ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Microsoft: Will it be too late to tablet party? Not with Office optimized device

By | May 30, 2011, 3:00am PDT

Summary: Microsoft’s tablet strategy hasn’t been much to get excited about, but there’s a compelling case to be made that the software giant can play catch up—especially in the enterprise.

Microsoft’s tablet strategy hasn’t been much to get excited about, but there’s a compelling case to be made that the software giant can play catch up—especially in the enterprise.

The company’s challenges are clear: Microsoft has to match Apple’s iPad and excel in other areas. That’s a tough chore and other tablets—Android devices and RIM’s PlayBook—have fallen short on features and price. In fact, the only unknown here is whether HP can deliver a compelling iPad competitor. Meanwhile, Microsoft doesn’t have the tablet ecosystem locked down and big partners like HTC and Acer are using Android.

But despite Microsoft’s best efforts to screw up its tablet prospects, the company can be a solid player in the market. Microsoft seems to be getting some lucky breaks as iPad challengers stumble.

In a widely publicized research report, Citi analyst Walter Pritchard made the case that Microsoft can make a go of tablets. Here’s his case and my thoughts:

Microsoft’s success will depend on how well Android fares in tablets. Should Android tablets surge Microsoft will be facing the same situation it does in smartphones—a nice product but too late to matter. My take: The tablet category will be huge and the Apple challengers will be a fragmented lot. Microsoft could make a play.

High prices give Microsoft some breathing room. The overall view is that a market of 50 million tablets is insurmountable to Microsoft, which needs a tablet soon. Pritchard, however, notes that price matters. The longer tablets sit in the $500 to $800 range the more time Microsoft has. As long as Microsoft enters the market before tablets fall to an average price of $250, the software giant has a shot. My take: There’s something to Pritchard’s argument, but can Microsoft really play the cheap tablet game?

Microsoft doesn’t have to play the app game that much with tablets.
Pritchard argues that the number of killer tablet apps is limited. A tablet optimized version of Office may be all Microsoft needs. Pritchard said “Office capability could differentiate the Windows tablet from the competition.” My take: Office could be the killer tablet app. Gaming too. Microsoft has both categories covered.

There’s always the enterprise. Microsoft’s enterprise relationships could work nicely in the tablet market. Consumers may hold back, but corporations are going to be looking for integration with existing Microsoft infrastructure. Pritchard said:

We believe enterprise customers are accustomed to managing Windows devices. It is feasible to foresee Microsoft extending its Systems Center management framework to tablets. This would enable companies to update software, patch, back-up and trouble-shoot a Windows tablet. These functions would be necessary on a corporate-owned tablet, no matter which OS it uses. Thus we believe the advantage is heavily in favor of Windows here.

My take: Microsoft has the enterprise chop to extend its PC domination to tablets for business customers.
Bottom line: Microsoft has a decent shot at the tablet market, but it’s going to need Office to pull businesses in. Consumers are likely to remain skeptical.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

54
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

LOL
MSFTWorshipper 9th Jun
@camcost@... Take your trolling to the Apple boards.
From personal experience, I can tell you that the iPad makes an excellent device to bring along in meetings. While others are scrambling around with papers, I and a few other of my colleagues bring along our iPads, follow the meeting take down notes etc. There is however one little shortcoming. Not all documents render properly in Pages or Numbers. IMO, this is where MS should focus its efforts. Office for iPad. If they decide to go for the whole shebang (OS and office apps) they'd better hurry up. Others aren't standing still.
0 Votes
+ -
Consumption device, but we need input
elroyjetson_z 30th May
@MG537 I also use my iPad in meetings. But the iPad has one fatal flaw. It's a consumption device. What I lack in a meeting is a device for input, for taking notes on. A lap top, with it's screen, become a barrier. What I need is Microsoft to produce a tablet device optimized not for office, but for OneNote. The UI needs to be optimized for a tablet, but I need the ability to write on it, to record with it, to make notes. Don't lose the consumption capabilities, but implement the input capabilities. This is where Microsoft can differentiate itself and regain a lead position.

The other tablet companies have simply tried to make an iPad and failed. You can't just emulate an iPad and hope to succeed, you need to differentiate yourself.
@elroyjetson_z They haven't failed yet and they're not trying to emulate the iPad, they're looking to make something better and in many ways they have succeeded.
0 Votes
+ -
OneNote is one killer app
LiquidLearner 30th May
@elroyjetson_z

OneNote is already an amazing app. With a good tablet interface it could be a killer app for tablets.

I honestly think Windows will be the killer app though. Think about it, a tablet that can switch between a touch oriented interface designed for tablets and a desktop interface when it's "docked" so it could take on the role of your office PC. To me, that's where Windows 8 could dominate. And after a few years smartphones would be able to do the same.
@elroyjetson_z
Apologies, I'm going to be that guy.

Why are you taking it to the meeting, then? To check e-mail? I wonder if a criterion for a non-essential meeting is that people can bring distracting consumption devices.

(Last night I did some Class diagrams on my iPad outdoors [OmniGraffle]. Light weight, long battery life, and I got some creation along with my consumption.)

I just looked up OneNote in the App Store. Free, but not adapted yet for the iPad. Made by Microsoft.

With all the millions of potential licensees getting iPads and other larger screened mobile devices every month, holding back the app in order to leverage adoption of an os-to-come, just seems to be leaving money on the table.

It may be a fad; I do see that argument from the folks who like to stamp it only a consumption device. If it's a fad, it might be over by the time Microsoft's os comes to market. If it is a fad then today is truly the day to have something to sell. It would have been better to have something to sell yesterday.

It also leaves a vacuum. If there's demand for functionality, if there's an obvious use case, many developers are working on it, and it doesn't take a company of Microsoft's size to bring effective, useful apps to a young platform. Indeed, I think the big boys are at a disadvantage, because Jane in accounting ran the numbers and it doesn't look like a billion dollar sector, and Jane is absolutely correct.
@elroyjetson_z
Onenote is great but I personally need the rest of it.
Basic MSOffice, Sharepoint and Outlook.
Say what you want, but these tools have become the backbone of my work.

and no, there is nothing available on the iPad today that even come close.
@DannyO_0x98

Are they holding back or is the ability to activate the full functionality require access to API's that Apple does not allow?.

Browse some of the development forums out there and that seems to be a common issue with iOS; not that it can't be done, but it can't be done in a way that satisfies Apple.

@ elroyjetson_z

That's exactly what I need too. The iPad isn't it, and none of the existing competitors is either.
@elroyjetson_z get a HP Touchsmart tm2 tablet/convertible that is great for meetings. Full laptop for typing, convertible tablet for pen input and touch. 9 hours of battery life, HDMI out, 4G ram, Windows7 Pro 64 and 500G HDD. WiFi or get a 3G stick and for $799 beats the crap out of the iPad
@LiquidLearner
What???
Are you taking us back in a time machine more than a decade? What are you suggesting that wasn't being attempted decades ago?
0 Votes
+ -
Byte
Sultansulan 31st May
@elroyjetson_z

Fail like Wp7 !!!!
@LiquidLearner
The Asus EEE Slate EP121 has Windows 7, a 12.1" display, Bluetooth kb, 4-5 hrs battery life and can go from a docked solution to a tablet format pretty much instantly... It also comes with a stylus for those times when you need one of those.

No need to wait for Windows 8...
@elroyjetson_z I agree fully - an instant-on OneNote write on tablet is what I'm waiting for
0 Votes
+ -
They did that
rbethell 1st Jun
@elroyjetson_z I saw Microsoft demo that years ago - OneNote was created with tablets in mind; its just that they never had one take off.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree, I need to input
BOUND4DOOM 2nd Jun
@elroyjetson_z
I agree, this is the only reason I have not bother buying a tablet yet. While I like the idea of one, right now the functionality I want and need is not there.

@DannyO_0x98
Your not thinking of it as an actual practical consumption device. For example I am working on a Masters now, one of the things I need to do is simply be able to take notes and review them. However, the iPad totally sucks for this. Sure I could type note however, when your doing advanced math, writing math formulas as fast as the professor and keeping up in class, the iPad can't do this. Droid tablets either. Instead it is more efficient to carry around a pad of paper and pencil with you. Sure if I was sitting outside with all the time in the world to try to figure out how write out Matrices and space them all out properly sure that would be fine. But in a meeting or on campus taking notes the current tables suck.
@MG537 Why would they do that? If they were smart they would sell copies of the OS that ran on Tegra 2 based machines.

Of course, the Windows 8 interface is honestly, the worst looking of the bunch and the color scheme sucks!
@Peter Perry - what are you talking about? nobody has yet seen the Win8 UI.
0 Votes
+ -
Facts don't matter
LiquidLearner 30th May
@bitcrazed

Why let little facts like that get in the way of saying Microsoft sucks? It's Microsoft, so you don't need facts.
@Peter Perry

Of course, the Windows 8 interface is honestly, the worst looking of the bunch and the color scheme sucks!

Well, you obviously have not feasted your eyes on the Windows 2017 interface. MAN is that ugly. wink
@Slithy Tove
Oh come on!!!!
Vectored Mauve 2D is not THAT ugly.......

Well maybe...... grin
@Peter Perry What you have seen is the redesigned Aero Basic theme-in-progress.
0 Votes
+ -
@MG537 If they could package a fully functional Office device that will interface with OWA or even 2010 Outlook Anywhere and be managed with Group Policy for security and app reasons, they could do it. My experience with iPads (18 of them) has been very favorable but for security reasons I would still like a fully integrated device with an Administrator Template in GP.
A windows tablet capable of syncing to Desktop/Laptop office suit, capable of projecting presentations & capable of connecting to a keyboard can make a killer product, it could have a very strong selling point.
@jeanshack

Blackberry Playbook has all that functionality right now.
0 Votes
+ -
And its an utter failure
Mr. Dee 30th May
@MobileAdmin Haven't you heard? You can't even do basic calendaring on the thing.
@MobileAdmin Really? External key-board and Office suit syncing is there in playbook?
0 Votes
+ -
PlayBook
alexkinsella 30th May
Hi @MobileAdmin,

Alex from RIM here. Thanks for thinking of the PlayBook.

To @jeanshack's points, the PlayBook comes pre-loaded with DocsToGo for document viewing and editing, and you can use Bluetooth to connect to an external keyboard. You can also output your presentations from the PlayBook to a projector or HDTV via its microHDMI port, and even use 'presentation mode' to multitask and run other applications independently while the presentation is on-screen.

To clarify @Mr. Dee's comment, BlackBerry smartphone users actually get the benefit of securely and wirelessly accessing their enterprise calendar (along with email, contacts and BBM) via BlackBerry Bridge technology. Native apps for this will come via an update to the BlackBerry Tablet OS this summer - you can see a demo here (http://bbry.lv/jkzxUz).

Cheers,

Alex, RIM Social Media Team
0 Votes
+ -
So it syncs to Office
LiquidLearner 30th May
@MobileAdmin

But doesn't have a calendar? Right... I'll believe that!
@alexkinsella
Unfortunately DocsToGo lacks several features that exist in Basic MSOffice. By itself it is not a bad piece of software - just not what I need in a corporate world.

I do however, and have bought the program for all of my OS's and it has improved over time - it is a good in between option.
@jeanshack

Asus actually makes such a Windows tablet...amazingly it has gotten very little airplay in the tablet universe:

http://www.asus.com/Eee/Eee_Pad/Eee_Slate_EP121/
0 Votes
+ -
Smart CIOs
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 30th May
are dipping their toes into the new technology water, no longer deferring decisions in lieu of waiting for Microsoft to provide solutions.

There are many directions in which to go and each offers opportunity.

Microsoft needs to be Agile as promises to have solutions, product announcements, simply is not a way to hold customer loyalty anymore.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate

I agree.
My company (one I work for) is testing the iPad2 and the Xoom. We heavily use MSOffice including Visio, Project, OneNote and Sharepoint.

Biggest issue, and no apparent solution yet, is the ability to use the other options and integrate with others via common software. The MS options are not there.
Unfortunately there is nothing on the horizon that looks to fill the bill.
Keep in mind, the predominate user of these devices would be management, project and travelers. The intent is to replace the current pricey X-series Lenovo laptops.
plain
0 Votes
+ -
You don't need the apps (or data) to reside on the tablet. All you need is a decent interface. I'd rather see the big software vendors work on that sort of thing rather than get all entwined in the hardware and building a "better tablet."
@ego.sum.stig@...
Agree, but which is more likely to occur?
Apple doesn't play well with others and Google is not into those functions unless it is via Docs.

That leaves one heck of aa gap for MS to hop into.
plain
0 Votes
+ -
Odd
ego.sum.stig@... 30th May
I never thought Microsoft, Apple etc blah blah played well with anyone. Which is a large part of my thin client thought.
0 Votes
+ -
On December 22, 2010, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols published his ZDNet blog entitled "Windows 7? On ARM Tablets? I don't think so!

The 224 Talkback comments posted speculated on the very issues that Larry Dignan discusses in his blog today. Those topics are, of course, Microsoft Enterprise based Tablets and an optimized Office suite for tablets.

At the time, I posted some comments that took into account a Wall Street Journal and a Bloomberg post published around that time which also speculated on these topics.

http://www.zdnet.com/tb/1-91492-1742092

Now .. its 17 months later and the topic of Microsoft tablets have been revisited by Larry. I will assume that those future tablets will be ARM based and operate in a Win 8 OS environment.

However, Larry's blog, by choice, has failed to mention the "other side" of the coin" with that coin being ARM based netbooks or notebooks from Apple and a unified iOS and OS X platform. (Recent rumors have been published that report details on a MBA with an A5 processor being used as a "test bed" for this reality.)

Consider also the rumors that by 2013, Apple will have in place a 64 bit ARM SoC with an increased GPU component. If Microsoft develops an optimized ARM based Office Suite than that Suite will also run on Apple products. Assuming that Microsoft continues its support of it's Apple platform based Office Suite, than any advantage of an enterprise based MS tablet offering would be mitigated by an already established Apple enterprise tablet ecosystem running the same Office Suite apps.

If the only hardware component that a speculated future MS Tablet processes is a touch screen optimized for pen input, that type of hardware, by definition, will increase the costs of this tablet concept above competing models from Apple, HP and tablets running the Android OS.

With the already established capability of voice recording for note taking in conjunction with simply optional pen based note taking apps for the iPad ecosystem, the advantages of a high resolution touch screen necessary for "really fine" handwriting input has been mitigated, to an extent.

In summary, as it was stated 17 months ago, Microsoft will have an uphill battle to capture a sizable market share for enterprise based tablet products from the established leaders in this segment.
@kenosha7777
I suppose your essential points are that it's not as easy as saying "Let's make tablet." in order to do so and competitors are already on the ground and running. Both excellent points.

People keep saying Microsoft tablets and smartphone and pcs, etc. Microsoft makes a game console and a personal music player. For the rest, it provides an os for device makers to license.

As to MBAs on A5s: Apple is a forward looking company. They were compiling OS X to Intel years before the switch was made. I suspect that when Intel nails the low power/low heat mobile multi-core, Apple will lash up some iPhone prototypes. And go public when it makes sense, i.e., they have something ready to sell.

If the A5/iOS/MBA does emerge, the usual suspects will call it a big iPad with hinges. And think that's a damning thing.

Microsoft will come to the market one day, and they'll do fine. Not as well as if they were there first in a way that excited the general consumer market. Not as well as if they and their partners were as ready last year as they suggested at the 2010 CES. Not as well as if their roadmap had convinced HP to save its money and let Palm disappear.

But, they'll do fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate Updated - 30th May
0 Votes
+ -
So Meego is a Nogo
Mister Spock Updated - 30th May
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate

It appears many simply do not care about Meego to make it worth pursuing in any serious way.

Yet you continue to cling to it as though it was relevant.

You must learn to accept things and move on.
0 Votes
+ -
Meego Not, Android Yes
rhonin 30th May
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate
Hmmm..... The tablet/phone (Padfone) runs on Android, not Meego.
wink
0 Votes
+ -
Gah. Yes. I read and neglected to comprehend.
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 30th May
@rhonin
nt
0 Votes
+ -
First Mover Advantage is no longer relevant in tech
facebook@... Updated - 30th May
As the Apple iphone and Microsoft Xbox have illustrated, first mover advantage is no longer critical for market success. In fact, it may be a barrier for success, with first movers burning and crashing like the Motorola Xoom.

Microsoft's greatest challenge is its ongoing committment to its enterprise customers. Microsoft cannot roll out half finished solutions like Google Docs and endless product roadmaps. Microsoft's customers demand complete roadmaps and solutions. Hence, the long lead time for Office 365.

By continuing to deliver complete solutions on a predictable schedule, Microsoft can secure and retain significant market share. Microsoft needs to deliver a tablet OS that meets the needs of the enterprise for data creation as well as data consumption -- a solution that is lacking in this generation of tablet devices.
@facebook@...
Very nicely said. Someone who thinks without a bias. Being first means nothing.
0 Votes
+ -
Windows = NO
shellcodes_coder Updated - 30th May
There's no reason to use Windows tablets when there's Android and iPad. Android is open source and there's plenty of applications and iPad well it's from Apple so that's more than enough for people to buy it. People don't care about Windows loaded tablets
@shellcodes_coder
Think again.
Almost everything on a tablet today is either consumptive or minor creative when it comes to standard enterprise needs.
As the majority of the world does their creation via MS, to say Windows loaded would be a disservice and incorrect.
Find me another tablet offering that I can get MSOffice/Outlook/Visio/Project functionality on and I will give it a try.
Likely I already have.
@shellcodes_coder
You sound like a consumer of electronic goods, not an enterprise CIO. That's the difference.
0 Votes
+ -
OneNote
Tsingi 31st May
I just read up on what OneNote is.

I use InkScape for that. It works on all the desktop OS's, don't know about tablet OS's. I suspect it works there as well.
@Tsingi OneNote is a note-taking program, while Inkspace is..is..a vector graphics editor!
Microsoft is just a mess, and it's coasting on its past laurels. Their online solutions are fragmented, anorexic and yet bloated due to the company's complete (willful) inability to adapt to the new model of doing business online. Microsoft could have been a contender. It could have *owned* every aspect of computing technology. Their Exchange and SharePoint technologies are far superior to anything Google has to offer; Microsoft should have "commercialized" them from the get-go, offered tight integration with WinMo, and made them freely available (in their "commercialized" forms). This way, MS would have captured users early in the game who already use and are comfortable with the desktop technology. But instead of blazing the trails, Microsoft is the dimwitted follower at the end of line, without identity...and, very soon now, without relevance. Had they adjusted their business model, Google Apps and Gmail would be nothing more than second thoughts, and we would be talking about some kind of iMicrosoft mobile technology instead of iPhone garbage. It's frustrating for me to see such a great company become a victim of its own hubris.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL
MSFTWorshipper 9th Jun
@camcost@... Take your trolling to the Apple boards.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix