ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

If no-one will save RIM, perhaps Canada should

By | August 17, 2011, 8:11am PDT

Summary: Takeover this, takeover that. If the BlackBerry maker is unsellable, or a loose cannon in the current market, why shouldn’t Canada step in?

Research in Motion is seriously struggling. As it puts on a brave face to the public by releasing its new BlackBerry smartphones into the wild, behind the scenes, there are fires burning in the offices, gang-warfare between floors and executives hurling themselves out of windows.

OK, so I paint a colourful, albeit fictional picture. But nevertheless Research in Motion is not looking healthy.

With the Motoroogle deal under way — the handset maker Motorola Mobility, is gobbled up by Google — the industry is turning its head towards RIM with bated breath — hoping it will survive the cold winter.

Shares at RIM have plummeted this year; rescued by a 10 percent rise since the Motoroogle deal, in anticipation it could be bought out.

After a long conversation with senior technology editor, Jason Perlow, as though we were conspiring stuffing a pillow over the face of the BlackBerry giant, we came to some interesting conclusions.

Perlow strongly believes that RIM cannot recover its losses on its own. It needs help. I questioned whether Google or even Amazon — in my sheer naivety — could buy out RIM.

Google suddenly has a cashflow problem in that, all in all, it cannot afford RIM. Besides, what would it do with it? Amazon has its own tablet coming out soon, along with the Kindle it needs to support. But Amazon isn’t worried about “getting dinged on patents”, as Perlow eloquently put it.

If anything, Amazon should focus its efforts on the cloud — only yesterday announcing provisions for the U.S. government — for supplying goods and content to RIM’s platforms.

And then comes Microsoft. The Redmond-based company and Ontario-based company have been secretly seeing each other for some time.

RIM and Microsoft have been holding hands behind the scenes, shying away from hotter, more attractive models such as Google and Facebook.

By bringing together BlackBerry enterprise and encrypted email software to Microsoft’s online services, this partners the two companies in a deep, meaningful evening of heavy petting.

Bringing together, dare I say it, Windows Phone 7 to the BlackBerry handset would force RIM to drop BlackBerry OS 7 and its QNX venture, into an operating system not strictly designed for the handset. It would mean further modifications to Windows Phone 7 to even get it to work on the vastly different BlackBerry handset range.

Together, whilst seemingly looking like a partnership, would be weighed on Microsoft’s part — supporting the BlackBerry maker through its troubling times. Besides which, Mary Jo Foley says “nah” to the idea — and I trust her with my life.

As Perlow put it nicely: “RIM is not a clean purchase for anyone”.

That is, with the exception, of nationalising it to become the property of the Canadian government.

Though the brand value of the BlackBerry may not be enough, and considering RIM’s net income was down by around $130 million last quarter, based on revenue in the same quarter the year before, the Canadian government could still present RIM as a vital boost to its citizen takings.

It would mean, by nationalising RIM, that the Canadian taxpayer would ultimately have to pay for the buy-out.

But it’s not the first time a government has taken over a failing company — or bank, for that matter.

Pointing you in the direction of Northern Rock in the United Kingdom — the BBC business editor Robert Peston, often cited as the man who brought down the bank — is safely in the hands of the British government.

Having said that, the Canadian economy needs RIM to keep going. It employs tens of thousands of employees in Canada alone, and pays a shedload of tax that Canada would struggle to find elsewhere.

Technologically, the Canadians have already roared upheaval over the United States’ Patriot Act, which can reach not only to cloud-stored data in Canada, but Europe and further afield, also.

But RIM already has a massive datacenter in Canada, allowing the Canadian government to outsource email operations to a datacenter on its own soil — well out of the reach of the American’s.

All I ask, dear Canada — a fellow commonwealth country to my British home — is that you don’t sit idly by as you did with Nortel and allow the company to be sold off.

What goes down, must come up. Or, something to that effect. Canada needs to keep RIM — economically, for its brand portfolio, or to simply keep it out of American hands — and it has to be done sooner rather than later.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from CNN, the Huffington Post, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
19
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: If no-one will save RIM, perhaps Canada should
PatrickBay.ca Updated - 18th Aug
@jk_10 It's true, the Harper government would never step in to help a viable company in trouble. Instead they focus on burgeoning industries like asbestos mining. This is the "right" way of doing things.
0 Votes
+ -
1. Canada is doing fine economically, actually finer than either US or UK. Actually do you find anyone doing better in western countries? Hard, right, US is in trouble, EU is in deaper trouble economically.

2. Canada right now is under right wing government. When I say right, I mean the "right" right is which opposite to wrong. They are not going to do stupid socialist things as the current US socialist goverment do.

3. You are right about Nortel, I do think Canada shouldn't have let Nortel die. Because Nortel was a technology giant with poor management. RIM doesn't have much of that.

Canada can't and will not try to save RIM in any way, trust me.

4. So, again, you are right about RIM to make Windows Phone. I simply just can't see a second choice. Unless someone believe QNX will save RIM.
@jk_10 If you think the current Canadian government doesn't do "stupid socalist things" then you've been drinking the Harper kool-aid without looking into anything yourself.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: If no-one will save RIM, perhaps Canada should
PatrickBay.ca Updated - 18th Aug
@jk_10 It's true, the Harper government would never step in to help a viable company in trouble. Instead they focus on burgeoning industries like asbestos mining. This is the "right" way of doing things.
I believe in QNX! =D
0 Votes
+ -
I don't
jk_10 17th Aug
@MediaCastleX I don't believe anyting ends with a X, I mean Unix or Linux.
0 Votes
+ -
RIM is toast.
matthew_maurice 17th Aug
Their numbers have been awful for years. ASP, subscribers added, total margin, etc, have all shown that they've been on the downward side of the bell curve for a while. Their co-CEOs have been too stupid to see it, and now RIM employees will pay, literally, with their jobs.

Rather than a bailout, the Canadian government should be preparing for a lot of smart, unemployed people. Instead of a lifeline to RIM that will likely only benefit executives and/or shareholders, Ottawa would be wise to allocate funds to stake start-ups by soon-to-be-ex-RIM employees.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@matthew_maurice But think of the benefits that Canada's government could have with the RIM portfolio. "Hey, we provide governments with secure messaging -- oh by the way, we're a government, too".
@zwhittaker Yes, because if there is one thing a Government will do, it is buy "secure" communications from another government.

The possibility of any sort of spying activity will ensure that every other government on the planet would immediately dump BlackBerry.

Sorry Zack, but you're out of your mind on this one.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@samalie Considering that BES encryption keys are *not* held by RIM, then there would be no need for other gov's to ditch the BlackBerry. It's not even clear whether BBM encryption keys are held by RIM -- but if they are, Canada could sell them to other law enforcement around the world.
@zwhittaker If the Canadian Government (or ANY government) got their hands on a company like RIM, probably the first thing they would do is engineer the software to be able to intercept communications of their choice. After all, they'll own the company, and they'll make changes that benefit THEM.

I know the keys are not held by RIM today...but you get a government involved, and there WILL be a backdoor. And you know they won't tell us about it.
0 Votes
+ -
If would be pure folly for Canada to even try. It would be a huge boondoggle wasting billions of Canadian taxpayer cash. RIM best bet now is to grab hold of WP7 and try to make a value add enterprise play and try to beat Nokia to the enterprise in the next 12 months while Nokia is still largely consumer focused. But it would take very quick decisive moving on RIM's part and they havent shown themselves to be that kind of company.
0 Votes
+ -
No one can save RIM... They are a failed company with a lot of crappy phones that they shove down our throat... They learnt from MS that if they give some kickbacks to the IT departments, they can stay in enterprise forever and shove crap phones down our throat... iPhone started a revolution against this mal-practice and Android is keeping it up... Bye RIM, it is time for you to RIP
@browser. Care to make a wager whether RIM will die? You will lose!
@kwatcha - Browser has no clue what he is talking about.Lets revisit his comments in 3 Weeks and he will iCry happy
Ah, I'm a Canadian & last time I checked Canada makes more money in a day than the U.S. makes in months. Yes, we make more money than you. Wake up! This article is soooo stupid! A little research wouldn't hurt at all. Canada makes more off minerals & potatoes than RIM will ever make for them.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
samalie Updated - 17th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
The author clearly suggests a ridiculous idea. RIM is nowhere close to failing as a company, now that they have stacked up on their patents. But if you guys look outside the US, RIMM has been doing pretty well in markets like India, Indonesia and the UAE. And for corporates, Blackberries are still the phones of choice if you want to do some serious work. RIM will continue to have a loyal marketshare and is nowhere close to extinction. Yes, it's in trouble but then its trying too with its BB OS 7 & QNX based new phones.
If Google has a Sell from S&P and so does US. The US and Google are the one's that need to be saved. You Idiots all think your funny claiming Death of RIM. The only death that will come before that, may be you. They surely aren't going anywhere! Idiots!
Zack - you and most of the other pundits still try and call RIM out all the time. Yet who was really "THE NEXT PALM"?
MOTOROLA! Yet all I can see are a bunch of articles espousing why RIM is dead, when clearly RIM knocked out MOTOROLA. Can you please explain why the pundits then are not espousing this fact on their blogs?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix