many of us are tired of trolls (you can disguise your post any way you wish, we all know exactly what they are) so continue telling yourself what it is you wish, if you believe we do not see you for what you really are, then there is nothing anyone can do to help you.

But as you feel so hopelesslly freightend of Microsoft and everything they produce to the point that it taints everything you write, then why become so upset when people here respond in the way they do, as that is what you wan't, isn't it?

BTW: I did not flag you, I just wanted you to know that...
0 Votes
+ -
@John Zern ...Kapersky people are calling it the "indestructible" botnet because it infects the MBR. It has already infected 4.5 million Windows computers in the first three months of 2011.

For information Google "TDL-4".

Everyone else on the planet has a story about it.

"But then again, you can never pass up an opportinty to belittle MS or their users, can you?"

"I think it's a great article that will benefit the Mac users more then the Windows users as they are the ones who believe the incorrect things people like you tell them about "being immune" and all."

TDL-4 has it's own built in AV that disables "pre-existing" botnets it finds on the computer along with numerous other malware. So, you know when your Windows computer is infected with TDL-4 because it suddenly runs faster?

It hasn't made it's debut on ZDNet because it only affects Windows and is too incriminating.
  • Flagged
@Joe.Smetona

And is that not a biased statement, claiming that ZDNet would not do a story on it as it is incriminating?

That would indicate that you too are interested only in truths that effect Microsoft in a negative way, deciding to remain staunchly quiet on any story effecting Linux or Apple in a negative way, while steering quite clear of the positive Microsoft articles that do not offer you the oppurtunity to paint Microsoft or their user base in a negative fashion.

Have I missed anything?

plain
0 Votes
+ -
No OS is Not Susceptible Given...
roystreet Updated - 7th May
All I can say is....Give it time, give it time...and enough users. When there is a good user base & people keep talking about how "indestructible an OS is", flaws will be revealed. It's very foolish to keep talking about how indestructible it is. People will take that as a personal challenge...and...a larger user base will give more of a reason for people to try. Linux has an incredibly small user base compared to Windows, but it's increasing.

Anything made by man has a way to be broken by another man. (or by the same man)
Remember the old saying, "Where there's a will, there's a way"...It holds true in any area of life. I have quite a bit of experience using Linux, but none really using the Mac OS. It's amazing some of the things Linux can do, how secure it is, & very customizable. Windows also is very customizable. Many times it's the 3rd party software vendors that cause trouble. If users were more Personally concerned about security (Instead of just buying 3rd party software to make it more 'secure') there would be a lot less of the issues with Windows or Android today.

Overall, I prefer Windows, there is a lot more software development involved, so many more software options.

Like I said though - Give it time & a larger user base...You will see problems arise.

EDIT: More likely it's the user that opens the door to exploitation, then, it's the 3rd party software that helps do the trick as well.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix