Cliq builds on iPhone idea, pushes away from smart"phone" category
Call these devices smartphones if you'd like - but increasingly, the phone part of the device is just another feature, another widget on the home page.
I talked to some of the attendees at the GigaOm Mobilize show yesterday, which is where Motorola and T-Mobile introduced the device, and a couple of them compared this device to the iPhone - no, not in the sense that this is finally the long-awaited iPhone killer. Instead, they see this type of device building on what Apple has been offering with the iPhone, a push away from the "phone" part of mobile device and more toward the apps - or widgets, as Motorola calls them.
One iPhone-carrying attendee told me that the majority of his time spent on the iPhone is through the apps - e-mail, Facebook, Twitter, banking, news"papers" and so on. The user-interface - the way you interact with the apps on the screen - is what's appealing, he said. (That, plus the AT&T voice service was hit or miss anyway.)
Motorola is trying to take that appeal a step further with MotoBlur, though. The idea behind the Cliq is that it's all right there in front of you - open already and running on the device's home page. No more having to find and open and close apps, the way you do on the iPhone. Because it's a Google device, you can expect that Google's most popular apps - GMail, Maps, Search - will be deeply integrated into the device, too.
And, of course, there's Twitter and Facebook. After all, you can't launch a device like this - which Motorola co-CEO Sanjay Jha called "The First Phone with Social Skills - and not have Facebook and Twitter built in. After all, these days, those are two of the biggest drivers of mobile data traffic -that, and email, of course.
Earlier this week, Facebook hosted a rooftop mixer for the tech press at its Silicon Valley headquarters to talk about what it's been doing in mobile. One of the most interesting st ats I heard at that event was that, among Facebook members, those with access to a mobile version spend twice as much time engaged in the Facebook on the site in it than someone who's only signing on from a PC. Think about that for a second. Twice as much time - because users can update their status from a red light. Yup, the mobility factor is defnitely huge.
Bottom line: Call them apps or widgets, but these are the drivers of the next-generation of smartphones.
And doesn't it feel kind of silly to keep calling them smartphones when the phone itself is just another app these days - and not even the most-used one, at that. I thought about just calling them "handhelds," as in "Has anyone seen my handheld?" but that didn't work for me, either. We definitely need a better name for this category,
Any suggestions?