ie8 fix
madison

Windows 8 Consumer Preview: a fresh start for Microsoft

By | February 29, 2012, 6:45am PST

Summary: With today’s release of the Windows 8 Consumer Preview, Microsoft is finally ready for the public to pass judgment on its most important software release in nearly two decades. Here’s what to expect.

Windows 8 Consumer Preview
Windows 8 Consumer Preview

A modern computing device must do certain things, right out of the box. It must connect you to the web and to social networks. It must enable communications with your friends and family and co-workers. It must play music and video. It must provide a framework for extending its capabilities with apps that are easy to discover and install.

Those capabilities require a blend of hardware, software, and services that collectively add up to an experience, which is much more than a list of features or a page of specs or a collection of screenshots.

Microsoft has been talking about experience for a long time. (The XP brand, introduced in 2001, came from the word eXPerience.) But it has taken a full decade for the company to turn its talk into something real. Windows 8 is the first operating system that Microsoft has consciously designed to work in harmony with hardware, apps, and services to deliver that consistent experience.

SEE ALSO

Although you won’t see the word beta in the Windows 8 Consumer Preview, that’s exactly what it is. It’s too early to run benchmarks or pass final judgment on a product, but this milestone is solidly built and feature-complete. It’s a good time to assess Microsoft’s progress with what is arguably its most consequential product release in nearly two decades.

I’ve been running Windows 8 Build 8250 for about a week on a Samsung tablet identical to the one developers received at Microsoft’s BUILD conference last September. (The hardware and preinstalled software were provided on a loan from Microsoft. The equipment will be returned before the final release of Windows 8 is available to the public.)

The Samsung slate is a well-built tablet that shows off Windows 8’s touch capabilities impressively. My review unit also included a docking station, which made it possible for me to connect to a 24-inch monitor, attach a keyboard and mouse, and evaluate this release the way most people are likely to use it in the near future: on a conventional PC, without touch capabilities.

If you dabbled with the Developer Preview edition of Windows 8, released nearly six months ago, you experienced bits and pieces of what Windows 8 would eventually become. But that incomplete release lacked the polish—not to mention the apps—that would have made it suitable for sustained use by nondevelopers.

With today’s unveiling of the Consumer Preview, the picture becomes considerably clearer. Microsoft says they’ve made “more than 100,000 changes” since the Developer Preview release, and it shows. It’s still a work in progress, but there’s no question that this release is ready for enthusiasts, early adopters, and especially skeptics to evaluate critically.

Dozens of small changes (and a few large ones) address complaints about the Start and search screens. You can manage groups of icons more easily (and optionally assign names to those groups) using the semantic zoom feature. (For an overview of what’s new and changed, see “A closer look at the Windows 8 Start screen,” on the next page.)

There’s considerably more polish in the keyboard/mouse interface than was evident in the Developer Preview. It took me a day or two to adjust to a handful of new navigation techniques. With that brief period of adaptation out of the way, though, I find that many tasks are indeed faster and easier than in Windows 7.

On the Windows 8 desktop, the most obvious change is the absence of the Start button in the lower left corner. It’s not gone, though. If you move the mouse to the top or bottom corner on the right side of the display, you’ll see the Windows 8 Start icon in the center of the Charms bar shown below. (In fact, all four corners play a crucial role in using a mouse with Windows 8, as I explain in “How Windows 8 works,” later in this review.)

(By the way, there are at least three visual puns hidden in that default background. For details, check out the comprehensive screenshot gallery I’ve put together, which digs deeper into the bits and pieces of Windows 8.)

The Developer Preview included a motley collection of demo apps that had literally been built by student interns working at Microsoft over the summer. In the Consumer Preview, those apps are gone, replaced by a much more useful suite of 18 Metro style apps. Mail, Calendar, and Messaging are there, as are the media apps that were missing from the developer preview: Music, Video, and Photos. You’ll find connections to services from Microsoft (Hotmail, Skydrive, Xbox Live) and third parties (Gmail, Facebook, Flickr). I’ve got more details in a screenshot gallery that lists all 18 apps.)

Third-party Metro style apps will also be available via the Windows Store, which is scheduled to open when the Consumer Preview bits are made available to the public. I didn’t have early access to those apps.

A week is just enough time to scratch the surface of something as detailed, complex, and still incomplete as Windows 8. I fully expect a nontrivial number of Windows users to absolutely hate this radical reimagining of a product that wipes out a decade’s worth of muscle memory. The big question is whether the general public will come to a different conclusion after they experience it for themselves.

Keep reading for more details on what you can expect.

Page 2: A closer look at the Windows 8 Start screen

Page 3: How Windows 8 works

Page 4: What’s next?

Page 2: A closer look at the new Start screen –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

232
Comments

Join the conversation!

Top Rated

Killer features in Windows 8
wp7mango 29th Feb
I think there are several killer features -

1. Windows to Go - having a full bootable OS on a USB stick with your data being stored in the cloud is a brilliant idea!

2. Storage space - if you need more storage, just connect any drive and Windows 8 will automatically use it without you having to worry about drive letters etc. So if you need more storage space, you just add more storage space. That's beautifully simple.

3. Legacy support in desktop, running side by side with Metro. I think this is an excellent way of providing backwards compatibility.

4. Fast boot in 8 seconds from cold. Awesome!

5. Get more use out of old hardware. For example, if you have an XP machine, it's much cheaper to upgrade to Windows 8 than to buy new hardware. Windows 8 will run faster than XP on the same hardware. I have several old XP laptops that will now have a new lease of life!

6. Office included FREE - that doesn't need any explanations!!!

Just In

not impressed
kbs24@... 6th Mar
I set up windows 8 a few days ago on a dual boot with win7. Runs smoothly. But, aesthetically, the start page is extremely unattractive, in my opinion. The tiles are just ugly. Now, if down the road there will be custom launchers or skins, fine. Or, if we could boot directly to the Desktop, but then might as well just stay with windows 7. Also, while it may run nicely on a tablet, my 17" laptop screen is not large enough to use without scrolling over to the right to see all the tiles. Just my two cents.
0 Votes
+ -
Start Screen is BS
JeveSobs 29th Feb
"The Start screen is the first thing every Windows 8 user will see after logging on. It???s a program launcher, a dashboard, and an app switcher that unifies functions that are distributed along different parts of the Windows 7 task bar."

It is Microsoft Bob 2.0
-6 Votes
+ -
lame subject line requirement
JeveSobs 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Unless I missed it in your article can I run apps in a Windowed mode? As in right now on my 24inch screen I have a few apps open, none of them full screen. I can see stuff from both apps at the same time. How do I do this in Windows 8? Do I need two monitors so that I can have two full screen apps running at the same time?
8 Votes
+ -
Desktop, buddy
Cylon Centurion 29th Feb
The Windows 8 desktop works just the same as Windows of years past. This includes windowed apps.
8 Votes
+ -
A more complete answer is that
rbethell 29th Feb
you can ONLY do this with Windows desktop apps. Anything purchased from the Windows App Store will not do this. Metro apps run immersively (i.e. full screen, and without overlapping windows.)
-11 Votes
+ -
LOL
usereplyto@... 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Perfect.
4 Votes
+ -
It's evident that you never...
PollyProteus 29th Feb
...actually used Microsoft Bob.

Was it awesome? No, but it was a design paradigm way ahead of it's time.

If Steve Jobs (yes Jeve, I got the word play of your account name) and Apple had been the ones to create it, to you and all the rest of the Apple faithful would be still singing it's praises.
-7 Votes
+ -
I's evident that you never...
pjones 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Nope! I am still using snow leopard and there are many of use that want our computers to look and act like computers not iPads. If I want an iPad screen I will get an iPad. If you your not smart enough to get around ina Computer you don't need to on one.
0 Votes
+ -
@pjones
Tea.Rollins 29th Feb
Sir, this has nothing to do with your sexuality. Please stop bringing it up.
2 Votes
+ -
Was it awesome? No
buddhistMonkey 29th Feb
((( "If Steve Jobs... and Apple had been the ones to create [Microsoft Bob], to you and all the rest of the Apple faithful would be still singing it's [sic] praises." )))

Nonsense. That's like saying that if PIXAR had spit out a bunch of low-quality garbage flicks, they'd still be international blockbusters. Steve Jobs wouldn't have been Steve Jobs, and Apple wouldn't be Apple if they had created garbage like Microsoft Bob (and yes, I've used it: it was ugly, confusing, and poorly-implemented, one of the most crushing software failures in the history of computing).
-6 Votes
+ -
Jump to 8
camcost@... 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
8 sounds good. I expect to upgrade my Vista and 7 laptops to 8. I've never been a fan of any Windows version besides XP, but maybe 8 will finally be the upgrade that will prove Microsoft is still in the game.
(Let's just hope we can go to 8 for a very minimal fee, not Microsoft's typical wallet gauge.)
I've never been a fan of any windows version besides NT4.0. Seriously, where's the real enhancement, another app launcher?
-2 Votes
+ -
Ever.

Make app to easily disable start screen and re-enable start menu.
Profit.

There are no other steps.
2 Votes
+ -
I'm not sold on Metro
Aerowind 29th Feb
But that's a ridiculous sentiment. It's like saying "I'm going to buy a phone, but I refuse to use it to call people."
-1 Votes
+ -
Why?
rshol 29th Feb
I want some of the under the hood changes in Win 8. I may want metro on my phone or tablet. I don't want the metro interface or full screen only (well 3/4 and 1/4) apps on my desktop. Its more like saying I want Ubuntu but prefer to run KDE to Unity.
-2 Votes
+ -
ummm...
BridgeT Roll 29th Feb
Have you tried calling someone on an iPjone? You might change your opinion.
2 Votes
+ -
No, it's more like saying
baggins_z 29th Feb
I didn't buy a phone, quit trying to tell me I have to make phone calls.
2 Votes
+ -
Metro
pjalm 29th Feb
I also want a way to disable Metro. I do not like it at all. I also have an iPhone and don't have cellular service (I use it as a glorified iPod Touch). I love the iPhone but hate cellphones. Am I not allowed to use my devices and software how I choose?
-2 Votes
+ -
You mean like "Classic Shell"?
Cylon Centurion 29th Feb
Here: classicshell.sourceforge.net/

If you're going to complain about new ways of computing, you might as well as go back to DOS. You remind me of an old college professor who spent entire class periods doing the same about the changes in Windows 7.
-10 Votes
+ -
It's about having a choice...
ScorpioBlack 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
...@Cylon Centurion. Something you know nothing about.
9 Votes
+ -
@ScorpioBlack
Cylon Centurion Updated - 29th Feb
Then don't use the metro apps. Pin your "classic apps to the screen, like you would in Windows 7, and that'll be the only metro you see. Metro apps aren't the end of "classic" apps.

The Start screen still has all of the functionality of the "old" Windows XP, Vista, 7 Start Menu.
-5 Votes
+ -
Why should I have to do that?
ScorpioBlack 29th Feb
Why are you so against users being able to turn them off? Of making a choice?

Seriously. What's it to you.
-3 Votes
+ -
Wrong Analogy
vucliriel@... 29th Feb
Yeah, I'd like to get back to before DRM and the Patriot Act and it won't happen either. You analogy with DOS is just as absurd. You CAN'T install old OSes on new computers precisely because there are no hardware drivers compatible with these OSes.
8 Votes
+ -
What UI choices does Apple give you
William Farrel 29th Feb
ScorpioBlue?
-6 Votes
+ -
Excellent point
ScorpioBlack 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Yeah, I'd like to get back to before DRM and the Patriot Act and it won't happen either. You analogy with DOS is just as absurd. You CAN'T install old OSes on new computers precisely because there are no hardware drivers compatible with these OSes.

That just their convoluted way of rationalizing things.

And as an added thought, notice I never got an answer to my previous post. Only the + - sign or flagging when one gets too near the truth and has to ask some tough questions.
-1 Votes
+ -
Don't use Apple, Wille
ScorpioBlack 29th Feb
However with Ubuntu, there's KDE, Gnome, Xfce and Envy.

I can also choose the variants:
Edubuntu
Kubuntu
Xubuntu
Ubuntu

And a few others....

And here we can't get a simple toggle option from the politburo in Redmond. Sad. Pathetic.
-8 Votes
+ -
Or worst
SylvainT 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Good point. they can even go back to worst than DOS by using linux. The only operating system I know who is still stuck in 90's
1 Vote
+ -
Wrong, fanboy
ScorpioBlack 1st Mar
Good point. they can even go back to worst than DOS by using linux. The only operating system I know who is still stuck in 90's

And that's probably the last time you've used it, too.
-2 Votes
+ -
there is no reason to waste money and time on it. Microsoft is NOT a big player to the software I use; it only facilitates loading/running it. So why would I want a $400 OS replacement that did nothing more than my current setup does? It's stupid and 7/8 offer NOTHING of any value to my computing day. After all, an OS is nothing but a way to run your "real" applications. It'll be quite some time before I get forced into an upgrade for THAT! Hell, my win98 machine is still pumping away 24/7 with nary a glitch or problem of any kind. And it still receives all the critical updates when something applies to "all versions". It will remain a viable OS for some time to come.
Choice choice choice....

This is becoming a tired argument. You always have choice.

GNOME3 & Unity are also disasters, yet some people use them. Go tell THEM they have choice and they will say "This works fine for me".

I am busy installing Win8, my choice, I also have a VM with Ubuntu (with Unity.. that doesn't work on the VM thankfully), Mint, and Puppy. I have the ISO for Debian, but haven't installed it yet. So as you can see I dabble in all areas, I am not a Windows/Apple/Linux/Android fanboi, since I use ALL of them. iPhone, Galaxy Tab, Windows PC, Linux Media Server. Why do I have all of them? Choice. So if you are not going to use/try windows 8... Why are you still here? It's your CHOICE.
-1 Votes
+ -
Sounds like you need to chill, dude.

And no, MS needs a toggle to get the old Start menu back. Big time. Yes, that is a choice many want out there.

We'll see what happens.
4 Votes
+ -
Currently Installing
Cylon Centurion 29th Feb
I'm setting it up on a laptop of mine. Can't wait to give it a go in a few!
-18 Votes
+ -
Go fanboy go!
ScorpioBlack Updated - 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
rah, rah, rah!
-1 Votes
+ -
Go fanboy go!
ScorpioBlack 1st Mar
go, go go!

lol...
-1 Votes
+ -
DOS
tom@... 1st Mar
DOS window gets used a lot more than a lot of people realiize. For one thing it's blazing fast on today's hardware with magnitudes like 10x faster than its gui counterpart. I use the command prompt myself these days: It's not called DOS anymore of course for obvious reasons, but the set of commands today makes the old DOS 662 look like beginner's work. The DOS window, as Microsoft still calls it, is an excellent choice, especially for anyone with any programming interest. You'd be amazed at what it can provide.
0 Votes
+ -
It???s too early to run benchmarks or pass final judgment on a product
Unfortunately that is what is going to happen from your colleagues. Its already happened before the consumer preview was released, just do a search for Windows 8 is DOA on ZDNet.

I'm glad Microsoft is taking a fresh approach to desktop computing. The new Metro UI is going to do wonders for people who need access to information immediately. Its a major shift from the desktop as we know it today. Falls in line with having a true Windows experience and just making computers a lot easier to use.
-2 Votes
+ -
Not sure...
jeremychappell 29th Feb
Maybe, though I'm wondering if it'll sell a lot of touch-enabled displays. It sort of reminds me of removing the floppy disk on the iMac. People saying it's the fall of civilisation, others saying it's going to be fantastic.

In truth, it'll be a huge pain in the proverbial, for about a week. Then we'll get over it and the Start Menu will seem impossibly quaint. Given that the Start Menu is a shameless ripoff of the Apple Menu from Classic Mac OS (not that new fangled "OS X") I suppose it IS impossibly quaint.

The Metrofied Start Screen is a bit jarring, but if they've improved the mouse support (as Ed says) then perhaps it'll be fine (wasn't dreadfully impressed with how DP worked... but I take Ed's point that it was "touch first").

Also interesting is the new "Desktop" theme, that seems much more in keeping than in DP.

I still think the ARM iteration is going to absolutely howl, but the x86 version seems to be shaping up well.
-11 Votes
+ -
So full of it Loverock
SamWilkinson 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Ballmer could toss an etch a sketch filled with manure your way and you'd say it's awesome.
5 Votes
+ -
The fact that the usual haters
William Farrel 29th Feb
are spending a great deal of time commenting on something they claim means nothing to them is all the proof you need to see it worries them.

But then again, if it came with the "Classic UI" you can bet that they would be the first to claim that "MS isn't doing anything different, and should have gone with Metro UI" instead.
-2 Votes
+ -
Wrong
tom@... 1st Mar
"spending a great deal of time commenting on something they claim means nothing to them is all the proof you need to see it worries them."

Au contrare, you of great ego and tiny knowledge, you could not be more wrong. But you do wonderfully demonstrate your allegations you project on to others.
So the start screen is a BSOD? Sure would simplify matters, as opposed to having to try to do something, then it crashes. It'd be handy as an night-lite then. So you'd have access to your information as soon as you can get a printed page pointed at the screen. 2012, the year Microsoft reinvents the light bulb!
-1 Votes
+ -
So many
tom@... 1st Mar
people get sucked in by simply hype with nothing but words, not facts, to back it up.
-8 Votes
+ -
Worst OS since 1985
HollywoodDog 29th Feb Below threshold | Show anyway
Windows 1.0 vs. Windows 8

1985: Windows 1.0
Gaudy colors, boxy design.
Apps can either run as small tile or fullscreen.
No freely resizable/movable windows.

1986 to 2011
A quarter century of fumbling around with user interface design.

2011: Windows 8
Gaudy colors, boxy design.
Apps can either run as small tile or fullscreen.
No freely resizable/movable windows.
-3 Votes
+ -
Well I won't go that far
ScorpioBlack 29th Feb
But so far, I'm not terribly impressed. There's no killer "must-have" in order to inspire any upgrade.

That's why it's important to put a damper on fanboy hype.

Let's hope they have downgrade rights with this they way they did with Vista.
15 Votes
+ -
Top Rated
Killer features in Windows 8
wp7mango 29th Feb Top Rated
I think there are several killer features -

1. Windows to Go - having a full bootable OS on a USB stick with your data being stored in the cloud is a brilliant idea!

2. Storage space - if you need more storage, just connect any drive and Windows 8 will automatically use it without you having to worry about drive letters etc. So if you need more storage space, you just add more storage space. That's beautifully simple.

3. Legacy support in desktop, running side by side with Metro. I think this is an excellent way of providing backwards compatibility.

4. Fast boot in 8 seconds from cold. Awesome!

5. Get more use out of old hardware. For example, if you have an XP machine, it's much cheaper to upgrade to Windows 8 than to buy new hardware. Windows 8 will run faster than XP on the same hardware. I have several old XP laptops that will now have a new lease of life!

6. Office included FREE - that doesn't need any explanations!!!
9 Votes
+ -
Holly..dog is a lost ball in tall weeds...
ItsTheBottomLine 29th Feb
If it doesn't have a fruit on it then he's slamming it (I mean he is in the land of fruits and nuts). I bet he has not even downloaded or tried it yet. He's worried about the positive comments.
  • Flagged
12 Votes
+ -
@wp7mango
number cruncher 29th Feb
"6. Office included FREE - that doesn't need any explanations!!!"

I wouldn't bet on it. They aren't going to GIVE you a $400 Office Suite for "FREE"! It will either be a significantly stripped down or limited time "starter" version or they are going to build the cost into the price of the OS. Don't hold your breath for a so-called FREE version of Office Professional...it's not going to happen!
5 Votes
+ -
maybe not so killer after all.
Jumpin Jack Flash 29th Feb
@wp7mango
1) something I wouldn't trust.Not handing all my files, and data to any third party, least of which would be Microsoft.

2) this is something other OSes have been doing for over a decade, talk about being late to the party.

3) Since Metro Apps run full screen you won't have too many Apps running at the same time. Now your computer will act like a giant WP 7 phone, without the phone functionality.

4, and 5) I'll believe that when I see it.

6) Office was supposed to be included in the ARM versions only. Microsoft is not going to give up $400, to $800 per seat just to push an OS.
-5 Votes
+ -
None of those are killer, @wp7mango
ScorpioBlack Updated - 29th Feb
1. Linux to go on a USB stick has been around for almost 10 years. Like whoop-de-do...

2. I never worried about drive letters on my desktop so big deal.

3. Legacy support? Well that's to be expected. What surprises me is they haven't dropped the 32bit OS yet and gone totally 64

4. Fast boot is already there in hibernate mode. So what.

5. Linux will run faster on old laptops so they get a new lease on life. Nothing new there, either. And you get to switch for free. No $200 wasted on an old machine.

6. Will be the strip-o version with partial functionality and ads built in. Better off with Open Office or LibreOffice.

I guess that was a 'good' try anyway.
5 Votes
+ -
That makes a lot of assumptions
vulpine@... 29th Feb
@wp7mango: I'll admit I haven't gone into depth with Win8 yet, but many of these things seem to be real exaggerations unless, as I suggested years ago, Microsoft completely wipes out almost all the old legacy software from Dos, 3.0/3.1, '95, '98, '98se, etc. At a mere 2.8 GB it really sounds like they tried to do this. However, retaining backwards compatibility to Win7/Vista/XP means that some things simply couldn't go away and I wonder just how compatible with older software Win8 will really be.

The storage space thing isn't anything new--Apple's OS X has been doing that for more than 10 years now and I'm really glad to see Microsoft finally understands it. I'd much rather name my drives myself than put up with /c, /d, etc.

Legacy support: As I said, if you ask me the jury's out on that one until we get some real-world use. I have a client who upgraded from WinXP to Win7 and lost all use of her still-fully-functional Dell scanner/printer due to a lack of drivers. I've seen similar but less severe failures with certain games that some players don't want to lose. We'll just have to see here, because I don't expect much legacy capability beyond Win7 apps.

Booting in 8 seconds: I find this one extremely hard to believe unless you're installing onto an SSD; any hard drive is still going to be significantly slower and Windows isn't really noted for installing applications on any drive but the boot drive. Rather, I expect they'll hit you with some kind of bitmapped image that looks like your Start window just to fool you into thinking you're already up. Still, a less than one-minute boot would be nice.

The 'old hardware' statement falls directly under my 'legacy' statement above--where you'd better have the most current drivers available for your cards and plug-in devices before you upgrade or you might find yourself unable to even get outside your box. I appreciate the nod to older hardware, but quite honestly Microsoft would be happier if you bought new machines instead--just so they can declare their successes.
0 Votes
+ -
How about putting up with some hard-facts.

Since you're preoccupied with petty point scoring - rather than providing anything based on fact, i'll take the liberty of givin' you an education.

I have just installed W8CP on the following specced machine: ASRock K8Upgrade-NF3, Athlon 64 3000+ (@2.4GHz, x10/240), LiteON DVD-RAM optical drv, 120GB Seagate PATA HDD, PS/2 Mouse, PS/2 keyboard, Philips 107-Si CRT Monitor, 2 x 512MB DDR-400 (PC3200) Infineon RAM, Leadtek A7600GS-TDH (DDR2, 256MB's VRAM, AGP 8x), onboard LAN, Realtek AC'97 Audio (7.1 Channel supported), USB 2.0 (x4). ...you get the drift. Point being, it's a dinosaurus REX of a machine, as can plainly be seen.

What is critical here is that, by default, every one of the hardware peripherals mentioned, worked straight after install (oob) - and without so much as a sign of a driver disk!

" I appreciate the nod to older hardware, but quite honestly Microsoft would be happier if you bought new machines instead--just so they can declare their successes. "

Hmmmm ... so that's why they include legacy support for positively ancient hardware - oob, mind you .. that self-installs and configures itself for the end-user's convenience?!? Besides, MS will obviously be pleased to see folk buy new PC's with W8 installed ... I mean, so what? Isn't Apple happy to see folk buy the latest Macbooks and desktop Macs with the latest release of OSX? You really ought to think things through before going public with your tired diatribe.

Y'know, it's crystal clear that your misguided take on W8 has blinded you, somewhat, to the fact Microsoft actually (and obviously) went out of their way to provide a platform (in W8) that plays nice with legacy hardware, current and emerging device technologies. I'm pretty sure your beloved Apple is nowhere near as compatible with average Jane & Joe's aging / old, everyday peripheral computing devices - at least not to the seamless, PnP ease-of-use level that Windows 8 does. Now if it's a hardware compatibility, Pepsi Challenge you want (Macintosh versus Windows) , i'll call your bluff any day [hint: see list at top of my post].

Moving right along, as for app compatibility? As an example, I've just installed and run VLC 1.0.1 (a 3 year old release!) and it runs flawlessly on W8CP.

Listen, you've always struck me as a nice guy, but your biased, negativity towards almost anything MS shows just how flawed, way-off and humorous some of your claims are about MS products and services. Now, please do yourself a big favour and get some perspective and objectivity .. rather than embarrassing yourself with unsubstantiated claims (no, fibs) for all the world to see.

To end with, W8 is a great cross-platform OS that works well with EDIT: most legacy hardware and aging, x86 applications. How do I know this?? Unlike you, I actually bothered to test drive it before commenting on it (wow .. how's that for a novel idea: actually testing and proving, one way or another).

Your Score for today: -100 (... because as a supposedly informed ZDNet poster, you really ought to know better)

Thanks for playing.
1 Vote
+ -
not impressed
kbs24@... 6th Mar
I set up windows 8 a few days ago on a dual boot with win7. Runs smoothly. But, aesthetically, the start page is extremely unattractive, in my opinion. The tiles are just ugly. Now, if down the road there will be custom launchers or skins, fine. Or, if we could boot directly to the Desktop, but then might as well just stay with windows 7. Also, while it may run nicely on a tablet, my 17" laptop screen is not large enough to use without scrolling over to the right to see all the tiles. Just my two cents.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix