ie8 fix
madison

Windows 7 setup secrets

By | May 1, 2009, 12:24am PDT

Summary: For the past week or so I’ve been installing and upgrading the Windows 7 RC code on a wide variety of systems, documenting the process as I go. In this post, I share seven of the lessons I’ve learned along the way, including a few setup secrets that even some Windows experts don’t know about.

As of May 5, the general public is finally allowed to download the official Windows 7 Release Candidate. It’s been up on BitTorrent networks since mid-April, and developers with MSDN or TechNet subscriptions have had access to it since April. But those groups constitute a tiny fraction of the people who are seeing the Windows 7 release candidate for the first time with its public release. (You can find downloads and installation instructions at Microsoft’s website.)

For the benefit of the early adopters and those who patiently wait, I’ve been gathering information on the right and wrong ways to set up Windows 7. For the past week or so I’ve been installing and upgrading the RC code on a wide variety of systems—notebooks and desktops, with and without touch and tablet capabilities, with and without TV tuners and Blu-ray drives, as clean installs and upgrades, in x86 and x64 flavors, documenting the process.

In this post, I want to share seven of the lessons I’ve learned along the way, including a few setup secrets that even some Windows experts don’t know about.

Secret #1: Choose the right Setup option

Secret #2: Start with a clean disk

Secret #3: Back up your old drivers first

Secret #4: Do a nondestructive clean install

Secret #5: You need less disk space than you think

Secret #6: Unblock the upgrade path for Windows 7 beta

Secret #7: Unlock those extra editions

Choose the right Setup option –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

186
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Windows 7 setup secrets
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Good tip on the File Repository...
BitTwiddler 1st May 2009
You learn something new every day happy
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows 7 setup secrets
beijing2008 14th Sep
snagging, thanks ! hermes replica ********
0 Votes
+ -
Gee...
Jeremy W 1st May 2009
more secrets and tweaks....

Did we not see too many of these on Vista.

Was W7 not supposed to be easy to use WITHOUT all the secrets and
tweaking and secrets and tweaking?

How about an OS that does not require all this nonsense?

If one buys a high end automobile, does one expect that there will be
hours of "training" to use it?

This medieval cult of priesthood is incomprehensible for any modern
product sold by a responsive manufacturer.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Like a broken record
Ed Bott Updated - 1st May 2009
Would you like me to point you to the thousands and thousands of similar pages for OS X, Jeremy? Here are 1.44 million pages to get you started:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=tweak+setup+%22os+x%22

Come back when you've read them all, mmmkay? (Or don't. That would be fine too.)

The reality is that Windows 7 and OS X and Ubuntu Linux all work pretty well out of the box these days. But an expert can always find a better way, and that's especially true when you are evaluating a new OS to see whether it's right for you. I know I benefited greatly from some of those OS X pages when I was evaluating OS X.
0 Votes
+ -
He has a valid gripe...
storm14k 1st May 2009
It may not be your fault but the fanboys on this site love to claim that Windows needs no tweaking whatsoever and you have to spend time tweaking an OS like Linux. Your articles helpful as they may be discredit that notion so you're going to see people point that out. I agree...you can use any of the three out of the box or tweak to your hearts desire.
0 Votes
+ -
Windows doesn't need any tweaking
mdemuth 1st May 2009
but you can if you want.
OSX is the same.

Linux? I've had to fiddle a bit with every install. Often times not much, but a necessity.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks for proving my point (nt)
storm14k 1st May 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Windows doesn't need any tweaking
pauldoyle98@... 1st May 2009
With one exception:

Encrypted File System Service.

I turned it off and disabled it, and I freed up a nice little chunk of memory and CPU cycles. My system is a bit quicker and more responsive.

(Running Win7 Build 7057)
0 Votes
+ -
But...
quasilou 1st May 2009
You didn't NEED to do that...you chose to. It's not like it wouldn't work if you hadn't done that.
0 Votes
+ -
No OS needs to be tweaked, I agree...
HypnoToad72 3rd May 2009
Just throw bigger hardware requiring bigger hardware supplies at it.

Microsoft makes fat piggy code.

OSX does far more with far less.

It's pathetic; my 2.93GHz dual core iMac with a 320GB 7200RPM drive and GTX120 video card and 4GB RAM runs rings around my Vista box (quad core Q9650, 8GB RAM, 320GB 10000RPM hard drive, GTX260 video). The iMac uses 200w, my Vista PC with monitor uses 850 (100w for the monitor, 750 for the rest).

Oink oink. It's like Microsoft has the swine flu, is coughing it, and now we're all sick. grin
0 Votes
+ -
Must be hot
Mahegan 25th Jul 2009
in your living room or work room. 850Watts?
0 Votes
+ -
Nobody ever said that...
Marty R. Milette 1st May 2009
Nobody I've ever seen who knows ANYTHING about Windows servers would EVER tell you that any idiot clicking next, next, next is going to set up a server properly.

While building a PROPERLY CONFIGURED Windows server it is still much faster and easier than trying the equivalent Linux unit -- it still takes some degree of knowledge, skill and experience to do the job RIGHT.

This is a big complaint I have against Linux geeks -- they click next, next, next -- end up with a Windows server that is improperly configured and insecure and then blame the O/S instead of their own ignorance and inexperience.
0 Votes
+ -
I think you told on yourself....
storm14k Updated - 1st May 2009
I didn't say anything about servers unless you didn't intend to reply to me. And I can show you tons of Windows admins that thing clicking next next next is all they need to do. The ones that know better most often also know *nix administration. So I really don't see proof of your claim that Linux geeks click next in Windows. The Linux geek has a totally different mindset to begin with because they can't just click next next...often they don't even have access to a GUI to click next on. They must know what it is they are trying to do.

As for building a properly configured Windows server being faster than Linux...well the multi system gurus I know would just laugh at you. The difference in the thickness of the hardening procedure docs for Windows vs Linux that I know of at one major hosting company tells the tale.
0 Votes
+ -
Read more carefully...
Marty R. Milette 1st May 2009
I said that anyone who KNOWS anything about windows... Yes, you can find unqualified, ignorant self-professed sys admins on both the Microsoft and Linux side of the house.

To be completely honest, I've never seen a 'multi-system guru', and I doubt that such an animal exists. The simple reason is that EACH environment is so complex that I have yet to meet any person capable of absorbing one environment entirely -- let alone both.

Yes, plenty of people consider themelves or tell other people that they are the second-coming-of-some-deity-multi-system gurus -- but when queried to any level of depth, they are generally only legends in their own mind.

Even here on ZDNET, I recently did battle with a self-professed multi-system security expert who didn't know the first thing about Active Directory.

If your ISP has issues with hardening, they need to get back to the books and learn what tools are available and built into the systems.

With MSBA, group policies and the new features and tighter default settings of 2003 and 2008 server -- no PROPERLY TRAINED AND QUALIFIED sys admin worth their salt would have any problem building or securing live Internet-facing systems.

Additionally, I'd not judge ANYTHING by the 'thickness of docs' -- Linux folks are notoriously lax in preparing documentation of any kind at all.
0 Votes
+ -
You go, Ed!
MGP2 1st May 2009
Too many bloggers let these foolish rants go unanswered, or worse, they answer them with some foolish diplomacy. It's nice to see someone finally tell them to STFU! My hat's off to you, Ed!
0 Votes
+ -
Wow Ed...
Spiritusindomit@... 1st May 2009
Gotta say, that's the most emotional I've ever seen you. Makes me feel better knowing you aren't just a cleverly designed AI blogging as Ed Bott.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
LOL
Ed Bott 1st May 2009
My wife will also bve happy to know that. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Would that make him the "Bott-bot"? (nt)
Thunderbuck 6th Jun 2009
nt
0 Votes
+ -
None of this is much to the point
Jeremy W 1st May 2009
You go on at great length about how you are using your honey to
catch so many bees and ask what you could have written there.

Of course, this is a site pitched at cognoscenti but this priesthood
cult (Learn these tricks and more up to the next level...) is all to
humorous. It must be great for your own personal marketing.

BTW: Maybe you could list these out:

PC: Easy as 1-23
1. Remove unneeded bloatware
2. Configure security settings
3. Download and install OS security patches
4. Restart
5. Download / install extra security programs
6. Restart
7. Download / install drivers for peripherals
8. Restart
9. Remove optional Windows components
10. Update new virus list
11. Run full system virus scan
12. Update new malware list
13. Run full system malware scan
14. Download / install application updates
15. Restart
16. Clean out system registry
17. Repair corupt system registry
18. Defragment hard drive
19. Free up disk space
20. Scan disk for errors
21. Run system file checker
22. Read online instruction manual
23. Cross fingers
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Umm...
quasilou 1st May 2009
None of those items you listed is necessary to use a Vista or Win7 machine.

None of my family members (parents, siblings, wife) have ever done a single one of those thigns and their computers all run fine.

Maybe nobody told you that most of what you listed out either are not required actions or run automatically, with no user intervention required?

And, did I mention that you're a moron? Oh, yeah, I did in a different reply...nevermind.
0 Votes
+ -
Not one runs antivirus????
xXSpeedzXx 1st May 2009
So their a part of the 9 million conficker botnet....

Every OS needs some kind of tweaking and maintainence. It is how the world works. The OS doesn't have all the drivers it needs, so you have to download those, and configure them. Patches are a necessity on all systems.

The one that never does any of these things is the moron.
0 Votes
+ -
Careful...
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 1st May 2009
Every OS needs some kind of tweaking and maintainence. It is how the world works. The OS doesn't have all the drivers it needs, so you have to download those, and configure them. Patches are a necessity on all systems.


According to tewls like Jeremey, only Windows needs that.

0 Votes
+ -
I've owned a Mac for 18 months...
Jeremy W 1st May 2009
and have done none of this.

My Mac defrags itself. I never worry about viruses and spyware,
registry cleaners, and all the rest of the junk that I was concerned
with Broken Windows. Backup is simple, easy and automatic; with
Broken Windows, it was complex, difficult, and, above all,
unreliable. At bottom, Windows is a fraud: it masquerades as
something simple until you actually try to use it.

You could not pay me to use anything from the BloatFarm any
longer.

As more people use Mac products, more will migrate away from the
M$H!T fever swamps and realize that there really is a better way
without endless false priests willing to bestow secrets and tweaks
and....

Users increasingly seek simple easy solutions, not the endless
drivel "features." Watch how many desert O2010 when that tossed
salad of an app is released.

Want to bet that the M$H!T icon for saving a file is still an old
fashioned floppy disk. How ancient; how microsofty; how
increasingly silly.

Like Vista, Zune, LiveSearch, PlaysForSure, Xbox, Encarta, SPoT and
WinMo, W7 will have a short life as the BloatFarm claws increasingly
desperately at life.

M$H!T is a good short sale.
  • Flagged
yes they do still have issues, but any os installed on that many machines worldwide would have the same issues. osx is no pretty thing when it comes to security. more and more security through obscurity doesn't work. i run linux, my linux box got hacked through the firefox browser. easily fixed, but thats not the point. cross platform hacks are becoming easier every day. i expect that within a couple of years we will all be buying our software on the same isles at wallyworld or downloading from the same web sites.

your not more secure because you run a mac. your less secure more so because you think you are than because of the os.

be diligent. no matter what platform your on. always stay aware of what your clicking on. always keep your malware and antivirus software up to date. if it doesn't run automatically, then schedule it.

and don't respond to this with the standard 'i've been running a mac for years and never had any problems'. just wait - you will.
0 Votes
+ -
Gotta remember that this is the internet
Ez_Customs 27th Jul 2009
Because it is online there are more noobie wannabies then knowlegable users in here. THey just think that there thoughts are right because of show's on G4 Network, and or are Best Buy Freaks that get talked into wasting there monies on things that are said to be required.

I bet there is 3% of the users in this thread that truely know what they are talking about. The ones that say that tweaking isn't needed in any OS are just complete morons. Tweaking isn't really about making the computer faster, it's about making the computer function the way you want it to. So therefore in technical terms there are some truths to it, if you are the .5% of users that just wanted a computer that turns on and nothing else matters to them!!
the weekend? even if you don't do half the list, malware and anti-virus steps are critical.
0 Votes
+ -
Two wrongs don't make a right.
AzuMao Updated - 10th May 2009
"He's bad so it's okay for me to be bad too" just
doesn't fly.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
One answer for you...
Ed Bott 1st May 2009
"If one buys a high end automobile, does one expect that there will be hours of 'training' to use it?"

If it's a BMW, then yes:

http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/driving_experience/drivertraining/content.html

Of course, only BMW drivers who want to become experts need this, just as only PC users who want to become experts need the advice in this post.
0 Votes
+ -
Guess You Answered His Question!
MeGaMiPs Updated - 1st May 2009
Great Answer Ed!
I'm lovin it, you don't have to know much about a car to drive one. But it's sure nice to know whats under the hood and what ways you can tweak the greatest performance out of it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ummm...
Jeremy W 15th May 2009
...you forgot to mention that after the BMW I-Drive system was
introduced, drivers howled like hell about its stupidity and
inconvenience and sales dropped dramatically - more than 12% in
a single year - 2003. In Europe, it was a bigger flop - about as
bad as the lamentable Vista that you were "tweaking" and
Secreting" last year.

You, Ed, are proving my point exactly by citing BMW. You are
demonstrating exactly why so many users abandon Windows.

People do NOT want to be experts in cars or the theory of internal
combustion engines or drivetrains, They want to get somewhere
with enjoyment, not go mousing down the road at 75 mph, one
eye on a screen to try to find an FM station and one on the road
ahead. BMW spent $millions fixing its "Windows" iDrive system
because it was a Microsoft solution - needless and unnecessary
complexity.

What you and the rest of the Vista priesthood have forgotten is
that users actually want to use their computers enjoyably just like
they want to go somewhere enjoyably, not be tethered to vastly
over complex devices that wastefully drain their time. They do
not want to be acolytes in a priesthood centered in Redmond. That do not want to be worshipers at a temple facing toward the
NW USA.

In short, they want computers that work easily and provide
enjoyable experiences, not exercises in frustrated searching after
"features" and "cool options".

There is a reason why WinMo is such an abject failure and the
iPhone is such a success; there is a reason why there is no WinMo
"killer" - WinMo is already roadkill. Apple makes it easy;
Redmond makes it vastly too complex,

Your "tweaks" and "secrets" and "features" only ADD to the
complexity. As a high priest, this may be gratifying; as a user, it
is simply more nonsense that is not needed.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
And yet...
Ed Bott 16th May 2009
...you continue to come here and allow my posts to annoy you. I'm sure a psychologist could explain it.

PS: You think this is about Windows. It's not. Go to a bookstore or just jump onto Google and look for books, blogs, and articles about OS X secrets, tweaks, etc. You'll find gazillions of them. Computers are complex general-purpose tools. The more you know, the more you can do with them.

But I guess you prefer a platform where, instead of "high priests," you have to go talk to a "genius."

Right?
0 Votes
+ -
You have never bought a HIGH END car evidently
thewhitewolfe@... 1st May 2009
"If one buys a high end automobile, does one expect that there will be
hours of "training" to use it?"
If you by a car that not your A type vehicle cheve Malibu, Then yes you have to get trained on how to drive and use the vehicle. Example if you buy HIGH END Ferrari you get flown to there School and they teach you how to drive it and many other fats about the vehicle.
0 Votes
+ -
Remember!
windozefreak 1st May 2009
This is a Beta that does not cost one penny. If you buy the real deal, go with what is your flow, and manly accept whatever consequenses you acquire.
0 Votes
+ -
ACTUALLY...
midenginedrift 1st May 2009
If you buy a "high end car" (read: overpriced and overrated) such as a mercedes or bmw, or any european car, you DO have to expect lots of training. most of the switches your accustomed to are in different places, are different shapes, and have different symbols!

it's even worse if your working ON the car, rather than just using it. everything on european cars is purposely designed differently so it's difficult to work on at home and requires it's own set of tools. that way you have to bring it in to the dealership!
0 Votes
+ -
You always had to learn how to.
EricEB 1st May 2009
Right! Program your universal remote control, your 4G phone or any of the products that you have to think to use or how about learning to use power tools like a router and the right use of the 100's of bits for all the different cuts. Now lets make something simple to use like the computer. All the machine codes for the different CPU levels, the different BIOS of all the motherboards, all the different hardware devices, and I find it astounding that the OS even works. And it has only gotten worse.
0 Votes
+ -
Unbelievable!!!
HAFox 1st May 2009
...and I don't mean just you, Jeremy. Every pundit and wonabee critic on this and every other forum that sits at the epicenter of the OS "wars" is nothing short of, well, like I said, unbelievable..and downright hilarious at that. What I find most amusing, is how each and every one of you (the zealots, that is, and you know who you are) truly do believe that your opinion (and that's really all it is, afterall) is quite literally the gospel and beyond any and all argument.

Please! Let's everyone get just an itsy-bitsy tiny little reality check here, shall we.

PSYCH 101- Lesson of the day: You argue and rant for argument's sake. Nothing more, nothing less. You desperately want everyone to read your words, sit back, ponder, and then think "Wow! This guy really knows his sh..tuff. Why, he's simply amazing!" C'mon. Just once, try to post something that's even a little bit constructive. Here's a quicky example:

From one of their closets, I pulled out one of my kids' old home-built boxes with a Pentium 4 (2.66Ghz circa early 2006), Intel 915 chipset and one gig of RAM. Attached a (new) USB wireless N adapter, a wireless keyboard and mouse, and fired her up with the Win7 RC dvd in the drive. It was going to be a fun experiment for the evening... Twenty minutes later, much to my astonished eyes, Win7 was up and running. With no real assistance from me, save a mouse click or two, it first found (from the dvd) a driver for the USB network adapter (which, btw, no other OS has been able to do so far), found my home network, helped me login, then connected itself to the Windows update site, downloaded and installed two updated drivers for the nearly 4-year old chipset and graphics adapter, and I was done. No muss, no fuss, no tweaking, no screaming, no fooling. It all just worked. Simple. One more cool thing... even on this pathetic pile of hardware, Aero mode is running and quite functional.

You know what, even sitting next to my new iMac, I like it. And, even though it took me about 15 minutes longer to get the Mac up and running, you know what, I still like the Mac, too. I'll even send you pictures of the two if you want. wink

So, there you have it. I love computers, what they do and how they do it. I don't give a rat's whisker which one is more intellectually titillating. I just need the darned things to work. Which, I suspect, is what most people want here.

If you simply want to argue, go take a philosophy class at your local high school. You'll get more people to listen and think that you know more than you really do. That goes for all you Z-men/women, too. Go to church if you just have to be a zealot about something. Computers just aren't worth the emotionally trouble, don't you think?

Lesson over. End of class. Try to remember some of what you learned in kindergarten.

Cheers!
0 Votes
+ -
Show us the pics.
HypnoToad72 3rd May 2009
I just bought an iMac as well. Startup time beats the living daylights out of Vista's tunnel with its light turned out at the end.

I always used to turn on my router and PC at the same time. The router took 45 seconds to initialize and Vista still kept loading, 10000RPM hard drive and all. Nowadays I have to wait for the router before powering up the imac; the iMac boots in 15 seconds.

I use both computers for the same tasks (Adobe products).

YMMV, but Apple definitely does make good machines.

Oh, I home-build too. No need to remove the subsidized spyware and bloatware crap that's installed on store-bought PCs in the first place. grin
0 Votes
+ -
I'll try to find time...
HAFox 4th May 2009
..to upload some pics to photobucket and post the link. I still can't believe how well 7 is working on the old clunker. happy
0 Votes
+ -
You will have a valid point if...
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 1st May 2009
...post release it takes a similar "Ed Bott's 12 step program" to get Windows 7 working based on secrets and undoing all the crap the OEMs did to Vista.

Pre-release, well, expect to sometimes need to stand on your head to get it installed. Ed is just being proactive in helping geeks who want to play get the best experience. Indeed, (and I hope he made some money off this), post Vista launch, Sony and other OEMs at least learned they were pretty lousy at setting up Vista.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
I know from personal experience that a new car, whether mid-range or high end, will likely take some training and tweaking to get everything working properly - complicated stereo system, maybe with satellite radio, bluetooth for hands-free phone, and other settings for the electronics. Check the manual, press some buttons, go back to the manual, press some more buttons or turn knobs. Seems every car is different. Sure you could get in, maybe start the car (some have Start buttons now, and no place to stick the key!), possibly get it in gear, and go and stop, but when your phone rings, or you want to change the radio station, you better have done the tweaking! And no, my new car does NOT have Synch!
0 Votes
+ -
Ever heard of iDrive?
RedM3 4th May 2009
BMW's 7 series took a beating for it's iDrive gizmo and would take anyone hours to learn to use.

Now how that compares to a computer OS I have no idea.
0 Votes
+ -
The endless...
LandonAB Updated - 1st May 2009
... ability to tweak is why I prefer Windows over Mac...personally. My wife does not tweak her Windows install at all. Works well for both of us either way.

Thanks for the write up Ed. Looking forward to the final release.
0 Votes
+ -
If you like to tweak...
Gozers 1st May 2009
...run Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
Please..........
Economister 1st May 2009
As helpful/useful as your piece may be, as soon as I read "secrets" I have a strong urge to move on. Your credibility immediately takes a beating.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Thanks for the feedback
Ed Bott 1st May 2009
So, you already knew everything in this post?
0 Votes
+ -
That was not my point.........
Economister 1st May 2009
No, I did not know everything in your post. The word "secrets" however makes it come across as low level tabloid journalism. What's wrong with feature, tweaks, undocumented.... or whatever. I appreciate your knowledge and efforts. In my view however you debase your writing by using the word "secrets". Just because something is (still) not well known does not make it a secret.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
So...
Ed Bott 1st May 2009
What would your headline have been? Remember that the job of a headline is to attract attention. You have less than a second to get the reader to stop, click, and read.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Headlines
FMBeachBum 1st May 2009
Ed, I think this is only partially true. When I see an article by you I'll read it regardless of the title because I know it will be well thought out and will be of substance. On the other hand, there are certain authors on this site that I won't even look at any more because the articles are nothing but fluff and/or flame bait. IMO the reputation of the author has a lot to do with it. Maybe I'm in the minority though. That being said, I would have to agree that secrets is just a little bit tacky happy
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Windows 7 setup secrets
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix