Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

10 obscure antivirus tools worth a look

By | April 7, 2010, 2:24am PDT

Summary: You know about the big players in the AV field — but a number of lesser-known tools may serve your needs as well (or even better). Jack Wallen runs through some of your choices.

You know about the big players in the AV field — but a number of lesser-known tools may serve your needs as well (or even better). TechRepublic’s Jack Wallen runs through some of your choices. For more blogs like this, see TechRepublic’s 10 Things blog.


Viruses come and go. Some of them are simply annoyances, but others are nasty little bits of malicious single-minded code that want to take down your machine or take away your data. Fortunately, there are plenty of tools out there that can help you deal with the problem. Some of those tools are well known: Symantec, McAfee, Norton. But you can also find tools that will serve you at a fraction of the cost or a fraction of the CPU processes.

I’m going to introduce you to some of these lesser-known antivirus tools. In the end, you will have more tools for your toolkit than you ever though you would have… all of which are ready to immunize you from machine-crushing code.

Note: This article is also available as a PDF download.

1: BitDefender

BitDefender is one of my favorites on the list. Why? Because it has one of the best graphical virus tools available for the Linux operating system. Of course it doesn’t offer just a Linux solution. BitDefender offers antivirus for both Linux and Windows, as well as for various server installations. In fact, BitDefender has solutions for mail servers, Samba servers, desktops, and much more.

2: Avira Antivir

Avira Antivir has, in many cases, found viruses where others have not. One of my favorite uses for this solution is to slap it on a Linux machine (the Linux version is command-line based, but does have a GUI if you prefer), attach an infected Windows drive externally, and run Avira on that drive. Much like BitDefender, Avira will find viruses many other solutions won’t find. And because it is mostly command line, it is also quite a bit faster than other tools.

3: ClamAV

ClamAV is mostly a mail server antivirus for Linux, but it does a bang-up job. If you’re hosting a Linux-based mail server, you will want to include ClamAV on it; otherwise, you risk winding up spreading the love of viruses around the globe.

4: Avast

Avast is not as much a wallflower as the other tools, but it certainly has never been crowned Prom Queen. It’s an outstanding tool that offers a lot of options many other tools over look. One of my favorite aspects of Avast is the built-in rootkit check. You can’t go wrong when you know your antivirus is keeping you safe from rootkits.

5: rkhunter

rkhunter is not so much an antivirus tool as it is an anti-rootkit tool. If you’ve never come across a rootkit on a machine, consider yourself lucky. Very lucky. Rootkits are the Mac Daddy of viruses. And if your current antivirus solution doesn’t protect you from rootkits, either add a rootkit protection tool on your system or uninstall and install one that does!

6: Dr.Web CureIt!

Dr.Web CureIt! is an interesting tool in that it requires no installation. It’s a simple binary file that, when double-clicked, will execute and scan your machine. The only drawback is that to get the latest definitions, you have to re-download the tool and use the newest version. But how easy would this tool be to use as a portable virus scanner?

7: ESET Smart Security

ESET Smart Security is from the makers of the NOD32 Antivirus tool that has been around for quite some time. ESET sets itself apart by being an antivirus and a firewall in one. But the firewall isn’t just a standard firewall. It’s a “learning firewall,” in that it observes how its users use the network and, theoretically, adapts to that usage. ESET also protects you from removable data and from viruses that attempt to disable your antivirus protection.

8: ZoneAlarm

ZoneAlarm is an antivirus tool that offers something others do not — DataLock. The DataLock portion of ZoneAlarm uses encryption on your hard drive so that it is readable only by those with the encryption key. DataLock also offers pre-boot authentication so that unauthorized users can’t even boot your machine. Yes, these features can be added from the BIOS or from other tools, but with ZoneAlarm, you have antivirus, encryption, and boot authentication all in one.

9: iAntiVirus

iAntiVirus is for — you guessed it — Mac. Like Linux, nothing is immune (no matter how much the media and the PR say it is). And that beautiful new Mac you bought can use protection as well as that new quad-core Windows 7 machine. iAntiVirus is as inherently Mac as you will ever find in an antivirus tool. Not only is it user-friendly, it has that same Mac interface that everyone has grown to love (or hate). And what’s best, iAntiVirus works like any other antivirus software you have ever used — only it does so on a Mac. So it must be better.

10: Microsoft Security Essentials

Microsoft Security Essentials has to be on this list. After all, it wouldn’t be fair of me to highlight inherently Linux and Mac tools without offering the Windows equivalent. What is really surprising about this antivirus protection is that it is free AND produced by Microsoft. Those two don’t usually go hand in hand. If you want free virus protection, and you want something that will seamlessly integrate with Windows, Security Essentials is your best bet.

Recommendations?

Those are just 10 of the less well known antivirus solutionsf. Of course, there are plenty more out there. Do you rely on a somewhat obscure tool for antivirus? If so, share it with your fellow TechRepublic readers. After all, the perfect antivirus solution is still out there, waiting to be found and enjoyed by PC users and admins across the globe.


Check out 10 Things… the newsletter

Get the key facts on a wide range of technologies, techniques, strategies, and skills with the help of the concise need-to-know lists featured in TechRepublic’s 10 Things newsletter, delivered every Friday. Automatically sign up today.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
256
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Great Discussion
Dietrich AC Schmitz 26th May
Great info - too bad I've got to filter past the trolls for good info.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft Security Essentials' biggest flaw is Microsoft's recent decision to share the same settings as Windows Update. If you don't have Windows Update set to install automatically, you get daily notifications to install the latest virus definitions. Virus definitions are something that you should be able to update automatically in the background while still requiring notification for major OS updates.
0 Votes
+ -
Are you sure?
Sleeper Service 7th Apr 2010
I use MSE and don't have Update set to install automatically and I don't get these alerts.
0 Votes
+ -
SIlent update...
didier.m.rousseau@... 7th Apr 2010
I don't get any notification.
MSE updates installs silently despite the fact that WU automatic update feature is turned off.
0 Votes
+ -
MSE updates
EricVM 7th Apr 2010
I have the latest version and it updates silently and my OS settings are on Notify if there are updates...and that is with three machines its on.
You are confusing Microsoft Security essentials with Windows Defender (now part of Windows 7). Defender does use the Windows Update feature to update its definitions once or twice a week.
0 Votes
+ -
I just got a message:
clfitz 7th Apr 2010
"Definition Update for Microsoft Security
Essentials - KB972696 (Definition 1.79.1379.0)"

This is Control Panel in Windows 7 Ultimate 32-
bit. I just noticed this change about a week ago,
and don't like it much either.
The reason is because if you have a real need to block Automatic Updates, which only includes bugs labelled 'Critical', and security updates which aren't intended to change operations, they figure the same reason would apply to antivirus updates.

That is, if you need to manage security in a very controlled manner, as is what you mention, antivirus updates should be part of that same methodology.

That's the reason.

If you want finer control of updates, you can always implement a WSUS server, but then individual systems don't usually need that level of control. Likewise, Microsoft's best practise is to have Automatic Updates turned on for unmanaged PC's so that security updates are automatically applied. Your antivirus should be one of the LAST lines of defense, not your first, and many viruses are mitigated or outright blocked by security updates.

FYI: Updates that include changes in operation or functionality that are not directly security related are listed under 'Optional', and are never installed automatically. Drivers are the same, unless there is a major bug that causes stability problems (often Solution Center will notify you of a known problem with a driver), or a device is missing a driver that is offered on WU.

AFAIK, WSUS is the only thing that can control deployment of updates based on categorization. I don't know of any way of doing that directly on the client, aside from what is already hard-locked into Automatic Updates.

Really though, if you aren't installing Automatic Updates, you aren't getting baseline security patches for Windows, so I refer you back to the statement in bold.
0 Votes
+ -
This response ignores important points
Old Techie 7th Apr 2010
AU only presents things periodically (a couple times a month) and has been seen SEVERAL times in the past to apply patches MS thinks are good only to find out they break needed functionality. Additionally, a Service Pack update, which is listed as "Critical" since it contains the body of previously issued critical patches can cause significant negative impact to performance when it occurs.

So, the reasons not to have AU do things automatically is so one can check out the updates in a managed manner 1) for applicability, 2) for negative impact (what may it affect for which I need to check another manufacturer's website for caveats), and 3) for convenient timing in the case of a service pack.

Furthermore, A/V products can quickly defend against vulnerabilities before MS even has a patch. If MSE is updated independently and often, MS can devise a protective signature through A/V during regression testing producing significant reduction in the impact of 0day events. What a PR win that would be.
0 Votes
+ -
No it didn't
Cyberjester 7th Apr 2010
It was one of the most intelligent and well done posts I've seen on this site, makes a total of 3 people I'll listen to in regards to computer security.

"
The reason is because if you have a real need to block Automatic Updates, which only includes bugs labelled 'Critical', and security updates which aren't intended to change operations, they figure the same reason would apply to antivirus updates.

That is, if you need to manage security in a very controlled manner, as is what you mention, antivirus updates should be part of that same methodology.
"

That's why AV updates are in with AU.

You could still set up a server to download all the updates, then send out the AV updates to clients whilst keeping the Windows/MSFT Office/etc updates behind for testing if you really wanted to.

Although there's no way an AV can take the place of Windows Updates. If a person can get root control of your computer, it's fairly simple to lock out the AV. Ye Old Windows Firewall on XP was a prime target, most viruses would disable it as default. :P
0 Votes
+ -
Microsft Security Essentials
ronangel 7th Apr 2010
There are thousands of computers worldwide that have been taken over as Bots unawarely being used by people who have had their updates from Microsoft prevented by not passing the verification process or not even trying to verify in case they are traced back & the door broken down by the pirate police!This is perfectly correct of Microsoft's part (not the door break down the anti piracy part) but not allowing security updates from the largest used operating system in the world risking & causing untold problems for users worldwide against a small in comparison corporate loss,is morally or thought legally correct unacceptable.
which invalidates your entire post.
0 Votes
+ -
Not unless validation has been attempted which would cause the "victim of piracy message" to be displayed. And increase paranoia of third world user who has not validated "just in case"...
Maybe they know something we don't......
0 Votes
+ -
Unless the changed something...
ShadowGIATL Updated - 22nd Apr 2010
What you describe is Windows Defender. Totally different program, and a different concept.

MSE is based on ForeFront/OneCare, and works largely the same, minus the advanced features required for networks/domains.
0 Votes
+ -
Bitdefender is just fine
gingoro 7th Apr 2010
Bitdefender seems just fine as it is not intrusive and seems to run with much less resources that either McAfee or Norton which is what I used to use.

Unfortunately it is unable to get rid of the viral version of McAfee which junk my wife keeps getting because she forgets to uncheck the box when she downloads a game or something. She then complains that her machine is unusable and I have to manually get rid of McAfee. I had subscription unexpired for McAfee but it was killing performance on our machines so I switched to BitDefender.
0 Votes
+ -
not for Win7 64 bit
Clewin 7th Apr 2010
I'm a little leery about BitDefender after the recent update that BSoD'd Windows 7 64 bit.

From the tools listed that I've used, AVAST seems decent, but it failed to find a rootkit that both Malwarebytes and Avira detected (I knew the machine was rootkitted by its behavior and started with MWB, but the system was so infected with malware and rootkits that I decided I needed to burn and clean with Avira on a liveCD - 3 rootkits and 164 viruses later, its clean - I also had to manually close a backdoor, fix some registry redirect entries and replace the Windows system32/drivers/etc/hosts file).

I used ZoneAlarm a long time ago, but it was a bit more intrusive than I liked (slowing down system performance and constantly asking me to allow connections - added to Vista doing the same and it was the most annoying system ever).
0 Votes
+ -
I strongly agree
didier.m.rousseau@... 7th Apr 2010
If you are running an x64 flavour of Windows 7 keep you hands far far away from bitdefender.
Its a bunch of sh..
High CPU usage, deadly updates leaving your PC unusabme and so on.
NOD32 was a good product until they release the 3.0 version.
Avast is not a good choice, it fails to detect too many threats.
I have no comments about any other product as I never used them
0 Votes
+ -
If it's a good rootkit
Cyberjester 8th Apr 2010
You won't see it, and if you think there's one on there, you won't be able to get rid of it. The whole point of a rootkit is that it intertwines with your computer at it's very base. Think a 100 year old tree with Ivy on it, where if you remove the Ivy you kill the tree. It's the ultimate in targetted malware atm.

I personally hate Avast. Avira is ok, I prefer Malwarebytes though. Don't need to pay for it. Just keep a firewall up with good security practices and run the AV once a week.
0 Votes
+ -
BD is Good
rhonin 7th Apr 2010
I have used BD for several years across XP/VIsta/Win7 32 and 64 bit.

I recently have been running this and MSE on various machines with similiar use (ex: my son has BD, my daughter has MSE+MD).

After a few months now, I am finding both are equally effective at protecting Windows systems.

For the "Power User" I would lean towards BD, for the general user MSE (front end and setup is more user friendly).

I'm slowly switching over to MSE on all my machines - reason: cost.

.
0 Votes
+ -
Or you can look at ...
n0neXn0ne Updated - 7th Apr 2010
... using another OS.

PS. You can use your time/money more wisely.

^o^

So what OS should I be looking at? All three have vulnerabilities.

Don't bother saying OSX - because we all know it has swiss cheese for security. The lace variety. It also regularly gets majorly PWNED - read: HACKED - at the Pwn2Own compeition at CanSecWest. Usually by Charlie Miller and generally in under 2 minutes flat.

If it can be pwned, it isn't any better.

So, then, we're left with Linux which gives it's own set of challenges. Like for instance, the native apps suck. It can't run the stuff I need to get my work done natively. I'd have to play around with WINE in order to get it working. And even then it's a hit or miss if it's going to work properly or not.

BEOS is extinct. OS/2 has likewise gone the way of the dodo. And even then, we've still got the same problem - it won't run my software.

There are no other serious alternatives.

So why would I want to ditch Windows? I make my money using Windows and Windows based programs and tools.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm a little disappointed ...
n0neXn0ne Updated - 7th Apr 2010
.. you didn't play the market-share card.

PS. Yeah, yeah, and anti-virus companies makes billions selling to non-windows platform. Stick to your delusional market-share argument. At least you had an argument.



^o^

0 Votes
+ -
actually...
crabbypup 7th Apr 2010
OS/2 is not dead. it is still alive, but has been renamed to ecomstation and is available from serenity systems. my dad runs it on his desktop. it is fully binary compatible with most windows XP apps. i do not believe .net is supported as of yet.

http://www.ecomstation.com/

as for your linux complaints - the native apps are pretty good, better than itunes.and why use wine when you can use microXP in a VM like virtual box instead?
i have used linux as my only OS (aside from my occasional XP VM usage) for over 2 years and have been able to do anything i needed to do. linux is getting better all the time. just watch.
0 Votes
+ -
Yea, *nix is real handy
Cyberjester 7th Apr 2010
But it still isn't Windows. I game which is still something *nix can't handle.

And a minor niggle, you say you "have used linux as my only OS", but Linux is an umbrella term for all OS's using the Linux kernel, which is a modification of the Unix kernel.

Just so you know. :P

But .Net is used in programming development worldwide, I believe Ubuntu ditched Mono because they didn't want "contamination" from Windows. Mono being a C# compiler. .Net will be a while in coming yet. :P
As I remember, Linus wrote the first kernel from scratch as an exercise trying to write something Minix like.
0 Votes
+ -
Close... but....
ShadowGIATL 22nd Apr 2010
"A Linux-based system is a modular Unix-like operating system. It derives much of its basic design from principles established in Unix during the 1970s and 1980s" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

Like ALL OSes, Linux was derived from another OS, at least initially. Just as DOS from CP/M and Unix, and Windows from OS/2 and ideas from Apples GUI, Linus pulled from other Unix like systems to build Linux.

So the source code might be different, but if they look and function largely the same from a user point of view... well as the saying goes "if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..."

That said, Unix is a solid system, and a very good platform to base and OS off of. In reality, nearly all OS are based off of Unix in one way or another at least in the beginning.
0 Votes
+ -
Think again
Yaminom 21st Apr 2010
>>Don't bother saying OSX - because we all know it has swiss cheese
for security. The lace variety. It also regularly gets majorly PWNED -
read: HACKED - at the Pwn2Own compeition at CanSecWest. Usually
by Charlie Miller and generally in under 2 minutes flat.

Charlie Miller himself disagrees with you. He says security is much
improved in OS X 10.6, and his personal computers are Macs.

While he has succeeded in hacking OS X at CanSecWest, saying that he
did it in 2 minutes is misleading. It took him weeks of preparation
each time to be able to pwn OS X.

Of course OS X is not invulnerable, as no OS can be. But calling it
"swiss cheese" is a huge overstatement, and reveals only that you
aren't fully up to speed about it.
0 Votes
+ -
Nt
see below


^o^

0 Votes
+ -
AV Tools are not needed if you use Ubuntu Linux
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate Updated - 7th Apr 2010
Folks,

The security by obscurity argument just doesn't cut it.

A well-equipped Ubuntu Linux machine running with Linux Security Module (LSM) AppArmor quite simply places your Internet facing Apps in a protective chroot-like 'sandbox'.

The modes of infection (vectors) for Windows-based products differ substantially from Linux and cannot mount attacks in the same way.

While buffer-overruns abound, with an App profiled with AppArmor it simply has no chance of privilege escalation.

Moreover, Ubuntu Linux maintains its repositories in a private GPG keyring 'ring of safety' to ensure that no 'rogue' App will ever find its way onto your system.

Canonical carefully vetts all Apps, Authors, reviews source code (many eyes), and thoroughly tests any App given official 'admission' to the repository system.

This repository feature alone is sorely needed in order for Microsoft to shelter and protect all vendor's installable Apps.

Very often, Windows Folks looking for Apps find there way to a web site to download what 'appears' to be a legitimate App, or at least a bona fide source for one, only to later find that the *.exe they installed has silently deployed a 'payload' on their system, a trojan bot, worse a rootkit.

This is what Ubuntu Linux is all about: Linux for Human Beings--Normal Human Beings--who should NOT need to give a 'hoot' about such security issues. In fact, Ubuntu Linux succeeds in doing just that:

Install Ubuntu, and feel liberated in the knowledge that when you open the Ubuntu Software Center or Synaptic tool, all your software sources and binary drivers have been screened for safety and are just a keystroke away to install on your system--no roaming around the 'net' to find an App is necessary.

The Ubuntu repository system is very secure, simple to use, a repository system which reflects many years of invested development and experience addressing security and most of all for Normal Human Beings who shouldn't have 'worry' about viruses, trojans, rootkits and the like.

Make an attempt to learn more about Ubuntu Linux. It doesn't cost you anything other than your time to find out. Be informed. Besides Ubuntu Linux is FREE.

You can easily install from inside Windows a copy of Ubuntu.

Probably the best choices are:

WUBI: h-t-t-p:slash-slash wubi-installer dot org
Portable Ubuntu Linux: h-t-t-p: slash slash sourceforge dot net slash projects slash portableubuntu

(I've formatted the above urls to avoid ZDNET's js strip routines.)

Please give consideration to the alternatives--you owe it to yourself!

Ubuntu Linux: The safest operating system on the planet.

I stake my reputation on it.

Thank you Larry.

Dietrich T. Schmitz
Linux Advocate
0 Votes
+ -
Reputation?
wolf_z 7th Apr 2010
You mean you actually have one?
0 Votes
+ -
I see you are mounting ad hominems in lieu of any valid rebuttal
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
A bad reputation is better then none
GuidingLight 7th Apr 2010
so yes, he does indeed have a reputation.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
And another with nothing substantive to say mounts ad hominems
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate Updated - 7th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
So we are in agreement on that one point. Your posts have nothing subtantive to say, so we tend to reply in kind.

Thank you for playing.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
You are being only clever, not smart. Again nothing substantive to say
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
And Dietrich, You just don't get it.
Wolfie2K3 7th Apr 2010
We, the readers of ZDNet - do NOT care. If we were going to use it, we probably already would be. You're barking at the wrong tree.

Most people here aren't newbies. If something goes wrong, we generally don't panic. We simply fix the problem and get on with life.

We're also not quite so reactionary - at least toward the hardware and software and software we use. We're skilled enough, usually, to work through and fix the problems and don't generally have the urge to throw the thing out the window when something goes wrong.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
NT
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
More useless TalkBack responses. Again no substance.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
How about a rebuttal of some kind?
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
I posted a rebuttal
Cyberjester 7th Apr 2010
The last 5 times I've seen you on here. You ignore intelligent conversation and just spam your two products, Ubuntu and Linux Security Module (LSM) AppArmor.

Ubuntu is just as open to malware as a Windows PC, using an "app" won't fix it. A hardended *nix distro won't include that. A home distro won't include it. Last I checked, the LSM had actually failed in it's purpose, was easily exploitable, and noted as "worthless" by most on *nix forums. Built as an alternative to hardening, right? And failing. Stop posting your useless product here and "L2Harden".

Side note: a true *nix guru would never use the term "app", it comes from the depths of evil that is MacOS. Built on a *nix base and then sold and copyrighted.
0 Votes
+ -
That isn't a rebuttal.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 8th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Of course he has one on ZDNet...
Wolfie2K3 7th Apr 2010
He posts essentially the same thing on pretty much every single article posted on ZDNet.

That'd make him a walking billboard ad for Linux.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
^^ The above is spam
Loverock Davidson 7th Apr 2010
Stop spamming the boards.
0 Votes
+ -
Another with no form of rebuttal who opts to mount ad hominems
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Uh no, I'm just telling you what it is
Loverock Davidson 7th Apr 2010
It has already been rebuttal but when I show you just how right I am you act like a 2 year old. So now I'm just calling you out for the fraud you are.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
The real answer is: You are devoid of thought and could not care less
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
nt
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Says the guy
Loverock Davidson 7th Apr 2010
who has no real thoughts of his own but only posts links to others thoughts.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Says the guy
Viva la crank dodo 7th Apr 2010
whose own thoughts could be documented amongst the worlds shortest fairy tales.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Actually
tripolitan 7th Apr 2010
You are feeding the trolls. Please Stop Feeding The Trolls
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Seriously, it has become 'tradition' for LD and me to trade 'barbs'.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate 7th Apr 2010
Nothing new.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Mr. Linux vs the Antilinux
rustek 7th Apr 2010
Mr. Linux vs the Antilinux, one of you is a lot more right, but your also the more annoying, I'll let you fight over who is who.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Great Discussion
Dietrich AC Schmitz 26th May
Great info - too bad I've got to filter past the trolls for good info.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix