Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Screen supplies the holiday story, especially if Apple unveils 7-inch iPad

By | August 5, 2010, 7:00am PDT

The technology supply chain going into the holiday season is focused on one thing going: Screens. Will there be enough LCD screens produced to meet demand for all of those smartphones, slates and tablets in the pipeline?

It’s no small issue. The industry is already seeing capacity constraints as HTC and others are racing to keep up with demand. Apple can’t make enough iPads. And there are a bevy of Android tablets being prepped. The common thread to all of these items is that they need screens and only a few companies—Sharp, LG, Mitsubishi, AUO,  and Samsung—can manufacture these screens.

The problem: There’s plenty of supply for large LCD screens—think TVs—but the demand is on the small side (smartphones, tablets etc). In fact, there’s a likely glut of large LCDs on the horizon, reports iSuppli. However, you can’t simply retool a large LCD fab for the small screen overnight. Ideally, that’s what LCD manufacturers would do.

And the big monkey wrench in this equation is the potential for an Apple iPad that has a 7-inch screen. Sources within the supply chain expect Apple to launch a 7-inch screen in November just in time for the holidays. The 7-inch iPad remains just a rumor at this point, but a well-placed source says the supply chain is already stirring.

From an Art of War perspective, a 7-inch iPad is just brilliant. Why? There are only so many screens to be had. Apple and its procurement team can gobble up LCDs for its latest iPad and crowd out supplies for all of those Android tablets. That’s why Samsung may wind up in the Android tablet pole position—it can make its own screens.

As for the rest of the tablet gang, companies are going to be looking for multiple suppliers and that’s going to raise quality issues.

After perusing earnings transcripts from a bevy of suppliers in Asia, it appears that they think they can supply the screens, but it’s going to be very tight.

LG executives said last Friday on its earnings call.

It is true that there has been some constraint in procuring LED chipsets.

Sister company LG Display, which makes the screen for the iPad, also said some components were in short supply—but also noted large screens for TVs may be seeing an inventory correction ahead. All of LG Display’s capacity buildouts are going to mobile screens, said Anthony Moon, vice president of investor relations at LG Display. He said on July 22:

The capacity we are building second half this year and the capacity we are building next year is mostly for the mobile applications including smartphone.

Other companies are also talking about tight supplies for screens and the components that go with them.

Given the concerns about screen supplies, it’s no wonder that there are strong rumors that China is going to build a “screen city” in the central part of the country. This rumored city is two to three years from being operational, but for China this effort would be the Silicon Valley for manufacturing.

For now, file the coming screen supply crunch—along with the 7-inch iPad launch—as informed speculation. Bottom line: The small screen is the big theme going into fourth quarter. All of these devices look great, but they aren’t worth a damn if there isn’t an adequate supply of screens to go with them.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Talkback Most Recent of 32 Talkback(s)

  • Normally I might comment on the rumored Apple product but ..
    Larry notes something more important and almost in passing. Specifically, that "China is going to build a ?screen city? in the central part of the country. This rumored city is two to three years from being operational, but for China this effort would be the Silicon Valley for manufacturing."

    This is an obvious election year and along with ZDNet's other blog about government spending to support off shore IT training, I believe its time to question the "wisdom" of our elected officials regarding the state of manufacturing importance in the US.

    Why can't our leaders put an emphasis on manufacturing as the Chinese leaders obviously do! Manufacturing generates jobs far more that service sector categories will (for example, in the health business sector.) And, to note in passing, I and millions of other Americans have fine health but jobs are scarce at the moment. It would be nice to have a healthy manufacturing sector in this country and worry about health care services later.
    Mike
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    5th Aug 2010
  • Agreed
    @kenosha7777 "Why can't our leaders..." is a good question. Our current political leadership is anti-capitalism and it is the investment of capital in a climate of political stability that generates factories. It is also when labor unions (absent in communist China) cooperate and realize you can't keep killing the goose and expect to still live on golden eggs.
    There is a current TV ad for Jeeps that talks about how America is a country that makes things, but sadly most of the video used in the commercial is over half a century old, which is a commentary in and of itself. I agree with your comments and would encourage you and others to address the issue at the ballot box in November.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    dheady@...
    5th Aug 2010
  • Capitalism versus Communism
    @dheady@... "Our current political leadership is anti-capitalism and it is the investment of capital in a climate of political stability that generates factories."

    You got that backwards. It is in communist countries like China where the government invests in industry, and the government decides what to build. In the capitalist USA, the government is prohibited from making a profit; it is up to entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and the stock market to decide what to build and what to invest in.

    The motto of Wall Street is, "One Dollar equals one vote." Unfortunately, these days people vote their dollars for maximum capital gains.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Steve Webb
    5th Aug 2010
  • The oposite, is capitalism at is best
    @dheady@...
    when objective #1 is to maximize profit (capitalism 101) you don't invest where the cost to produce Z will be twice than elsewhere.
    So basically we are seeing here capitalism at is best. Welcome to the flip burger generation, and don't forget, THIS IS capitalism.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    theo_durcan
    5th Aug 2010
  • Capitalism vs Communism
    @dheady@... Our government anti capitalism!!!!!!!!!
    You're clueless.
    This is just bigotry plane and simple.
    You should just admit it and stop making ridiculous fantasies.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    yobtaf
    5th Aug 2010
  • Union agreements are a two-way system...
    @dheady@... Union agreements are a two-way system. Administration can always say no, and there are plenty of people looking for jobs right now that wouldn't care if they were in a union or not.

    Our country can not compete with China and India when it comes to labor costs. It is impossible. Jobs will continue to migrate to other countries unless the U.S. does something to make American jobs competitive. One option would be to tariff and/or tax imports from countries where labor is cheaper. An American version of the Value Added Tax. When a DVD player made in China costs $25 more than a DVD player made in America by Americans making $20/hour not including health benefits, you'll see an economic boom as well as an increase in the quality of said products.

    Unfortunately this will never happen because WTO will see it as an unfair barrier on Free Trade.

    Incidentally, removing the requirement for cheap labor here in the U.S. just so it can compete with China will also eliminate the need to hire illegal immigrants.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    olePigeon
    5th Aug 2010
  • RE: Screen supplies the holiday story, especially if Apple unveils 7-inch iPad
    @dheady@...
    Well, there's a little problem with that. These jobs were long gone before Obama had quit soiling his diapers. I worked in an underground coal mine from 1977 until 1985, and that mine was gone by 1992. Guess who was President, and guess which party owned Congress, during that time?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    clfitz
    6th Aug 2010
  • "Our current political leadership is anti-capitalism" WHAT??? LOL!!
    @dheady@...
    Current leadership anti-capitalism? This is the U.S. leadership your talking about??

    The U.S. has never had an anti-capitalism leadership and I find it impossible to believe they ever will. Take a look at yourself and more then a few too many like you dheady, citizens in the U.S. abound with so much fervent over the top capitalism that it would be an impossibility to get elected to town dog catcher in the U.S. if the populace thought you were anti-capitalism.

    I see one guy here said "It would be nice to have a healthy manufacturing sector in this country and worry about health care services later." WHAT!?!?

    Wow!! Now thats capitalism! I guess theres one guy who is out of work and dosnt have anyone dieing of an illness in his family. Can you imagine the level of selfish heartlessness saying "screw the ill and the injured, I feel fine and my brother needs a job!" Now thats capitalism!! Hip hip hooray!

    Yes, sure, just what the U.S. needs is even more capitalism of that ilk. I just don't get the fervent capitalism freakazoids. Its like they think no matter what a country's ills are just pour on a little more capitalism and it will clear right up!

    What the U.S. could use is a little more balance in its approach and as we all know, true balance gets you the most with losing the least. Also quite hard to achieve, agreed.

    But these over the top claims of anti-capitalism leadership is such extreme nonsense. How many countries in the world are more capitalistic then the U.S.? I suggest Zero. Its as if there are some people out there who have failed miserably to realize that too much of anything means "TOO MUCH", meaning creates a problem. And sorry to say that applies to too much capitalism as well.

    Solving problems in the U.S. is not going happen by way of just pouring on more capitalism. There is enough capitalism in the U.S. to spread around a few countries and still have some left over. Too much capitalism in fact is a root cause of the recent recession so lets keep our heads clear and do our best to think a little straighter. When your house is on fire burning up your worldly possessions, if you want to rescue the situation the solution isnt to add more fire.

    Wake up.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Cayble
    6th Aug 2010
  • two words: labor cost
    @kenosha7777
    To sustain the standard of living that the majority of US citizens are both accustomed to and expect, we cannot compete in manufacturing anymore. Unemployment benefits would pay significantly better than manufacturing jobs and factories would sit empty.

    I don't disagree-- the US needs to find a new business that can provide work for less skilled workers. But the manufacturing industry isn't the answer. I wish I could say what the answer is...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ericesque
    5th Aug 2010
  • If we can make hamburgers
    @ericesque

    we can make other products. And I'm not talking fries.

    One killer issue has been the cost of health insurance benefits for employees and we have taken the first step in getting that out of the "cost of goods sold" equation.

    We also need to take hard looks at tax issues. Using tax breaks for motivating genuine training and job development and repealing those parts of the tax code that don't address these core issues.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Ken_z
    5th Aug 2010
  • Manufacturing
    @kenosha7777

    "Why can't our leaders put an emphasis on manufacturing as the Chinese leaders obviously do!"

    We could do that.

    Of course, Republicans responded to the President's visit to the new Michigan battery plant by chanting:

    "The Government has no right to choose which businesses succeed or fail !" Repeat, repeat.

    Now, I look at this and see the Government encouraging innovation in a new, promising market.

    Start the ball rolling and quickly get out of the way.

    Others see this as favoritism, sacrilege, and interfering with "the invisible hand of the market".

    These people are of course, stupid.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Jkirk3279
    5th Aug 2010
  • And who taught these "stupid individuals" in the first place
    @Jkirk3279
    Regarding, "...These people are of course, stupid." Agreed.

    For example, when a SINGLE modern engine manufacturing and assembly operation costs one billion dollars or more, its time once again to view manufacturing capability as a national strategic asset. Our elected officials "once" thought along those beliefs. Its about time senior levels of academia understand this most important and basic concept and begin teaching this to our future leaders attending our high schools and universities .. before its too late.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kenosha77a
    5th Aug 2010
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    itkonlyyou217
    5th Aug 2010
  • Microsoft will win the "screen wars"....
    It does not matter what Apple and the Android folks do. Most screen suppliers are going to sit tight and wait for the billions of orders from Microsoft's ARMY of device manufacturers for screens for Windows Phone and Windows Slate. The shortage of screens affecting iPhone and Android makers today is a direct result of these manufacturers understanding the market demands and REQUIRES full Windows 7 eXPerience on every platform. My rep is in total agreement and to prove my point, brought me some plastic screens which are the same form factor as the screen for the iPhone 4. We then we out in his Porsche and drove over them repeatedly.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Mike Cox
    5th Aug 2010
  • RE: Screen supplies the holiday story, especially if Apple unveils 7-inch iPad
    @Mike Cox

    Great to have you back Mike, we certainly missed you happy
    ZDNet Gravatar
    omdguy
    5th Aug 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources