Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Oracle: Sun integration 'better than expected;' Exadata pipeline swells

By | March 25, 2010, 1:33pm PDT

Summary: Oracle’s fiscal third quarter earnings had a little bit of everything: The Sun Microsystems integration is going well, Exadata is a hit, SAP took its lumps and the bottom and top lines topped Wall Street expectations. For good measure, Oracle threw in a dividend.

Oracle’s fiscal third quarter earnings had a little bit of everything: The Sun Microsystems integration is going well; Exadata is a hit; SAP took its lumps; and the bottom and top lines topped Wall Street expectations. For good measure, Oracle threw in a dividend.

The company reported third quarter net income of $1.2 billion, or 23 cents a share, on revenue of $6.4 billion, up 17 percent from a year ago. Non-GAAP earnings were $1.9 billion, or 38 cents a share. Wall Street was expecting Oracle to report third quarter earnings of 37 cents a share on revenue of $6.35 billion. Excluding Sun, Oracle delivered revenue growth of 7 percent.

Meanwhile, new software license revenue for the quarter was up 13 percent to $1.7 billion. Software license updates and product support revenue was up 13 percent to $3.3 billion.

On a conference call, Oracle president Safra Catz put revenue for the fourth quarter will rise 36 percent to 41 percent from a year ago. That’s roughly in line with Wall Street’s $9.55 billion target. Earnings will be between 52 cents a share and 56 cents a share. That’s a bit higher than the 53 cents a share expected by analysts.

Among the key themes in Oracle’s statement (preview):

Exadata’s pipeline is approaching $400 million with fourth quarter bookings nearing $100 million. Oracle is clearly aiming at IBM’s high-end systems as a target.

CEO Larry Ellison took aim at SAP—again. Ellison said:

“Every quarter we grab huge chunks of market share from SAP. SAP’s most recent quarter was the best quarter of their year, only down 15%, while Oracle’s application sales were up 21%. But SAP is well ahead of us in the number of CEOs for this year, announcing their third and fourth, while we only had one.”

Ouch. Technically I have three CEOs for SAP. Leo Apotheker stepped down and he was replaced by two co-CEOs (Bill McDermott and Jim Hagemann Snabe). Perhaps Ellison was referring to SAP Chairman Hasso Plattner.

Oracle declared a dividend of 5 cents per share outstanding as of April 14.

Sun’s health unclear. Unfortunately, a stub quarter for Sun—the deal closed during the quarter—doesn’t give us a complete picture of the company’s hardware sales. Oracle said hardware systems revenue was $458 million, or 7 percent of revenue. There’s no comparison to the year ago quarter. Hardware systems products and support expenses add up to $322 million in the quarter.  Catz said Sun will crimp profit margins. On the bright side, Oracle won’t sell systems at a loss like Sun did. Also see: Oracle-Sun’s great society vision: Will customers bite? Oracle-Sun: Strategy set; Will buyers go for the integrated stack?

Database and middleware revenue was up 11 percent in the third quarter to $1.24 billion. Applications revenue was up 21 percent to $477 million.

Here’s a look at Oracle’s trending revenue:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Oracle: Sun integration 'better than expected;' Exadata pipeline swells
randall.shimizu@... 30th Mar 2010
Layoffs are the big progress Oracle is referring too. The hard part will be to compete against IBM & HP.
0 Votes
+ -
The big question: OpenSolaris
Macintoshtoffy 25th Mar 2010
The big question is what is the role of OpenSolaris in Oracle's future - is
it going to be supported? will we see more resources by way of full time
programmers contributing to it? i18n localisation for libc hasn't been
released - are we going to see Sun put resource behind a open
replacement for the closed code?

I'm sorry to say but the lack of communication by Oracle isn't exactly
adding confidence to a project that isn't attraction outsider contributions
to the project. I'd love to see it succeed, thrive and possibly be a viable
desktop for the enterprise but if there is no long term plan for the
project, it will simply wonder around with no direction.
This makes for interesting reading:

http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or_Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234

This is clearly a play for pitching Solaris towards enterprise customers. If you're an enthusiast, or SMB customer - forget it.

I can't help but think this going to prove to be a long term mistake on Oracle's part. It was for Sun.
0 Votes
+ -
100% Agree, you speak the truth
Macintoshtoffy 25th Mar 2010
Where do large companies come from? they come from small companies.
Where do small companies come form? even smaller companies/sole
traders. If Sun aren't getting in when these companies are small and have
orientated their whole business around one vendor, it will be next to
impossible to move them to Sun at a later date once they have become
dependent on those particular types of technology from day one.

it is the same stupid policy Sun pursued and killed them off as a
company; now Oracle is doom to repeat the same idiotic mistake again. It
is like watching a car crash in slow motion.
Layoffs are the big progress Oracle is referring too. The hard part will be to compete against IBM & HP.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix