The iPhone launch report card

The iPhone launch report card

Summary: The iPhone launch has come and gone and now it's time to recap the moving parts. Here's a look at the key components and how they graded out.

TOPICS: Apple, iPhone, Mobility

The iPhone launch has come and gone and now it's time to recap the moving parts. Here's a look at the key components and how they graded out.

The product: A

It's hard to find a negative review on the iPhone. Apple set a high bar and delivered. Mitch Ratcliffe calls the iPhone spectacular. Jason O'Grady gives the iPhone 5 stars and reviews from around the Web are all on the iPhone bandwagon.

The network: D

AT&T is clearly the weakest link in the iPhone ecosystem. The glitches that occurred over the weekend highlight AT&T's role. In what was a stellar weekend for Apple, AT&T couldn't get many phones activated. Its systems weren't ready for the volume and customer service reps weren't available on a Sunday. The iPhone launch was not a good opener for the "new AT&T," which looks a lot like the old one. Declan McCullagh adds that a company called Synchronoss carries part of the blame.

WR Hambrecht analyst Matthew Kather sums up the consensus on AT&T.

"We believe that it is an amazing device, with the only poor experience being the internet browsing experience on the lackluster and slow Cingular EDGE network (which we've been using for mobile internet access for roughly three years already on our Blackberry 8700)."

The supply chain: A

Apple met high demand with high supply. Throughout the weekend Apple seemed to have iPhones in stock. Apple's link detailing what stores had iPhone inventory was a nice touch (real time would have been better but why gripe) and highlighted the company's visibility into its supply chain. So why did things go smoothly? My hunch is that Apple preannounced the product well in advance and had time to plan. This is in contrast to a product that is announced and made available quickly. Apple had good planning.

Consumers: C

How would you feel if you camped out for a gadget only to find you could have bought it on Saturday or Sunday? Enough said.

Demand forecasting: Incomplete

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster has a research note projecting that Apple moved 500,000 units over the weekend. That sum, which gotten a lot of blog chatter, is well above his estimates of 200,000 for the June quarter. However, I'd take Munster's projection with a grain of salt. His survey is based on 253 people interviewed at Apple stores. Munster marvels at "the rate Apple was able to sell the handsets, with 50 cashiers processing up to 1,000 iPhones an hour in some cases." But other analysts such as Kather add that a lot of shoppers were playing with the iPhone, but not buying it.

The bottom line: No one has a clue how many iPhones moved over the weekend--until Apple discloses it. If Apple hits a nice round number, say 1 million units in three days we'll hear about it soon. If not, Apple will keep quiet with its quarterly results due in two weeks or so.

Kather's take:

"In summary, the initial weekend of iPhone sales appears strong to us, but with so much availability, sales could have been a lot stronger, in our view, given the supply on hand. We do not feel that we or anyone can accurately quantify the units sold by extrapolating from channel checks, but expectations ranged from a few hundred thousand to a million and a half, in our opinion."

J.P. Morgan analyst Bill Shope says iPhone demand "may have been disappointing, but it's still early." He is projecting 312,000 iPhone units over the weekend. One thing is certain: The folks that camped out for an iPhone didn't have to. That means demand may have been light or supply was much better than expected.

Overall, it's far too early to guess or grade whether Apple forecasted demand correctly. For headline purposes an iPhone sellout may have looked better. For the actual sales, it can't hurt to have ample supply that moves over a few days. When it comes to supply and demand you want a level that's just right.

Topics: Apple, iPhone, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Bottom line,

    Fools and their money are easily parted.
    • Tru Dat ..... but what does that have to do with the iPhone?

      Pagan jim
      • Only everything.

        • For YOU perhaps but how does that translate to others?

          Pagan jim
        • Powerful come back RantBoy! - NT

    • fools

      Fools are easily parted with their money. No Ax is willing to lend $1000 to anyone who says they love Bill Gates above all others.
      • Is that your very best effort at insult?

        I've seen 6 year olds do better. Try again.
        • better

          Are you telling me even 6 year old's feel the need to be rude about your knowledge of IT.

          The only "fool" in this forum is maybe the person who claimed recently the iphone was just vapour ware.

          Maybe when we have windows mobile 7 you'll be telling us MS have innovated a whole load of features.
        • "I've seen 6 year olds . . . "

          Well, I suggest you be more careful about *which* forums you lurk on.
          brian ansorge
    • bottom line is

      ...that the iPhone is not a Microsoft product so Mr "No_Ax-to_Grind" finds it his religious duty to attack it and those who purchased it.

      Such zealotry says far more about Mr "No_Ax-to_Grind" than the people he insults.

      No such much a case of "bottom line" as "talking out of his bottom".
      • Your insults rate abotu the 1st grade level.

        And hey, I don't care who built it, its over priced crap.
        • How so?

          Pagan jim
        • No_Ax_to_Grind - that was so lame! - did you stomp your feet too! - NT


    • And..

      That is true about many things. I would say the same thing about people that bought Vista (and yes, I have used it.)

      My neighbor bought an iPhone. He is an Apple/MAC consultant so he wants to be up on all the latest Apple offerings. I have to say that it is a VERY nice device. Granted, I wouldn't spend that much money on one but I am a cheap SOB.
      Patrick Jones
    • ". . . easily parted"

      Well, I don't rub that in your face when you buy Crack from me.
      brian ansorge
    • Bottom line - No_Ax_to_Grind - Grinding away as usual! - NT

  • Consumers who waited in line should get an F <nt>

    • Why an F?

      I don't think you understand that it was an "event" more so than just buying an
      iPhone and some wanted to be a part of it. So what? Is that a crime? This is exactly
      why Apple rules the consumer electronics space right now: they create so much
      excitement around their products. Some people don't get that. Most companies
      would kill for the kind of buzz, fan loyalty and marketing savvy that Apple has right
      now. And Apple is cashing in on it.
      • because

        [i]I don't think you understand that it was an "event" more so than just buying an iPhone and some wanted to be a part of it. So what? Is that a crime?[/i]

        No, I understand it was an 'event'. An event of waiting in line. Don't get me wrong, I have no issue with anyone wanting the iPhone. I'm sure it's a marvelous piece of engineering. But I had the same feeling for people who waited in line for a PS3, and there was actually a shortage of those, a [b]reason to[/b] wait in line.