Google faces fine for bypassing Apple's Safari privacy settings
Summary: Only days after the FCC fined Google for impeding and hindering its investigation, the FTC is looking to fine the company for bypassing Safari users' browser settings to set tracking code.
U.S. government regulators may fine Google a second time this month, reports suggest.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is expected to decide on whether to fine Google for breaching user privacy, after it emerged the search giant bypassed privacy settings on Apple's Safari browser on iPhones and iPads, which left users vulnerable to tracking cookies.
A report in the San Jose Mercury News, citing sources familiar with the matter, notes the FTC is "deep into an investigation" of Google's actions, and could impose heavy fines within the next 30 days.
Google was accused of bypassing Safari's security by allowing sites to set tracking cookies, despite the security settings that should have preventing the practice. The website code which set the cookies was to allow users who had signed in to Google+ on Safari to access the '+1' button within advertisements, powered by Google's own DoubleClick network.
The search company admitted that it carried out this action, and since ceased the practice.
The FTC investigation is reportedly examining whether Google's privacy bypassing actions violated a 2011 settlement agreement set out between the agency and the company over Google Buzz.
The FTC could issue sanctions up to $16,000 per violation per day should the search and mobile giant be found in breach of the ruling.
Google told sister site CNET that it "[provides] features that signed-in Google users had enabled", but noting: "the Safari browser contained functionality that then enabled other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser". Google said it would co-operate with any regulatory body that has questions.
The agency ordered that Google's privacy policies should be audited for 20 years after Google apologised for the Buzz foul-up, emphasising that "user trust really matters." It was also forced to no longer misrepresent privacy or confidentiality of user data, and gain explicit consent before sharing user data with third parties.
The prospects of more fines comes only a few days since the U.S. Federal Communications Commission said it would propose a $25,000 fine for Google after the regulator said the company “deliberately impeded and delayed” an ongoing investigation into whether federal snooping laws were broken as part of its Street View data collection service.
Criticised for being a meagre penalty compared to the company's profits, had the new European data protection laws been in place today, the company could have been fined just shy of $1 billion.
Image credit: CNET.
Related:
- Did Google trick Apple's Safari into tracking users?
- Europe calls on Google to put privacy policy changes on ice
- Between the Lines: Google’s new privacy policy: The good, bad, scary
- Google to Congress: Let’s correct some privacy policy ‘misconceptions’
- Identity Matters: Court agrees to speed up case over Google’s privacy policies
- FCC proposes fine for Google Wi-Fi snooping case 'obstruction'
- Google passes Street View audit, but ‘must improve’ privacy policies
- Google offers Street View opt-out for Wi-Fi mapping; Unethical snooping, yet we must opt-out?
- Facebook to make all sharing privacy settings ‘opt-in’
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
get the government off our back
Apple and MS implemented an open standard
Google has no defense here, Linux Geek
Right, right
Errr...
There is a difference. Google is trying to dump a plugin on the Safari browser. Apple [on the other hand] has no plugin to put on the Chrome browser.
Oh why...
Google has - for too many times - went against standard, didn't care about security, and didn't give a crap about privacy issues. Or are going to tell us these are all lies or a conspiracy. Wake up!
What does the government have to do with it
BINGO
Oh wow, I've already brought up other tangents that help show how much a smokescreen Apple's app vetting process is, if it takes days to allow an app through that magically overrides its defenses... Apple's products are not that good (and Objective-C lacks memory management, which doesn't help matters either... but people say Flash is old and archaic... oh well...)
What app? And what's got to do with their vetting process?
um
You're mixing apples and kumquats, Linux Geek...
Still, if you want an anarchy, be careful what you wish for...
Is this why
Gee, I thought ET didn't call home anymore!
That's why I've gone to extraordinary lengths to remove everything Google including Picasso! I want the fox on the outside of my chicken coop NOT on the inside!!!!!!!
Google = snoop ware = spyware = CIA like activities (they should take notes from Google)
Nuff said.
Who did what?
Apple implemented an open standard
From what I've read...
Regardless of Google's statement's about features their users opted into, it doesn't take Mensa to figure out that if a user turns on private browsing, their goal is to not be tracked. The victim here isn't Apple, it's the users' who Google exploited here.
GoOgle