Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Is Android destined to be the Windows of smartphones?

By | May 25, 2010, 3:30am PDT

Summary: With the spread of Android accelerating, the assumption that Android will become the dominant mobile platform is also gaining stream. But, how likely is it?

In the 18 months since Android first launched, the mobile OS has gradually gained a sense of inevitability. It has reached the point where it is often talked about in the technology industry as if it is manifest destiny that Android will be the dominant platform in mobile computing.

However, today’s mobile market is vastly different than the PC market of the 1980s and 90s. Let’s take a look at Android’s  and how likely it is that Android will emerge as the platform of choice.

The rise of the computer phone

During the first half of the last decade, the smartphone market was dominated by BlackBerry and Palm Treo (and Nokia outside the U.S.). At the time, these devices were primarily used as a way to get your mail and calendar on your cellphone, and occasionally to access a specialized business application that connected to one of your company’s backend databases. The audience was almost completely corporate.

In June 2007, Apple changed the game with the launch of the iPhone. It brought a lot of consumers into the smartphone market with a touchscreen device that ditched the hardware qwerty form factor of the BlackBerry and the Treo and was much simpler to navigate and use. All the hoopla around the iPhone also had the halo effect of educating the public about smartphones and helped create greater consumer demand for smartphones in general.

With the iPhone, it took Apple another year to get the price down, add 3G connectivity, make it enterprise-friendly, and open it up to application developers. But, the revolution had already started. The race was on for other vendors to build mobile devices with three key features to match the iPhone:

  1. A touchscreen user interface
  2. Mobile Web capability
  3. An application platform

BlackBerry came out with the Storm. Palm launched the Pre and a completely redesigned OS to power it. Nokia made its play with the N97. HTC built the Touch Pro and then the Touch Pro2, both running Windows Mobile. And, Microsoft recently hit the restart button on its mobile platform with Windows Phone 7.

None of these “iPhone killers” did anything to stop the iPhone’s growth and momentum. It wasn’t until Google entered the smartphone market in October 2008 that the competition for the future of mobile computing really started heating up.

Android’s ascent

It’s easy to think of Android as a knock-off of Apple’s iPhone OS–and in many ways it is. But, Google has also been working toward mobile platform for much longer than most people realize. The timeline below shows evolution of Android and how much progress it has made, especially in the past year:

  • July 2005 - Google buys the startup Android, Inc., which was developing a mobile OS
  • November 2007 - Plans for the Android OS are unveiled as part of the announcement of the Open Handset Alliance, a consortium of 65 companies dedicated to building a mobile platform on open standards; Android is revealed as an open source OS and the first SDK is made available
  • October 2008 - The first Android phone, the G1 (a.k.a. the HTC Dream), hits the market; the hardware is awkward and unpolished but the OS has potential
  • October 2009 - The Motorola Droid–the first Android 2.0 phone–arrived with a big marketing push from Verizon; it brings Android out of beta and it’s a serious competitor to the iPhone, in terms of the three features mentioned above, and it’s also a competitor with business-specific devices such as the BlackBerry since the Droid features a slide-down keyboard
  • January 2010 - In partnership with HTC, Google releases its own Android phone, the Nexus One, which features a thin touchscreen form factor and outflanks the iPhone with a higher resolution screen and a faster processor; it is only sold online through Google (with T-Mobile for service) and sales figures are anemic, but it raises the bar for Android with the first device that easily stands toe-to-toe with the iPhone
  • April 2010 - The HTC Incredible debuts on Verizon; it offers most of the same features of the Nexus One but is paired with Verizon’s market-leading data network
  • May 2010 - NPD reports that in Q1 2010, Android passed iPhone in unit sales in the U.S.; it’s the first big market share victory for Android; In the report, BlackBerry was first with 36% share, then Android (28%), then iPhone (21%)

Will Android be the winner?

When you look at the escalating battle between Android and iPhone for leadership of the smartphone market, it’s easy to draw parallels between the early battle between the Apple II and the IBM PC, and the later war between Mac OS and Microsoft Windows.

In both cases, Apple lost. Both times you had Apple, a company that handled the entire product soup-to-nuts, versus an ecosystem of vendors that released a broader array of products.

We see the exact same scenario playing out with Apple against Google (and its Open Handset Alliance). That’s why most people in the technology industry expect Android to be the ultimate winner. They’ve seen it all before.

However, the smartphone market is far more fragmented than the PC market has ever been, and established platforms BlackBerry and Nokia’s Symbian still dominate, even though they are struggling to keep up with the pace of innovation from Android and iPhone.

Both BlackBerry and Symbian have major platforms updates coming in 2010. Hewlett-Packard’s purchase of Palm guarantees that the webOS platform will have the resources it needs to push forward. And, Microsoft has hit the reboot button on its mobile platform with Windows Phone 7. So, the smartphone market is not just about iPhone versus Android, even though they are the leading innovators.

Not all of these platforms will survive. But, it will be tough to put the genie back on the bottle with all of these platforms. Mobile is simply going to have more platforms and more choices than the PC market. There will likely be at least three big platforms and probably a couple niche platforms that serve specific audiences (enterprise, geographies or languages, etc.)

As all mobile phones become smartphones and as smartphones become the primary computing devices for most new users in emerging markets, this is going to be a huge growth market during the next decade. Nevertheless, even with all of its momentum, the lead isn’t going to just fall into Android’s lap.

In order to keep growing, Google needs to figure out the Android fragmentation issue (as I recently discussed), and how to keep innovating at a rapid pace without leaving too many of its users behind and thus creating disgruntled customers who could jump into the open arms of a competitor.

Also, don’t forget that another front has been opened in the Android-iPhone war: Tablets.

Apple has scaled up its iPhone OS to run on its tablet computer, the iPad. There are a variety of vendors who would like to do the same with Android. Plus, HP has stated it would like to create webOS tablets and BlackBerry is rumored to be working on a tablet that would be companion for BlackBerry smartphones.

It will be important to watch the impact (and halo effect) that tablets could have on their smartphone cousins. Tablets have the potential to draw more developers to the platform, but they could also drive further fragmentation of the platform as well.

See also:

Source: Is Android destined to be the Windows of mobile computing? (TechRepublic)

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic. He writes about the products, people, and ideas that are revolutionizing business with technology.

Disclosure

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic, an online trade publication and peer-to-peer community for IT leaders. He is an award-winning journalist who examines the latest trends and asks the big questions about the technology industry. He previously worked as an IT manager in the health care industry.

You can also find him on Twitter, , Facebook, and at JasonHiner.com.

59
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Is Android destined to be the Windows of smartphones?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
Hi there, I just stopped by to drop by your webpage and perceived as I would say mulberry bag sale I liked myself.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple will fall behind, Android is available on all carriers and with several models. Whether or not Android will dominate the market is another story.
0 Votes
+ -
America is at best a rapidly shrinking segment of the smartphone market. Apple may need to eventually create a non-SIM phone, but they are a global player using global technologies.
@croberts
Most of the World is GSM based. But even outside the US
Apple is only allowing it on select carriers and that will hold it back As for Smartphone market, US is just starting, the NON US market has been going on for way longer.
0 Votes
+ -
I would say over a decade that will become less
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 25th May 2010
@croberts: of a problem, well except for Sprint, since all of the carrier save for Sprint are moving over to LTE, which is being positioned as 4G and will be the global standard. Sprint is leading out with it's WiMax technology for 4g, which is likely going to be a bad move on the part of Sprint.
0 Votes
+ -
My thoughts:
Cylon Centurion 25th May 2010
It's very likely considering it has been rooted:

http://www.neowin.net/news/evo-4g-gets-rooted-before-it-even-launches
0 Votes
+ -
Windows of smartphones?
Userama 25th May 2010
Is that a good thing???
@Userama
I suspect the comparison was meant how Windows dominates the PC market, Android will dominate the smart phone market.
0 Votes
+ -
@mrlinux

That's right.

The more important thing, I think, is the question of whether domination really matters or if having innovative and thriving products and company be more significant.

Microsoft dominates, but really we don't think much of them as the company to turn to for innovation, design etc.

Both Microsoft and Apple are surviving/thriving. So why does domination matter at all if it is not necessarily correlated to surviving/thriving?
0 Votes
+ -
In the long run, HTML5 and other open standards will make the OS irrelevant. Android may and probably will still dominate, but given that "apps" will be cross platform it will just be due to user preference and not because of Android-only apps.
0 Votes
+ -
OS irrelevant - maybe
DevGuy_z 25th May 2010
@Michael Kelly
Time will tell. I still think performance issues will for some time require native apps. Perhaps if the bandwidth increases dramatically. Still developers wanting to target a hardware/software environment would prefer one that makes it easier on them. With android you can write java apps and get more deployments on more devices. With iPhone you get to write SystemC and go through Apple's approval process and run only on the iPhone. If html5 means that Apple can no longer control the apps then Apple's business model is toast.
0 Votes
+ -
@Michael Kelly

Doubtful that open standards will necessarily make the OS irrelevant. Hasn't that been a longstanding mantra of the linux and opensource software folks?

What we've actually seen is that opensource software has been combined with non-opensource software to create innovative produces. Think Apple. Think Google. etc.

I don't think it's going to be totally opensource dominated at all. Reality unfolds in very unexpected ways such as how opensource software is taken on by private companies to produce products that are not opensource en masse.
0 Votes
+ -
Do you bloggers even review past computing history?
croberts Updated - 25th May 2010
The dominant Smartphone platform for the longest time was the original palm OS. Windows CE was up there for a while.

Symbian was going to be the "next big thing".

Then RIM took over with Blackberry OS.

Then iPhone OS was going it be it...

Now android is the next big thing.

Great. Did you know my Telco is actually trying to sell Android, as if Sally Secretary gives a hoot. And Bill the accountant isn't much different: he just wants to open the odd Excel spreadsheet in an emergency.

Anyone who thinks the OS is a sellable feature for smartphones, bloggers included, is deluded. Preferences have shifted in the past, and they will continue to do so.
0 Votes
+ -
The OS is important to me!
DevGuy_z 25th May 2010
@croberts For one an android phone can run flash. My kids too if they knew they could run flash games would probably choose android. Plus free turn by turn navigation and other things makes the OS almost more important than the phone itself which typically now have all the same features
0 Votes
+ -
@DevGuy_z : I have neither iPhone or an Android phone and I have GPS, web and email working just fine. The OS has nothing to do with it.
0 Votes
+ -
Not really
frgough 25th May 2010
Android 2.2 can install the mobile Flash Player and run SOME flash, and play SOME games. Others will crash and burn the phone. I'm not sure your kids would be so happy with Android when they found out how spotty game support was.
0 Votes
+ -
@DevGuy_z

Same features doesn't mean comparable experience!

This is where a lot of people (including bloggers and tech journalists) are wrong. Yes, in a simplified standardised comparative approach listing features in a grid format, the iPhone and various Android phones are very similar. But that's because the experience of using the phone (which is NOT quantifiable and can NOT be simplified into a table format) is miles apart.

Think about it. Car A has four wheels, a steering wheel, automatic lock and windows and V6 engine. Well, Car B does too. Feature for feature they're the same. Ah...but we are not able to quantify and list how the drive and experience of using both cars are different! That's where the narrative has to enter.

Can't do a simple feature-by-feature comparison. Doesn't work that way.
@croberts Yeah, but Sally and Bill watching The Daily Show and seeing a commerical that repeats Droid Does .. over and over again will make them think Droid Does and everything else does not. And the over 35 crowd who adore Star Wars will hear it and get warm fuzzies. So once the general public associates Droid with Android .. it'll be like Scotch tape or "googling an answer" .. it won't matter what hardware maker puts out the hardware because Sally will know that Droid does what they THINK they need it to do. wink
0 Votes
+ -
who have iPhones and love them to death.

News flash for you: people are not the mindless drones you think they are.
0 Votes
+ -
The reason the OS is important is:
cornpie 25th May 2010
@croberts With Android if you you want to switch brands of phone or even switch carriers, you can stick with the same interface you are used to. You are much less locked in.

And to Mr. Kelly: As long as Apple is selling phones they are going to keep a strangle hold on the software for said phones. So the idea that apps are going to be cross platform will never come to be. HTMML5 may help...some...but just as on the desktop you can't do everything through a web browser.
0 Votes
+ -
@cornpie There are lots of countries/regions where the iPhone is not locked in to any one carrier. Canada, Hong Kong, much of Europe where you can buy unlocked iPhones and use them with any GSM mobile phone operator.
0 Votes
+ -
Nope.
@Loverock Davidson

Thanks for setting me straight on this. I was going to say yes until you commented. After thinking about I realized you are right. Android is much better the Windows.

I must admit I was a little surprised that you like Android but I assume you've taken them time to use it and been won over.

Keep on *luckin' that chicken.
0 Votes
+ -
@Lovey Dovey
That's it?

lol...
Once the iPhone is available on other carriers, Apple will regain their dominance. There is pent up demand with Verizon users for the iPhone. The primary reason Android had such a strong quarter was because of their buy one get one free promotion, not the superiorty of the platform. Let's wait for the announcements at the WWDC on June 7th. Hopefully Apple will announce iPhone availability outside of AT&T. It will also be I interesting to see what rabbits Steve Jobs pulls out of his hat. In my opinion, the iPhone is still a superior product with looks, performance, ease of use and eligance.
0 Votes
+ -
agreed
banned from zdnet Updated - 25th May 2010
@gtdworak
and android didn't have such a strong quarter as the techtards sites loved to report. the npd "report" was bogus (only a survey that didn't count business sales).

http://www.duncanleung.com/blog/2010/04/google-android-1-5-1-6-2-0-2-01-2-1-the-android-mobile-oerating-system-and-android-fragmentation/
@gtdworak

Even if the iPhone was available on every network it still wouldn't beat Android in sales. Android phones are currently selling at over 100,000 per day. That is more than the iPhone, iPhone Touch and iPad put together.

If you really believe that one phone can outsell over 60 phones, with more phones being released on an almost weekly basis, then I think you will be very surprised with how quickly Android will overtake Apple in sales. Despite all the media attention Apple isn't the leader in sales, its currently in third place behind Nokia and RIM.

Gartner and all the other research analysts agree that Android sales will overtake iPhone sales before the end of next year, and likely much sooner.

The Open Handset Alliance consists of companies such as HTC, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, LG, Toshiba, Dell, Sharp, NEC, Lenovo, Garmin, etc, etc and they are expanding Android into every sector and every niche of the smartphone market from the high-end premium phones to mid-range and low-end phones. iPhone is a niche high-end device with a very high price and limited choice.

Android adoption is accelerating at an incredible rate and I think Nokia should be just as worried for their dominant position, never mind Apple who are currently in 3rd place.
0 Votes
+ -
When your competitors have to do buy one get one free deals, they are not operating from a position of strength.
@frgough
Funny, Verizon's top seller, the Incredible, isn't offered in the BOGO deal. So keep spewing that FUD.
0 Votes
+ -
@Droid101
You do realize that your post is irrelevant, right?

FUD? Hardly
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is Android destined to be the Windows of smartphones?
ubiquitous one Updated - 26th May 2010
I did look at the Incredible and it's not all that it's hyped to be since the battery life on them, sucks royally. Complaints about that, left and right on Verizon's website, with poor reception coming in a moderate second. But then the iPhone's battery life isn't much better, either

Ya know the old saying: If it's too good to be true, it probably is...
@gtdworak
I would never, ever purchase a phone that requires me to install a buggy piece of bloatware (that I've never had on any PC I own) that is iTunes.

I prefer my updates to be over-the air. I never have to plug into a computer.

Android is simply superior.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is Android destined to be the Windows of smartphones?
DeusExMachina Updated - 26th May 2010
@Droid101
Unless of course Google starts requiring it. Then it'll be the smartest thing anyone has ever done. You are clearly cherry picking issues.

FUD indeed.
0 Votes
+ -
@Droid101

Then simply explain why it is superior.

I would agree that to have the iPhone not necessarily be tethered to iTunes is a plus. Apple should find a way to evolve out of that tether.
0 Votes
+ -
Making temporary inroads during microsofts downtime between WM6.5 and WP7 like DR-DOS did during microsofts pause in moving DOS forward while focusing its efforts on Windows without DOS. All the carriers are just using it as their temporary "iphone" stop gap while they're waiting for WP7 phones to come to market.
0 Votes
+ -
WP7 is likely going to be DOA
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 25th May 2010
@Johnny Vegas. Zune HD hasn't taken off, and with a system geared specifically for Consumers and not business, I find it very unlikely that this OS reboot is going to be able to make any in roads at all.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft has already won the battle for smart-phone supremacy. There is nothing in the world like terminating an employee on Pocket Outlook or firing off an HR termination on Pocket Word. I then use Pocket Excel to calculate the ROI on offshoring the terminated persons function. Android and iPhone are both waaaaay behind where it matters most and that is in tapping into the SharePoint 2010 ecosystem.
0 Votes
+ -
finally
banned from zdnet 25th May 2010
@Mike Cox
good to have you back!
The only thing missing therefore is a method to beat your MCSE's with your WinPhone and how to order expensive unhealthy meals/whatever with it.
0 Votes
+ -
@Mike Cox YOU may like WM and that's fine but the sales figures prove you wrong - the ONLY thing that has changed in this quarter (according to the NPD report which is based on online surveys) is that Apple and Android have switched places. RIM is still the market leader followed by Apple, then Android, then WM... (This is based on cold hard sales figures not an online survey BTW).

As for using a smartphone for employee terminations that is simply gutless and spineless.
0 Votes
+ -
Mike Cox fishes for these kinds of responses
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 25th May 2010
@athynz: it is just plain sarcasm. There really is no reason to try and debate him.
0 Votes
+ -
It's a fact that all of the updates and apps are not compatible for all of the Android devices. I think it's time for Google to stop the wild horses. But instead of fixing that fatal problem, Google is creating new ones by making Nexus One's non-standard resolution screen.
@samialtas
You're kidding, right? Android phones have the same aspect ratio (the 16:9 HD ratio). iPhones and the iPad are still clinging to the old, standard definition ratio of 4:3. Who is going against the standard, now?
0 Votes
+ -
Worst than Windows...
dave95. Updated - 25th May 2010
I think it's already worst than Windows. Android in its short life as a platform is already riddled with complexity and confusion, fragmentation. Phones within contract cycle suddenly find themselves outdated or unworthy of the latest updates. Still many different versions of the Android OS in the market, and with different skins like Sense, Blur, TouchFlo. Apps that works on some devices but not on others because of the many hardware variations. For instance only 27 percent of Android phones can run the official Twitter App. And this is a better environment for developers how? At least with Windows consumers knew the software they just purchased had a good chance of working with their new PC, any PC. Will Froyo fixes all this? Once they start to roll out Android Tablets (and you know they will clone Apple again here) I see things getting worst.

Microsoft have the right idea with WP7 by trying to create a unified easy to understand experience for users (copying Apple). No Android fragmentation with WP7. The problem I see is, you can't license out WP7 to partners while at the same time tightly controlling how they sell their devices. Controlling every bit of their hardware. Not when there's a freely available Android to compete with. Microsoft would eventually need to build their own phones for WP7 to even get notice. They are trying to hold on the their old business model (licensing) while at the same time trying to control the experience like Apple. Not sure how well that will work without doing it themselves.
0 Votes
+ -
Ah but the Googler Fanbois will say
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 25th May 2010
@dave95. that fragmentation isn't a problem, as the have so told me yesterday, (http://www.zdnet.com/tb/1-81883?tag=mantle_skin;content).

I agree, fragmentation is going to be an issue with Android.
@dave95.
Who is confused?

Find the form factor you like, and get an Android phone.

Again, what's the confusion?
@Droid101

Certainly someone with Droid in their name won't be confused. But I will never recommend Android to any family and friends, at least not until many of the issues are addressed (I have a feeling that's never with Google's "open" philosophy). For instance these phones are App driven phones yet there's no assurance that your current Apps will work on your next Android purchased. Maybe that's why most are second rate and are free. There's no assurance that whatever users download won't completely foul up their phone (but hey we're open!).
0 Votes
+ -
Delete
dave95. Updated - 25th May 2010
delete
0 Votes
+ -
Windows is lame...
Hatestone Johnson 25th May 2010
...so the answer to the title is a resounding NO!

If you mean to ask will Android be ubiquitous like Windows, then the answer is yes.
0 Votes
+ -
Sure... IF the reports of Android beating Apple in sales figures is actually accurate - I'd prefer to see real world cold hard sales figures first, NOT the results of some online survey... This is from the article claiming Android's sales: Methodology: The NPD Group compiles and analyzes mobile device sales data based on more than 150,000 completed online consumer research surveys each month. Surveys are based on a nationally balanced and demographically-representative sample, and results are projected to represent the entire population of U.S. consumers. Note: Sales figures do not include corporate/enterprise mobile phone sales. - Sorry, when I see the cold, hard sales figures then I'll admit that Android is outselling iPhone...

I just hope the tech support evolves into something more than the whole "pass the buck" so-called support that is plaguing the Nexus One devices...
I've been using the CIBC banking app on my phone for a couple of weeks now. There's nothing easier than taking your bank with you.


MTHIRTYhas just shared a widget with you on behalf of CIBC
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is Android destined to be the Windows of smartphones?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
Hi there, I just stopped by to drop by your webpage and perceived as I would say mulberry bag sale I liked myself.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix