ie8 fix
madison

Updating the Windows 7 release schedule

By | March 26, 2009, 10:30am PDT

Microsoft has been doing an admirable job of suppressing leaks about its Windows 7 release plans. But someone in Redmond needs to do a better job of teaching its own employees when not to hit the Publish button on web pages. As my colleague Mary Jo Foley noted this morning, Emil Protalinski at Ars Technica posted screen shots of a page at Microsoft’s Technet Plus site offering details about the Windows 7 release candidate, including a May 2009 date when it will, presumably, be available for download by the public.

I visited the page myself and can confirm it’s real, although the URL suggests it was supposed to be hidden in a staging area of the TechNet Evaluation Center and not found by outsiders.

Based on the details in this preliminary page and some additional tidbits I’ve heard from my own sources, I can make some pretty good guesses about the current plans for Windows 7 (all, of course, subject to the vagaries of bug-catching and coding):

Release Candidate escrow: Before end of April? In all previous milestone releases, Microsoft has taken a few weeks for exhaustive testing (with some tweaks to the code) before declaring a build ready for general release.

Release Candidate available to public: May? The fact that the TechNet page is written, formatted, and ready for staging suggests that the development team has a high degree of confidence in its ability to deliver in the month of May. Of course, changing May to June on an HTML page isn’t exactly rocket science, so the date could slip. But placing your bets on the middle of May seems pretty safe.

Release to OEM partners: Late July or early August? Microsoft will almost certainly give its OEM partners a crack at the code first, because they are the ones with a pressing need to qualify drivers and utilities and build packages they can install on PCs. OEMs that do offshore manufacturing need a few extra weeks of lead time to get products built in Asia and shipped to markets in the U.S., Western Europe, and elsewhere. I suspect this won’t happen until July 1 at the very earliest (and probably later in July). That’s the clear conclusion from this text on the Microsoft web page:

You don’t need to rush to get Windows 7 RC. The RC release will be available at least through June 2009 and we’re not limiting the number of product keys, so you have plenty of time.

Any date on the schedule for this milestone is going to be written in pencil, not indelible ink. Steven Sinofsky’s team has made it abundantly clear that they are not going to rush to hit an arbitrary date. I’m sure there’s a target date, but there’s still room for it to slip into August.

Release to web: August 24? One big question is when Microsoft will release the final Windows 7 bits to subscribers at MSDN and TechNet Plus. The calculus gets a little complicated, because the time between release to MSDN/TechNet and widespread availability on BitTorrent will be measured in hours. I’m betting that subscribers get a head start of a few weeks, but not much more. I’ve picked the August 24 date because it’s a magic one for Microsoft. They’d love nothing better than to see comparisons to the successful Windows 95 launch, which was also on August 24.

Retail launch: Late September? Marketing professionals will tell you: “Never launch a new product before Labor Day.” If OEMs get code in July, they can have systems ready to deliver to customers in September, maybe even with a simultaneous retail launch. The back-to-school market is not an important target given the oddities of school schedules these days (many school districts in the U.S. start in early August now, and some operate year-round). But holiday sales are crucial, and a September release allows for a full-on marketing blitz for the fourth quarter.

Almost a year ago, I picked July 29, 2009 as the date when Windows 7 would be released to manufacturing. The readers of this site picked September 30, 2009 for the launch date. Based on the current code, both predictions look pretty good.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

19
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

..what are you trying to run it on?
NamelessFor Now 20th Apr 2009
I'm with the other guy.. I haven't seen a BSOD for as long as I care to remember. I have had nothing but good things to say about Windows 7(build 7000) and I've been using it as my primary operating system for 4 and a half solid months. I've played games, run 3D modelling software, Photoshop.. you name it, all rock solid.
0 Votes
+ -
Are they ...
n0neXn0ne Updated - 26th Mar 2009
"Microsoft has been doing an admirable job of suppressing leaks about its Windows 7 release plans. But someone in Redmond needs to do a better job of teaching its own employees when not to hit the Publish button on web pages."


Are they looking for the leaker? Is it an inside job? Did the leaker get fired?

If it's an inside job then it's marketing. wink

It's convenient to use incompetents when it's advantageous.

^o^

0 Votes
+ -
It is funny....
storm14k 26th Mar 2009
...to see these "leaks" and then watch the blogosphere play along.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Occam's razor
Ed Bott 26th Mar 2009
Never attribugte to malice what can be explained by incompetence. This was in a staging area, which is an essential part of running any big website. It wasn't published to the main site. Someone with mad search skillz stumbled across it. Stuff happens. I don't see this as marketing. Theere are better, more reliable ways to do that.
0 Votes
+ -
....
n0neXn0ne Updated - 26th Mar 2009
"Stuff happens."

True, but:

Microsoft don't seem to be perturbed by these " leaks ".

Microsoft has not released an official statement saying it won't happen again.

It is funny....


Ed, please correct me if I'm wrong.

^o^

0 Votes
+ -
Actually...
fairportfan 27th Mar 2009
...i think that was Clausewitz.

Occam's Razor, in its simplest form, says that the simplest explanation that adequately explains events is probably correct.

In another way of putting it - when you hear hoofbeats, don't expect zebras.
0 Votes
+ -
Hoofbeats and zebras...
Wolfie2K3 27th Mar 2009
That would highly depend on where in the world you happened to be. Wouldn't it? If you were in say, the North American plains or the Asian steppes, horses would be right on the money. But in say, Africa, it wouldn't make much sense.
0 Votes
+ -
Stupid question:Will moving from beta to RC1 mean a fresh install or will we be able to do a simply update?
0 Votes
+ -
Install or Upgrade
medezark@... 26th Mar 2009
According to the BETA notes, the beta can not be upgraded to the retail version, so you probably can't update it to the RC version either. Then again the statement could be Microsoft heging their bets.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Not true
Ed Bott 26th Mar 2009
The leaked release notes say "...if you install the RC release you'll either need to upgrade to the final version of Windows 7 before that [expiration] date, or install a prior version of Windows."

In general, Beta to RC to RTM (from one major milestone to another) is a supported upgrade path.
0 Votes
+ -
I seem to recall...
fairportfan 27th Mar 2009
...that it was said that the W7 beta couldn't be upgraded to the RC - which is why i did a clean install of Build 7057 (which is working very nicely for me, thank you - though my wife is frustrated because the Microsoft games she downloaded don't work.
0 Votes
+ -
Beckett Spins
Harry Bardal 26th Mar 2009
The spirit of "under promise, over deliver" is alive and well.
This doesn't have to be a conspiracy theory, and it
probably wasn't leaked. It doesn't have to be these days.
there is quite enough hand wringing going on without
leaks.

Vista you ask? Well, there is absolutely nothing wrong with
it. Not now anyway. Nothing except for Windows 7. When
7 is released it will be heralded by the Windows-centric
blogosphere as the cure to the problem that we didn't
have, the disappointment we didn't feel, and the money
and time we won't get back but never did spend.

As long as Windows continues to compare itself exclusively
to Windows, the results are usually always progressively
positive.

As Windows moves to it's 4th generation of OS from
NT/2000/XP/2000 to Vista/7, Apple will coast along for at
least the next 3 years on it's third gen OS, OSX. One of
two things are in play. Either Windows is ahead now, and
the 4th generation was a leapfrog move, or they have been
behind and the 4th generation is the one required to catch
up. If the latter is true, and Windows 7 does "repair" Vista,
and evolve beyond XP, the time lag has to be put at 8
years.

It's easiest now to attribute the comparison to Mac
zealotry, and dismiss it. I expect that will happen again. If
Apple was just the foil in this argument, it's important to
the ongoing class war, that the notion gets lost in the din
of name calling.

Why does anyone need this to be a "leak" to be
scandalous? Fussing over July vs September and providing
distractions from a 8 year shortfall happens weekly and
openly.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
More opaque than ever
Ed Bott 26th Mar 2009
I couldn't make heads nor tails of that. The part about Windows' "4th generation of OS from
NT/2000/XP/2000 to Vista/7" was especially incomprehensible. Who knew that Windows 2000 came back sometime between 2001 and 2006 briefly?

Anyway, I have to go read the latest leaks about Snow Leopard. Supposedly it's going to have a new skin (leaked screens!) and there may or may not be surprises at WWDC, which was just announced today. Fun times!

Kthxbai.

0 Votes
+ -
Harry is earning his paycheque. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Decoding the code...
Wolfie2K3 27th Mar 2009
I think Harry meant major releases - 1.) NT 3.x, 2.) NT 4.0, 3.) 2000/XP and 4.) Vista/7...

Give him some kudos - this was one of his more lucid posts.
0 Votes
+ -
How was Windows behind?
LiquidLearner 26th Mar 2009
In what way, exactly, is Windows XP even "behind" OS X? Better application support, check. Better hardware support, check. Better security, check. OS X has a pretty interface but that's about all it has going for it.

Kudos though. You managed 6 paragraphs and said nothing. Good job.
0 Votes
+ -
Are you quoting from experience?
jaypeg 27th Mar 2009
Have you used OS X?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Updating the Windows 7 release schedule
rpowers01@... 27th Mar 2009
I installed Ubuntu today and it truly does run better than Windows 7. I couldn't get Win 7 to run without the BSoD popping up. I install it three times. Tech support is useless. I am glad other people are having better luck than I did. I'm going to play around with Ubuntu and see how it compares to XP.
0 Votes
+ -
BSOD? Did you install it on an abacus?
babyboomer57 27th Mar 2009
I haven't see a BSOD in so long I can't even remember when it was for sure. I do think it was in the earliest days of Win XP, but may have been Win ME.

As far as tech support, you may have noticed before the Win7 install began it clearly says that there IS NO tech support for the Beta.

Stick with your Ubuntu, maybe Linsux Geek will help you out when you get lost and don't have a clue what to do next. That should be sometime, in say, the next couple of hours. The Windows crowd doesn't need you around anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
..what are you trying to run it on?
NamelessFor Now 20th Apr 2009
I'm with the other guy.. I haven't seen a BSOD for as long as I care to remember. I have had nothing but good things to say about Windows 7(build 7000) and I've been using it as my primary operating system for 4 and a half solid months. I've played games, run 3D modelling software, Photoshop.. you name it, all rock solid.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix