Google to introduce music service without major label support
Summary: There are several expectations for product announcements at Google I/O this week, and an online music service is among them. The official launch is expected today, and Google appears to be going rogue.
There are several expectations for product announcements at Google I/O this week, and an online music service is among them. The official launch is expected today, and Google appears to be going rogue.
That is to say that Google is doing this with or without the help of the major music labels, which could turn out to be very problematic later. As told to Peter Kafka over at All Things D, Google's director of Android product management Jamie Rosenberg said:
Unfortunately, a couple of the major labels were less focused on the innovative vision that we put forward, and more interested in in an unreasonable and unsustainable set of business terms.
Because of this, it doesn't look like Google Music will come across as a very innovative concept. The Wall Street Journal reports that the service will closely resemble the program Amazon revealed earlier this year:
Users of the service are expected to be able to listen to songs they have uploaded to the service in a so-called streaming mode but won't be able to download the files themselves. That limit appears to be a bid by Google to hinder the service from being used to spread pirated music.
Presumably, users will be able to stream that content to their computers and Android devices. Although consumers won't be able to buy anything from Google, there are a few perks to using Google Music over Amazon. Google Music users will be able to store up to 20,000 songs for free, whereas Amazon only permits free storage space for an estimated 2,000 tracks. Additionally, Google Music supports the creation of playlists. It remains to be seen how much Google will charge for additional storage space or whatever else it decides to throw in.
At first glance, the WSJ description of Google Music also doesn't sound far off from Sony's Music Unlimited powered by Qriocity. (At least Google Music has a less atrocious long name.) However, Music Unlimited is more like a Netflix for music with a set of monthly subscription fee choices for unlimited playback of over six million songs. As long as the PlayStation Network isn't down, it seems like the better option.
Google is going to have a fairly impressive list of specs and/or prices to introduce this afternoon or Google Music is going to be a hard sell. Based on the details discovered by now, the service doesn't seem to have much going for it. Who wants to bet now whether or not Google Music will go the way of Google Wave?
Related coverage on ZDNet:
- Opening the doors to developers at Google I/O (photos)
- Google's flagship Nexus 4G now available via Sprint
- Comscore: Android leads RIM, Apple in U.S. smartphone market
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Google drifting into irrelevancy
What happened to the innovative Google of 3 years ago?
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
Message has been deleted.
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
I don't know if they have any remaining invites, but if you want to try your luck here's the site:
http://freemusicbetainvites.com.nu
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
Sure third part was to blame. But GoogleTV also failed because content providers and networks didn't like the way Google went about offering their web content to GoogleTV users (all 5 of them :P), without their permission. So ABC, NBC, CBS, Viacom, Hulu and Fox slammed the door on GoogleTV and users!
This cloud music service sounds like a similar situation of Google trying to play hardball with content providers but may end up on the losing end.
Do it right or not at all.
In Google terms this means they expected the labels to take a 0% cut and Google a 100% cut with the expectation that the labels will make it up on volume. When it comes to IP and copyright, Google inovation typically means something close to theft.
Based on what this "service" offers, however, it is nothing more than what Apple does with iDisk right now (and for the past year or so).
What is the point?
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
Are you impressed with the offering?
It is mostly 6 years behind the times. Only Eric Schmidt or Larry Page would be impressed with what they are offering.
US Only.
Google IO people only right now.
Seriously? It is laughable at best. It strands over 40% of Android users with the service being unusable.
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
It's true that Apple does it best
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
@blueskip
Personally, I purchase music from multiple sources and on multiple devices. The Google solution does not look to handle this well. Amazon does. iTMS does.
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
That is code for "the labels forget what century they live in".
Their model died long ago, they (labels) refuse to accept it.
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
RE: Google to introduce music service without major label support
Completely different situation.
Music labels are stuck in the 80's