ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Many more budget-friendly Android phones to ship by 2015

By | October 20, 2011, 3:35pm PDT

Summary: Android has a chance to lock down the low-cost smartphone market if it doesn’t get ahead of itself.

Android has ruled the U.S. smartphone market share for months and months now, and based on a new report, Google’s mobile OS will only continue to grow stronger.

But that could be helped in part by a factor that still proves to be a barrier for some consumers when it comes to smartphones: pricing.

A new report from market intelligence firm In-Stat asserts that 339 million low-cost Android smartphones will ship worldwide in 2015. Low-cost is defined at $150 and under. Right now, most smartphones start at $199 with the signing of a two-year service agreement.

The group argues that mobile phone consumers only have one choice for a mobile operating system in this budget-friendly category, and that would be Android. As Ice Cream Sandwich and further (and better) versions of Android OS roll out in the future, older versions can still be made useful.

In-Stat research director Allen Nogee explained in a statement:

The low-cost Android handset segment will cause some fragmentation in the Android platform. Most low-cost Android smartphones are likely to be released with Android 2.2 or 2.3, since these versions are a good blend of features with modest memory and processor usage. The Ice Cream Sandwich (Android 4.0) step-up in memory and processor demands makes this release less attractive for low-cost Android devices.

However, that argument could certainly be applied to other mobile platforms. Just look at the iPhone 3GS. That device is selling for free with a two-year contract, and the iPhone 4 now retails for $99 on-contract, which is an incredible steal if you can settle for 8GB of space and don’t care about Siri.

In-Stat also acknowledges that this particular smartphone market is Android’s to lose as this space “could get much more competitive, especially as other OS vendors begin to target the space.” The study cites Huawei, MicroMax, Motorola, Samsung, Spice, and ZTE as potential competitors, mainly because these low-cost devices will be built to at 600MHz speeds or less with a single-core EDGE chip that costs less than $10.

At least that’s the idea for the short-term. By 2015, the price points on smartphones and the materials that go in them could be drastically different. After all, if an iPhone 4S can be made for $188 a piece now, smartphone parts could be very well much cheaper in the next few years.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

38
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

<a href="http://www.androidsmartphones.net">android smartphones</a>
LLisa80 29th Nov
@Johnny Vegas WP is just too boring for me, I need risk Godammit! Bill Gates is a boring old fart!
Whereas all versions of Windows Phone will run better on that hardware than android does on 1.5G dual cores. With Huawei, ZTE, Samsung, Nokia, all coming out with nice low end WP hw early next year and WP being more secure and reliable WP will be a much better option for this market segment as well as the medium and high end segments.
@Johnny Vegas But they won't be running that because the market has shown they don't want Windows Phone in any variant... They want Android and iOS.
@Peter Perry
When did you become representative of Market, DonnieBoy?
@Peter Perry .... is what ever cheap piece of crap they can get for free.

Of all the Android products (over one hundred models), less than 10 are of acceptable quality. The rest are just crapware ..... and that is what most of the market is getting.
@Wackoae, wow, that would be wrong! There were probably 10 this year alone!
@Rama.net I don't hide behind an alias, my name is Pete Perry and I have never used another... Now you on the other hand, I seriously doubt .net is your last name.

As for being representative for the market, I am reading the market... Windows Mobile / Phone is still losing market share! Try doing research for a change!
@Peter Perry
Whether you are DonnieBoy with real name or not is not the question here. You are all of sudden become preacher of iPhone by bringing Windows Phone into the subject with no reason. Also you are making blanket statements like DonnieBoy does. And for your information I started using .NET as my suffix as soon as Microsoft announced their .NET for my online activities and Rama is my real name.
@Rama.NET
He did not bring Windows Phone into the subject for no reason. He was trying to educate a blind MS fan who bought in Windows Phone for no reason.
@anono. "He did not bring Windows Phone into the subject for no reason. He was trying to educate a blind MS fan who bought in Windows Phone for no reason."

He didn't educate anyone, because his posts were factually wrong. So take your irrational hatred of Microsoft, and shove it where the sun don't shine fanboy.
@Johnny Vegas
I hate the very look of the Windows phone. The ugly green screen and sickly orange or baby poop yellow huge tiles makes me think of gagging.

My Droid phone has a beautiful picture as a wallpaper and even with 16 icons on the screen I can still see the wallpaper. I like having up to 16 icons on the phones screen or only having 8 or 9 icons and still having the wallpaper mostly clear.

Sorry, while there may be many who go for ugly and there may be many who get forced into using Win8, it is not for me.
@John238 And this is exactly the way I feel about the product as do most of the people I know! Balmer needs a class on color theory and then another on design aesthetics before he manages another interface change.
0 Votes
+ -
@John238

Aaaah the endless grid of static icons. My WP7 phone has a picture on the front screen, but when I slide it up I want to get to what I want fast - hunting through a sea of dated icons is not the best way to get there.

I can see you don't get it. Simple, sophisticated, stylish and streamlined is not your thing - however it is for most of us.

If you're that in love with last century's UI, then take up software archeology
.
@John238 That only proves you have no taste to speak of, because Android is the ugliest OS on the market by a country mile. The entire OS is an ugly, unintuitive, fragmented, laggy, malware-ridden piece of crap.
@John238
It is funny how Android-haters do not get it.
In Android, it is tailored per user. Not by software manufacturer.

Example with three launcher screens, having a middle one as default, without any icons or widgets and people can see their lowed wallpaper easily. Sliding to right or left side then they get their wanted apps and widgets. Example, on right side are apps and widgets related to work. On left side for personal life.

Own folders, widgets, icons, you just name it. How about a folder what includes latest facebook updates or latest emails or photos?

Android-haters do not know how flexible and customization friendly Android is and how damn easy to learn and use it is because it.
Life folders and life icons are something what Android-haters do not even mostly know.
Android users do not just get widgets or simple icons on view. They have interactive, life information and from what they can see at glance everything. And single message center what is accessible from everywhere just pulling it down.
Direct access to new notifications from lock screen (I have disabled mine as I dont need lockscreen) what just speeds things more.

And everything is how user wants it. With user wanted UI, not just single UI as what WP or iOS offers, but there are dozens of different UI's to be chosen from.

Windows Phone shows only 6 tiles at once. Android at least 16 but bigger screens it can even be 24. Every icon can be life one, updating its status, showing information from weather to status updates to missed calls or SMS's or email topics etc.

But if someone really loves two colored tiles what takes whole screen, go ahead, it is not away from me. But that is the goal of Microsoft, to get to same situation than in PC market that typical (over 90% of PC buyers) people do not have a choice to select alternative software.
@Johnny Vegas I don't think that you are right there is the fastest Tablet from asus that runs on Android 4.0 and in my think of view this is fastest then iPad 2 check there: http://www.technologyfazer.com/asus-transformer-android-tablet.html
@Johnny Vegas I would love to see Windows Phone 7.5 running 100% smoothly and without hickups on 600Mhz ARM6 CPU without GPU..... as does my Android.

Oh, and phone price on retail was 100 euros without any contract.

If few carriers throws all kind bloatware to Android phones, it is not reason to blame Android but those carriers. If it is not carriers but OEM's, then blame them and not Android.

My phone had vanilla Android in it (of course carrier own bootsplash what I have seen last time year ago) and one new app added, what was carriers own SIP service.

So stop saying Android is faster and smoother as it is same thing as saying Windows 7 gets BSOD few times a day and it is typical thing.
@Johnny Vegas WP is just too boring for me, I need risk Godammit! Bill Gates is a boring old fart!
0 Votes
+ -
There already are a lot of low cost Android phones available, from companies like ZTE, Huawei, even Samsung has models like the Corby or HTC with the Cha Cha and Salsa.

The danger with these low cost phones is data usage, will the people who buy them be willing to pay extra for data?

How well do "smartphones" work when data connectivity is minimal or non existent?
@bannedagain
I pay $25 a month for everything for my daughters phone. I purchased the phone for her ($150) and for a small monthly fee she gets unlimited data, unlimited text, only 300 min talk but she uses texting almost exclusivly. Also, with her plan she can never run up a $500 bill. . . . NEVER. Her bill is always only $25 a month.

She watches movies on her phone, watches music videos, accesses her music files, etc. . . it seems to work great for her.

Her program works so well for her I am considering shifting to her carrier.
@bannedagain remember, even if they don't use data on the cell networks, they can still use it for a lot of things in any wifi area. There are lots of places with free wifi and the number of them is going up fast. In places where data connectivity is minimal they work just as well as a dumb phone. If the cost of a smartphone is insignificantly different, why wouldn't the opt for one.
This is a good thing because low end is now 1 GHz and these phones will make for more market saturation.

Why is this good? No artificial Vendor lock-in like some companies mobile divisions do.
@Peter Perry
Well at least not better than Free Phones or BOGO deals that carriers push even for higher end phones.
@Rama.NET Hey, it is called competition and moving those phones with Bogo was never about Apple, it was about competing with other Android phones and the Bogos stopped when the iPhone hit Verizon and yet people still bought more Android phones than iPhones!
@Peter Perry LOL! I'd love to see Android run on 1GHz phones with 512MB of RAM. That would be a riot to see.
0 Votes
+ -
But if you're paying for 3G, whose going to skimp on the phone? In future they'll be cheaper, sure, but the capital costs will simply have been absorbed by then. They will have the same spec as today (probably higher), only be cheaper.

I also don't believe Android 4 has a higher processor requirement for the same number of pixels. Tablets require more oomph, but that's a function of having more screen and more things on screen, not any fundamental of code. So the basic premis that Android 4 on Android 2.3 spec hardware is slower seems faulty to me since most the extra code would only be executing if it was running on a tablet.
600mhz? Very low memory and storage? EDGE chip? The majority of Android users already experience lag and stuttering on their phone, this will make things worst.
WP hardware will be expensive so it will not compete in the low-end smartphone market. Microsoft has very strict hardware requirements for its partners. Also, Balmer keeps repeating the "cheap Android phone" phrase. He would not do that if he was going to let Windows phones sell for less.
@BoloMKXXVIII Not even remotely true. Microsoft is already targeting low end handsets with their Tango update. Nokia will ship tons of low end Windows Phones to developing markets.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Many more budget-friendly Android phones to ship by 2015
LoverockDavidson_-24231404894599612871915491754222 21st Oct
This is exactly what Steve Ballmer said, android would be on the low end market and everyone blasted him for it. Jokes on you, android.
@LoverockDavidson_
You mean kind of like Windows. And I use Windows. There is nothing wrong with bringing a more affordable solution to the market.
@anono Actually, Windows the OS would be on the higher end if you're judging cost. You're talking about hardware, which has nothing to do with Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
It's the cost of the monthly service from the carriers. Even if you get a cheap phone or a free phone your voice, messaging and data plan are going to cost you about $70 to $80 bucks a month, and that's on the lower end.
Quit all the bickering; Android is by far better than Windows with all the glitches! Stop the hate! Folks want Android phones...period! ;.)
@laloriss Pot, meet kettle.
these prices are on contract.

and frankly only the dumb and the poor think on contract pricing means anything other than getting hauled over the coals for 2 years....
@evilcart Since I am going to pay the same price for my voice/data each month on AT&T regardless of if I get a subsidized phone or not why would pay more to get the unsubsidized phone?
0 Votes
+ -
The report mentions upcoming makers of low-cost handsets, but doesn't say anything about what OS they might be using, other than Android. So it's not clear what kind of "competition" for Android they might be thinking about.

The only choice for an OS that covers both the high-end and low-end is Android.
@ldo17 Open your eyes, it's not the only choice.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix