ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Apple sued over voicemail 'patent infringement'

By | February 22, 2012, 1:00pm PST

Summary: A ‘patent trolling’ company has filed a suit against Apple over voicemail technology used within iPad and iPhone products.

Lodging a complaint with the U.S. district court in Florida on Tuesday, Brandywine Communications Technologies is launching a suit against Apple, citing patent infringement.

Brandywine believes that the voicemail technology imbued within iPads and iPhone products infringes on two patents that the company own, based on mobile technology - patents No. 6,236,717 and 5,719,922 held in the U.S:

Patent No. 6236717:

A simultaneous voice and data modem coordinates the storage of voice messages and data messages on an audio answering machine and a personal computer, respectively.

This allows the called party to subsequently retrieve, via the simultaneous voice and data modem, both a voice message and an associated data message, i.e., a multimedia message, where the called party listens to the voice message while viewing the data message. The called party can retrieve the multimedia message either locally or from a remote location.

No. 5719922 is almost identical to the aforementioned patent, both of which were filed in 2001 and 1998 respectively.

Brandywine may not be a household name, but for enterprises, it is known for demanding ’serial’ court cases. The company has already sued many industry players, including RIM, LG, Nokia, and HTC.

Last week, when the company was sued by Verizon over a separate collection of patents in spectrum technology, the communications corporation described Brandywine as a company that amasses a collection of patents, which are continually enforced through the filing of various lawsuits.

Although Brandywine has attempted in the past to sue Apple collectively, this time, it appears that the company has been singled out.

(via Gigom)

Image credit: CNet

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

23
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple sued over voicemail 'patent infringement'
Pete "athynz" Athens 23rd Feb
@baggins_z That could be - I don't own one and the one I borrowed was a WiFi only version of the original iPad.
Yet another of these bogus, overly-broad patents granted by the drooling buffoons at the USPTO, none of whom apparently know what a patent is or what the requirements are. I often wonder what sort of otherwise unemployable liberal arts majors infest their offices, but there doesn't appear anyone in the USPTO with any technical acumen or the ability to think critically. I also wonder how many of them leave there for cushy jobs at the companies for whom these ludicrous patents were granted, after some discreet interval of time, so as not to make it too obvious. Then again, it could be something as simple as monetary compensation. Whatever the mechanism it, it is quite obvious the the patent system is irretrievably broken, and the rest of the world would be best advised to simply ignore these scams.
0 Votes
+ -
patent for a typewriter as well, saying something like: What? A patent for pressing a button that swings a lever onto a piece of paper?!?!? Then you would cite moveable type as prior art.
@baggins_z No, the analogy would be that typewriters come into being for several years, a company convinces the patent office that their particular typewriter deserves a patent even though a wide variety of similar devices existed prior to the filing, and then that company goes on to sue the entire laser-printing and ink-jet industry because they feel their patent gives them the rights to any device of any kind which could produce black and white text on a piece of paper upon the request of a human.
0 Votes
+ -
@spark
baggins_z 23rd Feb
My apologies. It's obvious you would be screaming at Dvorak for patenting his typewriter keyboard layout. After all, just changing the keys around and patenting it?!?
0 Votes
+ -
@thetwonkey
Possibly another bogus patent acse, but it couldn't happen to a more deserving company. What goes around comes around.
Wait, so the patent troll is getting a taste of its own medicine?
@Peter Perry made me chuckle. Indeed a real patent troll has been sued this time. happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Peter Perry
Hey, good one. Apple has sued every technology companies that compete against them and now they are geting a taste of their own medicine. It's funny how the zdnet editor did not point this out.
0 Votes
+ -
One thing would help....
rhonin Updated - 22nd Feb
When the author writes an article like this, it would be very helpful for him / her / it to add a "kindergarten" level example on how the infringement works.
Using this article as an example, I read it and this article made sort of sense to me (a bit of a stretch?) but when my wife read it she was like "huh?".
@rhonin Patents can be legally bought and sold and this gives the patent owner the right to sue. There is no such thing as "trolling".
0 Votes
+ -
Basically the patent covers
baggins_z 22nd Feb
devices that integrate the function of a modem and a computer to allow for voice to trigger data recall or vice versa. For example, tapping a phone number to view voicemail from that number, or doing text recognition on a voicemail to display a phone number or a picture. The key to the patent is the "crosstalking" between a modem answering machine and the computer.
@baggins_z and it sounds much more sophisticated than the "slide to open" patent by Apple. If Apple could get this ridiculous patent, then I do not see why other people should not be allowed to patent any marginally inventive or esthetically novel ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
@pupkin
baggins_z 23rd Feb
Everyone thinks an idea is obvious AFTER someone else has thought of it.
0 Votes
+ -
Both of those patents seem to be broad and could apply to any phone from a feature phone to a smartphone... and last time I checked the iPad does not have any sort of voicemail capability.
applies to devices that integrate a modem (the cellular portion) and a computer (the iPad portion) in order to use voice data to trigger date recall and vice versa.
0 Votes
+ -
@baggins_z That could be - I don't own one and the one I borrowed was a WiFi only version of the original iPad.
@Pete "athynz" Athens sounds like you only bought the wifi version But hey, everyone wants an oversized cellphone you can't carry in your pocket for $800.
0 Votes
+ -
@Nate_K sounds like you only bought the wifi version

What are you peeking into my windows? Sorry, wrong house then. I do not own an iPad although my wife is planning on getting one when her desktop dies as she uses the 'net for email and light web browsing.

But hey, everyone wants an oversized cellphone you can't carry in your pocket for $800.

Your sheer ignorance amazes me at times - more so because it find it hard to believe that someone can be this uneducated and still be able to use a computer. You do realize that your pathetic attempt at a swipe at the iPad can be applied to most tablet PCs?
@Pete "athynz" Athens
And Slide to unlock is not broad at all?
0 Votes
+ -
@Samic Not as I read that particular patent which described not only the motion but the combination of the motion, the icon, and the graphical representation of the "track" the icon slides in including the "Slide to Unlock" text.
0 Votes
+ -
This is why I don't fault Apple, Microsoft or any other company when they patent things, even if it may seem trivial to some. Patent trolls.
So it seems the one lesson Apple has not learned yet is instead of hardware updating old products and calling them NEW, why not devote some resources to making actual NEW products.... oh wait. They are making apple TV.. wo0ho0 1 new product in several years but wait, they have tons of lawsuits going. Way to be innovative Apple. I don't know how they figured after 5 years of the same products that there wouldn't be any competition. I mean this is only what nearly every company in the world does though....
@Nate_K

Yes, because every tech manufacturer releases completely new products that didn't exist prior every quarter.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix