FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
Summary: Only days after the Megaupload website was taken offline by U.S. authorities, similar businesses are scrambling to protect themselves before any action is taken against them.
File-sharing site FileSonic has announced that it is has disabled "all sharing functionality", and that its service can "only be used to upload and retrieve files you have uploaded personally".
The company's Facebook page has also disappeared. According to users on Reddit, it is believed that many accounts and files were deleted today.
It is thought that this measure has been put in place in response to the wider crackdown on file-sharing sites by U.S. authorities.
U.S. and New Zealand authorities shut down one of the Web's most popular online properties, Megaupload, last week. Its founders and three other employees were arrested and detained. They are awaiting extradition to the United States to face copyright infringement and money laundering charges.
Within a few hours of the news breaking, hacktivist collective Anonymous retaliated by attacking the websites of the RIAA, the MPAA, the FBI, and the U.S. Justice Department by way of denial-of-service attacks.
Late last week, Uploaded.to blocked all U.S. visitors from accessing its site as part of efforts to distance itself from U.S. jurisdiction.
Another popular file-sharing service, RapidShare, said in an interview with Ars Technica that it was "not concerned", adding that, "file hosting itself is a legitimate business". The file-sharing giant is based in Switzerland, and is "set up in a much more transparent way".
RapidShare and FileSonic comply with DMCA requests, and both have dedicated staff to remove illegally uploaded content.
FileSonic did not respond to comments at the time of publication.
Image source: FileSonic.
Related:
- CBS News: Popular file-sharing website Megaupload shut down
- Megaupload Anonymous hacker retaliation, nobody wins
- ZDNet: Anonymous hacks DOJ, RIAA, MPAA and Universal Music websites
- UK web blacklist blocks access to file-sharing site Fileserve
- More ISPs asked to block access to file-sharing sites
- CNET: FBI charges MegaUpload operators with piracy crimes
- Officials seize $42 million in MegaUpload assets
- What MegaUpload founders stand to lose
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
I'm with t.glaze. Remember, remember on the twelfth of November the treason this boil has wrought.
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
Filesonic did not shutter their site. All they did was to start enforcing their own policy of disallowing sharing of copyrighted material. To shutter means to take the site off line.
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
New restrictive technology means that recording from the television is no longer a viable option, so unless you have a massive storage solution on Sky Plus(TM), which I'm not sure exists, the limited amount that can be stored for viewing at one's leisure doesn't fulfil the demand. And when they inevitably go pear shaped and Sky zap your box with a software upgrade all of the recordings are lost because there's no backup solution.
The money lost from filesharing is a vastly over-egged pudding for the reasons above. The industry needs to catch up, the same as the music industry has with iTunes for example. Not many people object to paying a few bob for a music download, and I certainly wouldn't mind paying for Breaking Bad for example - I WANT to pay for Breaking Bad, but as I'm from England, I can't. It's totally unavailable on TV, DVD, or any legitimate media. The industry needs to up its game rather than close down the sites that are undermining it.
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
I agree that it would significantly help if the industry came up with a legitimate, simple method for downloading a copy of a movie or tv show that you paid for previously
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
now I have all my files on:
http://www.peeje.com/upload
???decent sized allowance, and it gives my users direct-links???which they love....so far, it???s been better than sonic, MU and HF COMBINED!!!
RE: FileSonic shutters: Another file-sharing site bites the dust
You do buy or rent if it seems appropriate. If it's hard, over-cost or unavailable to do, you log in, watch it online or grab it from someone who's sharing it.
This is just the "1+1=2" in digital media, and no, it won't walk backwards.