Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
Summary: Few disagree that cloud computing will be disruptive to industries, enterprise technology and the way we conduct businesses. The disruption will extend to the workforce.
Cloud computing, which amounts to be the industrialization of enterprise technology infrastructure, will bring a lot of advantages coupled with a lot of lost jobs.
Few disagree that cloud computing will be disruptive to industries, enterprise technology and the way we conduct businesses. The disruption will extend to the workforce.
In other words, humans will be virtualized just like servers are. The upshot from cloud computing is that companies will need fewer data centers. People run data centers. Those jobs are likely to simply disappear.
Johan Jacobs and Ken Brant, two Gartner analysts, made the cloud computing-jobs connection last week at the Gartner Symposium in Orlando. The presentation was categorized as "maverick" in that it may not happen in the allotted time frame. Jacobs and Brant argued by 2020 demand for IT staff dedicated to supporting data centers will collapse.
"The long-run value proposition of IT is not to support the human workforce – it is to replace it," wrote Gartner in its presentation. In other words, any job loss related to offshore outsourcing may look like a walk in the park once cloud computing gets rolling.
The rough argument goes like this:
- Computing will be outsourced to the cloud and become an IT utility.
- Business processes will be outsourced to software. That outcome will hit all economies---especially emerging ones like India that now dominate technology outsourcing.
- As the data center is virtualized the need for people to maintain that infrastructure will go away. In addition, all the people in sales and services linked to building and designing data centers will also lose jobs. When there's less technology infrastructure to support jobs will disappear.
- Some of those workers will reinvent themselves and find more opportunities. Others will never match those previous positions. Many IT workers will face hollowed out job prospects just like factory workers did as the U.S. manufacturing base disappeared.
This cloud computing-job connection is just a whisper today. But a few executives I talked to see an offshore outsourcing backlash as a possibility for cloud computing.
If Gartner's post-human industry theory, which dictates that intelligent machines will drive the economy more than people, pans out the economic implications will be huge. There is no need for a human-machine singularity to impact career prospects. Creative destruction looks great on the whiteboard, but there is a human cost.
What's the probability for this cloud vs. jobs scenario? In the long run, I'd argue it's highly likely. The timing---2020---is debatable. Jacobs and Brant highlighted a few scenarios.
- If companies move to private clouds and hybrid infrastructure the job losses won't be as large. Companies will need to maintain people and use brokers for public cloud services.
- Machines may complement humans more than replace them.
- However, companies may aim to eliminate assets. Call centers will be run by avatars and software. Business operations will be largely automated.
- IT utilities emerge. IT utilities will accelerate asset cuts. In this scenario, the goal is to drop physical assets in a hurry.
The last two outcomes will have the most impact on jobs. This scenario ties into what Harvard professor Clay Christensen said last week. Christensen noted that semiconductor companies tout how they are fabless. As a result, Intel is one of the few that actually owns manufacturing facilities. By worshipping profit ratios, companies nuke jobs. In the long run, this focus on ratios hurts innovation.
Gartner noted that this ratio worship is already underway:
CIOs believe that their data centers, servers, desktop and business applications are grossly inefficient and must be rationalized over the next ten years. We believe that the people associated with these inefficient assets will also be rationalized in significant numbers along the way. We foresee a substantial reduction in the U.S. IT workforce, especially among those supporting the data center and applications, in end-user organizations. According to Gartner's 2011 survey of U.S. CIOs, "Reducing the cost of IT," "Reorganizing IT" and "Consolidating IT operations and resources" were ranked high among their top strategies. In the same survey, "Virtualization" and "Cloud Computing" were the two top ranked U.S. CIO technology priorities; 83% of U.S. CIOs estimated that their organizations would conduct "more than half of their transactions on a cloud infrastructure" by 2020.
The other argument here is that IT is becoming a necessity good and that points to services provided by utilities. Toss in the fact that compensation is a large expense line in IT budgets and it's clear that there will be pressure to cut expenses via cloud computing and job cuts.
- Enterprise IT and megavendors: Cloud players angle in on bad marriages
- Can the cloud bail enterprises out of IT debt?
- Enterprise IT: Here comes that deer in the headlights look again
- Analytics in 40 years: Machines will kick human managers to the curb
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Like Car industry reduction in Assembly line work force!
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
dsgdsfg
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
The resources that MegaCloudB uses to support TinyCorpA through TinyCorpZZZ might displace the job of TinyITProviderA or the side income of somebody's nephew but they will be a net add to the IT workforce to offset the loss at MegaCorpA. End result will be a loss of workforce but not on par with the loss of Assembly Line workers. At least not by 2020. 2030? perhaps.
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
What you and most other people don't seem to understand, is that there is a person that is still going to be involved. Cloud or no Cloud, there will be a lot of companies not using those kinds of services. Some high-tech defense companies are no way or shape going to be using Cloud computing.
Also, the whole concept of Cloud computing relies on a data center running a cloud service, so again more people needed.
Then the other part of the issue is without a connection to the internet you're still going to need a IT person to get reconnected.
The reliability of internet service is still not there, even if you have a fiber optic connection to the internet there's nothing that can be done if the telephone pole carrying that wire goes down.
And if people think that Robots will replace the need for the IT staff people, think again. If we get to the point of a Robot replacing IT people, they will also be replacing the CEO's, Board Members, and basically everyone in the company.
Automation or not, a Human being is still going to be needed for the IT service
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
This is such a blinkered view of the world
Until the machines can build and repair themselves, skilled IT professionals will always be in work (look at the job boards if you don't believe me). If the machines do start to build and repair themselves, then I suspect we'll have a bigger problem on our hands then looking for a job.
IT job loss? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
<br>Young people would be well-advised to pick a career that requires high-level abstract thinking and creativity.
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
While we transition from Big Platforms to Medium Platforms back to Big Platforms, the workforce will go though plenty of changes but if you've been in this industry long enough, you should be used to it by now.
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
Finally I have every belief that the stuxnet discussion currently going on is only the beginning of the kind of virus writing and even political hacktivism, we're going to be seeing and while in today's corporate culture, they are sensitive to what their spokespersons and other talent may be doing, they will eventually be a lot more sensitive to which corporate entities they are sharing resources with and even partnered with.
Besides whether virtualized and remote or in-house, its all going to come down to uptime, accessibility and the potential losses associated with the failure of either. Smaller companies may not mind sitting and waiting on emails from their provider explaining that their still looking into the outage along with the requisite promises, but larger and established corporations typically like control and the appearance of accountability and I don't see them not wanting to be able to call some guy up out of the basement so they can see him sweat and bypass the email you get from a provider.
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
Young people should dump IT altogether
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce
RE: Cloud computing's real creative destruction may be the IT workforce