Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit

By | July 29, 2010, 3:58pm PDT

Intel today won a key ruling in an antitrust case when a Delaware court rejected the request to grant the case class action status, according to reports.

Intel is accused of wrongfully offering discounts to manufacturers, which led to inflated prices. But the court said that the plaintiffs could not show that consumers were harmed by Intel’s discounts.

Intel settled all of its legal disputes, including antitrust litigation, with AMD in November for $1.25 billion. But even as the companies announced the settlement, a defiant Intel maintained that its business practices are not illegal.

The plaintiffs have 21 days to object to today’s ruling.

Previous coverage: Intel to pay AMD $1.25 billion as companies end litigation war; Is it a new chip era?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

Talkback Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)

  • The harm is that Intel selected which PC manufactures survived.
    The manufacturers that towed the Intel line were given unrealistic discounts. The companies that marketed both Intel and AMD products paid higher prices for their Intel parts. Those companies were at a competitive disadvantage and many failed or were acquired.

    Intel selected which companies survived. They reduced competition. We're paying more today because of this and will continue paying more into the future.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Programmer1028
    29th Jul 2010
  • Hmmm
    @Programmer1028

    What constitutes an unrealistic discount? Shouldnt Intel be free to sell its chips as it sees fit?

    Or is it the govts job to prevent companies from being acquired or from failing?

    Im sure AMD would have loved to give these other OEM's discounts on their chips...or maybe these other companies were poorly run and so Intel and AMD didnt need or want their business.

    These kind of lawsuits are ridiculous.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    otaddy
    30th Jul 2010
  • RE: Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit
    @otaddy While I believe government should have little role in business, the role they should have is preventing monopolies so free markets can actually work and providing fair rules for business practices. It's the second one that applies here.
    Basically if you and a stranger go into a store and the store owner says to the stranger, "For you this television is 20 USD dollars". Then looks at you and says, "Well, for you the same television is 500 USD dollars because you look like you can afford it and I don't really like the way you are dressed." How fair is that and because it is you and not some faceless company can you see their point? It's not Intel's job to put some companies out of business, Intel's job is to make great digital chips to sell at a profit to customers . Picking and choosing your customer base in a free market economy is wrong, monopolistic, and abusive.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mr1972
    30th Jul 2010
  • RE: Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit
    Handy site webpage, bookmarked your website with hopes reebok jerseys to browse more!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812
    11th Oct
  • RE: Court rejects class action status for Intel antitrust suit
    Howdy there, I just mulberry bag sale stopped by to go to your blogging site web page and believed I'd say numerous many thanks for acquiring me.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770
    11th Oct

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources