Is Eric Schmidt getting too cocky?

Is Eric Schmidt getting too cocky?

Summary: "In 2007 we’ll witness the increasing dominance of open Internet standards. As web access via mobile phones grows, these standards will sweep aside the proprietary protocols promoted by individual companies striving for technical monopoly.

TOPICS: Google

"In 2007 we’ll witness the increasing dominance of open Internet standards. As web access via mobile phones grows, these standards will sweep aside the proprietary protocols promoted by individual companies striving for technical monopoly. Today’s desktop software will be overtaken by internet-based services that enable users to choose the document formats, search tools and editing capability that best suit their needs."

That passage, from an interview with the Economist certainly sounds like Google CEO Eric Schmidt is picking a fight with Microsoft, aka the main player "striving for technical monopoly."

As Nick Carr notes on his blog Schmidt's quotes are a bit of a departure from what he told ZDNet's Dan Farber earlier this month. Overall, Carr reads Schmidt to be issuing a threat to Microsoft's Office juggernaut. Until now Schmidt has been coy about Google's plans in productivity software.

Add it up and you're left with a few questions. What exactly is Schmidt thinking? Is he getting too cocky? Or does he honestly believe that running into Microsoft head-on is the best business move?

Perhaps Schmidt is being blinded by a $500-plus stock price, but a direct assault Microsoft, which has unlimited resources, may not be the brightest move.

After all, Microsoft could buy Yahoo tomorrow and make life difficult for Google. The turn of events is even more surprising given Schmidt's track record. He was a whipping boy for Microsoft while he was CEO of Novell. Listening to those conference calls--and the Wall Street disappointments--a few years ago was just downright painful. It's quite a sea change compared to the lovefest that Google's earnings calls have become.

What happened? Schmidt landed in a situation that was perfect for him. Meanwhile, his engineering background gelled with Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page. That arrangement is a once in a lifetime gig.

Perhaps the Google trio has a plan to bring down Microsoft, but Silicon Valley executives have plenty of treadmarks from trying. Schmidt is right about cloud computing and a new paradigm, but it wouldn't it make more sense to wage guerilla warfare instead of a frontal assault?

Since Schmidt has the Microsoft battle scars from Novell you'd think the frontal assault wouldn't be an option. But maybe Schmidt knows something we don't. This observer just keeps remembering those awkward Novell moments and wondering if Schmidt has become a little too cocky.

Topic: Google

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Perhaps

    But you can't blame Google for Microsoft's history of antitrust action.
    glocks out
  • But, Google has nothing to lose with Google Office either. It costs them

    very little right now compared to their income. It also forces Microsoft to react and compete in ways that makes them un-comfortable. And, who knows, Gooble may be doing this just to cause Microsoft to waste time trying to compete with everything little thing Google does.

    The real suprise that Google is working on with Mozilla engineers is an open run-time environment to replace the AJAX development model, the solution to the off-line problem, and, the ability to deploy web applications on Google appliances inside the company firewall.

    Google is in the drivers seat right now. They are able to go after anything they want and compete in any way they want.

    Microsoft employees have one hand tied behind their back, forced to use one hand to protect the twin monopolies.

    Google als has a HUGE recuiting advantage right now.
  • Grand Moff Tarkin

    <i>"We shall then crush the rebellion with one swift stroke.." </i>
  • What if...

    ... the cloud- and the offline-world will survive?
    See my cartoon:

  • Competition is a good thing

    I say that if anyone has a true chance for a full frontal assault of M$ it's Google. The bottom line is that Google is light years ahead of M$ with web based services, searching, advertising, videos, maps, gmail, well the list just goes on and on. The point of notice is that they're using open source and creating and using STANDARDS. I know thats a hard word to understand from an M$ perspective but the gavel has already fallen on the Office debate and Open Office won that fight especially since China and a Billion plus users decided that OO was their standard moving forward. It's not that M$ cant compete it's that they don't want to they would rather move the standards to their own monopoly instead of making their product meet the standard. Same with .NET after all not everyone uses Internet Exploder and many larger companies have banned it outright for being insecure. Our company spent millions on a web based app using .NET (despite my warnings) and come to find out the customer we were pursuing had banned all use of IE from desktops. So needless to say I'm enjoying contract work. Thanks M$
  • bre

    Autonomy And Fashion of WomenChanel inherits the tradition and careful carving along with innovative technology are applied to its design. <a href="">Asus Batteries</a> ,why don't you choose your favorite pink dress?Hot pink wedding gowns are also a fashion, and this type is different from light pink ones <a href="">gucci bags</a> etc are made out of the particular best materials with the superior craftsmanship. Then, how does Christian Dior achieve its present success? T <a href="">laptop batteries</a> New York premiere of Black Swan wearing a long black Dior grown. Her Christian Dior Ceur Romantique platinum ring is very attractive, but the most <a href="">replica rolex</a> the attention of a customer.Apart from functions, appearance is also an important element. From the first bricklike phone with antennas t <a href="">Compaq Batteries</a> nce of it allows the owner to carry it for any occasions. It will make the owner looks graceful!There are some famous purses in the fashion <a href="">replica watches uk</a> hand-made jewelry. Guadua is a local product of South American and looks like bamboo. As for tagua, in Colombia and Ecuador, palm trees are common to <a href="">replica watches uk</a> rful female feature. Galaxy 36 automatic series could be dynamic with superb crafts. The elaborate mechanical movement is installed in the dial with <a href="">rolex replica</a> Vuitton: Ease And ComfortNamed after the greatest leather designer in France history, Louis Vuitton has become the symbol of upper class. With its <a href="">Sony Batteries</a> at gift. Every time when she wears the shoes she would remember the romantic day when you give her the gift. Chanel, women's favorite brand u <a href="">Sony Batteries</a> technical skills and emphasizes on delicate and elegant temperament, which is different from the present design style. Multiple elements of <a href="">Hermes bags</a> that the reason is that the tail hem is very playful. It can cut one side like a flower while another side looks like lovely or others looks very <a href="">replica rolex</a> g of different seasons.alle Berry and her large handbagThe large handbag Halle Berry was carrying gives her a real casual look on the street. Whether <a href="">rolex replica</a> There are different colors and tattoos of the caps in the market, such as white, black, green, pink, red, yellow, brown, and coffee. <a href="">swiss replica watches</a> ry to a woman. A famous jewelry makes a woman twinkle in others eyes, so does the watch. It is a symbol of fashion and reputation. Looking at diff <a href="">Apple Batteries</a>