Microsoft offers to buy FAST for $1.2 billion; Likely to trigger enterprise search consolidation

Summary: Microsoft said Tuesday that it will offer $1.2 billion in cash for Fast Search and Transfer (FAST), a big player in the enterprise search market.

Microsoft said Tuesday that it will offer $1.2 billion in cash for Fast Search and Transfer (FAST), a big player in the enterprise search market.

The move is sure to shake up the enterprise search market, which thus far has been dominated by a series of smaller players like FAST, Autonomy and Vivisimo. Google has made some inroads, but for the most part the market is the realm of niche players. Microsoft is about to change that with FAST. You can expect Google to make a purchase in enterprise search along with traditional enterprise players like HP, IBM and the usual suspects.

In a statement, Microsoft said its offer is a 42 percent premium to where FAST shares trade in Norway. FAST's board of directors has recommended that shareholders take the offer and the company's two largest shareholders--Orkla ASA and Hermes Focus Asset Management Europe--are on board with the deal. The transaction should be completed in the second quarter.

FAST counts Comcast, Disney, Microsoft, Pfizer, UBS and others as customers. In its most recent third quarter, FAST had revenue of $35.6 million, up 4 percent from the second quarter. Third quarter recurring revenue was up 65 percent from a year ago. Fiscal 2006 revenue topped $162 million, according to FAST's annual report. The company is profitable and had $137.9 million in cash at the end of its third quarter.

Microsoft is likely to raise a ruckus in enterprise search and force consolidation among FAST's rivals. Microsoft can bundle FAST with its Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and probably poach some features for its consumer search if warranted. And Microsoft will gladly take FAST's search engineering talent. I did an overview of enterprise search last year and highlighted how long it takes to deploy. In a nutshell, enterprise search is more complicated than slapping in a search appliance because you have unstructured data.

In a statement, Jeff Raikes, president of Microsoft's Business Division, said:

"Until now organizations have been forced to choose between powerful, high-end search technologies or more mainstream, infrastructure solutions. The combination of Microsoft and FAST gives customers a new choice: a single vendor with solutions that span the full range of customer needs."

Translation: The rest of this industry is going to consolidate fast.

Update: The area to watch going forward is how FAST integrates with SharePoint Server. Mary Jo Foley has more on that angle and it's one we'll be following throughout the day.

Topics: Microsoft, Browser, Google

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

26 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Could be a prudent purchase...

    ... or could be money down the tubes. This is a drop in the ocean for their finances, so it will be interesting to see how this pans out.
    BanjoPaterson
    • i think it makes sense

      From the Sharepoint perspective. Mary Jo has more details on that here;

      http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1085

      And besides FAST is a rounding error to Microsoft.
      Larry Dignan
      • Rounding error? According to most recent financial statements...

        1.2 billion is almost 5% of Microsoft's available cash.

        xuniL_z
  • a futile move

    FAST is not going to add anything new to M$ when compared to the google offering. It's just 1.2 billions wasted that whould sped M$ demise at the hands of OSS.
    Linux Geek
    • Wow....

      so you really have no understanding of the difference between what FAST brings to the table vs. Google. The GSA doesn't hold a candle to FAST's capabilities in enterprise search.
      K Anderson
      • Didn't they laugh at me...

        Didn't they laugh at me when I asked them when Bill or Larry were going to make them an offer?

        Excellent move by MS. Now a SharePoint search that won't suck. That'll be fantastic!
        fbraski@...
        • Haha...who's laughing at who?!

          A Sharepoint search that won't suck? Don't bet on it. M$ will find a way to ruin FAST. They've had their own internal group working on search for several years now...and then they went out to buy one? As soon as they get their hands on it...downhill, my friend...downhill it goes....
          techboy_z
      • FAST >> Google Appliance

        Yeah - the google appliance is good only for the most simplistic of internal search applications where you don't need customizability, your own taxonomy, et cetera. FAST is arguable the best (Autonomy etc give it a run for its money) but anyone mentioning Google in this space doesn't know what they're talking about.
        mxyzplk
        • FAST << Google Appliance

          I disagree. I've made a study for the large international SI I work for and our appraisal is that a Google search appliance is better for unstructured data, particularly in third party stores such as Documentum etc. The other side is that taxonomies are an artifact of the days before relevancy algorithms and are no longer needed to locate data. Where mandated by law they'll need to be supported, and FAST will have an advantage there, I agree -- but people don't think of the taxonomy when they're storing a file and rarely when they're looking something up.
          NefariousWheel
          • Errata

            Read further and was reminded Documentum uses FAST internally. No matter, the list of strange and wonderful stores that the GSA (and I'm talking the Enterprise GSA's, not the little blue entry-level one) is still much better with Google. It's far more flexible, easier to implement and it scales very well.
            NefariousWheel
      • so what?

        M$ bought a company that was nearly bankrupt with a lot of debt and few customers...in other words with no market.
        There is no wonder that FAST shareholders are happy that somebody bought their wortless stock at a premium.
        Linux Geek
        • Nearly bankrupt ? They have $137 million in cash and

          revenue for 2006 was $160 million. I think they still have a way to go before bankrupt.
          hkommedal
          • norway enron

            ..."Over the past couple of years, though, Fast has suffered a number of other blows, including issues raised by Goldman Sachs around lack of customer payment; the loss of Norwegian newspaper company Schibsted as a major customer; questions around the legitimacy of a deal with Walt Disney; and layoffs -- announced last June -- of 20 percent of its staff.

            In addition, several board members have recently resigned from Fast."
            rmf04br@...
  • RE: Microsoft offers to buy FAST for $1.2 billion; Likely to trigger enterprise search consolidation

    Gives microsoft search tools that actually work.
    Shuts Oracle out from buying them
    Bugs EMC who use fast as part of Documentum.
    Bloatware
  • Good Move

    In a recent interview, BG said that Microsoft was looking at search with a strong eye!!! And here comes the first signs of that.
    For its size Microsoft is still one awesome ambitious company and also constantly evolving something..
    Awesome.
    www.danielsrepublic.com
    edsley
  • RE: Microsoft offers to buy FAST for $1.2 billion; Likely to trigger enterprise search consolidation

    Oh... poo. We're big FAST customers, we leverage their search extensively and it's a great product. We're a Linux/Java/open source shop, so I don't anticipate this being a good thing for us.
    mxyzplk
  • Chicken Bitty, The Sky Is Falling!!

    DRM is not going to make it through 2008!!!
    itanalyst
  • Makes sense? Not!

    Didn't M$ bring in a couple big names within the last few years, to work on some of these things? They've had their own team working on "search" for at least a few years...and "visionaries" like the Lotus dude...and others. And then they go and make a purchase? hahaha Wow. Small wonder Vista can barely get off the ground, even with OEM lock-in and Windows being the de-facto OS for PCs...M$ just can't seem to do much in the way of actual internal development anymore! I'd really, really love to be a fly on the wall in the exec suites these days...I'm betting there's a whole lotta chaos going on!
    techboy_z
  • Fast performance

    THIS IS LAUGHABLE

    In its most recent third quarter, FAST had revenue of $35.6 million, up 4 percent from the second quarter. Third quarter recurring revenue was up 65 percent from a year ago. Fiscal 2006 revenue topped $162 million, according to FAST???s annual report. The company is ???profitable??? and had $137.9 million in cash at the end of its third quarter.

    Its been loosing money and customers hand over fist for some years now it posted losses of over $100 million in the last quarter. Microsoft saved the technology, but unfortunately the technology is a lame duck in enterprise search.
    benjob@...
  • it must be amazing software

    to have developers look at the code and go... there's no way man.. how'd you do that? thats why its 1.2 billion.

    thats it.. im going to migrate from networking to networking+programming... more cash... way more cash.
    pcguy777