Notable nuggets from Google's 10Q

Google filed its second quarter regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company's filing matched what it reported a few weeks ago.

Nevertheless, Google did have a few notable passages. Among the Google nuggets you may not have heard before:

The company is up to its eyeballs in lawsuits--that's not a surprise, but some of the topics may be new.

Companies have filed trademark infringement and related claims against us over the display of ads in response to user queries that include trademark terms. The outcomes of these lawsuits have differed from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Courts in France have held us liable for allowing advertisers to select certain trademarked terms as keywords. We are appealing those decisions. We were also subject to two lawsuits in Germany on similar matters where the courts held that we are not liable for the actions of our advertisers prior to notification of trademark rights. We are litigating or have recently litigated similar issues in other cases in the U.S., France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Austria and Australia.

And then there are the various copyright claims--think Google BookSearch and YouTube.

Google is under audit by the IRS and various "other tax authorities." That can’t be fun.

Google hates proprietary formats:

A large amount of information on the internet is provided in proprietary document formats such as Microsoft Word. The providers of the software application used to create these documents could engineer the document format to prevent or interfere with our ability to access the document contents with our search technology. This would mean that the document contents would not be included in our search results even if the contents were directly relevant to a search. The software providers may also seek to require us to pay them royalties in exchange for giving us the ability to search documents in their format. If the software provider also competes with us in the search business, they may give their search technology a preferential ability to search documents in their proprietary format.

Why Google is gung ho for wireless:

The number of people who access the internet through devices other than personal computers, including mobile telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), smart phones and handheld computers and video game consoles, as well as television set-top devices, has increased dramatically in the past few years. The lower resolution, functionality and memory associated with alternative devices make the use of our products and services through such devices more difficult. If we are unable to attract and retain a substantial number of alternative device users to our web search services or if we are slow to develop products and technologies that are more compatible with non-PC communications devices, we will fail to capture a significant share of an increasingly important portion of the market for online services.

And this risk factor is just comical.

Google:

"We also face risks associated with our trademarks. For example, there is a risk that the word “Google” could become so commonly used that it becomes synonymous with the word “search.” If this happens, we could lose protection for this trademark, which could result in other people using the word “Google” to refer to their own products, thus diminishing our brand."

So let me get this straight. Google becoming a verb could be bad if I start using Yahoo to Google something. I guess I shouldn't make fun of this statement since I did Xerox something on a Canon copier yesterday.