AMD's CTO stumps for company's intellectual property

Summary: AMD is a so-called "solutions company," but it sure sounds like one that wants to be valued for its patents.

AMD CTO Mark Papermaster appears to want the chip maker to be valued more on its intellectual property.

And why not? It's a bull market for patents these days.

In a talk at the Jefferies global technology and telecom conference in New York, Papermaster outlined the AMD intellectual property case. Papermaster was a former executive at IBM and Apple.

Consider Papermaster's money quotes:

AMD has got a rich tradition of innovation. It's got a deep talent bench. This is what really attracted me to join AMD last year.

And if you look at what we're focused on doing, it is exactly leveraging that base. And leveraging, not only that technology, but the relationships with the ODMs and the OEMs and bringing that to market, and the deep platform and software skills we have around that IP.What we're changing is how we bringing that together, right. How we architect bringing those IP's pieces together from a methodology standpoint and a true system-on-a-chip methodology and really marrying that strategy with what's going on in the industry, because it's pretty clear the changes that we see every day, I see in front of each of you tablets, you've got smartphones, you've got your PCs. And what's your expectation? Your expectation is, you can get it that same data that you need, both your work life, your personal life.

We're focused on both that consumer experience and then what's going on to compute in the back office. And our value proposition is very clear. Leverage that CPU, that GPU all of the IP, the multimedia, the high-speed memory accesses, each of the IP that we're developing over the years, but bring it incredibly focused on those segments that we are targeting and change the rate at which we can bring that value to our customers, not only the rate and speed at which we deliver it, but how we tailor that differentiation.

And then there's more IP chatter from Papermaster.

AMD has been around over 40 years, and so we've been developing a rich, rich treasure trove, I call it, of IP. And you think of us as CPU, and you know from the ATI acquisition some years ago, about the rich graphics capability.

From there, Papermaster touted AMD's:

  • System on a chip intellectual property;
  • IP for embedded applications;
  • And memory management.

Add it up and Papermaster pitched AMD as a company that can do custom systems for customers. Papermaster stopped short of calling AMD an IP company completely.

He said:

You look at our products today, they are a systems capability. We have a very long -- largest software investment. We have -- a deep platform investment we have. And so our customers are looking at us to bring together this IP, bring together the enablement around it, and what this approach that we're taking, this ambidextrous approach, is allows us to say yes, when, in addition to our offerings that we have in the markets that we play in today, that there is growth opportunities to be able to allow our customers to differentiate with our technology.

OK, so AMD is a so-called "solutions company," but it sure sounds like one that wants to be valued for its patents.

Topics: Networking, Enterprise Software, Legal, Processors

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • AMD wants/needs to get bought.

    I'm not sure by whom, whether it is an iron vendor like HP or some other chip company like Samsung. But they are just too small and cash-poor to keep going head-to-head with Intel. And the potential for high-end ARM mega-core chips has to keep them awake at night.

    In two to three years, we'll probably replace our 1000-core x86 HPC with an 8000-core ARM system that is essentially a quarter of the size and cost. Companies are making fantastic progress in building systems with inexpensive CPUs, and all of this is just more pressure on the x86 vendors. Intel has the cash and the muscle, but AMD needs help to stay in the game.
    terry flores
    • I disagree

      AMD is the only platform chip company left. Intel got out of doing platforms because they couldn't focus or reduce the prices on bundling, but AMD is doing extremely well with "VISION" and has a good rapport with OEM's. They want to continue to become a go-to company for solution builders because they can handle most everything in house. Intel is only seen as a CPU vendor anymore.

      Also, AMD is working with ARM to replace x86 with ARM cores in their Fusion APU's.
      Joe_Raby
      • Platforms? I don't see it.

        Intel is "only a CPU vendor" that happens to sell millions of graphics systems every year, they're just bundled inside the chipset. We have several thousand of them. VISION and FUSION sound nice, but they have to translate into real revenue numbers and profits. AMD isn't within spitting distance of Intel on either one. They can sign any number of OEMs that they want, but in the end they have been lucky to hold their market share and that's about it.

        Don't get me wrong, I wish AMD all the best and realize that they are the main reason why we aren't paying through the nose for an Intel monopoly. But they can't keep taking writedowns and lagging behind on process technology and stay alive by themselves.
        terry flores
  • Ugh...

    If those are truly verbatim quotes, the guy's English grammar is *terrible*!! Is this really the stuff our "C-level" execs are made of? What, then, catapults one to these ranks?
    techboy_z