ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Red Hat: Nearing $1 billion in revenue; Not bad for free software

By | March 23, 2011, 1:26pm PDT

Red Hat delivered a strong fourth quarter and is on track to be the first pure play open source company to hit $1 billion in annual revenue.

The open source software provider reported fourth quarter net income of $33.5 million, or 17 cents a share. Non-GAAP earnings were 26 cents a share for the fourth quarter was $244.8 million, up 25 percent from a year ago. Red Hat’s earnings were boosted by 2 cents a share due to a research and development tax credit. Wall Street was expecting earnings of 22 cents a share on sales of $236 million.

For the year ended Feb. 28, 2011, Red Hat reported net income of $107.3 million, or 55 cents a share, on revenue of $909.3 million, up 22 percent from a year ago.

That revenue tally makes Red Hat a lock to break through the $1 billion sales total in the year ahead. Jim Whitehurst, CEO of Red Hat, said the company’s run rate is approaching $1 billion in revenue. Whitehurst added that Red Hat is gaining from data center upgrades, virtualization software and JBoss middleware.

By the numbers:

  • Red Hat delivered margins of 16 percent for fiscal 2011.
  • Fourth quarter subscription revenue was $209.3 million, up 24 percent from a year ago. Training and services revenue was $35.4 million.
  • Billings in the quarter topped 30 percent, Red Hat’s fastest rate in 12 quarters.
  • Cash and investments were $1.2 billion as of Feb. 28.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

28
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Red Hat: Nearing $1 billion in revenue; Not bad for free software
tringo007 27th Sep
I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it???s rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.. gout diet
0 Votes
+ -
Not as good as Apple
edtimes 23rd Mar 2011
Apple makes hundreds of billions of dollars a year on iTunes and Safari, both free products. Safari is even mostly open source.
@edtimes Although, you must buy either Windows or MacOS to use these 'free' products.
No Text
@Bruizer
Does the price of tea in China dance on the head of a needle? What the heck are you talking about?
@edtimes yeah, but Apple has to pay so much over head their revenue is only in the millions.

Mac OS X is a copy of FreeBSD with no root access
iOS is a copy of the original Palm OS. (well, they are very similar)
And, safari is a copy of Webkit. So, is there any originality in Apple's software? NO!
0 Votes
+ -
@Maarek

Wow, I have not seen such a bald-facedly wrong series of statements in a long time, and that it saying a LOT here at ZDNet.

1) Apple's revenue is in the billions. Recheck your facts. Their profit margin per unit AFTER costs is staggering.
2) MacOS is NOT FreeBSD, though it has many FBSD components, just as it is not MACH. More importantly, even if it were, considering the fact that Apple is, BY FAR, the single biggest contributor to the code base, WTF is your point, exactly?!?
Also hate to break it to you, but OSX most certainly DOES have root access. As a POSIX compliant, FULLY certified UNIX, it has to. It just is not turned on by default, which is how it should be. (Directory Utility>Enable Root User)
2) iOS IS OSX. Or are you claiming Apple stole UNIX from Palm, now?!?
3) Safari is based on KHTML, NOT webkit. Webkit came from Apple's KHTML work. And as with FreeBSD, as Apple is, by far, the single biggest contributor to the code repository, what, exactly, is your point?
@edtimes

Hundreds of billions a year for Apple? Give me a break! They don't even have revenue of $100 billion a year for their entire product line (iPod, iPad, Mac, etc.)!
@edtimes Get a clue "hundreds of billions"? I work for the largest Corporation in the world and even they don't make "hundreds of billions", they barely gross that amount.
WooHoo!

Nice job Red Hat
Congrats to Red Hat
I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it???s rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.. gout diet
0 Votes
+ -
M$ demise is within site
Linux Geek 23rd Mar 2011
starved by the FOSS revolution, in a couple of years M$ will go belly up!
@Linux Geek

thats wat they said last year and the year before that keep trying though...
0 Votes
+ -
You could be right...
dazzlingd 23rd Mar 2011
@Linux Geek
MSFT 2010 revenue was about $66 Billion. A record year.

Looks like they are really in trouble there, Champ...
@Linux Geek with nearly 40 Billion in cash? Belly up? Not hardly. They just had a record 4th *Quarter* of over 16 Billion.
To keep this in perspective. Symantec made over 6 billion last year. A good chunk of this was simply AntiVirus. And no other pure-play linux company is even close to RedHat.
The first billion is the hardest. Way to go, Redhat!
0 Votes
+ -
It is an impressive mile-stone.
Bruizer 23rd Mar 2011
@anothercanuck

For a company based almost purely on open-source (ie: different than free) software.
@Bruizer
What part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is not open-source?
0 Votes
+ -
Red Hat does not sell a free product
edtimes 23rd Mar 2011
@Bruizer
They sell support. To say that Red Hat made a billion dollars on a free product is ridiculous. It's stupid. And it simply isn't true.

Like I suggested above (and you understood, no one else did), Apple doesn't make billions selling iTunes and Safari. They make billions selling the things that go around iTunes and Safari. Red Hat has made a billion selling services that aren't offered for free by anyone else. No one has made a billion selling Linux. Not Red Hat. Not Novell. Not Linus. No one.
@edtimes

"To say that Red Hat made a billion dollars on a free product is ridiculous. It's stupid. And it simply isn't true."

Stupid, stupid strawman! Somebody get that thing a brain!
@Bruizer I agree it is pretty amazing. And even though they sell Linux, they probably make most of their money on service contracts - not unlike IBM. So in that sense they aren't pure-play. I doubt there IS a profitable pure-play OSS company out there.
0 Votes
+ -
@ jeverettk
If your comments in other threads did not make it obvious that you don't understand simple logic, we have this. FYI, you don't know what a straw man argument is. While I disagree with the OP's statement, it was NOT a straw man.

Hint: straw men are NOT red herrings.
@anothercanuck
Exactly, First billion is the hardest.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Loverock Davidson Updated - 28th Mar 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Another good joke
kirovs@... 24th Mar 2011
@Loverock Davidson
I am sure people really listen to you. After all you are quite funny. Good laugh for my morning espresso, thanks dude (or dudette)!
@Loverock Davidson
Seriously, you're worse than that toenail biter, Stallman and his stupid GnuLinux drum he keeps beating. Nobody buys your crap, dude. Proto-Morlock that he is, at least he does better than your glib FUDeralities like "all the legal risks, mwahahaha!" Give us a friggin' break!
0 Votes
+ -
Free software does not mean it doesn't cost anything it means you have access to the source. RedHat sells Linux for $$. though I doubt they make most of their money this way. They likely make most of their money via service contracts.
0 Votes
+ -
Congrats but not free
Keeping Current 24th Mar 2011
Glad to see Red Hat prosper but lets not kid ourselves. It isn't free. Try to download RHEL 5 without buying a support contract. And no, Fedora doesn't count.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix