SANS Institute paints gloomy security picture
Summary: The SANS Institute report on the state of security circa 2007 is enough to make you want to pull your ethernet cord out. Is anything out there secure?
The SANS Institute report on the state of security circa 2007 is enough to make you want to pull your ethernet cord out. Is anything out there secure?
On Wednesday, the SANS Institute released its top 20 security risks update for 2007. It's pretty bleak across the board. There are client vulnerabilities in browsers, Office software (especially the Microsoft variety), email clients and media players. On the server side, Web applications are a joke, Windows Services are a big target, Unix and Mac operating systems have holes, backup software is an issue as are databases and management servers. Even anti-virus software is a target.
And assuming you button down all of those parts--good luck folks--you have policies to be implemented (rights, access, encrypted laptops etc.) just so people can elude them. Meanwhile, instant messaging, peer-to-peer programs and your VOIP system are vulnerable. The star of the security show is the infamous zero day attack (here's how to prevent them).
I'm feeling better how about you?
A few notable nuggets to ponder:
Your browser has too many friends. IE and Firefox are full of vulnerabilities. No surprise there. But part of the problem is rich Internet content--and all the plug-ins to go with it. SANs says:
With the explosion of rich content in web sites, a parallel increase has been seen in the number of Browser Helper Object and third-party plug-ins used to access various MIME file types such as multimedia and documents. These plug-ins often support client-side web scripting languages such as Macromedia Flash or Shockwave. Many of these plug-ins are installed (semi-)transparently by a website. Users may thus not be aware that an at-risk helper object or plug-in is installed on his/her system. These additional plug-ins introduce more avenues for hackers to exploit to compromise computers of users visiting malicious web sites.
Microsoft Office is under siege. We'll let this vulnerability graphic do the talking:
Backup software is a target. This may be news to some folks since backup software usually just gets information pushed to it. However, backup systems need access to all files. Hackers can take advantage of these access privileges to infect an enterprise system. SANS says:
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
My suggestion - shut down the internet
Now, we tend to consider ourselves streetwise on the villages we live on, and know how to deal with most situations in our own towns. Folks, the internet is a village where you live. Lear to deal with it. SANs did nothing more than state the obvious - big cities are not safe, and the police won't save you in time.
If you think this situation will change, I've got a really nice patch of land to sell you. on the north of Africa, inthe middle of the Sahara desert - but believe me, it's a bargain.
Conveinience = Risk
There is no difference between the terrorist threat and the hacker threat. And the solution is not raising the security level, and reducing the freedom/convienience. How many security checkpoints do you want to go through in order to fly to LA or purchace a phone online? The more you reduce the risk, the more inconveineint the activity becomes.
Freedom is not free. To have it, to hold it, one must have the backbone to deal with it's insecurities.
The Internet, like the U.S.A., requires of us a willingness to face the inevitable consequences of freedom. There will always be people with bad intent anywhere there is freedom for all. I lock my house, set my alarm, and bolt my doors because my security is my responsability. The day it is no longer my responcibility is the day I no longer have any freedom of my own.
I don't want to make that trade. I'm willing to bet that most people would not want to make that trade.
Internet Security, the great misnomer!
So consider IE7 on it own is fine, but IE7 with any ActiveX control add-on, smilie!
OR
More along the lines with the columist fears.. Windows XP is fine, but XP and an active ethernet connection, smilie.
Internet Security
Eliminate MS Windows
RE: SANS Institute paints gloomy security picture
How did I know it would be trouble? Because it bypasses the browser completely, opening up its own can of worms, multiplying the possibilities for security holes. Not to mention it provides so little other than pure fluff.
RE: SANS Institute paints gloomy security picture
This article is written about them and the OS they chose to use. ZDNet's bread is buttered by Microsoft so it will not take an editorial stand and say the obvious: "Nearly 100% of all infected PC are running an operating systems sold by a single manufacturer, Microsoft."
Linux is not susceptible to email's infections or trojans UNLESS the user takes an [B]active roll[/B] in saving, changing permissions, and running the malware. While stores frequently fill the papers of hundreds of thousands of Windows boxes getting infected or becoming part of a bot farm, similar stories about Linux are exceedingly rare. The most reliably way for a Linux box to get infected is by manually hacking into it, a risky procedure. You can't build 50,000 PC bot farms one at a time. That is why the ones that are hacked into, usually because the user runs as root, are used at controllers for the 50,000 owned Windows boxes.
Personally, I've been using Linux for 9 years and I've yet to see an infective Linux virus or a successful hack on my box. No one at the local LUG has heard of any, either. Nor have any of the newbies and former newbies on whose PCs I've installed Linux. It seems to me that if they exist they exist only in the threats of software houses selling anti-virus software for Linux, hoping to use fear to create a Linux market after Microsoft stole their Window market.
It is a matter of education
This makes me believe that Internet Security will also be realized (again at a much faster pace) as people are educated. This needs to happen at both enterprise and grassroots levels. People need to be told that internet threats are as dangerous and malicious as physical threats...and that discipline and alertness will go a long way in dissuading cyber-villians.
As long as Internet Security remains the domain of IT folks and Hackers - innocent folks and users will continue to second-guess what the SANS report (or ZD Net blogs) are talking about...and the threat will not abate.
RE: SANS Institute paints gloomy security picture
The computer model is bad!
Now I will let you figure it out since I am tired of typing.
D.
Bugs are to be expected
- John Musbach