Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Summary: Notebooks might have missed the mark and tablet popularity is on the rise, but that doesn't mean the PC is dead - at least not according to Dell chairman and CEO, Michael Dell.
Notebooks might have missed the mark and tablet popularity is on the rise, but that doesn't mean the PC is dead - at least not according to Dell chairman and CEO, Michael Dell.
Speaking with Toni Sacconaghi, an IT hardware analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Inc., Dell discussed a number of different issues relevant to his company and the computer industry at large.
However, it was their debate over the current theory that we are in a "post-PC world" that seemed to strike a chord. Based on the constant bouncing back during the conversation, it's difficult to decipher an actual answer out of these two. Nevertheless, Dell's takeaway points are:
- Notebooks screwed up and could have done a better job
- Tablets fill a void that laptops missed
- Tablets are a viable form factor, but they don't replace PCs entirely
- PCs are still necessary and critical products at work and at home
It's almost impossible to convey the tension (and even hilarity) of this debate without reading how it went down, so here's an excerpt:
Sacconaghi: Maybe we can talk about PCs a little bit. Is -- are we in a post-PC era, and are we seeing the beginning of the death of the PC?
Dell: Here's a way to think about it. When you got your smart phone, did you get rid of your PC?
Sacconaghi: No.
Dell: Most -- (inaudible) no, you didn't get rid of your PC. Okay. When you got your tablet, did you get rid of your PC?
Sacconaghi: I have not, but if I look around the room and I see the number of tablets that are here, maybe these people haven't thrown them out (multiple speakers)
Dell: Well, let's ask them. Okay, you have a tablet. How many of you have a tablet and got rid of your PC? So we've got one, two, three, four, five, six?
Sacconaghi: I ask it in a different way?
Dell: Sure.
Sacconaghi: How many of you have a tablet and will wait longer to replace your existing PC? Right? So if I think about that and my average replacement cycle on a (multiple speakers)
Dell: I've got another question. How many of your employers will buy you a smart phone, a tablet, and a PC? Okay. Those of you who have your hands up, how many of you work in organizations with more than 500 people? One, two, three, 3.5 maybe?
So this -- so I was at a bank earlier today, the biggest or one of the biggest, and meeting with the CIO and a bunch of the folks there. They're not going to buy three devices for every person.
You look at the tablet, you say, well, what is a tablet? What job does the tablet do that the Notebook didn't do? There are a lot of things there. One thing is that the tablet is much lighter, much better battery life; there's all these sort of things. The Notebook, it just screwed up. Notebook could have done such a better job.
So why did that happen? Well, power management, light weight. You can actually make a better Notebook that gets closer to the tablet. We're still going to do tablets, and tablets are a very viable form factor, but I think there are many ways to kind of learn from this in terms of how does the Notebook get better? Because let's say you had a tablet that also had a keyboard. Keyboards don't weigh very much, so that's pretty interesting.
So I think as ARM shows up on Android and Windows, in small low-power devices, I think you're going to have a pretty exciting environment here. But put it in perspective. We will ask the expert here. How many tablets do you think Apple will sell this year?
Sacconaghi: Between 30 million and 40 million.
Dell: Fine, whatever. So the installed base of PCs is 1.5 billion. Gartner says there will be 2 billion PCs in 2014, so 1.5 billion, 2 billion PCs, 30 million, 40 million tablets. I think it's important for us to put it in perspective, and also when you go into this kind of corporate environment and you say how many corporations are actually going to buy a third device for their employees? You've got a lot of rich people here in the audience who buy their own device, great, fantastic. Last night, we had a bunch of CIOs, some of them from some very expensive universities in the area. You ask the CIO what are kids bringing to school? Parents will buy the kid a smart phone, a Notebook, and a tablet to go to school. They'll buy them a smart phone and a PC. If they want to buy their own tablet, the kid's got to pay for it themselves.
Sacconaghi: I guess I don't want to belabor the point and I'm going to get to these questions in rapid-fire succession, but if you were a consumer PC company, given that we had almost half the room saying that they would push out their replacement cycle in existing PCs, would you feel more threatened or worried about tablets? I realize consumer PCs are a small part of your business today, but is it largely this corporate distinction or do you think this is a skewed demographic given how many people said they were pushing out their PC purchases?
Dell: I'm taking it a bit more pragmatically in terms of there are things that I can do something about and things I can't do something about. So, if somebody wants to delay a Windows 7 refresh because they now have a tablet, I'm not sure I can really do anything about that today. Maybe I can worry about that; I'm not sure that really helps. So I sort of analyze the problem and say what can I actually do about it? I go to ARM, get a processor that doesn't use as much power. I can make a tablet. I can make a better Notebook that competes better with the tablet. I can go to Microsoft and say, hey, why don't you make ARM; Google, why don't you do this, do that? Those are the things we are doing.
Related coverage on ZDNet:
- Dell's new laptop "thinnest on the planet," except for Apple, that is
- Dell rolls out rugged laptops tested to withstand 'harshest conditions'
- Dell: The power of listening
- LG and Dell relying on Android to capture Indian mobile market
- 10.1" Dell Streak Pro with Android Honeycomb to hit stores in June
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Delaying Upgrades
When you go to service a security panel / fire alarm / aircon system / gigaswitch, and you find an RS-232 port, then having the latest USB3 / Thunderbolt on your laptop is kinda useless.
Yes, you could buy an adaptor - or you could just keep your old laptop and save a freakin' fortune.
95 percent of company hardware pre-dates Windows 95?
I say BS on that. The earliest I've seen in all the places I've been is a handful of Windows2000, everything else being 5 years old or newer.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Odd that. Inanimate objects don't screw up.
The funniest, or shall we say oddest thing about that dialog is saying that Notebooks screwed up.
People screw things up. Inanimate objects that don't make decisions aren't responsible for screwing things up.
It's yet another corp/exec doublespeak dialect for deflecting blame.
Actually, what is really unsaid is that Intel/Microsoft/etc ... PC makers failed to deliver that big niche that Apple actually delivered on.
And that: the truly big elephant in the room is that Microsoft is the main one to blame for screwing up the low-power computing device market. Windows as it is today, is a huge resource hog (CPU/Memory/Storage/etc...), and this has let down its allied manufacturers in their ability to innovate new, lighter, simpler to use, more foolproof, more responsive, longer battery duration devices.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
<i>The funniest, or shall we say oddest thing about that dialog is saying that Notebooks screwed up. </i>
I don't see that as double-speak or blame deflection. He seems to be talking pretty openly about it.
Looks more like an awkward phrase born from speaking publicly without a script.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
I have a 7 year old Toshiba still getting 4 hours on a charge. Or is it the Fujitsu? But anyway, it is a flip around touch screen, with USB, keyboard, eraser mouse... take anywhere that I love and was glad when there was money there that let me make such an expensive purchase. (opted for the BIG battery - 8+ hours when new)
Nice thing was it was 2 lbs less than the lightest laptop... 2 lbs more that the heaviest iPad to put in perspective.
The Marketplace screwed up by having no clear picture as to what a notebook was. They called what I had a tablet because you can hold it like a tablet.* Maybe, but more so that they could charge you $500 more for it than the notebook. When what we call tablets today came out, they had to reclassify the earlier WinXP models as notebooks.
When they make a Tablet as good as what I had, the ViewPad 10 is close, I will probably buy another. * meaning that the value of my tablet to my work 7 years ago equal to todays productivity. I know the new ones are great, they are just not worth much to me at this time.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Consider buying a PC or notebook. You'll have choices about vendors, operating systems (you can switch later if you want) and other software, can usually get a credible warranty and technical support, and will receive fairly frequent OS updates to fix bugs. You will be in charge of installing and removing any application software you choose. You will be free to choose your ISP. The installed OS will have been pretty well tested and will be reasonably reliable, at least with regard to major functionality.
Now consider purchasing a tablet: in reference to most, if not all, the above you will not have such choices, support and updates. For example, if you want connectivity to Verizon's 3G network, you have to buy the device from Verizon and accept whatever warranty and technical support they're willing to give (in this case none). Also, if you want an Android device (at least in the US) you have to accept a lot of non-removable crapware and probably no Android bug-fixing updates. See
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?can=2&q=5593&id=5593
for documentation of a serious Android email bug that was first reported on Google's own site 17 months ago, so far without Google's acknowledgment or response--much less support. At this point neither Samsung nor Verizon have a schedule for upgrading Android 2.2 to a later version, nor do they push bug-fixing interim updates to Android. Android "Honeycomb" is an acknowledged hack-job. I think most would agree that Google seems to be performing far less professionally in building and supporting Android than Microsoft is in creating and supporting Windows.
I'd like to suggest that, since the users' experiences with devices like PCs, notebooks and tablets are very heavily influenced by vendor business practices, any discussion of what sort of device is most screwed up at the moment should include a comparative discussion of these practices. These can be substantially more determining of a consumer's experience than whatever technical niftiness is inside the devices.
Message has been deleted.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
ROFL, good one!
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Someone has an agenda...
And he's exactly right.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
No one, not even MD, has a clue as to what's going to happen. Pro-Apple pundits dissed the iPad for weeks after it came out. It now owns the market and nothing... no desktop, no smart phone, no netbook, no notebook seems poised to compete, let alone win. What if Dell is wrong?
Turn out the lights, Michael. Give the money back to the shareholders.
Schadenfreude. Sweet.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
What market? It's like netbooks. It's a fad that will tail off the same way. People will wake up like they did with netbooks and ask "Why the heck did I buy this thing?" That'll kill the market before competitors kill the market.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
Funny you should say that (about it being a fad), most of the folks I know that bought an iPad have buyers remorse about it now, it's basically an expensive TV guide for when they watch TV. Most of the corporate ones at work stay in the draw till there's a meeting.
I think Dell might have this one right, tablets don't replace PC's/Macs
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
I don't think most smart people are saying that tablets will totally replace PCs (right away), but the interviewer made a great point to Michael Dell: tablets may push off PC upgrade cycle, particularly in the consumer space, but that's more of an Acer, Asus and H-P worry than Dell, whose consumer business is small.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
<i>Turn out the lights, Michael. Give the money back to the shareholders. </i>
Yeah, Dell only made $1 billion last quarter. Failure obviously. /slitwrists
<i>What if Dell is wrong? </i>
Wrong about what? He stated that he intends to try to learn from tablets in notebook design and compete in the tablet space. Don't know that he could do anything much differently as a response.
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets
RE: Michael Dell: Notebooks 'screwed up' but can still compete with tablets