Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
Summary: With "Mountain Lion", the next Mac OS X operating system, out to developers today, why is a new version on the cards so soon after its previous incarnation?
The one thing that jumps out over the past hour of reporting --- and the hour I was on my lunch break, go figure --- is how soon after 'Lion' comes 'Mountain Lion', the next version of the Mac OS X operating system.
Seven months after the last version of Mac OS X was released, the speed in which Apple develops is breathtakingly fast, considering each and every time it simply adds more to where it left off.
Is Apple going too fast in its development? No, it's not. In fact, I think Apple strikes the balance just right, and the timing almost down to perfection.

You have Microsoft updating Windows roughly every 2--3 years with a radical overhaul of interfaces, designs, applications and features. Every once in a while, it throws in a curveball like a 'cultural identity' shift towards Metro; something only a fraction of people actually wants.
And then you have the Mozilla 'on steroids' routine. An update every few weeks from Firefox 5 to 6, 7 and 8 all in the space of a few months. It not only makes it a nightmare for users who do not have seamless upgrades unlike Google's Chrome browser, but it causes no end of updating headaches for enterprise administrators who have to push out the browser so often.
Seven months is a suitable time to keep things fresh, the price of the product down --- and in some cases, as a free upgrade --- and the end consumers feel as though they are not forgotten about. In fact, it's seven months since Lion was brought out and Mountain Lion was announced. As sister site CNET notes, there is a roughly a year gap between each release.
Apple wants to keep things on the edge, whilst giving the impression that its users are far from the cliff edge. Not a great analogy, but it's not the fear, rather the excitement of the drop. Seven months for the announcement to grab the hook, a year for the end product release.
But the enterprise still feels left behind in the cold by Apple. Its Lion Server product is more akin to Microsoft's series of Windows Home Servers. The multiple users, file sharing and even a mail server are all useful features for small to medium-sized businesses, but the power still rests in the hands of Linux and arguably Windows too.
The real question is how prepared will the Apple developer community be. Mac developers in particular will need time to get to grips with the new APIs, the new features, and also help Apple shake out the bugs.
Image source: CNET.
Related:
- Apple's 'Mountain Lion': Another step toward iOS, Mac feature unification
- Gallery: Mountain Lion developer preview (screenshots)
- CNET: Apple Mac OS X 'Mountain Lion' takes more bites out of iOS
- With Mountain Lion, Apple brings iOS and OS X a big step closer
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Because Windows 8 is coming out this year?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
Coming out and going to be thrown-up by most users.
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
This is a developer preview!
People forget that before the iPhone was released OS X revs were 12-15 months. Leopard was pushed back when resources were transferred to iOS from Mac OS. We're just about 11 years into the OS X era, and we're now on the eighth version (10.0-10.7).
I hope they finally ditched the single menu approach
So pay Apple $30 every year for a new OS is OK?
One has to wonder why I have to spend $30 or more a year to update OS X? I can understand why Apple cannot attract much Enterprise interest. Apple is making too much money selling consumers upgrades every year.
Why would you have to upgrade?
How hard is that?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
I'm hoping they found a bit of time to optimise the code this time, since Snow Leopard and Lion, my iMac has been running like a dog. I keep thinking of going back to Tiger or Leopard.
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
$29 a year for a new OS is OK and FANTASTIC.
Further, you don't have to upgrade. Just like cheapening out by using Windows XP for 5 years without upgrading and depriving Microsoft of the $89 for the upgrade, you don't have to upgrade to the latest, greatest Mac OS X. You don't have to buy new software. You can keep using what you've got.
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
I could easily choose not to upgrade my Mac for 5 years and not pay a DIME as well. So what's your stupid point then?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
Also, be sure to factor in how much you have spent on basic DVD Authoring tools, Anti-Virus, Firewall Software, Photo Management tools, etc.
That's not factoring in less time spent on maintenance and the fact that the machines last longer.
Honestly, PCs are a lot more expensive over time, so $30/year is not that big of a deal.
Oh, I also forgot to mention that when bought through the App Store that $30 is good for upgrades on up to 5 machines...so how much would it cost you over 5 years to upgrade 5 PCs and then what does that work out to per year?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
This is a strong enough motivation to keep things going.
Heard that every release
MS had hoped Apple would follow their touch on the desktop. Thankfully this is not the case. Future not looking good for the MS direction.
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?
RE: Seven months on: Too much, too soon for a major Mac OS X update?