Nvidia on Apple's iPad A5X graphics claims: Show us the benchmarks
Summary: Apple's A5X allegedly has 4X the performance of Nvidia's Tegra 3 chip, but without benchmarks and footnotes the claims ring hollow.
Apple took direct aim at Nvidia's Tegra 3---a processor for a new batch of superphones---as it launched its latest iPad. The problem: Apple showed a chart with 4X the performance of Tegra 3, but provided no benchmarks or footnotes.
Anyone used to the Intel-AMD benchmark wars knows that any chart has more footnotes than a commercial for antidepressants. That's why Apple's chart looked off. Nvidia was digesting Apple's iPad claims just like everyone else via live blogs (CNET, GDGT, Engadget, Techmeme).
Ken Brown, a spokesman for Nvidia, said that it was "certainly flattering" to be called out by Apple, but the performance claims are sketchy without more data. "We don't have the benchmark information," said Brown. "We have to understand what the application was that was used. Was it one or a variety of applications? What drivers were used? There are so many issues to get into with benchmark."
Will Apple provide those benchmarks? Doubtful. However, Nvidia plans to get a new iPad when they go on sale March 16 and do some comparisons tablet to tablet. "At some point it will become more clear what the performance really is," said Brown. "For now, Apple has a really generic statement."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
This seems to be norm these days
What's the point...
uhhh yea
nVidia credibility is earned
To be honest.
Apple has NOT claimed that the A5x is 4 times faster...
What is really the norm is flame bait lying headlines. The photo at the top clearly says "GRAPHICS" performance. But the summary at the top just says Apple claims the A5x is 4x faster. Apple has NOT claimed that.
ZDNet knows that the graphics WILL prove to be 4x. The A5 already benchmarks 2x against the Tegra3.
Not only that
So if Apple is going to claim anything like this, there is no doubt they have actually measured the performance of this Tegra 3 chip vs. their own A5X. They may have even built few iPads with Tegra 3 chips to be sure.
Quad core or not, the Tegra 3 chip may just not be up to the task. That it powers other lower performance tablets does not change anything. Remember the Intel Atom? And all the pathetic netbooks that were "about as fast as your other laptop, and with dual core at that!"?
apple is well known for fudging the numbers
it's all about the results
All everyone else cares is whether the thing does it job and if it does it's job well.
It will be how the new iPad performs in the end
Finally
Proof of technical claims? Since when did that matter?
Now they have the new IPad. ;). They could re-release the iPad 2 in September and we will all be lined up at the stores. Maybe Apple is the forbidden fruit and we have all taken a bite. ;)
You need to rephrase that...
You are absolutely right!
In fact, nobody cares if the next iPad will have the internals of the oldest iPad or will just be an stone brick. As long as it does what was promised.
I agree
Does it really matter how good the camera is?
Edit
Just Apple...
Apple always makes grand claims
http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2012/03/new-ipad-tablet-market.html
So what?
But, they will lose sales of their chips no matter what, because the iPad 3 will be huge success -- even if it's CPU is slower than that of the iPad2 (which is apparently not true).
Come on, Apple is no different than any other, except in one thing: they never ever release half-baked products and are very careful of their public statements. So chances are Apple are right on this one (and they might be even modest)