Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Obama outlines federal CTO position; Where's the power?

By | November 14, 2007, 9:45am PST

Barack Obama unveiled plans for a chief technology officer, support for Net neutrality, improving education, next-generation broadband networks and more research spending. Oh yeah, and there will be more open government and feds using wikis and blogs.

This agenda, outlined in this PDF, makes for good fodder. VentureBeat was first with details of the plan. Obama’s goals are sure to set Silicon Valley all aflutter with Web 2.0 talking points, but let’s focus on what this CTO would do.

According to Obama’s outline:

  • Obama will appoint the nation’s first Chief Technology Officer (CTO) to ensure that our government and all its agencies have the right infrastructure, policies and services for the 21st century. The CTO will ensure the safety of our networks and will lead an interagency effort, working with chief technology and chief information officers of each of the federal agencies, to ensure that they use best-in-class technologies and share best practices.
  • The CTO will have a specific focus on transparency, by ensuring that each arm of the federal government makes its records open and accessible as the E-Government Act requires. The CTO will also focus on using new technologies to solicit and receive information back from citizens to improve the functioning of democratic government.
  • The CTO will also ensure technological interoperability of key government functions. For example, the Chief Technology Officer will oversee the development of a national, interoperable wireless network for local, state and federal first responders as the 9/11 commission recommended. This will ensure that fire officials, police officers and EMTs from different jurisdictions have the ability to communicate with each other during a crisis and we do not have a repeat of the failure to deliver critical public services that occurred in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Who would disagree with this? No one. But here’s a provision Obama should add:

The CTO will have budgetary power and the ability to audit information technology projects at various agencies. He will work with the Office of Management and Budget and General Accountability Office to audit agencies’ technology plans.

While wikis, blogs, Net neutrality and open government are fine talking points they miss the point. The reality is this: The federal government needs better IT project management. The government agencies need a standard template for CIO power. For instance, the CIO at the Department of Homeland Security has to line up 22 agencies and their various IT systems. The DHS CIO has the hardest job on the planet–and until recently no budget authority. For more you can check out the GAO’s latest tome on DHS’s IT management challenges.

Many of Obama’s initiatives are already underway in the federal government, but the issue is that CIOs generally aren’t powerful in the government. In business, CIOs have a seat at the CEO’s table. In the government, CIOs are hamstrung in most cases. Sure some agencies have their IT act together, but as a whole they don’t. The good news is Obama wants to put a CTO at the table. But I need a little more. To rectify the government’s IT woes this CTO will have to bust some heads. He or she can start with the FBI and work around the government.

When there’s an IT failure in the government here’s what we get: A Congressional hearing and some legislator grandstanding followed by more money thrown down the well. We need someone that’s going to crack a whip and maybe even toss out the folks responsible for poor project management. For this CTO to really have an impact Obama needs to drop the Web 2.0 banter and focus more on giving this position the power it deserves.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Obama's support for net neutrality
LookMaNoHands 15th Nov 2007
Um... did anybody notice that he only devoted one sentence to this subject? I thought it was curious. Where he almost started to get back into it, then veered off back toward glittering generalities. "Raise the bar" etc. Anybody else think it's a cynical ploy to recapture the netroots?
0 Votes
+ -
I'd bet Obama has it covered.
i8thecat 14th Nov 2007
Out of all the Presidential Candidates, Obama is by far the most intelligent among them. He doesn't strike me as the type to ask someone to do a job without making sure they have the tools necessary to get it done. The other candidates.. not so much.. rather clueless.
0 Votes
+ -
What a difference from the current dumb fsck occupying the whitehouse.
0 Votes
+ -
Flowery words, no real substance.
No_Ax_to_Grind 14th Nov 2007
Hey, I will create a minister of "feel good" slogans, it will cure everything. Bah...
0 Votes
+ -
At least there is dialogue...
jasonp@... 15th Nov 2007
instead of what has been a problem completely ignored. The real test is to see where the dialogue goes from here. Will it continue to flow, or will the powers that be decide they don't like the direction the conversation is going and change the subject? Little things like the abolition of slavery and giving women the right to vote started out as someone with an idea that really didn't look anything like the end result. Don't bash 'em for opening up the discourse, bash 'em for shutting it down when they realize that real progress begins with things like disagreement and compromise. Unfortunately that is seen as the end-point all too often these days.
0 Votes
+ -
Uh,...
Henry Miller 14th Nov 2007
...Why in the world does the US need yet another vast bureaucracy cramming idiotic, one-size-fits-all, "solutions" to whatever "problems" the government thinks it can play to their advantage?

"I'm from the government; I'm here to help."

A more pernicious lie was never spoken.
0 Votes
+ -
So you think...
jasonp@... 15th Nov 2007
that the approach our government is currently taking towards IT...no standards, no accountability, no clue...is how we should continue? While I would agree that government almost always oversteps it's boundaries, that doesn't mean I want to live in a society where it goes just as overboard in the other direction.
0 Votes
+ -
In other words
Omch'Ar 14th Nov 2007
He's a dirty collectivist.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: A good start
stambaugh.services@... 15th Nov 2007
I am pleased that at least one candidate is tech savvy enough to even admit the need for such a position. We in the industry know this vacuum exists, yet are aware also that shaky IT project management is the norm rather than the exception. We all need to wake up and agree that this problem is industry wide and needs addressed. Well done Barack, who among the other candidates will match this plank in their platform?
So he would appoint one of his political ally cronies to the position. Someone who more than likely has no IT background what so ever and will create even more of a mess then there already is. It is still the federal government and they can't get anything right.

Now if this position were filled by a CTO from a fortune 500 company and had the juice to cut staff from each of the federal agencies and create a unified streamlined IT organization to serve the entire federal government with the CTO position being somewhat like the supreme court that the appointment doesn't end with the presidential term then the position might have a chance at sucess.
0 Votes
+ -
Obama's support for net neutrality
LookMaNoHands 15th Nov 2007
Um... did anybody notice that he only devoted one sentence to this subject? I thought it was curious. Where he almost started to get back into it, then veered off back toward glittering generalities. "Raise the bar" etc. Anybody else think it's a cynical ploy to recapture the netroots?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix