McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise
Summary: The most recent quarterly reports from McAfee and Symantec highlight some trench warfare in both the enterprise and consumer markets.
The most recent quarterly reports from McAfee and Symantec highlight some trench warfare in both the enterprise and consumer markets.
Both companies reported solid quarters, but Symantec was the one that really knocked the cover off the ball. Symantec reported fiscal second quarter net income of $150 million, or 18 cents a share, on revenue of $1.47 billion. Non-GAAP earnings were 36 cents a share, three cents ahead of Wall Street estimates.
But what was curious is the reason behind Symantec's surge. Sure, CEO Enrique Salem has given Symantec more focus, but the quarter got a lift from small and mid-sized businesses and consumers. The consumer business coupled with improving enterprise trends enabled Symantec to maintain its outlook for the next quarter.
Salem said on a conference call:
We started to see initial signs of progress in SMB security as we renewed our relationships with channel partners given the launch of our new security products. We also saw strength in the consumer segment as our business continues to benefit from our market-leading products...The strength of our Consumer business was driven by strong Norton 360 sales and by our relationships with eight of the top nine OEMs...During the quarter, we won consumer online backup deals with Toshiba and Acer. We now have backup relationships with four of the top five OEMs.
Add it up and Symantec's consumer business was up 6 percent to $463 million in the second quarter compared to a year ago. All other businesses---security and compliance and storage---were down anywhere from 3 percent to 9 percent.
Enter McAfee. McAfee's quarter was also solid (statement). The company reported fiscal third quarter earnings of $36.8 million, or 23 cents a share, on revenue of $485.3 million, up 18 percent from a year ago. Non-GAAP earnings were 62 cents a share, two cents better than estimates. Revenue, however, fell short of the $487 million projected by Wall Street.
McAfee also projected fiscal fourth quarter non-GAAP earnings of 61 cents a share to 65 cents a share. Wall Street was looking for 63 cents a share.
Under the hood though, McAfee showed a 25 percent jump in its corporate business. Third quarter corporate revenue checked in at $308 million. On the consumer side of the house, McAfee had revenue of $177 million, up 8 percent from a year ago.
Based on growth rates, it appears Symantec is taking it to McAfee in the consumer market. In the enterprise, McAfee, which is much smaller than Symantec, appears to be gaining some strength from a smaller base.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Worked for SYMC - products inadequately tested
Working for SYMC
Then you could have said to have been part of improving of the process . Just compare Norton 2009/10 to previous releases.
It'll be a cold day in hell
They destroyed their good name all by themselves.
but...
You switched to Mac
mmkay
I guess you think Symantec is the only Anti-malware company out there.
I trust neither Symantic nor McAfee for security.
in Windows Vista 64-Bit. :)
Prefer Noron Over Mcafee ANY DAY
If I have a stupid silly question or a major issue all I have to do is click the support link and someone comes online and helps me fix any and everything without having to send a million emails to get a problem fixed.
I own Norton Internet Security 2010 and Norton 360 3 Premier but I am using Norton 360 V4 Premier at the moment.
Backwards to my experience
At home, I've used multiple anti-virus/anti-spyware systems and for now, am using AVG.
I don't use software firewalls, etc. since the box I use as a firewall does a good job without using resources on the enduser computer and even gives me nice reports on attempted attacks, scans, etc.
As usual, YMMV.
Bloatware
RE: McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise
Norton on the other hand has really turned the corner. Norton 2010 is incredible considering I stopped using them in 2003 when they really started to bloat up. 2010 is night and day, I even paid for it.
RE: McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise
Odd...
Overall on-demand detection (556,224 samples) 99.46%
Wildlist Malware detection (on-demand and on-access) 100%
Behavioral/Dynamic detection (on-access) 100%
Overall system disinfection (active components) 100%
Rootkit disinfection (active components) 100%
Maybe you have some other test results or data to share with us?
no bias there ...
Google reveals many comarisons from independent companies, and one such (with no implication reagarding its 'authority') is http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/main-tests
That's fine, but
RE: McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise
RE: McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise
security product for my pc.
Once upon a time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, they
were THE best.
Thankfully ,I love my Avira premium security suite & if
it dies someday,I will put my money on Bitdefender.
(sorry mcafee & norton fans.;-))
RE: McAfee vs. Symantec: Dueling in consumer and enterprise