New iPad feature 'Dictation' sends/stores private data to Apple servers
Summary: Dictation is one of the key features of the new iPad; however, using it requires more than meets the eye. Read all about it in this post.
After spending a solid weekend with the new iPad, I finally set my sights on one of the noted features: Dictation.
What I've come to learn about Dictation is that it requires more from me to use than I'm comfortable with Apple requesting. Thankfully, they're upfront about some of the data they collect; however, their intentions are vague at best, and they use some rather loose verbiage, which I will cover in a bit.
To start, Apple's marketing of this feature is slightly misleading. Take a look at what Apple says about Dictation on the new iPad features page:

So simple, right? Just buy your new iPad, press the Dictation button, talk, press it again, then you're all set with your speech-to-text conversion! Well, unfortunately, Dictation is a feature bound by the following fine-print limitation (which can be found in light-gray at the bottom of the new iPad features page):
"Some features require a Wi-Fi connection."
I found that to be the case after enabling Dictation for the first time and being presented with the following dialogue box:

"Information like" is so vague and facile, is it not? Anyway, I thought to myself, "If this is true, then I wonder what happens if I have Dictation enabled but Wi-Fi disabled." Lo and behold, the Dictation key next to the space bar completely disappears. Dictation is fully disabled and non-functional if you aren't connected to the Internet. I presume a 4G connection will suffice in lieu of Wi-Fi, but I cannot verify that at the moment since I don't have a 4G-capable iPad.
Out of curiosity at this point, I went to disable Dictation and was met with the following dialogue box:

That's good news, right? At least you can opt-out of Dictation and have Apple delete everything they've stored from you on their servers... or can you? Back on the settings page for Dictation, there's a link underneath that says "About Dictation and Privacy:"

When tapping on that link, a form appears and states -- amongst other things -- the following (bold and italicized emphases by me):
[T]he things you dictate will be recorded and sent to Apple to convert what you say into text. Your device will also send Apple other information, such as your first name and nickname; the names, nicknames, and relationship with you (e.g., "my dad") of your address book contacts; and song names in your collection (collectively, your "User Data"). All of this data is used to help the dictation feature understand you better and recognize what you say. It is not linked to other data that Apple may have from your use of other Apple services.
...
If you turn off Dictation, Apple will delete your User Data, as well as your recent voice input data. Older voice input data that has been disassociated from you may be retained for a period of time to generally improve Dictation and other Apple products and services. This voice input data may include audio files and transcripts of what you said and related diagnostic data, such as hardware and operating system specifications and performance statistics.
That's an interesting collection of vague verbiage and revealing details! Just how/when does Apple disassociate voice input data from a user, and for exactly how long do they keep it? Also, to update my Twitter feed or leave myself a note to pick up some coffee, Apple needs to collect all of my "User Data?" I understand that it needs to learn what I mean by "paw-paw" if that's what I call my grandfather, but why not wait until I have a reason to tell Apple that Dictation has done a shoddy job before just going ahead and uploading all of my "User Data" to store on their servers? And what about "OS specifications?" Will Apple look to see if I've jailbroken my iPad? I wouldn't be in a good position warranty-wise if my "User Data" happened to be tied to such information.
As it so happens, the first time you fire up your new 3rd-generation iPad, one of the setup screens covers everything I showed in screen shots above:

In my case, however, I simply chose not to enable the feature at the time of setup. To be honest, I was initially under the impression that Dictation was a built-in feature that I could use regardless of if I was connected to the Internet or not. As we see, though, Dictation is simply a fraction of Siri's capabilities, yet a large part of Siri's server-based functionality and privacy facets.
As I stated in my "7 critiques of the new iPad" gallery, I don't quite understand why Apple didn't just completely implement Siri in the new iPad -- especially since they have 4G-capable models, and, in their new iPad promo video, they show people using the iPad as a camera while traveling, etc. At that rate, why not give us Siri completely? Is it because Siri is still in beta or something? I mean, don't get me wrong; I'm not upset that I can't tell my iPad to call me "Rock God" or whatever, but Dictation feels so empty now after realizing the privacy trade-off is the same as Siri on a device that could use Siri just as well as an iPhone. Maybe that's just me, though.
To note, I'm not trying to fear-monger here. No, I don't think Apple plans to do anything malicious with whatever "User Data" it collects, and I do understand why they would need certain "User Data" to improve Dictation; however, it's quite interesting to see the slick writing style and verbiage used to cover their bases such that they could request just about anything from you they wanted to and store it on their servers. It's things like "information like" and "other information, such as" that makes me wonder what's not specified that is potentially sent to Apple, stored on their servers, and used to improve products. Dictation isn't that useful for me, personally.
Lastly, if you're interested in enabling/disabling Dictation based on the information in this post, follow these instructions:
How to enable/disable Dictation:
1: Tap "Settings" 2: Tap "General" 3: Tap "Keyboard" 4: Next to "Dictation," tap the slider to turn it on or off.
What are your thoughts on Dictation and the "User Data" Apple collects for you to use the feature? Do you think the trade-off is worth it? What if Apple had implemented all of Siri instead of just Dictation? Would the privacy trade-off be worth it to you then? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below!
Related Articles:
- Gallery: 7 critiques of the new iPad
- First impressions of my new iPad: it's absolutely gorgeous
- 10 stress-relieving apps for iPad
- I purchased a $50 iPad app. Seriously.
- ZDNet's special coverage of the iPad
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
People in glass houses
No doubt both Apple and ZDNet are conscious that privacy policies must be understandable to end users and although the option to literally list every piece of information collected and how it's used might be interesting or useful for some, for the most part it would result in a statement that wouldn't be read by the majority.
This is normal...
How do you think Google was able to update voice actions to match Siri, on all devices, in just 3 months? there was no update, it was server side.
Not completely true
Dictation on my Galaxy Tablet
I do not know aboit the Galaxy Tablet
Another thing, When I used Siri it might not have been mature enough yet but, I can tell you that wasn't as accurate as the Android Dictation or the new iPad.
Dictation on Android tablet
Android superior, but of course!
You like having 5 minute dictation sessions, before hitting the button? Like stepping on the soapbox and telling the world all the urges to be spoken?
Why not use voice recorder? That way, it will preserve your intonation and be much more ... informative ;)
By the way, it is neither iOS or Android. Dictation is an application. Nothing to do with the OS.
Apple is not google. Their business model
I know it's a bit of a long read, but...
-Stephen
Linkbait
How about SIRI?
Fear-mongering is exactly what you're doing.
Then what's the point of this article? There are several voice dictation programs on the iPhone such as Dragon Dictation. They all work in a similar fashion to the way dictation on the iPad does. All Siri functions, including dictation, on the iPhone work the same way too.
So why are you writing this article? What are you telling us that we didn't already know? What are you implying because you're sure as heck implying something.
I don't think you can hide behind a disclaimer that you're not trying to fear monger. You're being a bit more subtle than most, but fear-mongering is exactly what you're doing.
Yes you did, but...
Either you're a luddite or you're suggesting something in this article though trying your best to come off innocent.
Bold, Italics etc
Apples is a business not a faith based religion
Besides, if it's getting and keeping this information with the voice dictation feature, it also means they're probably doing it now with SIRI too. Does the average iUser understand and accept that too? Steve Chapman, how about a closer look at SIRI too?
Yes, tell us about the GPS data...
GPS data?
Both start with G, yes.
Apple is not Google?
Ya right....
Siri was bought by Apple prior to Google having anhything similar. Judging by the recent issues with Siri, I would prefer the "old fashion" way of using a search engine rather than asking Siri [and repeating at least once] what I want.
Oh, this Flash religion
Flash was banned from iDevices, because these devices need to conserve battery power and still provide adequate experience for the user. The Adobe Flash Player is know for it's abysmal resource consumption, both memory and CPU, it's frequent crashing and security flaws.
Why would Apple want to subject it's users to this awful experience? After all, if they accept subpar experience, there are plenty of other options.