ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Meet the new Comcast-NBCU: Content meets conduit everywhere; Will it work?

By | December 3, 2009, 6:39am PST

Summary: Comcast said officially acquired a controlling stake in NBC Universal in a deal valued at $30 billion. Comcast will have an arsenal of cable channels, a huge distribution network, a movie studio and a top 10 Web presence with 82 million monthly unique visitors. Now the hard part: Leveraging these assets.

Comcast said Thursday that it has officially acquired a controlling stake in NBC Universal in a deal valued at $30 billion. Comcast will have an arsenal of cable channels, a huge distribution network, a movie studio and a top 10 Web presence with 82 million monthly unique visitors. Now the hard part: Leveraging these assets.

But as Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said on a conference call (statement, Techmeme, presentation): “There’s more upside than downside buying it today.” In the end, Roberts got a good deal, “buying at low point in cyclical changes,” and had a willing seller in General Electric. “It’s a reasonable risk and that’s how you get excess returns,” added Roberts.

First the details:

  • Comcast will own 51 percent of NBCU in a joint venture with GE holding the rest.
  • NBCU deal valued at $30 billion. Comcast will contribute properties valued at $7.25 billion and pay GE $6.5 billion in cash.
  • Jeff Zucker, NBCU’s head honcho, will run the venture, based in New York.
  • NBCU will have a bevy of cable channels such as USA, Bravo, CNBC and Versus. These properties will have two revenue streams, cable affiliate fees and online revenue. Cable still drives most of the joint company’s revenue and earnings.
  • Roberts talked the financials and gave Wall Street a lot of goodies to allay any worries. Biggest perk: Comcast raised its dividend. And the deal is immediately accretive to earnings.

  • Comcast will be able to tap multiple demographics and can chase interactive television and powerhouse content such as Olympics coverage. Executives talked about launching new properties and creating video on demand bundles.

Now the big questions: Will this deal work when history is littered with botched media mergers and attempts at vertical integration? Will there be culture clashes? Will regulators approve? And what’s the big overriding strategy online and offline?

The short answers:

  • If anyone can make a media merger work it’s Roberts, who has a lot of experience with large acquisitions and isn’t ego driven. He’s a good business man who will let NBCU operate as its own. Comcast executives said this deal is more like Time Warner buying Turner than Time Warner buying AOL. Roberts said the deal was good standing on its own without any synergy assumptions. How many media executives have you heard break out terms like IRR (internal rate of return)?
  • Culture clashes? NBCU employees will be stoked to go to Comcast relative to GE. There’s a better match with working with a company that has cable pipes and content than one that make airplane engines and wind turbines. “I think we’re going to merge quite well,” said Roberts. Here’s the team:

  • As for the regulatory issues, the Comcast-NBCU deal doesn’t rewrite the TV industry. The deal will get scrutiny, but everyone I’ve asked thinks regulators will approve. “We believe this is an approvable transaction,” said Roberts.
  • The cable strategy is the same as it always is for Comcast. Grow margins. With NBCU’s library and channels Comcast won’t have to negotiate with all of these properties. There’s a lot of savings there. Comcast is also likely to bundle these content assets for TV Everywhere. Distribution helps content. The company talked a lot about new distribution models. “We’re big believers in trying new things,” said Stephen Burke, chief operating officer.

Later in the conference call there was an interesting exchange about TV Everywhere and Hulu. “Right now NBCU is distributing its free broadcast content on Hulu, but has been careful about putting cable content out there,” said Burke, who added that the move made sense. “Cable content would go out to TV Everywhere. Hulu and TV Everywhere are complimentary,” said Burke. An executive also noted that Hulu premium wasn’t in the cards.

What Comcast will do with properties ranging from Univision to NBC Sports to Hulu remains to be seen. But the giant has a huge arsenal of assets at its disposal for online and cable use. Comcast can compete directly with ESPN with Versus, NBC Sports and regional assets, it can be an interactive TV player and do just about anything. Executives also talked up wireless broadband via its partnership with Clearwire. As with all mergers on the day the deal is announced the sky’s the limit. Now Comcast and NBCU just have to deliver.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
60
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Meet the new Comcast-NBCU: Content meets conduit everywhere; Will it work?
Joe1DISH 2nd May 2011
Just downloaded this app to my iPad and it's great. Was easy to set up and the app was free. I work over at DISH and that's where I got my device from. Now I'm set up to watch TV Everywhere. Went to the park and let the kids play while I watched my raw is war wrestling show. This is great now I can stay caught up and I don?t have to be home. This I would recommend to everyone. Find out more when you call DISH Network.
As soon as Comcast starts raising the prices that their competitors have to pay this will be a goldmine! Imagine the negotiations between Comcast and DirectTV and/or Dish Network for carriage of the "Comcast channels". I can see Comcast raising the prices to extortion levels soon.

Consumers will lose, and lose BIG.

Now that Comcast is both a content provider and a pipe-line for that content we will see price gouging wherever possible.

Your cable bill WILL go up. Even if you are not a Comcast subscriber. Satellite TV will be held hostage to the ransom demands of Comcast. And there will NEVER be any ability to stream video over the internet in any form that competes with the "Cable TV" delivery system.

We lose, Comcast wins. All your content are belong to us.

0 Votes
+ -
It's already happened...
Mark D. Peterson 3rd Dec 2009
DirecTV dropped Versus earlier this earlier this fall because Comcast wanted too much money from them...
0 Votes
+ -
Why wouldn't they
ICUR12 3rd Dec 2009
Comcast already overcharges for their services.
They have a history of trying to block there competitors services on the Internet.

This can only be bad.

I've been waiting and watching for someone to host the TV lineup via the Internet so I can call them and cancel my service. They charge twice what I'm willing to pay and every two or three months it goes up again.
0 Votes
+ -
Why Wouldn't they
El Condor 4th Dec 2009
The big battle will come when Comcast tries to wrest control of ZDNET away from CBS. Networks and Internet do not play well with others.
Seriously, they can't find money to improve their network, but they can come up with $30B to buy content that their network already has a hard time delivering?

Not to mention the new and wonderful caps that they put on how much you can download. Sure, you don't get charged for stuff that is on the TV side. But more and more people don't even bother to watch cable when they can just watch streaming video over the Internet.
0 Votes
+ -
Never mind the bits
gnesterenko 3rd Dec 2009
How about providing HD channels that don't pixellate, freeze and stutter any time there's any action on the screen. Done with this company - going Verizon FIOS. May have to pay more, but its worth it just to not give these guys any more money.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

0 Votes
+ -
Actually....
PollyProteus 3rd Dec 2009
--> "...going Verizon FIOS. May have to pay more, but its worth it just to not give these guys any more money."

Even if you go to Version FIOS, you're going to be paying these guys because they will up the rates for Verizon to re-broadcast the content that Comcast will own and that rate increase will be passed on to you as the subscriber. So seriously, unless you unplug your TV from any provider and stick strictly with OTA content, Comcast is going to get money from you, one way or the other.
0 Votes
+ -
So seriously, unless you unplug your TV from any provider and stick strictly with OTA content, Comcast is going to get money from you, one way or the other.

I'd be a good excuse to get away from the boob tube anyway, but Americans are so addicted to junk, I doubt they'd have the willpower to break themselves away.

And cable monopolies know this...
0 Votes
+ -
GE's Fault, too??
escapepod 3rd Dec 2009
Seems like GE doesn't give a rip about the consumer, too. Else, they would have found a more worthy buyer (not likely -- they're very happy to unload NBC/Universal in their current financial situation).
This transaction has got to be stopped. Having this much
high-value content held hostage by the owner of one set of
pipes is a trust of the worst order.
0 Votes
+ -
High-value content? Hardly...
jedidethfreak 3rd Dec 2009
NBCU's only shining star is Universal HD. All of
their other networks have been tanking for years.
Now, that doesn't mean that Comcast isn't going to
screw people six ways to Sunday, but let's be
realistic on what the programming actually is.
0 Votes
+ -
butcher and sell pieces
Silent Observer 3rd Dec 2009
I expect more of a butcher and sell pieces from the deal. Just like they did with the radio stations they controlled in Arizona - fired their top talent that drew people to the stations, all for the mighty short term dollar.
0 Votes
+ -
I am sure it will work - for Comcast!
mwagner@... 3rd Dec 2009
How about for consumers though? In the early 20th Century, law makers found that companies who controlled the supply chain controlled prices - to the detriment of consumers.

In the 1970s, the law came to include owners or communications outlets. If you owned all of the news outlets in a community, you controlled information access so only your opnions were heard. That simply was not permitted.

All that legislation has fallen by the wayside in recent years.

In many of the communities that they serve, Comcast is the defacto news & entertainment monopoly. This deal only serves to expand that monopoly.

Would we acquiece so quickly if it was FOX buying NBC-Universal? How about the Chinese government?
Now that's Comcastic! Good for Comcast in becoming the biggest cable giant out there. After losing a big chunk of their subscriber base, they decided that acquiring a big TV network would force more to subscribe to cable. I personally saw a huge (30% or so) decrease in cable subscribers last December in our town when we cut the cable. When people don't have jobs, they don't watch cable tv because they can't pay the price.

I wonder now if they will stop over-the-air broadcasts of all NBC affiliates? Talk about a huge monoply! Did they buy out the FCC too? I always thought that over-the-air reception would remain free. Now Comcast could shut that down too.

All sorts of money-making (?) possibilities for Comcast. (If anyone can afford the bi-annual cable price increase!)
Yeah, the FCC is totally corrupt and bought out, either by the Cable Moguls or the Telcos. They are seriously considering the abolition of free broadcast TV in order to re-allocate more spectrum to wireless, and exclusive transmission of content via cable.

Predatory-prey "Free" Market Capitalism at its finest.
0 Votes
+ -
... dramatically altering the Communication Act of 1934, which declared the airwaves public.

Scrambling content from privately-owned satellites is quite different than closing down (or scrambling) OTA broadcasts over the public airwaves.

Most people still watch ABC, CBS, & NBC more than they do their subscription channels.

These folks purchase basic cable to get good reception in fringe areas (and to support analog TV).

Premium services give them the cable channels.

We need not worry about OTA. It's the cost of premium content that we have to worry about...

For instance ...

Will Comcast raise the price of NBC cable channels to competitor cable outlets?

Will Comcast do the same for Universal-produced TV shows and movies?
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think they can
John Zern 3rd Dec 2009
I always thought that over-the-air reception would remain free. Now Comcast could shut that down too

That's not NBC, that's thier afiliates, the local stations. Here in the Philadelphia area two local stations swapped affiliates (NBC/CBS) years ago.

And alot of people still watch TV over the air. If Comcast where to drop their NBC affiliates to go "cable only", they would lose a very large chuck of advertising revenue.
0 Votes
+ -
Congress is not likely to repeal the cornerstone of the Communcations Act of 1934 (declaring the airwaves public) so we won't likely see OTA broadcasting come to an end.

After all, Comcast would have nothing to offer its "basic cable" subscribers if there were no OTA signals to tap.

Now that all OTA is digital, many many communities get no OTA signal at all without basic cable (which has to support analog TVs for some time to come as well as provide OTA digital signals). In those communities where OTA reception is non-existant, cable subscribers might downgrade to BASIC service but they won't stop buying cable.

The problem is that cable is a de facto monopoly in most markets because (1) satellite-based Internet access is not mature or reliable (due to latency issues), and (2) fibre build-out is so far behind that DSL-based access to TV/Internet is just not widely available.

Add to that Comcast's less than stellar reputation and it all spells trouble.
0 Votes
+ -
Time Warner buying AOL?
steve.ro 3rd Dec 2009
How quickly we forget. AOL bought Time Warner. Forget it at your peril.
0 Votes
+ -
Same problem (nt)
mwagner@... 3rd Dec 2009
.
0 Votes
+ -
Anti-trust issues will be hard to avoid.
No_Ax_to_Grind 3rd Dec 2009
I an certain this will be a tough sale to regulators.
0 Votes
+ -
.
0 Votes
+ -
I think it will go through
Michael Kelly 3rd Dec 2009
But you can bet they will be given warning upfront and that they will be watched like hawks. As they should be.
0 Votes
+ -
Anti-trust....
El Condor 4th Dec 2009
Not in the least. Noproblem wit anti-trust issues. With Team Obama in place they can overcome(destroy) any objections. Besides this will compliment Government Motors(GM) The Government Banking and Financial Underwriters(Government F U) And Control of the U.S Workers Party(The Unions) AS soon as health care is passed we will all be led around by the short and curlies. No problem comrade.
0 Votes
+ -
As for the banks and GM well would you like more people unemployed
this holiday season many more? The banks and GM are working hard
to pay the government back and won't owe the government anything
soon enough. Now if you had a better idea I mean one that did not
include the total collapse of our's and the worlds economy I'm happy
to hear it bot if not they stop with the wacko talk. As for Health Care
reform. Let's see forcing legally insurance companies to actually cover
people and not drop them for thing like "Prior conditions" to use more
of the money they take in to actually treat people's ills instead of
constantly trying to find ways to avoid spending out money for our
health benefit. You know do what they always should have done over
the years instead of allowing people to dIe for perfectly treatable
illnesses because well they'd make less money..how sad for them I cry
at the thought. Instead of making 10 or 100 of billions in profit at the
cost of human suffering and lives they might only make billions in the
single numbers. How will they go on!?! I have been diabetic for 41
years. Due to wear and tear of the disease my kidneys failed me a few
years back and after three years on dialysis I got a transplant. I have
several other diabetic related ills but still I work and the last thing
after all these years I need to hear is some nut job freaking out about
Health Care reform and thinking that after all the true life stories of
insurance companies many evils against our own citizens you actually
seem to expect that these very same companies are going to
straighten up and fly right on their own. Or worse still you think they
have and are doing a good job as is? Every single year in this our
country insurance companies and their policies kill more people due to
neglect and out of their mind pricing than were killed on 9/11, Every
single year more die in our own borders that do not have to die and
not for some crazy world view but for the stupidest of reasons profit
and stock share prices and you feel that is OK? And worse still
without action by fighting against reform you not only say it's OK by
you that these people die but that you want it to continue.

As for Comcast and NBC I for one don't like it......
0 Votes
+ -
Goodbye cable
fredb 3rd Dec 2009
All I know is I'm getting a new pair of reading glasses.
I think I'll be using them a lot more.
0 Votes
+ -
Comcast profit == consumer loss
Richard in Phoenix 3rd Dec 2009
So, what is going to stop Comcast from deciding to
restrict internet bandwidth to certain competing video
streaming sites, while providing enhanced bandwidth to
their own? Or charging DirectTV more for the rights
to allow subscribers to DVR prime-time NBC
programming? Or experiencing "technical problems" on
networks other than NBC to juice ratings during
sweeps?

I think it is likely Comcast will see increased
margins/profits from this deal, but it won't be
because of any "synergies", cost savings, or value-
adds...it will come from extortion.
...from the Weather Channel.
0 Votes
+ -
eh? whats wrong with AL?
Jim_in_VA 3rd Dec 2009
Seems to be a above-board guy to me. Whats your issue?
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe they will do another TechTV
Randalllind 3rd Dec 2009
Maybe we can kiss Law & Order goodbye.
The company that provides online content that I watch is merging with the company that wants to meter bandwidth to its customers. Yeah, I'm not too happy about that one. If comcast can see that it needs to provide better bandwidth to it's customers, at the very least when they access the NBC site to watch stuff, then there is a lot they could do here. If not, then there are likely to be internal conflicts, especially if they try and do exclusive online content for comcast customers only. Time will tell.
0 Votes
+ -
No Problem
dlsweb 3rd Dec 2009
Wasn't the original intent of network neutrality specifically to address situations like this?
Of course putting it in the hands of people like our FCC diversity czar and an administration looking to control every aspect of our lives is truly problematic.

Part of their grand scheme?
Don't forget that Jeffrey Immelt, GE chairman is a "special" advisor to the President.
I promise you will hear of no issues from the FCC or any agency.
Eyes Open folks.
I live in New Mexico, and the recent ranking places our state with the worst Internet Service out of all 50.

Comcast is listed on the top of this list as the worst provider in our state.
Drop signals at random, questionable connection speeds, and a list of issues I do not have time to write about.

I do nto see the advantage here, to me or anyone who lives in this state. As an investor...Sure, and I have already watched stocks over the last 3 weeks. To say I invested wisely is already an understatement.

Either way...as far as I can tell Comcast services are not state-of-the-art, and some of this money could have been spent in upgrades to infrastructure over expansion.

A dead animal can not grow, and out here Comcast is considered a dead horse!

I fear for what may happen with this new investment....I have worked with teh worst that Comcast has to offer!
0 Votes
+ -
Only one way to fight this
gnesterenko 3rd Dec 2009
Switch to an alternate Interenet provider, cut your cable all together (other then basic), anything you want to watch you can get cheaper and in higher quality via streaming/netflix or other more nefarious means. The only exception to this, unfortunatly, is sports. Unfortunately because so many people watch them and will not give up cable simply because of that one fact.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
Get real
Wintel BSOD Updated - 3rd Dec 2009
Switch to an alternate Interenet provider,

Easier said than done. Especially when there's only one game in town. Kinda like Micro$oft, huh? wink

cut your cable all together (other then basic),

Easier said than done. Americans are addicted to their junk. Book readership is down. Eye candy is in.

anything you want to watch you can get cheaper and in higher quality via streaming/netflix or other more nefarious means.

Easier said than done. With Comcast throttling back streaming video and the MPAA looking at the "nefarious means" aspect, you're just sh*t out of luck there.

The only exception to this, unfortunatly, is sports. Unfortunately because so many people watch them and will not give up cable simply because of that one fact.

Again, part of the junk equation. The cable monopolies know this. I'm surprised they haven't gone totally towards pay-per-view knowing enough lemmings and addicts will pay for it.
Ok my thoughts on this now Comcast got NBC this means
they will have more rights to block your upload speeds
for Uploaders. Like Avi's and other media and enforce it
more.. I still can't upload my 350mb file to mozy backups
is because Comcast put on the P2P filtering back on since
they got caught and fined by the FTC.
For the customers it is from the frying pan into the fire?
I think this will be bad for the entire entertainment industry since one company, Comcast, has so many channels and control so many shows.
0 Votes
+ -
I will be happy if they do just one thing....
Hallowed are the Ori 3rd Dec 2009
Take that godforsaken ECW trash OFF the Sci-Fi... oops, I mean, "SyFy" Channel.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm with you...

and they should replace the ECW with "Global Warming: The Baking Planet". It would fit perfectly in the science fiction channel.
Comcast will raise prices for everyone, Its there whole business model, the only thing that matters to them and any large corporation in the world it the bottom line.

It really sucks that ZD nets paints this merger as a good thing, when it is terrible.

Will Comcast force Direct TV and the Dish network to raise there prices to have access to NBCU?

Will Comcast force other cable service providers like Charter ect. to raise there prices to have access to NBCU?

Will online content still be available through streaming sites like Hulu.com?

Will the general admission price to see a movie sky rocked now that Comcast owns Universal studios?

Not that Comcast owns its own media outlet how will it manage it and will it be for the benefit of the public or another moth piece for special interest groups like FOX is?

I think these are the questions the consumers want asked, and not silly talk about how great the CEO's of both company's are and how great they will be at running a full on monopoly. I for one could care less about some guys making millions and billions on my behalf!
0 Votes
+ -
"Could not".
Hallowed are the Ori 3rd Dec 2009
I for one could care less about some guys making millions and billions on my behalf!

It's "I for one could not care less...".

...or another moth piece for special interest groups like FOX is?

So, go ahead and tell us what the FOX special interest groups are that you talk about?
Can you say MONOPOLY Pretty soon they'll merge with Home Depot
Perhaps the merger will put some brakes on the political leanings of the NBC channels (e.g., MSNBC's constant screeds).
With NBC already being so politically left, Comcast will be using them as leverage to gain special favors from the liberal congress and the socialist administration. The liberals and the president won't want to lose NBC/MSNBC as their mouthpieces or shills.
0 Votes
+ -
NBC news is just another shrill voice in the main stream media, not saying anything different than CBS, ABC, or CNN. Why not close the new unit, and turn NBC into an All-Entertainment channel ?? I'm sure it will make more money for Comcast and others.
Comcast can continue NBC in it's leftist political stance in order to gain favor from government, especially from the liberal congress and the socialist presidency. NBC will be a good tool for Comcast, and the liberals won't want to give up one of their most effective tools/mouthpieces in the media, namely, NBC/MSNBC and all other NBCU properties.
0 Votes
+ -
Many People...
windozefreak 3rd Dec 2009
Like to criticize and never offer any solutions, or run the thing themselves. Hey God, think you can do a better job?
0 Votes
+ -
Many People... Like to criticize and never offer any solutions,

In the everyday world of politics and all human endeavors, criticism can always be used as a means to warn others about potential problems. Thus, the solution does not have to come directly or immediately from the messenger. The solution to a big conglomerate that has potential dangers to a population can be the reaction by the people themselves; thus, the people can stop being consumers of the product or service being offered by the conglomerate.

or run the thing themselves.

How would that be a solution? And why would that be the only solution?

Hey God, think you can do a better job?

First off, I'm not God; secondly why would someone have to be a God just because he/she mentions potential problems?

Can I do a better job? Perhaps.

But, my first step would be to remove potential conflicts of interest in the makeup of any organization, and that would include any relationship which might gain a company any advantage because of its relationship with government or political figures.
Just downloaded this app to my iPad and it's great. Was easy to set up and the app was free. I work over at DISH and that's where I got my device from. Now I'm set up to watch TV Everywhere. Went to the park and let the kids play while I watched my raw is war wrestling show. This is great now I can stay caught up and I don?t have to be home. This I would recommend to everyone. Find out more when you call DISH Network.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix