ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Google TV will revolutionize television once viewers understand it

By | October 5, 2010, 3:00am PDT

Summary: Consider for a moment how Google TV will bridge the worlds of television and Web video and bring them together to alter your television-viewing experience. It’s revolutionary.

Anyone who was an early adopter of TiVo will recall how difficult it was to explain digital video recording. It was one of those things that you couldn’t really explain to people. It was something they had to see in action, something that they had to experience to really appreciate the way the technology would change their lives.

Today, that’s the uphill battle in front of Google TV, which is preparing for its big launch in the coming weeks.

Also see: Open thread: Will Google TV change your viewing habits?

Watching television is one of those near-sacred experiences that some people just don’t want to disrupt - especially with something like Web content. Do you really want tweets or Facebook updates flashing across the screen during a action-packed movie or a laugh-out-loud sitcom? Probably not.

But what about during American Idol, the Oscars or the World Series? Hmmm. Maybe you would - after all, there are already a lot of people who are already bringing their own TV commentary to live, event television via Facebook feeds and Twitter blasts.

Just for a minute, though, put aside how Google TV will make the experience more interactive. Forget, for a moment, how Google will do a better job than the old TV ratings system to determine what you like or don’t like on TV, when you start channel surfing for something else or which shows you might watch several times. And, of course, don’t think about how Google - the advertising company - will use all of this data to serve up ads that are supposed to be relevant to you.

Instead, just consider for a moment how Google TV will bridge the worlds of television and Web video and bring them together to alter your television-viewing experience.

It’s revolutionary.

Also see: Google makes TV smarter [video]

In a blog post yesterday, Google highlighted the partners who are excited about “how they can use the Google TV platform to personalize, monetize and distribute their content in new ways.” Most, the company noted, already work with Google TV but many want to “further enhance their premium web content for TV viewing.” Among those on-board early: NBC Universal, HBO, Turner Broadcasting and the NBA. In the post, the company also noted that it had created a special web site devoted to Google TV. On that site, Google explained why Google TV will change the video viewing experience:

We haven’t been this excited about TV since Saturday morning cartoons. Not only are TVs the center of our living rooms, but five billion of us use them. That’s more than the number of people who use mobile phones or computers. Knowing how the web radically transformed those devices, we wondered what it could do for the most ubiquitous screen in the world. Which is why we’ve been busy geeking out on how to make TV as awesome as possible. The result, coming shortly, is Google TV. It’s an adventure where TV meets web, apps, search and the world’s creativity. Like Android, it will be an open software platform. From the start, it will be able to work with any TV. And before long, anyone will be able to build applications for it. The coolest thing about Google TV is that we don’t even know what the coolest thing about it will be.

That last sentence is the money line. We have no idea what the coolest thing about Google TV will be - and that’s OK, because the stuff that it’s promising to do now is pretty damn cool already.

For some time, consumers have been squawking about the hold that cable and satellite TV have over us, forcing us to pay for programming we don’t necessarily want but are forced to pay for because it comes as part of the bundle. Google TV isn’t necessarily a technology that is replacing the cable or satellite companies - but I certainly can see those folks scrambling around a bit to make sure that customers don’t start jumping ship. (It’s amazing what a bit of competition will do, huh?)

I would be remiss if I failed to mention the revamped Apple TV and how that product is also looking to enhance the television experience. As the long-time owner of an Apple TV device, I can honestly say that the offering was cool when we first got it - but that luster has gone away. Frankly, I wasn’t impressed with Apple’s update when the company unveiled it last month. In typical Apple fashion, the platform is still very closed and very restrictive - and still very tied to iTunes.

The only content available on the Apple platform is the content that Apple is able to put on it by cutting deals with the content providers. By contrast, Google TV is unleashing content on the Internet by making it searchable by your TV.

Which one sounds like the better deal to you?

Also see:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sam has been a technology and business blogger for more than 18 years.

Disclosure

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Sam Diaz

Sam has been a technology and business blogger, reporter and editor at ZDNet, the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News and Fresno Bee for more than 18 years. He's a member of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a graduate of California State University, Fresno.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
165
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Google TV will revolutionize television once viewers understand it
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
This web site is remarkably mulberry purses good! How can I generate a simple identical to this?
0 Votes
+ -
Revolutionary?
Userama 5th Oct 2010
WebTV?
@Userama second to that. TV is just a big computer monitor. Many TV stations around the world put their content on the Web. There are many sites where one can search/watch any TV program. So what is so revolutionary here? I am guessing people just want to be entertained. The fact that WebTV/InternetTV is not widespread supports this. Google is just desperate in trying to find new revenue streams.
0 Votes
+ -
easy media center
ALISON SMOCK 5th Oct 2010
@pupkin_z

The reality is that most people don't have media center PCs because they aren't tech savvy enough or don't have an extra computer. I've replaced cable with mine long ago and have used a combination of firefox extensions and vlc to create something remarkably similar to what Google TV offers. However, I still can't get access to content such as HBO and have to work with suboptimal controls and screen resolutions.
0 Votes
+ -
No doubt.
ziggah@... Updated - 5th Oct 2010
@pupkin_z Yeah, this article is paid for by Google it flat out lies about anything revolutionary or new and the logic that it is useful is that this time Google is doing it. Hey look on the bright side, if Google throws enough money at this streams from every show will be available minutes after they air on free sites with such a huge boost in availability.
@pupkin_z : Really? Let's see.

1) News - Any TV station that puts news on the web tends to put only the headline articles up. It usually has limited commentary and only one or two video clips for each category. They're playing to the fact that web viewers tend to have a very short attention span. As such, most of that station's TV news is just that--on the TV alone.

The same pretty much holds true whether you're talking weather or sports channels as well. They offer highlights and maybe even guides to their programming, but they don't put all their programming onto the web. As such, you're still stuck with cable, satellite or ordinary broadcast if you want full television programming. However...

2) Hulu and other content sites - Most of these require some form of payment--whether by advertising or subscription--to view prime-time programming. They serve similarly to the TiVo, letting you watch the program when you are able rather than forcing you to schedule a specific time each week, but you still have to pay for that benefit one way or another. The same is basically true with GoogleTV or Apple's iTunes--one way or another, you pay.

So, no, television content on the web is not free nor is it complete. It won't be until all content, from local network affiliates to the networks themselves, is on the web that something like Google TV or AppleTV will see real capability. Apple currently has the advantage and Google will likely take it a step farther, but until they both prove that the consumer want to watch their programming when they want to watch it will television really start to become a more web-based system. I, personally, don't like being forced to sacrifice watching one favorite program because it's on at the same time as another. Multi-screening isn't good enough--I want to devote my full attention to each program as I watch it.
@stebidri

What are you doing wrong? You can get a $30(albeit after MIR) video card that will push 4 megapixels, twice as many as 1080p, and will scale a 720p signal to 4MP better than most TVs scale Comcasts 720p to 1080p.
@ vulpine@...

@vulpine@...

Sorry, internet TV is already free, it's just not legal. Visit any torrent site and you'll see any show you can think of available around 4 hours after it is broadcast in DivX or H264 format both of which scale fine. In a few cases, shows have even been available before they were broadcast.
0 Votes
+ -
webTV did not integrate sources
wraith404 5th Oct 2010
@Userama

In fact it was a typical Microsoft fiasco of half-assed features. A GoogleTV box (or integrated TV) will replace your cable box, and add internet sources, aggregating content from both with a single guide, UI and output.

This can save you money if it allows you to let go of more expensive cable content. It can save you inputs on your AV tuner if you face a growing issue of more HDMI sources than your tuner can handle. It might not be for everyone, but it is infinitely better thought out than WebTV, and considerably more simple to use than a media PC hacked into your family room AV rack.
@wraith404
Be fair, MS bought WebTV in the days when many people couldn't afford a PC or didn't understand one. A lot of older folks used WebTV for dial-up email.

The problem for Google is that the TV companies rightly see this as an effort to scavenge value out of their content without paying for it. Unless Google is willing to share the pie, they could have a wonderful interface that shows empty screens. Unless they get major studios supporting them (and sharing the revenue), I doubt it will go anywhere in the longer term.
people are already afraid that Orsenized Big brother is controling the media, Could you imigine individual controled content to selected people, regons, Could you imigine one news feed for supporters, and another for known apponants. Could you imigine a presidential debate, with one feed directed at demacrats, a second feed to registered republicans, and a third feed to Indapendants. It's one thing to have chanels or people that can be influnced as to what to say, but another thing entirley, to be able to control the media.
0 Votes
+ -
@KMoore4318@... In the case of presidential debates, the content doesn't change, though... Unless the candidates will be CG puppets saying what each group wants to hear... and that's a bit too "conspiracy theory" to really take seriously. In other words, if there were separate feeds of a debate for each group, they would all still be seeing the same thing, wouldn't they? Or did I misunderstand your post?
PS- I'm not so sure, with the volume of content sources available that "controlling the media" is really an option anymore. Each channel has their own opinions, which they are not shy about stating, but people watching still make up their own minds. At least they should be. If they can be influenced that way, they watch too much damned tv. IMHO
www.dfwsupergeek.com
@KMoore4318@...
0 Votes
+ -
What makes Google TV different
Art_Ilano 5th Oct 2010
It may start out as an add-on to current TV sets, but what makes Google TV so promising is that, like Android, it can be integrated into future TV sets at hardly any cost to the manufacturers. No royalties required. That's what makes Google TV different from other web TV formats.

In fact, TV makers won't care if there's no market for it. Since it barely costs them anything to implement anyway, then they might as well ride on it since it'll give them something new to promote. Heck, if so many TV makers so easily rode on the 3D bandwagon (and frankly, nobody cares), then what more for this feature.

So expect a future where you will be seeing TV sets with the "with Google(TM)" sign plastered on them. Expect Samsung to be among the very first to jump in. And then expect other TV makers to feel that they have to have it or else their TV sets might look like old tech--the way smartphones now make basic phones look like old tech.
cost of adding Google TV to near zero.
@Art_Ilano
If you believe nobody else has patents that read on this, you are in dreamland. Google is in denial when it comes to the realities of licensing technology.
0 Votes
+ -
WebTV... are you kidding...
cosuna 5th Oct 2010
@Userama : Sadly WebTV was a revolutionary 'concept' but after Microsoft's acquisition it simply went nowhere.

If you like to put it in someway, the WebTV is akin to Apple's Newton, that is the first of its kind, but not the one that actually created the market. That merit will lie to Palm in the latter case, and to Roku (maybe) in the former case.
@Userama

So Google figured how to add advertising to webtv. I thought that's why we left broadcast.

Wow advertising on television, who would have thought?
0 Votes
+ -
Oh Wow!
ddmattison Updated - 5th Oct 2010
Yet ANOTHER way for advertisers to try and squeeze their way into the "6 billion" TV sets, disrupting the experience. Gee, I can't wait.... So "revolutionary"...Gimme a break.
@ddmattison Absolutely, my sentiments exactly!!
@ddmattison exactly, and how exactly does Google reach the TV's which are in households which do not have internet ?! Or perhaps the billions of TV's is just hyperbole - just may be!
0 Votes
+ -
This all assumes I want to be interactive.
No_Ax_to_Grind 5th Oct 2010
Which I do not while watching TV. If I want interactive I have several PCs thank you.

Sorry but someone should pay attention. Lots of "interactive TV" has been available for years, it didn't sell.
@No_Ax_to_Grind - I agree, even the cable companies have had a hard time getting the public to buy into it, but time will tell. Might go the way of the "almighty Apple" AppleTV. Geeks might love it, but beyond that will Jon Q Public pick it up...history would say no.
@No_Ax_to_Grind: I agree 100%... I either want to be a couch potato, stare at the tube, and give my hands a rest from the keyboard/mouse, OR surf the net and read. If I absolutely must do both, that's what a wireless laptop provides. This is hardly revolutionary.
@No_Ax_to_Grind

Obviously you have no imagination (do you work at Microsoft?).

Imagine this (if you can). You are watching a live broadcast, the phone rings and the person appears on your TV (Skype). After you hang up you continue watching the show, this time from your local DVR (it has been automatically recorded). All rhis seamlessly...
@prof123

Well for one I generally don't care to see someone when I'm talking to them, nor do I want them to see me. I'd either 1) check who's calling and ignore it if the show is more important, 2) mute the TV and keep watching (with captions), or 3) press pause on my DVR and unpause when I'm done. I don't the system to "assume" when I get a call that I want to pause the TV.
0 Votes
+ -
Not interested.
Tommy S. 5th Oct 2010
I have a PC and a TV. This is for interweb users... This is cancerous Web2.0 stuff.
Please, build into the Google TV a good diagnostic program, a volt/amp monitor, a how to repair or fix, and any thing else that will keep it up and running...also make it worth what we will be paying for it. Jim
This article paid for by Google. No thanks, its not just that I don't want my TV connected to the internet for a less than pleasurable web browsing experience, but because its Google. I don't need them selling my info and I don't see a dime of it.
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds like
bobiroc 5th Oct 2010
just another way for Google to bombard you with ads based on your viewing habits. I think many people will understand it just fine. It has very little to do with revolutionizing TV and a whole lot to do with making money.

Like others have said I think when most people sit down to watch TV they just want to watch TV. I turned off all the interactive crap on my TV and have shown many people how to do it on theirs and have yet to find anyone that really likes it and most find it intrusive and unnecessary. That being said I can see a place for internet video streaming on a TV but to make it entirely powered by the web like google's model I don't think so.
0 Votes
+ -
dimed
ALISON SMOCK Updated - 5th Oct 2010
@Loverock Davidson

The dime you see is the free content...

Saying this, for example, Hulu's ads are so frequent, long, loud, and overall annoying that I've taken extra measures with adblock plus to completely block them. Hopefully Google's TV ads will take this into account and force lower volume ads.
The price of free is the commercials we sit thru. But at least with over the air TV, there's no one on the other end learning anything about me thru what I'm watching.
@stebidri
Actually, the government is looking into the volume issue for advertisement. Not sure if it extends to the web, but on your television, there is a strong movement to reduce the volume.
@stebidri Exactly- too many people get bent out of shape about ads, while forgetting that Google, Fox, HBO, etc etc etc are businesses- they don't care what they're showing, as long as a lot of people are watching it, because it makes them money.
www.dfwsupergeek.com
0 Votes
+ -
ads, commercials, and other annoying critters
Mihi Nomen Est 5th Oct 2010
@stebidri

Is this different than the systems of yore (ReplayTV) which were sued because people could skip over ads, identified by looking for intervals in the video stream ??
0 Votes
+ -
doa
banned from zdnet Updated - 5th Oct 2010
too expensive ($300), too complicated to use (you will need an extra remote or even a mouse). it is webtv of the 90s all over again. and we all know how that turned out. i guess it will be interesting for geeks and nerds, the rest will either ignore the digital tv trend alltogether or go with a much cheaper appletv or roku box.
@banned from zdnet : please let us know your source for price... since as per my view, it should cost about the same as Apple TV and Roku, and they both are below the $100 tag.
0 Votes
+ -
Stop Saying "Revolutionary"
trickytom3 5th Oct 2010
Web TV has been around for a long, long time; this isn't any more "revolutionary" than the electric toaster.

Yawn.
@trickytom3 I have to agree, and if history is an indicator it will be a niche. Personally I"m not interested, but with 5Billion, there are probably enough techno heads to keep them interested.
@trickytom3

This could be the way to merge live TV, streaming video, video phone, gaming and internet browsing in your living room TV... and controlled from a tablet or a simple remote. If done right and is simple enough, this could be revolutionary.
0 Votes
+ -
WOW, nobody here has any vision....
hcforever Updated - 5th Oct 2010
...you all sound like crotchety old men stuck in there ways. I agree with the article, I think this will be revolutionary. No **** its not the first product to merge the internet and tv, but its my opinion that it will be the first to do it correctly....the internet, believe it or not, its kinda the future. The iphone wasn't the first smart you could surf the web on, listen to mp3's etc. etc. but it was revolutionary. There are endless possibilities of what could be done with native and web apps for this thing from gaming to video conferencing and anything else you could think of.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Re: WOW, nobody here has any vision...
sldiaz Updated - 5th Oct 2010
@hcforever Finally!!!! Thank you for posting your comment.
0 Votes
+ -
Or maybe their vision is clearer?
Mister Spock 5th Oct 2010
I see of all the "revolutionary" things it might do, but no one has really shown an incentive to actually do them in any great numbers to make it "the future".

I see those who claim that it will be wonderful to interact with their television, yet no one appears to stop and think about why they are in front of their televisions? If interaction was really the reason, would they not be in front of their computer instead?

Gaming to video conferencing? Now you will be adding onto the device. In the end it will be another computer attached to your television.

Many humans do that already.
@Mister Spock, I disagree with everything you said and feel my vision is clearerer happy Something like google tv could eventually eliminate the need for every other box you have hooked up to your tv, the internet is the future of everything.....I thought that was a basic assumption of everybody who post comments on blogs like these but I guess not. I interact with my computer and not my tv because I can't interact with my tv.
0 Votes
+ -
I admit to being a crotchety old geezer
Pete "athynz" Athens 5th Oct 2010
@hcforever and I personally do NOT want interactive TV because when I'm watching TV I do it to wind down from my day and I get into what I'm watching... I really don't like it when people are talking to me when I'm watching something - for the 30-60 minutes a day that I do watch it - why would I want to see twitter and facebook on my TV while I'm watching it... if I want to use either one I have my laptop, my iPhone, my BB...

Having said that I'm not putting it down at all - I'm saying that it is not for me. If this is something you, Sam, and others like it's all good...
0 Votes
+ -
@athynz I think that is all everyone is saying, and the author asked for everyone's "opinion". But "if you don't do what I do then your wrong" attitude prevails.
@hcforever - When I'm on my TV, I don't want interruptions. If I want to multitask (use web while watching TV) I switch over to Windows Media Center on my computer.

The only experience that merges TV and internet "correctly" is the one that *I* can configure to my liking. And where *I* can set privacy controls.

I highly doubt that Google would be that flexible. Also, the whole thing about popups of comments from other viewers, even if I were watching American Idol or some other reality competition show, I'm seriously NOT interested in what other people think especially since the US spans how many timezones?
@hcforever - Yes, many technology revolutions are perceived after the fact, and the evolutionary steps that produce the revolution are resisted by the status quo.

Snow Crash and the Metaverse are inevitable - and this is a step. I say "yay".
@hcforever I almost NEVER even watch tv- but this looks cool because of the amount of other content available from one box.
www.dfwsupergeek.com
What I would rather see are tablets and other devices take the forefront here in the living rooms. That's the direction I see Apple heading with Apple TV + AirPlay. Soon tablets will become ubiquitous and cheap, and it will be linked to your TVs and other devices for controlling. Just grab your iPad (or iPhone, iPod Touch) and stream your content directly to your TV of choice around the house (Apple TV+ Airplay). Then you can continue surfing the web, using twitter, playing games and apps on the device while the movie continues to stream to the TV. Hopefully soon apps will be supported. With Google TV you would need to do one thing at a time it seems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_o3ZeVfHIQ&feature=related

Edit: Looks like you will also be able to do use your Android phones (and possibly future Android tablets) with your Google TV. So that base is covered by Google.

http://www.google.com/tv/features.html
@dave95.
Earth to Aliens! What you are talking about. I have been doing this for years on both laptops and desktops, long before there were any ithingys. This is not revelutionary and neither is the ithings. Quit trying to sell a load of it!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Google TV will revolutionize television once viewers understand it
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
This web site is remarkably mulberry purses good! How can I generate a simple identical to this?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix