HP rolls out 20-foot datacenter pod

HP rolls out 20-foot datacenter pod

Summary: Hewlett-Packard unveiled a 20-foot version of its Performance-Optimized Datacenter (POD), a trailer-sized container that packs a datacenter in it.

SHARE:

Hewlett-Packard on Tuesday unveiled a 20-foot version of its Performance-Optimized Datacenter (POD), a trailer-sized container that packs a datacenter in it.

In 2008, HP introduced a 40-foot POD that was initially designed for so-called "scale out" customers such as Web 2.0 companies and cloud computing vendors, but the concept has caught on among enterprises in verticals such as oil and gas, government and financial services.

The POD movement has a bevy of players including IBM, Rackable, Sun, Verari Systems and HP. In addition, some companies are going with so-called Pod architecture, a big hollow building that carries a series of these data center containers linked together. With that architecture, datacenter pods can be swapped out continually to enhance performance of a facility.

Also see: Data center design 101

Jean Brandau, POD product marketing manager for HP's Scalable Computing and Infrastructure group, said the company went with a smaller POD option because the 40-foot containers were hard to transport in areas where roads were dicey.

The 40-foot PODs can weigh as much as 100,000 pounds depending on the IT that's packed in side. That weight means you can't airlift it into place. In industries such as oil and gas and the military these datacenters can be found in places where the roads aren't exactly built out.

"The 40-foot POD limits how you transport," says Brandau. "The 20-foot version, which weighs about 50,000 pounds can be transported in a cargo plane."

For enterprises, the 20-foot version POD may also have some appeal. Some companies don't need all the racks that come inside a 40-foot container. As for the pricing, the 40-foot POD lists for $1.2 million and the 20-foot lists for $600,000 not including the IT deployed inside. Brandau also noted that some companies may choose to lay out a series of 20-foot PODs in various geographies instead of centralizing their data centers in one location.

Among the notable features of HP's 20-foot POD:

  • A single utility closet that consolidates operational panels and hot aisle access;
  • A smaller footprint that packs 2,000 square feet of data center space into a 20-foot container;
  • Improved energy efficiency.

Topics: Storage, Data Centers, Hardware, Hewlett-Packard

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Finally, something that can play Crysis?

    Finally, something that can play Crysis?

    (joke)
    CobraA1
    • sure you can

      have one airlifted to your back yard
      Larry Dignan
      • 50,000 cores in a box ...

        that would cause your electric bill to go up some!
        terry flores
  • Sounds cool!

    I personally believe there should be public clouds, and private clouds for everyone - including individuals. So it great to see what HP is doing. I hope in addition to above, companies like MS market Windows Home Server as a private cloud, and provide its range of Windows Server products as optional turn key private cloud solutions.

    I however think MS could come down a little further, and provide a virtual Home Server option for Windows Ultimate. This would allow a family to use one of their PCs to act as both a regular PC and a home server, which could offer a number of the features of Windows Home Server like remote access, and storage of data on their PC, which could be accessed anywhere. Services could then act against the data (like MS' MyPhone service), and users could have confidence that their privacy is secured. (The data of course could be auto encrypted and backed up to servers on public clouds for redundancy.)

    I think public clouds should try and encourage businesses and users to generate and process as much public data on their platforms as possible, while at the same time private cloud partnerships should try and do the same for private data on their platforms. I don't think I will ever like the idea of putting private data onto public clouds - even if privacy laws are passed to support it. If the stakes are high enough to know private data about a company or someone, laws aren't going to make much of a difference. Also, information is power; and the more (private in particular) information is distributed, the more secure are our personal liberties. Coalescing large amounts of private data onto public platforms is much too dangerous to our personal liberties, in my opinion.
    P. Douglas
  • RE: HP rolls out 20-foot datacenter pod

    Usually libertarians use the term personal liberties.
    grandadmiralmcb@...