Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
Summary: Microsoft created a solid product with Windows Phone 7 but it suffered from one fatal flaw: The burden and baggage of the Windows brand.
Windows Phone 7 is the best product Microsoft has built in a very long time.
Of course, building a great product -- it could even be the best product in its category -- never guarantees success. Microsoft benefited from that dynamic in the 1980s and 1990s when its operating systems were never the best software on the market but prevailed as the dominant platform in personal computing.
Timing, key partnerships, sales savvy, even geography can play an important role in a product winning a big share of the market. Oh, and one other factor: branding.
I'd argue that the number one factor that has torpedoed Windows Phone 7 is branding.
We talked a lot about this earlier this week in the ZDNet Great Debate that I moderated between Matt Miller andLarry Dignan over the future trajectory of Nokia and Windows Phone 7.
The bottom line is that Windows Phone 7 has been dismal failure in 2011, failing to even take a meager 2% of the smartphone market. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has admitted that Windows Phone 7 sales have been a disappointment and recently changed the leadership of the division.
While Ballmer and the rest of the tech industry have puzzled over why more people aren't buying Windows Phone 7 devices, the answer is almost too obvious to consider. The biggest thing that's wrong with Windows Phone 7 is Windows.
One of the reasons people love smartphones and tablets so much is that they aren't as complicated and confusing as the Windows computers that they've been using for years. Other than the small-but-rabid cadre of Windows enthusiasts, most people shudder when they think about having a phone that runs like Windows. The last thing they want is a device that locks up for no apparent reason, gradually gets slower over time, and is constantly getting bogged down by spyware, malware, and crapware.
Of course, Windows Phone 7 doesn't have any of those desktop Windows problems, but the burden and baggage of the Windows brand has brought the factor of guilt by association. The fact that Microsoft's earlier mobile attempt -- Windows Mobile -- was slow and confusing also doesn't help.
If Microsoft had jettisoned the Windows brand from its mobile product line, the devices could have competed on their own merits and attracted a lot more buyers. After all, the operating system itself is fluid and self-evident. It runs quickly and has a high-quality app ecosystem that is growing by leaps and bounds.
Imagine if Microsoft had followed its Xbox strategy and given the phone its own branding. In fact, Microsoft could have drawn on the popularity of the Xbox and used the name "Xphone" (which would have also playfully mocked Apple's "iPhone" a bit). The "Xphone" would have been better than "Xbox Phone" because not everyone is a gamer and a phone also needs to be able to do get work done -- which Windows Phone 7 does (especially if you already use Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft Office, and Microsoft SharePoint), even though the device is primarily aimed at consumers. The "Xphone" would have been shiny and new, instead of looking like Microsoft trying to squeeze its way back into the market after the failure of Windows Mobile.
The other big problem Windows Phone 7 had was that its big hardware partners, Samsung and HTC, didn't take it seriously and ended up putting WP7 on their second class Android hardware. That's why Microsoft had to make the salty $1 billion deal with Nokia to get at least one big phone maker putting Windows Phone 7 on their most innovative hardware designs. However, Samsung, HTC, and Motorola (which passed on Windows Phone 7) certainly sensed that consumers weren't going to get excited about the Windows brand on a phone. Better branding like "Xphone" could have energized them.
I'm not saying that Microsoft would have leapfrogged Android and iPhone in 2011, but better branding could have turned a solid mobile product into a hotter commodity with phone makers and mobile carriers and grabbed at least 5-10% of the growing smartphone market.
Also, keep in mind that Microsoft will be heavily promoting the Windows brand when it launches its tablet strategy in 2012 with Windows 8. In fact, the success or failure of Windows 8 on tablets will be one of the most important things to watch in the tech industry in 2012. Unfortunately, the fate of Windows Phone 7 in 2011 could be a bad omen for Microsoft. Again, one of the main things people like about tablets is that they aren't PCs -- specifically Windows PCs. It's hard to imagine many people getting excited about "going back to Windows" on a tablet. But, Xtablet? That might have been a different story.
This was originally published on TechRepublic.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
Really? I beg to differ. Windows have always had largest set of features and the best or one of the top GUIs. Success was not for nothing. Linux and Mac tried their best but Linux could not even capture 2%!
DOS was never ever the "best"
And Win95? Please. For example, the Amiga blew DOS out of the water back in 1985.
Yes, MS captured market share but it did it with very poor and mediocre product at best.
Xpad
They should have built off the "X" name
MS missed the boat on this One.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
"MS advertising has been terrible" and why is microsoft the one making ads??? what about Samsung and HTC and LG. look at nokia! they have done what they can to sell their windows phone. yeah people say "Lumia 800 doesn't even have FFC, while titan and samsung focus S does" bla bla. but look the difference, people KNOW and LIKE and WANT Lumia 800! even when it doesn't have FFC and all, people pay attention to that, why? because Nokia CARES about WP7. samsung, htc, and LG no! and then they dont advertise enough or at all. you know, they have their android phones, so they expect faeries to sell the windows phones with no ads.
even right now some people want Lumia 710! and thats because Nokia advertise it.
Microsoft can only advertise the OS, and what if you go to stores and you saw the phone and then people push you to Android or Iphone?... but Nokia makes sure people look at the phone first and then the OS. so its not Microsoft Job to advertise what sells the OS... you know, the PHONES! thats each company job! and Nokia is the one doing it right.
if Nokia is doing it right and by themselves... why in the hell is microsoft the one who has to advertise Samsung and HTC and LG if they didn't do it enough in a year or at all?... just because they dont want to and because they dont care? i reallly dont understand why people like you expect Microsoft to do others job. they aren't Microsoft phones. they are Samsung, HTC, LG, Nokia... with a Microsoft OS. and the only one advertising because they actually care its Nokia.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
..and the consumers are aware of that "android extortion tactics" ?, it's purely the lack of marketing me thinks
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
I agree the branding is wrong too. I'm not sure an entirely new brand would help either though. That said, Microsoft have been clever by not calling the Xbox, Microsoft Xbox. Most people don't even know it's made by Microsoft. It's Microsoft Office, Microsoft Windows but just Xbox.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
The main reasons it has not completely taken off is Store presence. When you have a sales clerk pushing Android/iOS and who still thinks the windows phone is windows mobile 6.# yea you are not going or generate many sales there. Especially when stores do not have demo units or signage.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
Amen, couldn't have said it better. Windows Phone is appropriate branding for what is. A mobile version of a computer OS. It is not a small gaming phone.
Calling it XPhone would have had little impact. Their true miss is marketing in the stores, and mostly lame TV marketing (which is getting better now).
MS' main problem with Windows Phone ...
As for using Windows as the brand for its smartphone platform, I think that it was the smart thing to do. Generally, it is better MS grows and improves the Windows brand, because this simplifies and lessens the cost of marketing. This is true, even if MS endures turbulence in the short term because of the history of Windows Mobile. As for the suggestion of Xphone, it appears to me that MS wants to use Xbox as a consumer brand, whereas Windows Phones is supposed to target both the business and consumer markets.
RE: Salespersons simply refused to sell Windows Phones
Oh how I agree with that Statement. I was Christmas Shopping last week and decided to stop in the Cellular Department at Best Buy to take a look at the HTC Titan as a possible replacement for my iPhone 4. The salesperson was all Android this and iOS that and Windows Sucks. I ended up telling his manager I did not appreciate his unprofessional sales methods and walked away. I had a similar experience at the AT&T Store. I guess that is what you get when you have poorly trained sales staff that sell based on personal bias.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
Staff at Bust Buy is selling way over their heads. My experience at ATT was a little better. Love my P7, hoping the apps grow.
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone
RE: Microsoft could have rocked mobile in 2011 with the Xphone