ie8 fix
madison

Why won't Internet Explorer 10 run on Windows Vista?

By | April 13, 2011, 3:36pm PDT

Summary: Why does the platform preview of Internet Explorer 10 refuse to install on Windows Vista? Maybe it’s because Vista’s short, unhappy life will end in less than one year. I help decode the cryptic support lifecycle.

It might seem impossible to believe, but Windows Vista is drawing to the end of its short, unhappy life. Under Microsoft’s official product lifecycle, the mainstream support phase for Windows Vista will end in less than one year, on April 10, 2012—five years, two months, and 16 days after it became generally available on January 25, 2007. (For business editions, there’s an extended support period that lasts another five years, guaranteeing security updates until 2017.)

I don’t expect there to be any great outcry when Vista fades away. But knowing that end-of-life date helps answer one mystery that puzzled some Microsoft watchers this week. Why does the platform preview of Internet Explorer 10 throw up an error message if you try to run it on Windows Vista? Maybe it’s because, if the newly announced browser follows the same development schedule as IE9, its scheduled ship date will be a year from now—after Windows Vista is retired.

Decoding Microsoft’s cryptic product support lifecycle isn’t easy. Even experienced Microsoft watchers sometimes get tripped up by the many conditions that apply. Service packs and browsers complicate the issue even more. Shortly after Windows 7 shipped, I wrote How long will Microsoft support XP, Vista, and Windows 7? and assembled those dates into a table, which is still accurate.

Will the release of a new version of Internet Explorer change those plans? Nope. Here’s why.

As the Microsoft Support Lifecycle blog helpfully explained in a 2009 post, Internet Explorer is a “component.” That distinction is important in terms of support dates:

Under the Support Lifecycle policy, we support components with the product or service pack that it shipped for. … Internet Explorer is considered as a component of the operating system (OS) for which it was released. The support timelines for IE are inherited from the OS and its associated service packs. Basically, this means that the versions of Internet Explorer that shipped for a specific OS or service pack will be supported with the support lifecycle of the OS or service pack.

[…]

As per the policy, we will not end support [for] previous versions of Internet Explorer on supported operating system versions.

When Windows Vista shifts into its extended support phase next year, that also means the end of the line for any version of Internet Explorer that was released for it. Because the extended support phase lasts another five years, you don’t have to worry about security updates for Windows Vista and its supported browsers—even Internet Explorer 7. But you won’t get anything new.

It’s possible, of course, that Microsoft will allow the final version of IE 10 to install on Windows Vista. But it’s also reasonable for them to push web developers to test its platform previews on the latest and greatest Windows, which will be around until January, 2015.

I’m assuming (reasonably, I think) that Windows 8 will still be several months away from its official release when April 2012 rolls around, If that’s true, it means that Microsoft will, at least briefly, have only one version of Windows that it’s actively supporting.

See related coverage:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

139
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Why won't Internet Explorer 10 run on Windows Vista?
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Vista's garbage, anyway
ScorpioBlue 13th Apr 2011
So I don't blame them from running away from it. Probably the 'smartest' thing they'll do all year.

lol...
@ScorpioBlue Copy meet Paste.
@statuskwo5
Want me to teach you how to do it? wink

lol...
@ScorpioBlue & statuskwo5
Some of us were smart enough to wait for after SP1 before even attempting to use Vista. Especially with mission critical machines at the work place. The same is true with Windows 7.

Even better we know how to make Vista run pretty lean, mean and pretty much trouble free. It helps NOT using Microsoft for anything but the OS. I haven't used Internet Exploder in so long I forgot what it looks like. Only a very few annoying programs force Exploder to open. My policy is no bloatware. I am forced to use Windows at work because the Engineering software I use. Else I would use Linux a long time ago. I have a friend of a friend who works at M$ so I got 2 free Win 7 disks. One is working good on my HTPC at home. Netflix, Rfactor and Media center are it's only tasks. And the other Win 7 disk sits in my office desk until SP1 is out and works well for all you beta testers before I'll even attempt to put it on my work machine. less headaches that way. Vista always worked great for me because I didn't adopt it early on. Win 7/8 will work well for me for that same reasons. wink
0 Votes
+ -
That's one opinion anyway...
linux for me 14th Apr 2011
@ScorpioBlue

I see that Microsoft continues to be short sighted as usual. and is missing the boat here.

With XP still having almost 60% of the windows desktop, Microsoft should be supporting both XP and Vista with the new versions of IE. These XP boxes are not going to be leaving soon, as most of these boxes are in corporate hands, and with all the customized applications, costs of new hardware, costs of installations of both hardware and software, and the labor involved to do the upgrades, there is no compelling reason for corporate offices to make the switch.

If Microsoft is so keen on the new browser, Microsoft should make the IE browser platform independent. Make it run on Apple and Linux. Instead of using IE as hammer to beat it's own users to upgrade, make IE available to everyone. Microsoft may be surprised at the results and get some of the browser share back it continues to lose to Firefox and Chrome.
@linux for me Cross platform for IE would be interesting, but I suspect nearly impossible, since 80+% of it is in the kernel (now).
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah nice concern troll
MSFTWorshipper 14th Apr 2011
@linux for me As if you cared about what's good for MSFT.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why won't Internet Explorer 10 run on Windows Vista?
fatman65535 Updated - 14th Apr 2011
@linux for me

Where do I begin??

First of all, as an Ubuntu user, I like your handle!!!

Second, WRT to the costs of replacing existing corporate owned boxes with existing applications; you are indeed correct.

(sarcasm)
But, it is not in Microsoft's interest to allow such long term use of their intellectual property. If M$ could get their way, you would be paying monthly rental fees for their software. After all, Micro$oft is committed to increasing the revenue streams of itself and its software and hardware partners. Think of the (hardware and software) vendors who would be forced to lower their profit expectations because the forced upgrade cycle that M$ defines with a new O/S becomes longer. They are barely surviving on a 3 year cycle, can you imagine the pains they would endure if hardware and software could last 5 to 7 years before needing to be replaced.
(/sarcasm)

Thirdly, make IE run on Apple and Linux???

(sarcasm)
Lucifer would be running a snow plow outside his home before that ever happened . What unsuspecting, and intelligent Apple or Linux user would ever allow their computer to be infected with Internet Exploder.
(/sarcasm)
0 Votes
+ -
Web Developers
voyager529 14th Apr 2011
@fatman65535

The answer is that web developers and coders would be served by having a copy of IE available for their coding platform of choice. A disproportionately high number of Mac users use their machines for web and graphic design, while Linux users, in many cases, write back end code for databases and such. While I agree that it will be a chilly day in hell before IE is the primary browser of any quantifiable number of Mac or Linux users (though the "big blue 'e'" may provide comfort for some new users of each platform), I'd wager that a well coded, self contained, cross-platform flavor of IE wouldn't yield a negative reaction for Microsoft...of course the loyalists for virtually all three platforms would tell me that 'well coded', 'self contained' and 'cross platform' are all essentially the antithesis of IE, so whatevs.

Joey
@linux for me

You neglect what the biggest portion of those XP machines are: corporate desktops, many of which are still locked on IE6 due to legacy apps. Going forward, this will make up a larger and larger portion of the XP base as consumers make new PC purchases and retire their XP systems. This makes the effort of back porting the required Win7 features used by IE9 a losing proposition with diminishing returns. The XP base in growing proportion couldn't upgrade if the option were there. They are more likely to look at the latest browser generation as the company finally moves beyond XP. I know one large bank with over a million seats worldwide that is testing Win7 right now. Whether they're planning on including a newer browser than the stock IE8 hasn't been said and is hard to predict as such institutions are supremely conservative in their software upgrades. It holds back progress, as with the IE6 situation but that is not their concern.

If you were working for Mozilla, how concerned would you be about compatibility with ten year old distros? Consider what the latest kernal revision was at the time XP launched. No matter how much patching was done, would test your brand new application against it or would you draw the line at something a bit more recent?

As for Vista, it's footprint is small and diminishing. As any adequate Vista machine can run Win7 just fine, there would more reward for Microsoft in offering discounted upgrades to Vista users to move to Win7. Move the portion of the base that can forward rather than backporting to it

As for cross platform support, this goes against the philosophy of looking at the browser and its infrastructure as a vital OS component. On that basis, porting to other OSes is minding other people's business. It wastes your time and annoys the recipient. Apple has Safari. They and third partybrowser makers have it covered while MS tends its own house.
0 Votes
+ -
@MSFTWorshipper

A fool by any other name....You can continue to worship Microsoft, I rather be more practical since I support all windows systems in additional to linux and Unix. You can continue to live in your own dream world.
0 Votes
+ -
I will say this...
ScorpioBlue 14th Apr 2011
I was never an ABMer until Vista came along. It changed my whole perspective about Micro$oft 180 degrees.
@linux for me
Microsoft tried going cross-platform with IE during the early days of Mac OS X. However, it failed pretty bad and was later disconnected.
0 Votes
+ -
Do you know what a kernel is?
WilErz 15th Apr 2011
@ dabble53

If you know what a kernel is, I don't believe you would have made the claim that there is any IE code is in the Windows kernel. IE is a set of user-mode libraries and a user-mode executable. None of the IE modules are kernel-mode modules (.sys files), which means the percentage of IE code in the Windows kernel is precisely zero.

A lot of the IE libraries are used by other user-mode Windows components (e.g. the Windows help system) to render HTML, which is why IE is actually part of Windows and can't be fully removed from the OS (the executable can be removed, but that doesn't remove IE). That, however, has nothing to do with the kernel. IE is no more part of the Windows kernel than bash is part of the Linux kernel.
@ScorpioBlue

When I read comments like yours, I actually wonder if Microsoft was ever supposed to be allowed to release another OS after Windows XP? I've been an XP Pro user since 6 months after it released, and haven't found any need to "update" ever since. eventually I'll move to Win7 but as others have already pointed out, what's the rush.

I'm fine with a whole new PC OS every 5-8 years for my home and business use. Any shorter than that, and I'm out.

it's funny that Mac users are allowed, well expected, to bow at the feet of Steve Jobs every time they release OS(x+1), yet Windows users are generally left to be reliant on something from 2001 and a new "official" browser every year. I welcome a balance.
@ScorpioBlue If MSucks had any integrity at all, they would offer a free upgrade to Win 7 to all Vista victims.
0 Votes
+ -
Victims?
Michael Alan Goff 15th Apr 2011
Vista was a good OS after SP1.
@ScorpioBlue Vista wasn't garbage, but a lot of the drivers definitely were. I have had 5 systems running Vista 24/7 since it was released with zero problems. The problems came from people using equipment with old drivers. I build my own systems and use only hardware from the approved hardware list MS publishes. The only time my systems reboot are when Windows update reboots them.
That said... I think not supporting Vista with IE10 is a good move. I really want to see Microsoft start cutting support for legacy crap so they can move toward a Windows replacement that is smaller, more secure, and self-repairing.
@BillDem - Way too late in the game to change my mind.

Some just struggled with it in frustration. You can see evidence of this in any tech forum.

Me? I either switched to Linux or downgraded to XP. Saved myself a lot of problems. Life's too short to be struggling with Redmond junkware.
Thank you so much for your sharing. rolex daydate replica
they will turn to Chrome or Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
Or they will stick with IE 9.
@goff256
Let's all move to Opera and live in peace.
0 Votes
+ -
Most people don't care about a
Michael Alan Goff 14th Apr 2011
"more recent browser"
@DonnieBoy

What is Internet Explorer exactly? wink
I seem to recall some program or other that went by that name some 40 years ago was it? LOL
Good for Chrome and Firefox. happy
@ScorpioBlue So, I don't know how an OS such as Vista with a dwindling marketshare day by day will be good for Chrome and Firefox.
@Mr. Dee is that something to be proud of? A piece of junk?
@Mr. Dee

Looks like Win 7 users can't use IE11-browser?
0 Votes
+ -
@Mr. Dee : the problem's the following.

Up until know, there's the notion that Vista and 7 (and in the future 8) are part of a "post Windows Vista Universe".

So, if this "universe" splits with Windows 8 and IE 10, it would not split in two, but in three.

Reason. Developers (specially HTML5) will feel no guarantee that their work will work on all versions of the "post Vista" thingy.

So, even considering a "best case scenario" for 2013—40% penetration of Windows 7, a 5% penetration of Windows Vista and 10% penetration of Windows 8—XP (and the browsers that work with it) would still rule the landscape with a 45% hold, although its a whopping 15 percent below the current 60 mark.

The combined the "post Vista Universe" would have had a 55 mark, wasted by this fragmentation stunt.
Windows Vista ranks right up there with Windows Millennium Edition or Windows Me. On certain computers and for certain computer users, both Operating Systems were the best thing since "hot buttered bread".

To everyone else, both OSs failed to meet basic system requirements. RIP and become the footnote in history both so richly deserved.
@kenosha7777
But even the Third Reich had it's die-hards.

No doubt you'll find them here, too.
0 Votes
+ -
@kenosha7777 I call that success in my book. Vista was successful, but the Open Source propaganda machine took the early mishaps in its marketing execution and ran with it. Most of the performance issues and compatibility issues were resolved within the first 6 months of its release, in fact most driver issues like printers and AIO had drivers 1 to 2 months after release. It is also the foundation for a lot of what we take for granted today in Windows 7 like the improved security, driver model, network and graphics stack. We have Windows ME to thank for things like System Restore, file archiving, Movie Maker 1.0.
@Mr. Dee Yea you are right, most of the big issues were fixed within the first 6 months, but those first 6 months left a horrible taste in everyone's mouth, and most people won't defend something that bad out of the box. Vista is a moot OS. Despite all the foundations it may have created for W7, it is not W7. Why continue to support an OS that by most end users views, is already at EOL. My company won't touch Vista, we are running XP on all of our workstations. Vista needs to fade away.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mr. Dee Regardless of the Nay sayers, Vista was an excellent OS. Apple is at least partially to blame for the bad press, (and that is all it is - Bad Press) for the OS. It ran perfectly out of the box on several machines here. The other problem was not the OS itself, it was OEMs putting it on computers not capable of running it full blast.
0 Votes
+ -
Sales <> Users
SteveMak 14th Apr 2011
Mr. Dee write "At its peak Vista was on 450 million systems"

Keep in mind MS was plying "unit sales" as the metric for these big numbers. A huge portion of these Vista "sales" actually manifested as XP "downgrades", meaning they counted as a Vista sale, but were actually an XP installation and usage. Most Vista users were consumers who bought a PC that came with Vista, and they didn't now they had a choice. Savvy consumers avoided Vista, as did enterprises.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mr. Dee, I`m typing this on a Toshiba Laptop that came with Vista in April 2008. When I got it, it used to crash coming out of hibernation, white screen at the most inconvenient times and took ages to copy files from one medium to another. Using it is like walking on eggshells. Now that it`s at service pack 2 it`s stopped crashing but Win 7 does circles around it without breaking a sweat.

The reason Vista was on 450 million machines is because Vista was shipped on 450 million machines. That`s no way to gauge success.
0 Votes
+ -
Guess ScorpioBlue was right...
cosuna Updated - 14th Apr 2011
@Mr. Dee : the Third Reich had a stronghold on most of Europe by 1941, but that didn't make it a success. It was controlled by bipolar schizophrenic lunatic which run out of gas, once the two emerging world powers regrouped and striked back.

At this moment, iPads and Open Source come to mind. Just don't know who are the Soviets and who are the "Free World". It varies on whom you ask.

But anyways.... I think the Reign of Terror is about to end. LOL!!!
0 Votes
+ -
@Bates_

Actually, all one unlucky soul had to do was go near a computer infected with Vista, and the stench is unmistakable.

(/snark)
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, I am right
ScorpioBlue Updated - 14th Apr 2011
@Mr. Dee : the Third Reich had a stronghold on most of Europe by 1941, but that didn't make it a success.

No, but die-hards like you will no doubt try. wink

It was controlled by bipolar schizophrenic lunatic which run out of gas,...

Well given the past bizarre behavior of Steve Ballmer, maybe he's destined for the lunatic fringe. Don't-cha think?

lol...

At this moment, iPads and Open Source come to mind.

Good spin @cosuma, but just as your Fuhrer monopolized the European continent for a few years, so too does Micro$oft with the desktop.

But like all empires, they too will crumble eventually. Nothing lasts forever.
0 Votes
+ -
Well there ya go @kenosha7777
ScorpioBlue 13th Apr 2011
Wha'd I tell ya...
@ScorpioBlue What an amazing response. Truly astonishing the way you just took an insightful post such as Mr. Dee's and just... ignored it, saw someone (slightly) defending Vista/ME and just ignored the points like a fat man drinking poison.
@Warmijwilf
It's nothing more than a mild salad dressing for a junk OS.

As I said, the die-hards will take a long time to die off. Until they come out and admit it was a mediocre failure for many people, this will always be the case.

There's too much pride & ego at stake. Not to mention, money.
@kenosha7777

Snort. I've been using Vista since RTM and never had a problem with it. I switched users off XP as quickly as I could, replacing systems as they died (some of which were 7+ years old).

I haven't had a bit of trouble from the Vista machines, so what "basic system requirements" are you babbling about?

Now I'm replacing the few XP systems with Win 7 machines, and although Win 7 has a lot of nice things, it's just a refined Vista rather than any kind of XP replacement.
@wolf_z

Windows Vista == Windows Server 2008

then

Windows Server 2008 ==> Windows Server R2

Therefore

Windows 7 == Windows Vista R2
0 Votes
+ -
@wolf_z

Congratulations for you. Our plan was to stay with XP and skip Vista entirely. We have never regretted that decision. All the IT department ran Vista here for several months to get an idea of where things would be going with it.

It may have been a configuration issue with Active Directory, but if you tried to access a UNC and had a typo in it, it would cause issues. The window in question would lock and once that happened you could not start any applications on the computer and the Logoff and Shutdown buttons would disappear. Once again, it was an encouragement to exercise our downgrade rights and delay a hardware/software refresh till 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Amen
SteveMak Updated - 14th Apr 2011
Gotta agree with kenosha7777. And with most of the PC world still running XP and *not* wanting to go to Windows 7, Microsoft could learn a lesson or two about easy migration paths, carrot vs stick, backwards compatibility, "what's in it for me?", etc

Vista was released for MS's desire to enhance their revenue. Windows 7 was released because Vista was an abortion. I'd like a compelling reason to *seduce* me off XP. So far, the pain of migrating (compatibility, drivers, legacy devices and software, single-core XP Mode, learning curve) exceeds the alleged benefits of Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows Millennium Edition
fatman65535 14th Apr 2011
@kenosha7777

Is better known by its unofficial (but more popular) title: Windows Mistake Edition
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why won't Internet Explorer 10 run on Windows Vista?
ScorpioBlue Updated - 13th Apr 2011
And in spite of Vista, IE9 or IE10...

XP still LIVES
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix