Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)

By | January 3, 2011, 6:00pm PST

Summary: Steve Jobs once said, “People want to own their music.” Someone better tell the folks who run the iTunes Store and its competitors. When you pay for a digital music track or album from an online service, you get a limited set of rights and you most assuredly don’t own those downloads. Here’s why that matters.

Steve Jobs once said, “People want to own their music.”

Someone better tell the folks who run the iTunes Store and its competitors. If you buy a digital music track or album from the iTunes store or one of its competitors, you don’t own it. Instead, you’re buying a license to play that track or album, and that license comes with an extremely limited set of rights.

Why does it matter? If you buy a CD in the United States, Section 109 of the Copyright Act gives you very specific rights under the first-sale doctrine. Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation explains those rights:

[O]nce you’ve acquired a lawfully-made CD or book or DVD, you can lend, sell, or give it away without having to get permission from the copyright owner. In simpler terms, “you bought it, you own it” (and because first sale also applies to gifts, “they gave it to you, you own it” is also true).

But the first-sale doctrine only applies to tangible goods, such as CDs. Digital music downloads (just like movies and TV shows and books) come with a completely different, much more limited set of rights. If you buy a digital album from an online service such as the iTunes store, Amazon MP3, or eMusic, you have no legal right to lend that album to a friend, as you could if you had purchased a CD. If you decide after a few listens that you hate the album, well, tough. You can’t resell it. You can’t even legally give it away.

Don’t believe me? Read the license agreement that you agree to every time you purchase digital music. If you’re like 99.9% of the world, you’ve clicked right past those agreements to get to the download. Here’s what you missed. I’ve used boldface type to highlight the most interesting parts.

The Terms and Conditions for the iTunes Store contains more than 14,000 words of dense legalese, including these bits:

Apple is the provider of the Service, which permits you to purchase or rent digital content (”Products”) for end user use only under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

[…]

You agree that the Service and certain Products include security technology that limits your use of Products and that, whether or not Products are limited by security technology, you shall use Products in compliance with the applicable usage rules established by Apple and its licensors (“Usage Rules”), and that any other use of the Products may constitute a copyright infringement. Any security technology is an inseparable part of the Products. Apple reserves the right to modify the Usage Rules at any time. You agree not to violate, circumvent, reverse-engineer, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise tamper with any of the security technology related to such Usage Rules for any reason—or to attempt or assist another person to do so. Usage Rules may be controlled and monitored by Apple for compliance purposes, and Apple reserves the right to enforce the Usage Rules without notice to you. You agree not to access the Service by any means other than through software that is provided by Apple for accessing the Service.

The “Usage Rules” heading contains six rules. Four of those rules apply to products protected by digital rights management technology, including music sold through the iTunes store before early 2009 and movies and TV shows sold at any time. Music tracks sold after March 2009 do not include Apple’s FairPlay DRM technology and are referred to as iTunes Plus Products. Rules (i) and (vi) apply to all digital music sold today in the iTunes Store:

(i) You shall be authorized to use Products only for personal, noncommercial use.

[…]

(vi) iTunes Plus Products do not contain security technology that limits your usage of such Products, and Usage Rules (ii) – (v) do not apply to iTunes Plus Products. You may copy, store, and burn iTunes Plus Products as reasonably necessary for personal, noncommercial use.

What about the competition? The Amazon MP3 store Terms of Use contain a mere 1330 words. The license terms make it abundantly clear who owns the product you’re purchasing:

2.1  Rights Granted. Upon your payment of our fees for Digital Content, we grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the Digital Content for your personal, non-commercial, entertainment use, subject to and in accordance with the Terms of Use. You may copy, store, transfer and burn the Digital Content only for your personal, non-commercial, entertainment use, subject to and in accordance with the Terms of Use.

[…]

5. Reservation of Rights

Except for the rights explicitly granted to you in the Terms of Use, all right, title and interest in the Service, the Software and the Digital Content are reserved and retained by us, our Digital Content providers, and our licensors. You do not acquire any ownership rights in the Software or Digital Content as a result of downloading Software or Digital Content.

And finally, there’s the eMusic Subscription Agreement, which contains more than 8800 words, including this blunt statement:

5.2 By enrolling in the Service, you acknowledge and agree that you have no right to provide any files obtained through the Service to any other party or through any other means. You may only make copies of any file obtained through the Service for your own personal use.

[…]

5.6 eMusic derives its rights to use the media offered on the Service from artists, record labels, publishers and other third parties for fixed periods of time and, sometimes, for limited territories. As well, eMusic is sometimes required to pull certain media off the Service (or otherwise restrict access to such media) for legal or commercial reasons.

[…]

8.1 Only you may access the Service using your IDs, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by eMusic. The content available through the Service is the property of eMusic or its licensors and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. Content received through the Service may be viewed, used and played for your personal, non-commercial use only. You agree not to reproduce, retransmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, broadcast, perform, make available to third parties or circulate the content received through the Service to anyone or to exploit any such content for commercial or noncommercial purposes without the express prior written consent of eMusic. You further agree not to make use of the Content in a manner that would infringe the copyright therein.

The moral of the story? If you really want to own your music, forget about downloading and buy a CD. You might even save some money compared to a digital download.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books are currently distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMWare. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

241
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly right
John L. Ries Updated - 3rd Jan 2011
If you have to click through an EULA to use it, then you don't own it (same goes for e-books; if you want to own the book, then buy a paper copy). And if the vendor claims ultimate control over the hardware and how it is to be used, as with a Kindle, iPhone, or XBox, you don't own that either, no matter how much money you paid for it.

The exception, of course, is with digital media that's either in the public domain or freely copyable. So, yes, you do own those public domain e-books you downloaded from Project Gutenberg.
0 Votes
+ -
true
banned from zdnet Updated - 4th Jan 2011
@John L. Ries
and the relentless microsoft shill won't let a chance pass by badmouthing their competitors. hey ed, why not read us a bit of the zune eula? how about those 10 songs you can keep every months. do you own those?
0 Votes
+ -
Give me a break
use_what_works_4_U 4th Jan 2011
@banned from zdnet
True, Ed didn't use the Zune EULA as an example but the article seems to make the point that this is true for every digital file as a rule of thumb.
@banned from zdnet
why on earth does his comment have to be about a ms shill? All we're talking about is downloaded music in general not something sold exclusively by MS, apple or google. You're a weee bit obsessive.
0 Votes
+ -
isnt it obvious?
Ron Bergundy 4th Jan 2011
@banned from zdnet because with a SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE even an idiot would realize that once you stop paying the songs go away so how would anyone think they could own the music that there listening too via SUBSCRIPTION?!?

Duh!
@banned from zdnet
cyberslammer2: try having knowledge in a subject before insulting someones intelligence. The zune pass is a subscription service, however you are able to keep 10 songs per with removed drm exactly like a song you would e downloading from another provider. The songs which the 10 credits were not applied to would dissappear at the end of the subscription and I assume the 10 songs you keep, would not be 'owned' similarly to the examples in the article
0 Votes
+ -
For purposes of debate...
John L. Ries Updated - 4th Jan 2011
@banned from zdnet
...it really doesn't matter if Ed (or anyone else) is a shill or not. What matters are the validity of his opinions and the accuracy and usefulness of his reports. If he gets it wrong, or his logic is questionable, or if he's leaving important details out, then call him on it, but since it's almost impossible to determine the motives of people you've never met and will never meet, it's much more productive to focus on the merits of the articles and talkbacks and to avoid making accusations that can neither be proven nor disproven. Propaganda is only dangerous if it goes unchallenged, which isn't likely to happen in this forum.

Since Ed and John Carroll are the only reliably pro-MS commentators left on ZDNet, and Ed's the only one of those two who posts regularly, it's actually good to have him around to keep all of us "ABMers" honest.

Ed-- I think you're definitely proven yourself to be a constant friend of MS and fan of its products (rightly or wrongly), but I don't think you're a shill and never have.
0 Votes
+ -
What about those cases where you visit a site that, for instance, allows you to listen to music tracks, not just snippets, but full tracks? I'm not talking about streaming music but those sites that actually place a copy of the song on your computer in the temporary internet files directory ( in the case of IE and Windows ). You have not downloaded the song purposely, nor have you acquired it illegally, yet they have placed the song on your personal computer. What laws are in control there? Can you use and listen to that track without ramification in the future, or is it up to you to now go and delete your temporay items constantly?
0 Votes
+ -
Editor
Go read the terms and conditions
Ed Bott 4th Jan 2011
@brianscook

Each site has a different set of terms and conditions. Go read and see for yourself.
@brianscook If someone with the legal right to the song decides to place a copy on your computer, I would imagine that at a minimum you would have the right to replay it from that location. Technically you should be able to move it to another location on that computer as well as back it up.

Unless explicitly granted, you would not have the right to transfer that file to another system for use and you could not burn it to give to someone else.

If the site has an agreement that requires you to clean up afterward, the point is moot since that agreement takes precedence, though I sincerely doubt it could/would
be enforceable.
Ok, so I read their policies at projectplaylist.com and they state it is illegal for users of the site to download music files.

Since they download every song you listen to there for you with no warning that they are doing so, I guess it's ok.

I bet all the copyrighted music owners they list in their search engine are just overjoyed that project playlist is designed to give you free copies of their songs.
0 Votes
+ -
@brianscook

the short version: you are legally allowed to play it from their site only, finding it in your cache yourself and playing it outside of their site is a violation
0 Votes
+ -
Not STRICTLY true . . .
JLHenry 4th Jan 2011
@John L. Ries

Concerning the Public Domain stuff: Downloading it doesn't mean you own it. No can own it, That's what Public Domain means. You CAN download as many copies as you want, however . . .
0 Votes
+ -
Sure you do
John L. Ries 4th Jan 2011
@JLHenry
You own the copies you made; you just don't hold the copyright, but neither does anyone else.
@JLHenry "Public Domain" means that no copyright attaches. That is absolutely the only meaning of the phrase, no exceptions no discussion.

"The Pickwick Papers" is in the public domain, but stealing a copy from the bookstore is still theft.
0 Votes
+ -
A good example is Linux ...
mwagner@... 4th Jan 2011
@JLHenry ... the copyright for the Linux kernel is owned by Linus Torvalds. He has CHOSEN to license it under the GNU GPL so it can be distributed with a wealth of other utilities which he didn't write which are also distributed under the GNU GPL.

Lunus COULD release his next Lunix Kernel under a different license. Any one at all as long as his modifications were different enough to not violate the terms of the GPL his last iteration was released under. Or he could write a brand new kernel and license it exlcusively to IBM, for instance. Now that would be a 'kick in the pants', wouldn't it. Linus is free to do so with HIS code. You are not.
0 Votes
+ -
@mwagner@...

actually, since Linus is the original owner of the Linux kernel, he could release *his code* for the Linux kernel as is under any license or all of them at the same time.

what Linus could not do is release other people's contributions to the kernel codebase under another license. those contributions were submitted to him under the GPL and Linus would be bound by the GPL for other people's code in the kernel. however, as enough of the kernel is now not written by Linus himself, what he could release under a license other than the GPL would be very incomplete and likely inoperable without a very large investment in reinventing the wheel to replace parts he didn't write himself.

i have seen this occur with other projects that turned from purely open source to a dual version with the core being open source and certain add ons being closed source paid add ons. in those cases, the entire original authors group signed off on releasing the closed source version and spent months auditing the code to make sure all pieces they didn't write themselves were ripped out of the closed source version. these were all also (comparatively) much smaller projects than the Linux kernel

the licensing restrictions get very very tangled very very quickly in such a large project
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
Software Architect 1982 4th Jan 2011
@John L. Ries

I have a hard time believing that I don't own my XBox, unless I sign something agreeing to let someone else (Microsoft) own it. I don't care what they (MS) write on paper somewhere. When I buy a tangible product and I don't sign anything other than my credit card receipt, it's mine. I can set it on fire, shoot it, drop it off a tall building, use it, or sell it. MS can CLAIM they own it, but that doesn't make it so. I have to sign an agreement to give up the ownership rights to something I paid for in a traditional cash for hardware purchase. MS can no more own my XBox than Craftsman can own my socket set nor Chevy can own my vehicle.
@Digital Video Expert
0 Votes
+ -
Hardware yes, software NO!
mwagner@... 4th Jan 2011
@Digital Video Expert ... your Xbox is driven by MS software. When you remove the shrink-wrap (on the box or any included software/games) you implicitly agree to their terms of use. Period.

Try to reverse engineer that software and sell an Xbox "knock-off" and and Microsoft will have you in court so fast your head will swim. (So would Apple.)

Game developers have to agree to similar terms to be licensed to write and sell games for the Xbox.

In the end, you cannot legally do whetever you want with your Xbox. You CAN transfer ownership but then the new owner will have to agree to the same terms and conditions.

When it comes to terms of use, it is less about to what extent you violate those terms than it is about how much damage you do to Microsoft by doing so.
@Digital Video Expert
Actually, there is no question that you own the hardware.
The problem is the licenses involved. In theory they may
have the right to brick your device and make it useless,
though I doubt they would come straight out and say that they want to do so.

It's possible that the right written agreement might make
your purchase effectively a lease, at least if they have
bribed the right law makers. Look at the DMCA which
extended copyrights for things previously in the public
domain or about to go there. Spread enough money around and almost anything can happen.
0 Votes
+ -
Technically you might own it
John L. Ries 4th Jan 2011
@Digital Video Expert
But if MS has the legal authority to restrict what you can do with it and can take you to court for violating their rules, that ownership is encumbered, to say the least.

Effect is the same, it's not really yours.
0 Votes
+ -
As for Chevy ...
mwagner@... 4th Jan 2011
@Digital Video Expert ... General Motors would love to be able to COMPEL YOU to lease you a fleet car owned by them instead of selling you a car overwhich you have complete control.

That is what the Apple ecosystem is all about. You may OWN your iPod and you can own the CDs with the music you put on it but it is pretty worthless without iTunes. Apple iTunes is "free" but it comes at a cost - you have to agree to their terms of service.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
Software Architect 1982 Updated - 4th Jan 2011
@mwagner

>>>
your Xbox is driven by MS software. When you remove the shrink-wrap (on the box or any included software/games) you implicitly agree to their terms of use. Period.

Try to reverse engineer that software and sell an Xbox "knock-off" and and Microsoft will have you in court so fast your head will swim. (So would Apple.)

Game developers have to agree to similar terms to be licensed to write and sell games for the Xbox.

In the end, you cannot legally do whetever you want with your Xbox


Yes I can... with the HARDWARE. The OS is a completely different story and Microsoft has full ownership of that... even my copy on my XBox, but I can remove it from the XBox if I want. I just can't sell copies or alter or reverse engineer the software. I CAN alter the hardware to my heart's content.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
Software Architect 1982 Updated - 4th Jan 2011
@John L. Ries,
>>>
But if MS has the legal authority to restrict what you can do with it


But, that's just it. They don't. They can legally restrict what I can do with their software, but not my hardware. I can remove their software from it and install my own. I can open it up and pull out parts to use in other components. It's MY hardware, both legally and ethically. Don't get confused with hardware vs. software. They do indeed own the software. They do NOT own the hardware.
@Digital Video Expert
@Digital Video Expert
"But, that's just it. They don't. They can legally restrict what I can do with their software, but not my hardware. I can remove their software from it and install my own. I can open it up and pull out parts to use in other components. It's MY hardware, both legally and ethically. Don't get confused with hardware vs. software. They do indeed own the software. They do NOT own the hardware.?

Tell that to the million xbox 360 users that got their systems bricked, by Microsoft. Microsoft labeled them as pirates and cheaters, then disabled the hard drives on the ?offending xboxes?. The extent of some of these ?offending xboxes? was the end user chose to install a larger HDD than Microsoft endorses.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
erik.soderquist Updated - 4th Jan 2011
@Digital Video Expert

as i don't own an Xbox i can't comment directly on that; however, an Xbox is a computer, with an MS Windows based OS preloaded on it, just like any Dell or HP computer i could buy, and having set up thousands of them, i can say with certainly that every single one of them comes up with an EULA prompt and will refuse to function in any usable fashion unless you agree to the EULA.

even Linux installs prompt for acceptance of the GPL, which forms the EULA on Linux installations

edit to correct spelling
@Rick_k
Microsoft labeled them as pirates and cheaters, then disabled the hard drives on the "offending xboxes".

The Hard Drives were not disabled. Their XBox Live accounts were disabled.
0 Votes
+ -
@Digital Video Expert
I quite take your point about owning the hardware but only leasing the software - but what about firmware? I've never owned a console, so I might be wildly off base here, but surely the hardware includes a board with a BIOS on it - not to mention all the coding inside controller chips etc. That too you do not own.

I hadn't heard the one about about MS making trouble for people who added unauthorised hardware to the box, but it adds a further level of manufacturer control.

And of course you do not own the "look and feel" of the XBox. Suppose you customise you XBox with orange paint and go-faster stripes. Your friends think this is cool (indulge my fantasies!) and ask you to do the same to their XBoxes. All you are doing is making an alteration to the hardware - the bits of plastic which you must surely own. But could Microsoft not claim that you were in some way damaging the image of the XBox - especially if your friends started a craze and you got paid for this paint job?
one and you do own the other. Also, what you can do with something you have paid for is not proof of ownership. You can't brain your neighbor with your craftsman socket set, so according to your logic, you don't really own it since you are limited in what you can do with it.
@John L. Ries
@John L. Ries That is correct, more or less.

Digital downloads or streams and physical publications (books, CDs, etc.) are apples and oranges. I think the main difference is the ability to resell or lend out the physical media. Otherwise you have pretty much the same rights. In no case is it your music. It's just yours to listen to.

They cannot prevent you from storing it forever in your brain, but you still don't own the music, just your memory!
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries ... is because it's original copyright has expired. The score for Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is in the public domain but the copyright of the recording of the performance by the "Berliner Philharmonica" directed by the late Herbert van Karan is owned either by the von Karan estate or by Deutch Gramaphone.
0 Votes
+ -
Not quite right
John L. Ries Updated - 4th Jan 2011
In the not so distant past, written material was public domain by default: you actually had to register the items claimed before copyright protection took effect. And in the really old days, there was no copyright at all (copyright is, after all, an 18th century invention).

But there's still a difference between holding the copyright on a recording and owning the physical recording. I don't hold any of the copyrights on the recordings in my CD collection, but I own every one of those CDs (or my wife does). AFAICT, the only restrictions on what I can do with them all relate to public performance or making/distributing copies and are all imposed by act of Congress (not the terms of a special license). I don't need a license from the publishers to play them in private, and I'm allowed to give them to whomever I like, as long as I either destroy any copies in my possession or give them to the new owner.

Likewise, I own a copy of the score and parts for Samuel Barber's "Adagio". Barber's estate may still hold the copyright, but the legally made paper copies are my property nevertheless.
@mwagner@...

Correction: Herbert von Karajan.
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries Hey John, Ed wrote a whole article to say what you did in the first line happy
not the content. When you purchase a digital download, there is no medium to own. So nothing has really changed. Except that the fact that you've never owned the content is now more obvious.
0 Votes
+ -
No one -- ever -- owns the content
bswiss Updated - 6th Jan 2011
@frgough

No one -- ever -- owns the content.

All anybody owns, or can own, is the (artificial, legislated) legal power created by some-or-other Copyright Act to control the distribution of copies. Supposedly and explicitly for a strictly limited (sic) time and for the overall general net benefit to society.

The so-called "Intellectual Property" industries have been waging a long, persistent (and well-funded) campaign to blur this distinction. Their greatest success has been to create the wide-spread meme that there even is anything that can be called "intellectual property", rather than "copyrights", "patent grants", "trademarks" and "proprietary secrets".

Whenever someone talks about who "owns" the "content", they are just wrong, and quite besides the point. Some (most?) people don't realize this, some are using a sort of loose shorthand (and often forgetting that this is so), and all to frequently, this "error" and misunderstanding is deliberately exploited and encouraged by people with a vested interest in promoting this confusion.
@John L. Ries
Even in the case of a book, you own *that specific copy* only. You can give it away or even sell it, but what you can't do is make a bunch of photocopies of the whole thing and give them to others, even if you don't receive any money.

A case could be made that the EULAs mentioned above aren't legal because you as a purchaser can give away or sell your copy of a song in electronic format as long as you do not retain said copy (I'm leaving aside the scenario of streamed data temporarily stored on the hard drive, which is a bit different - this is about directly purchasing something from iTunes or similar service).

As far as public domain/freely copyable, those do not grant ownership rights. It merely means that you do not have to ask the owner for permission to copy or distribute. Subtle but important difference.
@John L. Ries
That goes for every Microsoft operating system as well. There is a mug born to be ripped off every minute.
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries

Working in the Pink Diamond Mine.... large discovery....

Create Chaos Pandoria13@hotmail.com

A very unique occurrence in nature has been found;
analyzed; assessed; weighed; tested; enhanced;
implemented and deployed in the pink diamond mine's of the Mainframes'.

www.z390.org and www.zCOBOL

zCICS; zVSAM; zSORT etc... etc... etc...

read all about it !!!!!!!!!! Then Try IT !!!!!!!!

Supporting Newest z196 instruction set execution through emulation x86 & x64 in JAVA

Interfaced with IBM DB2 Express-C batch SQL capabilities; [ I actually help in doing some of this, really ]

Deployed onto the CloudShare Pro CLOUD [ I actually DID this in Jan of 2011, really ]

Running on Win & Linux or J2SE supported platform's

100% JAVA Open Source... 100% F R E E ...

caution... please, read the ton's and ton's of documentation provided, it saves you a lot of time...
caution... please, ton's and ton's of examples, it saves you a lot of time...
caution... please, join the group, and read all of the group posting's from the beginning, it saves you a lot of time...
caution... please, ask questions, you will be amazed at the cut right to the chase on the subject requiring attention,
it saves you a lot of time...
caution... please, you might find yourself rummaging around the attic or garage for that dang old source code you developed back when,
that may not save you time...
caution... please, you might just actually save your company and you, very serious monies...
caution... please, SHARE, share, ShArE, sHaRe...
caution... please, introduce yourself, you just might find that Old Code Slinger Buddy from back a while ago, you forgot about...
caution... please, don't take my word for it, that it WORK's, try it, you find a REAL BUG [$ 1.00 reward ],
Mr. Don Higgin's will rule if it a BUG or NOT...
caution... please, believe found myself doing that nasty bit fiddling thing again,
and I can do that in xxxx instructions, like name that tune...
caution... please, believe found bunche's of JAVA, IBM HLASM Assembler, COBOL, WIN, LINUX & etc........
WIZARD's still exist, that were locked away in the back room like me.
caution... please, O P E N S O U R C E is the only way to GO...
caution... please, you can donate or not donate, that is entirely up to YOU...
caution... please, it is advisable, to look out the window and see if the sun has risen...
caution... please, Lot's of thing's to get involved with, no offer of assistance has ever been refused so far...
caution... please, ... ... ... .... .... flower box's are still kool

caution... please, Adviable to Display Entering Pink Diamond Mine Unlimited Work Zone Area...

Pandoria13@hotmail.com

2011 is gonna,,,,, Rock, and Rock, and Rock.......
Downloading, thank you. rolex replicas
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
ChrispyCritter Updated - 3rd Jan 2011
Yeah they slip a lot of things in those agreements and who has the time to read them all. I don't buy into the legality of online agreements so much as they are not notarized nor signed. I look at them as more of rules to use something that are not so legally binding.

Well not to worry I bought most of my music on record,tape an CD's in the 20th century and don't buy digital music online.

Glad I refuse to install craptunes..er..I mean itunes on my PC grin

Edit: I believe in fair use for users of digital content. Example: If I owned 10 computers that only I use I believe it's fair for me to have the content on all 10 if I wanted. I know this isn't the case though.
@ChrispyCritter

While you may not "buy into the legality of online agreements," courts of law do.

As for refusing to install iTunes, what does that have to do with anything under discussion? If you actually read the article, you'd see that Amazon's MP3 store and the eMusic subscription service operate under the same legal restrictions.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
ChrispyCritter Updated - 3rd Jan 2011
@msalzberg Oh I know they do but is it right or constitutional for that matter? and would a jury?

I know this applies to other services I just felt the need to give my opinion on craptunes..not to mention the 1st paragraph was about it.
@ChrispyCritter

First of all, it's hard to take someone who uses the word 'craptunes' very seriously.

Secondly, copyrights are based on Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution, so, yes, they are constitutional.

"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Who owns your digital downloads? (Hint: it's not you)
ChrispyCritter Updated - 3rd Jan 2011
@msalzberg As far as I can see that clause only prevents you from profiting from the use of it..anyways how are science and arts prevented from progressing here? If anything in my opinion the big record company's are the ones that are preventing the progress in some ways far more than some people coping some music.

The craptunes comment was a joke from my experience with itunes and other apple software that was on my 1st PC.
@ChrispyCritter

Two words: "exclusive Right."

There's nothing in there about profit. The copyright owner's rights are absolute; they can give their work away, allow others to give their work away, or not allow anyone to even listen to their work, if they so choose.
@msalzberg Actually, "exclusive right" is NOT absolute.
Once an item is sold the owner has the right to resell it.

The problem is, is that the music/media companies have
managed to get the downloads treated like licensed
software rather than being treated in the same manner as a tangible good. The will continue to do this as long
as the public accepts it. If enough of the public refuses
to accept it, it goes away just like the DRM has.
If a court eventually decides that the click through
is not enforceable, eventually there will be a new model
that allows for transfers. Likely the media companies
would end up having some form of cloud computing with
streaming being the only way to access the music and a
fee being charged to transfer it to someone else.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources