Offshore outsourcing: The latest mileposts

Offshore outsourcing: The latest mileposts

Summary: Infosys Technologies reported its fiscal first quarter results on Wednesday and provided a few notable data points on the state of offshore outsourcing. First off, Infosys was dinged a bit by the strength of India's currency, the Rupee vs.

SHARE:
TOPICS: India
5

Infosys Technologies reported its fiscal first quarter results on Wednesday and provided a few notable data points on the state of offshore outsourcing.

First off, Infosys was dinged a bit by the strength of India's currency, the Rupee vs. the U.S. dollar. This development isn't too surprising since the dollar is weaker against most currencies these days. In any case, Infosys had to trim its outlook. For the quarter ending June 30 the company reported earnings of 46 cents a share on revenue of $928 million. Revenue was up 40.6 percent from a year ago.

The upshot for Infosys is that margins get squeezed a bit since it's taking revenue in U.S. dollars in most cases and paying workers in Rupees. While the Rupee situation got a lot of play yesterday Infosys says it has enough wiggle room to manage its profit margins.

Instead of currency worries there were a few notable items that stood out on the Infosys conference call. We'll see if these topics surface again as other offshoring firms such as Wipro report earnings.

Here's a look at some of the offshore outsourcing developments mentioned by Infosys:

North American companies accounted for 62.6 percent of revenue for Infosys with Europe representing 26.8 percent. If Infosys can get its Europe revenue up its Rupee problems will go away quickly. Don't be surprised if Infosys starts pushing for more Europe deals.

By service, development and maintenance accounted for 40 percent of revenue. Package implementation was 18.4 percent of revenue with consulting bringing up the rear at 4.9 percent. Financials services was 36 percent of revenue followed by telecommunications at 22 percent.

Infosys has 509 clients with 285 of them with deals worth $1 million. There are 113 $5 million customers and one customer paying Infosys more than $200 million. Infosys has eight customers paying Infosys more than $8 million.

More work is being conducted on customer sites. Here's what CEO S. Gopalakrishnan had to say about the on site/offshore mix when asked.

"Regarding your question about what is the ideal onsite/offshore ratio. So around 50% is the ideal onsite/offshore ratio because you still need to remember that we have tax breaks in India and we have significant benefits because of that. I think when 2009 comes, 2010 comes, as some of the centers we have in India come off the tax holiday, then we need to look at what is the ideal onsite/offshore mix because today the significant driver will be based on the tax holiday we have.

Having said that, we are constantly looking at our business mix. Some of the services like enterprise solutions, even though they have a higher onsite content, today they're running at around 38%, 39% onsite, the margins are actually better than the company average. So we play around with that and that’s one of the levers we have in order to offset the rupee appreciation and the impact on margins. So we are leveraging our services mix in order to maintain our margin.

And some of the faster growing services are services like consulting, package implementation, et cetera., which have a slightly higher consulting, of course, is almost all onsite and the package implementation, as I said, is about 39%, 40% onsite."

Captives (offshore sites wholly owned by companies) aren't doing well.

Gopalakrishnan said:

Generally, captives are not doing so well in India. Forrester have put out a report that said 60% of the captives are actually not meeting its goals, have not given the value benefit expected. Costs are higher. Attrition is very high, etcetera. So, generally, captives are not actually doing that well.

Captives are an opportunity for us to look at integrating with Infosys, taking over that and running it for our clients, etcetera. When a client looks at setting up a new captive in India, sometimes we do help them set it up. Generally we don't like to do build, operate, transfer, etcetera, because there's no guarantee that the employees will move.

Topic: India

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • watch tech companies push for more H1-B visa's now

    Tech companies will now push for more H1-B visa. Their goal being to flood the market with programmers creating an over supply and thereby lead to depress wages.

    Meanwhile tech companies CEO's get multi-million dollar pay packages without getting any results or innovations
    e.g. ex-CEO of Yahoo Terry Semel who got paid $30-70 million a year, produced no results, Google outclassed Yahoo in innovation (infact no innovation from Yahoo) and to top it off Terry Semel would fly 3-4 times a week from LA to Sunnyvale by private jet (his work commute).
    code_Warrior
    • pro free market.

      all for outsourcing and making America competitive. Not for labor abuse by any company.


      Free Market is about moving goods and services freely. Its not about importing cheap labor or providing direct or indirect subsidy.
      Importing cheap labor is a way or proving indirect subsidy which is against the principles of free trade.
      code_Warrior
      • Free market leads to what you see today.

        You say the [i]"Free Market is about moving goods and services freely. Its not about importing cheap labor or providing direct or indirect subsidy."[/i]

        Now when have you ever seen the market [b]truly[/b] work this way? The basic premise of the free market is that they will automatically regulate themselves. This has been shown time and time again to be a fallacy. Companies will milk customers for all they're worth or rape the environment for oil, wood, and other natural resources till they're barren.

        Time and events have proven these free market theories don't work in real life as they predicted it would in theory. This is why America is in the unenviable situation it is now.

        The unregulated free market or capitalist system will only work for so long, till resources run out or till there is a general revolt. The way we do things today is simply not sustainable in the long term.
        kraterz
    • rediculous

      Where do some people come up with these kinds of stories?

      What planet do these people live on?

      First, the employment market in North America is the best it has been in many many years. With unemployement rates of less than 5 or 6 percent -- only a fool would complain.

      Second, this market means that offshore and near-shore outsourcing firms can't even find enough good staff to satisfy existing clients -- let alone the retarded statement of 'flooding the merket with programmers and depressing wages'.

      Third, equally rediculous is why they would WANT to? Is it any benefit for any company to flood the market with anything and reduce prices and demand? Companies BENEFIT from tight markets and INCREASED prices.

      Some people are pissed because their limited skills don't command the same kinds of money they used to. Companies (organizations trying to earn money for shareholders) have no obligation to become a 'charity' and pay more than necessary to get the job done. So there is the rub.

      If some people have private jets and big salaries -- in most cases they EARNED them, or at the very least, the companies think they DESERVE them. People at the bottom are usually just bitter and jealous.
      Marty R. Milette
  • Double talk

    Infosys and other outsourcers say captives are not doing well. But companies consider captives in first place because they see Infosys's 45+% gross margins...see

    http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/05/thats_3_an_hour.html
    vmirchan